Please check the project and compare. Safebsc is very good

$Jager Jager and SafeBSC both charge a 5% fee, but the operational methods are completely different:

1) Value creation source

Jager: 5% tax is immediately distributed to traders/LP/burn → completely depends on volume.

SafeBSC: 70% tax creates a profit-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → has revenue outside of volume.

2) Burn

Jager: Strong burn when volume is high; low volume → burn decreases significantly.

SafeBSC: Daily yield burn, consistently maintained even when the market has low transactions.

3) Illustrative data (realistic assumptions):

If market volume drops significantly over 30 days:

Jager: burn & reward may decrease by ~70% (due to lack of transactions).

SafeBSC: burn still maintains ~80–90% thanks to treasury & BTC generating profit.

4) Conclusion

Jager: suitable when volume is high, easily weakens when the market slows.

SafeBSC: more sustainable because burn does not depend on volume but relies on yield + BTC.

This is just an analysis of the mechanism.