safebsctoken
13 Following
806 Followers
1.1K+ Liked
151 Shared
All
Quotes
PINNED
📢 SafeBSC Official Announcement
We are proud to announce that the SafeBSC Whitepaper has been officially published on BNB Greenfield, the decentralized storage infrastructure of BNB Chain.
By storing our whitepaper on Greenfield, we ensure:
• Immutable and censorship-resistant documentation
• Verifiable transparency for all community members
• Decentralized, permanent access to project information
• A fully Web3-aligned approach to data integrity
🔗 Official Greenfield : https://greenfield-sp.defibit.io/view/safebsc-transparency/SafeBSC_Whitepaper/SafeBSC_Whitepaper.pdf
SafeBSC represents the next evolution of memecoins:
Meme + Real Yield + BTC Reserve + Perpetual Burn.
We are here to build long-term value — transparently and sustainably.#BNBChain # #Web3 #RealYield @BNB Chain
We are proud to announce that the SafeBSC Whitepaper has been officially published on BNB Greenfield, the decentralized storage infrastructure of BNB Chain.
By storing our whitepaper on Greenfield, we ensure:
• Immutable and censorship-resistant documentation
• Verifiable transparency for all community members
• Decentralized, permanent access to project information
• A fully Web3-aligned approach to data integrity
🔗 Official Greenfield : https://greenfield-sp.defibit.io/view/safebsc-transparency/SafeBSC_Whitepaper/SafeBSC_Whitepaper.pdf
SafeBSC represents the next evolution of memecoins:
Meme + Real Yield + BTC Reserve + Perpetual Burn.
We are here to build long-term value — transparently and sustainably.#BNBChain # #Web3 #RealYield @BNB Chain
check x : @safebsctoken
How to play the activity
$GIGGLE SafeBSC has a $15,000 event — come check it out and see how much you can earn! 🚀
$Jager SafeBSC has a $15,000 event — come check it out and see how much you can earn! 🚀
🎉 SafeBSC Community Mega Event – $15,000 Reward Pool
SafeBSC has launched a 15-week community appreciation program with a total reward pool of $15,000.
Up to $1,000 will be distributed each week through simple and transparent community activities.
Week #1 is now live.
🔥 How to Join
All details, participation steps, and weekly rules are available on our official X account.
➡️ Visit X: @safebsctoken
to view the full event announcement and join the weekly rewards.
🔎 Full Transparency
The entire $15,000 event fund has been transferred to a public wallet for the community to monitor openly.
🚀 Follow us on X to stay updated and participate in the weekly rewards!
SafeBSC continues to grow with transparency, consistency, and strong community support.
#Airdrop #CryptoAirdrop #GIVEAWAY🎁 #CryptoRewards #BNBChain $Jager $GIGGLE $BNB
SafeBSC has launched a 15-week community appreciation program with a total reward pool of $15,000.
Up to $1,000 will be distributed each week through simple and transparent community activities.
Week #1 is now live.
🔥 How to Join
All details, participation steps, and weekly rules are available on our official X account.
➡️ Visit X: @safebsctoken
to view the full event announcement and join the weekly rewards.
🔎 Full Transparency
The entire $15,000 event fund has been transferred to a public wallet for the community to monitor openly.
🚀 Follow us on X to stay updated and participate in the weekly rewards!
SafeBSC continues to grow with transparency, consistency, and strong community support.
#Airdrop #CryptoAirdrop #GIVEAWAY🎁 #CryptoRewards #BNBChain $Jager $GIGGLE $BNB
See original
You are wrong. Please research the 2 burning mechanisms thoroughly and compare them yourself. Jager's performance on safebsc is top-notch. You don't understand anything about these 2 mechanisms. I can assure you that you don't understand anything about these 2 mechanisms.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Please check the project and compare. Safebsc is very good
$Jager Jager and SafeBSC both charge a 5% fee, but the operational methods are completely different:
1) Value creation source
Jager: 5% tax is immediately distributed to traders/LP/burn → completely depends on volume.
SafeBSC: 70% tax creates a profit-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → has revenue outside of volume.
2) Burn
Jager: Strong burn when volume is high; low volume → burn decreases significantly.
SafeBSC: Daily yield burn, consistently maintained even when the market has low transactions.
3) Illustrative data (realistic assumptions):
If market volume drops significantly over 30 days:
Jager: burn & reward may decrease by ~70% (due to lack of transactions).
SafeBSC: burn still maintains ~80–90% thanks to treasury & BTC generating profit.
4) Conclusion
Jager: suitable when volume is high, easily weakens when the market slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because burn does not depend on volume but relies on yield + BTC.
This is just an analysis of the mechanism.
1) Value creation source
Jager: 5% tax is immediately distributed to traders/LP/burn → completely depends on volume.
SafeBSC: 70% tax creates a profit-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → has revenue outside of volume.
2) Burn
Jager: Strong burn when volume is high; low volume → burn decreases significantly.
SafeBSC: Daily yield burn, consistently maintained even when the market has low transactions.
3) Illustrative data (realistic assumptions):
If market volume drops significantly over 30 days:
Jager: burn & reward may decrease by ~70% (due to lack of transactions).
SafeBSC: burn still maintains ~80–90% thanks to treasury & BTC generating profit.
4) Conclusion
Jager: suitable when volume is high, easily weakens when the market slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because burn does not depend on volume but relies on yield + BTC.
This is just an analysis of the mechanism.
$Jager
Both Jager and SafeBSC use a 5% tax, but the mechanisms are completely different:
1) Value Source
Jager: The 5% tax goes mainly to traders/LP/burn → fully dependent on trading volume.
SafeBSC: 70% of tax builds a yield-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → value comes from external yield, not only volume.
2) Burn Mechanism
Jager: Burns strongly when volume is high; when volume drops, burn slows down sharply.
SafeBSC: Burns using daily yield, so supply reduction continues even in low-volume periods.
3) Example Data (realistic hypothetical):
If market volume drops for 30 days:
Jager: burn + rewards may drop ~70% due to lack of transactions.
SafeBSC: burn can maintain ~80–90% activity thanks to treasury yield + BTC gains.
4) Summary
Jager: works well in high-volume conditions but weakens when volume slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because its burn is yield-driven, not volume-dependent.
This is a mechanism comparison only.
Both Jager and SafeBSC use a 5% tax, but the mechanisms are completely different:
1) Value Source
Jager: The 5% tax goes mainly to traders/LP/burn → fully dependent on trading volume.
SafeBSC: 70% of tax builds a yield-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → value comes from external yield, not only volume.
2) Burn Mechanism
Jager: Burns strongly when volume is high; when volume drops, burn slows down sharply.
SafeBSC: Burns using daily yield, so supply reduction continues even in low-volume periods.
3) Example Data (realistic hypothetical):
If market volume drops for 30 days:
Jager: burn + rewards may drop ~70% due to lack of transactions.
SafeBSC: burn can maintain ~80–90% activity thanks to treasury yield + BTC gains.
4) Summary
Jager: works well in high-volume conditions but weakens when volume slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because its burn is yield-driven, not volume-dependent.
This is a mechanism comparison only.
See original
$Jager Jager and SafeBSC both charge a 5% fee, but the operational methods are completely different:
1) Value creation source
Jager: 5% tax is immediately distributed to traders/LP/burn → completely depends on volume.
SafeBSC: 70% tax creates a profit-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → has revenue outside of volume.
2) Burn
Jager: Strong burn when volume is high; low volume → burn decreases significantly.
SafeBSC: Daily yield burn, consistently maintained even when the market has low transactions.
3) Illustrative data (realistic assumptions):
If market volume drops significantly over 30 days:
Jager: burn & reward may decrease by ~70% (due to lack of transactions).
SafeBSC: burn still maintains ~80–90% thanks to treasury & BTC generating profit.
4) Conclusion
Jager: suitable when volume is high, easily weakens when the market slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because burn does not depend on volume but relies on yield + BTC.
This is just an analysis of the mechanism.
1) Value creation source
Jager: 5% tax is immediately distributed to traders/LP/burn → completely depends on volume.
SafeBSC: 70% tax creates a profit-generating treasury, 30% DCA BTC → has revenue outside of volume.
2) Burn
Jager: Strong burn when volume is high; low volume → burn decreases significantly.
SafeBSC: Daily yield burn, consistently maintained even when the market has low transactions.
3) Illustrative data (realistic assumptions):
If market volume drops significantly over 30 days:
Jager: burn & reward may decrease by ~70% (due to lack of transactions).
SafeBSC: burn still maintains ~80–90% thanks to treasury & BTC generating profit.
4) Conclusion
Jager: suitable when volume is high, easily weakens when the market slows.
SafeBSC: more sustainable because burn does not depend on volume but relies on yield + BTC.
This is just an analysis of the mechanism.
See original
$jager is a step; if you step back, you will fall to the ground and die. Safebsc is a step where each level it builds a foundation up to that point. Please understand the two mechanisms well and compare them. You will see
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Safebsc operates and deflates even without volume and with strong volume.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Compound interest and its cyclical period are designed to cause permanent deflation. It always burns and burns every day, and each day it burns even more.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Safebsc has designed a more modern burning mechanism. It takes USDT to hold bonds that generate money every day to burn and does not lose the principal. It uses BTC reserves to accelerate the generation of compound interest.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
But when the project volume runs out, it will gradually die, and everyone will clearly realize that. Even if the dev wants to build, it cannot be built.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Regarding jager and safebsc, safebsc has a much better burning mechanism. Jager only uses fee money to immediately return to short-term holders, clearly benefiting the holders from the fee.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
China has a lot of scam projects. But the Vietnamese culture is quite savvy, so most are speculative. Therefore, Vietnamese developers can easily get caught up in the vortex and find it very difficult to build.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Common spoken language creates more trust. Therefore, the general psychology is like that, c98 or axs has succeeded.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
I am the mkt safebsc I will respond according to my thoughts. First, why do Vietnamese people dislike Vietnamese projects? This is not true; in most countries, people dislike their own country's projects because the majority speak a common language.
Quoted content has been removed
$Jager Projects like this show how strong meme energy is on BNB Chain.
Another one I’ve been watching is SafeBSC — a meme with a long-term burn engine.
It’s been increasing its floor value every day thanks to its sustainable model, and after 53 days it hit a 200x ATH.
Very curious which models will lead the next wave of memecoins $BTC $BNB
Another one I’ve been watching is SafeBSC — a meme with a long-term burn engine.
It’s been increasing its floor value every day thanks to its sustainable model, and after 53 days it hit a 200x ATH.
Very curious which models will lead the next wave of memecoins $BTC $BNB
$GIGGLE Nice momentum here! I’m also following a new-generation memecoin called SafeBSC — it focuses on sustainable growth with a real daily burn mechanism instead of pure hype.
It has already grown for 53 days and reached a 200x ATH. Interesting to see how different mechanisms perform in the next cycle
It has already grown for 53 days and reached a 200x ATH. Interesting to see how different mechanisms perform in the next cycle
Login to explore more contents