We are accustomed to understanding blockchain from a very human perspective.
Wallets are for people to use, transactions are initiated by people, and risks are also borne by people.
Even automated strategies are essentially just 'people authorizing, machines executing.'
But this premise is being gradually broken by AI.
The real question worth considering is not:
Can AI help us with the analysis?
But—when AI begins to act independently and continues to execute, can the on-chain system still bear it?
Kite, emerged in this context.
An underestimated turning point: AI is transforming from a tool into an executing entity.
Past AI was more like a sophisticated assistant.
It gives you signals, gives you advice, but the one who confirms is still you.
And now AI Agents have already begun:
Automatically running strategies
Proactively calling contracts
All-weather uninterrupted execution
When execution power is no longer in human hands, problems immediately become apparent:
👉 What identity does AI use to participate in the on-chain economy?
Without identity, permissions cannot be allocated
Without a wallet, you cannot settle earnings
Without rules, collaborative scaling is impossible
This is not a matter of 'how usable it is', but rather fundamentally unable to run.
Kite's core logic: building a native on-chain economic identity for AI
Kite did not choose to be an AI application.
It chose a more fundamental layer—
Building a native EVM public chain for AI Agents.
On Kite, AI is no longer just a logical module in contracts, but:
Having a clear on-chain identity
Having a programmable wallet and permission model
Can automatically execute, automatically pay, automatically collaborate
In short:
👉 AI on Kite is an economic participant, not a passive tool.
This is also the most essential difference between Kite and most 'AI + Crypto' projects.
Why say Kite is more like infrastructure, rather than speculative hype?
Because it solves a structural problem.
Once AI begins to participate on-chain at scale, the existing system will face three real bottlenecks:
First, manual authorization models cannot support high-frequency execution
Second, general public chains have not optimized for non-human actions
Third, collaboration between AIs requires a stable, low-friction settlement layer
The design premise of Kite is very clear:
Default on-chain participants are not humans.
And this premise is precisely the reality that the future will inevitably face.
From a trend perspective, Kite is betting on a determined direction
It does not bet on whether a particular application will succeed,
But it is betting on an irreversible trend:
👉 AI will definitely evolve from a tool into an economic entity.
As long as this trend holds:
AI's identity management
AI's funding allocation
AI's cross-protocol collaboration
There must be dedicated foundational support.
This is also why infrastructure is often the last category to be caught up by emotions.
Market position: cognition has already led, emotions have not fully caught up yet
Current Kite:
The narrative is already complete
Logic can be deduced
But market sentiment has not been extreme.
This is a very typical stage:
Those who understand begin to layout, while those who don't are still watching.
By the time the 'AI economy' is repeatedly mentioned,
Foundational facilities have often completed the first round of pricing.
Why do I think Kite will be mentioned repeatedly?
Because it is not solving the 'problems of now',
But it is preparing for an upcoming world.
When you find that more and more on-chain actions are not initiated by humans,
When you realize the economic system is operating automatically,
You will look back and realize:
Kite is not a story, but an answer.
The last sentence
Kite is not necessarily the one that rises the fastest,
But it is likely that you will reflect on this round of AI narratives when
One of the projects you will most regret not having looked at seriously earlier.
The market will never reward cognition in advance,
But it will definitely tell you the price in the future,
Who is ahead.
