Today, let's talk about something that most people overlook, yet truly determines whether you can advance—reviewing trades. It's not just about looking at profit and loss numbers; it's about treating trading as a craft that can continuously be refined.

Valuable reviews do only three things.

First, whether the plan was executed. This is much more important than making money. As long as you entered and exited according to the plan, this trade is considered qualified; even if you incur a loss, you are paying tuition for the system.

Second, whether the risk was controlled. Looking back, was the stop-loss reasonable? Was the position matched to the volatility? If a loss affects your emotions, it indicates that the risk was set too high, rather than the market being right or wrong.

Third, whether the signals were misinterpreted. It's not about changing the system, but rather changing the understanding. The same pattern holds different meanings in different structures; clarifying "why it was viewed this way at the time" is more important than changing parameters.

The core of reviewing trades is not to find a method to be "more accurate next time," but to reduce the number of times you make the same mistakes again. Each time you reduce impulsiveness, heavy positions, or hesitation, your curve will become smoother.

I always emphasize: stability does not come from making one more profitable trade, but from making fewer mistakes. If you make reviewing a habit, you will notice three changes: you no longer rush to prove yourself; you are more willing to wait for high-quality opportunities; you begin to remain calm in the face of uncertainty.

In trading, in the end, it’s not about who learns the most, but who adapts quickly and stays steady. Turn each trade into a reusable experience, and time will be on your side.

Wenjing focuses on Ether contract spot ambush; the team still has positions available. Jump in quickly: #美国讨论BTC战略储备 $ETH