#数字资产市场洞察 Recently, I've encountered quite a few people asking: Is it still worth laying out a plan for $BNB at this stage?
My view is very straightforward—large cryptocurrencies are not meant for chasing highs and lows; they're meant for gradual accumulation.
I know a friend who has been continuously buying BNB since 2022. Initially, he couldn't avoid psychological fluctuations, but over time he discovered an interesting phenomenon: those who truly profit never care about the lows and highs; they maintain their composure. Now this guy has achieved financial independence, and work has become an option for him.
Speaking of regular investments, I have summarized three strategies, each with its own characteristics:
**First: Time Anchoring Method**
Fixed period, fixed amount. For example, invest 600U every week without looking at the candlestick charts, just execute. Over the long term, the cost will naturally be averaged out evenly.
**Second: Price Layering Method**
Set three price points in advance:
- Drop to 300U, first entry
- Drop to 400U, add position
- Drop to 500U, significantly build position
The advantage of this approach is that when the market declines, it actually becomes an opportunity to enter, and the mindset is completely different.
**Third: Technical Reference**
Use EMA100 as a mid-term judgment line; when BNB approaches this line, it usually signals a mid-term bottom. If you want to be more conservative, EMA200 can help you grasp the long-term rhythm.
These methods may seem unremarkable, but the key lies in whether one can persist. Regular investment is never about being smarter; it's about who has more patience. Those who can sustain regular investments for a whole year before a bull market starts often appear very 'lucky'—in reality, they have simply prepared in advance.
If you also want to break free from the cycle of blindly following trends and avoid some detours, rather than repeatedly exploring, it's better to clarify your strategic framework first. There is no shortcut to regular investments, but there are methods.
