I sign in Pixels and the wallet tells me everything is good.
Cool. Then I open the game and my value is just sitting in limbo like the frontend got amnesia. Deposit confirmed on chain, but somehow I’m still not done. It goes Pending, then it needs to hit mail, then I still have to collect it, and if mail decides to ghost me, I’m not farming anymore. I’m not playing. I’m sitting there with Ronin open, explorer open, Pixels open, probably another Pixels tab because the first one feels cursed, digging for the TX hash like I’m doing paperwork for something I already paid for. That is the part that makes me tired. The wallet worked. The chain recorded it. The game still looks at me like, okay, prove it.
Guild shards are worse because the anxiety is bigger. You sell the shard. You approve the wallet request. The dashboard gives you that tiny moment where you think it went through, then the payout does not show up and now your brain starts eating itself. Was the minimum price right? Did the sale actually execute? Did the backend sync break? Did the game eat it? Did I close the wrong tab? Why am I sitting here with fifteen browser tabs open just to verify one shard sale? And the fix is not some clean account check. It is TX hash plus the original minimum price, so they can retry the transaction from their side. Lovely. Because from my side, I already did the thing. I clicked Sell. I approved. I waited. The wallet says it happened. The dashboard kind of says it happened. My proceeds are just gone quiet like they left the server. That is the mini heart attack. And if you did not save the hash before relaxing, good luck. Seriously. Keep that thing or you’re cooked. Copy the hash on the deposit. Do the same for the shard sale. Honestly, just copy the damn thing every time you move money between wallet and game because trusting the frontend for even one second is how you end up in support with nothing useful to send. I hate that this is normal, but it is normal. Wallet tab, explorer tab, dashboard tab, mail, inventory, maybe refresh, maybe relog, maybe check Ronin again, maybe open explorer again because now I do not trust what I just saw. One action turns into babysitting a whole broken family of tabs until the game finally admits the value exists. And when wallet state and game state stop matching, the hash is the only thing that does not gaslight you when the UI breaks. Not the green check. Not the dashboard. Definitely not the vibe. The hash. That guide for finding a TX hash looks boring until your deposit is missing or your shard payout disappears into the void. Then suddenly it is the only page in the room that matters. If there is no TX, you are looking at a dead end. No hash? Good luck explaining that to support. Just you, a confirmed wallet action, and the game acting like it needs more evidence for the thing you literally watched happen. Great system.
Deposits get stuck between Pending and mail. Shard sales get stuck between approval, minimum price, and proceeds. Ronin says yes, Pixels says maybe, mail says nothing, and now I’m refreshing like a clown because somewhere between the bridge, the dashboard, and whatever backend sync is supposed to happen, my transaction fell into a black hole. The annoying part is not even the lag. It is having to prepare for the lag before it happens. I do not close tabs anymore after moving value in Pixels. I do not trust the first confirmation. I do not trust the frontend smile. I copy the hash, keep the minimum price, leave the explorer page open, keep the proof trail sitting there, then maybe I breathe. Maybe. I did not sign up to be an unpaid auditor for their backend, but here we are. #pixel $PIXEL @pixels
I linked Discord to the wrong PIXELS account and yeah, apparently that’s not a normal mistake. There’s no disconnect button. No “my bad, unlink this” button. It just gets stuck there. Email, phone, Discord, Moca ID, Twitter, all that stuff feels like it should be account settings, but in PIXELS if it lands on the wrong account you’re basically cooked. You don’t just move it. You don’t clean it up later. You stare at the wrong link sitting there like the UI is daring you to fix it. And the only workaround is nuclear. Delete the whole account. That’s insane for a misclick. So now I’m not deciding whether I want Discord linked or unlinked. I’m deciding whether I leave the wrong Discord trapped on the wrong PIXELS account, or wipe the entire account just to get out of one bad setup click. Absolute overkill for a misclick. @Pixels $PIXEL #pixel
fed wraps apr 29 gdp + pce apr 30 btc basically gets macro punched twice in 48h. ugly timing cuts trade still getting frontrun, but feels way too crowded now powell doesn’t even need to be mega hawk. just some boring “not yet” fed talk and dollar bids, btc starts wicking like an idiot we’re pinned at 79k rn 80k refusing to budge. everyone watching it too, which makes it worse apr 30 gets nastier weak gdp / soft pce and risk prob stays bid hot pce and the trade gets nuked puke first, explanations after 74k is the line lose that and longs are trapped again $BTC
the $1,000 $XRP posts are literal math-defying brain rot at this point lmao every cycle it’s the same chart, same arrows, same “utility is coming” larp, same dudes acting like banks are about to flip a switch and make their bags the center of global finance overnight??? $28 isn’t some casual target either. people say it like “yeah bro easy 2030” while ignoring the market cap would have to go absolutely stupid. and $5 would already be a huge move, but nah everyone wants to skip straight to fantasy land bc the screenshot has green candles on it “XRP to $1000” isn’t alpha. its exit liquidity bait with better font choices. could XRP pamp? sure. everything pamps when the market gets dumb enough. but acting like $1,000 is a normal target is NGMI behavior, ser good luck with those bags
Oil systems do not usually “explode” because tankers cannot clear a port. That is the bit worth pausing on. Trump says Iran’s crude network could blow within days, and the story is doing the rounds through the Washington Examiner and Iran International, while Reuters has the broader market backdrop: blockade pressure, export strain, traders staring at the chokepoints. CNN, for its part, was blocked from direct access. The Houston crowd is not exactly saluting the reservoir theory here. In Trump’s telling, the U.S. naval blockade leaves Iran unable to move enough crude out, pressure builds through the system, and pipelines or other bits of infrastructure start giving way. Maybe that works as cable-news hydraulics. Downhole, it is a different animal. Bottom-hole pressure is not a cartoon gauge screaming into the red because a tanker missed its berth. What actually bites is tankage. Crude keeps coming up, exports slow, shore tanks fill, and then someone has to start cutting rates. Choke it back. Shut in wells. Push the pain upstream. None of that is clean, especially when lifting costs are already ugly and the field kit is old, but it is still not crude lines detonating because there is nowhere left to park the barrels. Andy Lipow of Lipow Oil Associates told CNN that Iraq, Kuwait and the UAE have all taken similar production cuts without the supposed blast scenario. “The oil will not explode,” he said. The risk is more boring, which usually means more expensive. Older Iranian reservoirs do not take kindly to being stopped and restarted for political theatre. Shut-ins can mess with reservoir pressure, water cut and formation damage, and once that starts showing up in the field data, Iran is not just waiting for tankers to return. It is looking at weaker wells, higher restart costs and a production base that may have quietly lost some muscle. $ZBT | $ORCA | $TRUMP
Justin Sun claims $WLFI froze his tokens, nuked his governance rights, and caused roughly $276M in losses. And this same guy was reportedly the #1 $TRUMP holder who ghosted Trump’s April 25 crypto luncheon. wild that he’s still publicly backing the pro-crypto Trump line while WLFI drama keeps heating up and $TRUMP is bleeding near its lows 📉 top bagholder missing from the room. absolute circus. #JustinSun #TRUMP #WLFI #Crypto
rumor tape is messy. fed emergency meeting chatter floating around. $5T number getting passed like everyone suddenly found a secret term sheet. not touching that headline until there’s a print. but desks are already front-running it. you can see it in the way risk refuses to fully puke, BTC keeps catching bids, and everyone’s pretending they’re not watching DXY tick by tick. if the Fed even leaks a real liquidity angle, algos won’t wait for the adult explanation. they’ll just chase whatever moves first. watch yields. watch DXY. watch BTC around the last high. and honestly, watch whether the Fed has enough credibility left to jawbone this without making the tape even stupider.
Japan’s “blue energy” is irritating because the headline makes it sound cleaner than it is. I mean, the idea is simple enough. Freshwater meets seawater, there is a pressure difference, and osmotic power tries to pull electricity out of that with membranes. Japan has the geography for it too. Coastlines, river mouths, industrial load nearby, and the usual energy-security pressure sitting in the background. The part I keep coming back to is not really the “green” label. It is that the input is boring in a useful way. A river keeps running into the sea whether the sector is hot or not, so at least on paper you get a cleaner output profile than solar or wind. That matters for financing, forecasting, and all the dull tracking work that starts showing up once real money touches infrastructure. The catch is the physical side is still ugly. Membranes are not cheap, saltwater leaves gunk everywhere, and if fouling turns into constant maintenance overhead, the whole thing can become a capex nightmare with a nice press photo attached. Predictable clean power is only useful if the plant does not spend half its life proving why the model was too optimistic. Anyway, this is where the crypto angle gets less annoying to me. Not a blue-energy token. That feels like the lazy version. It is mostly just unsexy ledger work. If smaller osmotic sites ever produce steady output, someone has to track what came out, who funded what, how revenue or credits get split, and whether the operator report is close enough to reality to settle against. And even that assumes the data is good, which is not a small assumption when the sensor is sitting in salt water and everyone downstream wants the number to be clean. So yeah, I do think blockchain has a possible job here, but it is not glamorous. It is meter records, production claims, investor accounting, maybe credits if those get attached later. The reason I’m still looking at this is that it turns crypto into a tracking problem instead of a hype problem. We are still miles away from that being easy.
Sold a Guild Shard and my $PIXEL didn’t show upfound out after closing Ronin. That’s just dumb.
I literally just spent 20 mins trying to figure out where the money went because the shard looked like it sold, the wallet approval went through, everything looked normal enough, and then the PIXEL was just... not there. Like cool, shard moved, wallet did the thing, but now i’m sitting there refreshing and checking like an idiot because the actual payout decided to live in limbo. Seriously, if you’re dumping a Pixels Guild Shard, do not rush off the screen. The sell flow looks done way before i’d trust it. You hit Sell, Ronin pops up, you approve, the game acts like the sale happened, and your first instinct is to close the tab because why would you keep staring at it. Don’t. Classic Pixels too. Buying and pledging shards are already a mess, and now selling is the same way. Selling should take two seconds, but here we are. Ronin is already janky before any of this. Wrong wallet attached and the sell option won’t even show. Right wallet attached and now you’re approving the request, setting the minimum price, waiting for the action to go through, hoping the PIXEL actually lands somewhere. Don’t be like me and forget the price floor. You need that price floor number for the support form later if the payout doesn’t arrive, which is insane because i was not exactly sitting there thinking “let me keep paperwork for this shard sale” while dumping it.
Save the tx hash before you close anything. Save the minimum price too. Put it in a note, DM it to yourself, screenshot it, whatever. Just don’t assume you can easily find it later because good luck finding the right transaction in Ronin if you didn’t save the hash. It’s a total mess in there when you’re already annoyed. Wallet actions, approvals, timestamps, hashes that all look the same after about five seconds, and then you’re trying to match the one shard sale while your PIXEL is missing and you’re getting more tilted every time you click around. If it breaks, you have to go use that stupid Sell Issues form on the Guild Page, which is a total nightmare if you didn’t save your info. It asks for the tx hash and the same minimum price you used when selling. Then Pixels retries it from their side and the proceeds are supposed to show up in your mailbox. Supposed to. Very normal thing to be doing after something already “sold”... The shard can look gone and you can still not have the money. That’s the whole problem. You’re not selling anymore at that point, you’re chasing the sale around the UI. Ronin activity, Guild Page, Sell Issues, mailbox, back to Ronin because maybe you copied the wrong thing, then back to the game because maybe the mailbox updated. It feels like some buggy little side quest nobody asked for. And yeah, check the mailbox. Actually check it before you log off. I know it sounds obvious but the payout might not be where your brain expects it to be, and this whole thing already bounces between wallet and game menus enough that it’s easy to miss the one place you’re supposed to look. I kept thinking the wallet would just tell me everything cleanly, but no, you still need to check the in-game mailbox because apparently the sale can end there.
Maybe yours works fine and the PIXEL shows up right away. Great. But if it doesn’t, you do not want to be digging through Ronin activity later trying to remember which hash was the shard sale, while the shard is already gone and the payout is stuck somewhere weird. That’s the exact kind of thing that makes you feel stupid even though the flow is the one being clunky. i wouldn’t close the browser after selling. Let Ronin finish, copy the hash, keep the minimum price number, check the mailbox. Then log off. Save the hash or you’re gonna regret it. Good luck.
i swear owning one PIXELS land on Ethereum is fine. owning a few is where this gets stupid. i’m sitting here waiting for like the fourth bridge tx to clear and it’s the same clunky loop every time. open Ronin Bridge, switch from Tokens to NFTs, pick Farm Lands, paste the Ronin wallet, send, wait, check Ronin, then go back and do it again like some unpaid bridge intern. i own it, but i can’t use it. that’s the annoying part. the land is already in my Ethereum wallet, so on paper it’s mine. but until i shove it through this one-by-one bridge UI, it’s basically just sitting there. bulk transfer still isn’t live, so every single plot turns into its own little chore. one land is whatever. a stack of lands is just miserable. click, paste, send, wait. click, paste, send, wait. then stare at the progress bar and wonder why i’m doing portfolio management like it’s manual data entry from 2009. honestly, at this rate, half my lands are just going to rot on Ethereum because i can’t be bothered to click through this bridge 50 more times. i get that Ethereum to Ronin needs a bridge. fine. but this current flow feels way too stuck and manual for anyone holding more than one or two lands... @Pixels $PIXEL #pixel
Do not ape into Pixels guild shards just because the guild page looks clean. Seriously. This is the kind of thing people skip because the UI gives them that fake settled feeling. You open a guild page and it already looks done. Handle, image, shard curve, market, all of it sitting there like the guild has already hardened into something permanent. Your brain just goes yeah, okay, this exists now. People can buy shards. Looks real. But the backend is where it gets ugly. Pixels locks the handle, which is a total head-fake. The name feels permanent, so people treat the whole guild like it is permanent. But the $PIXEL does not route to the name. The payout route is the thing that matters, and that can still move. The guild still needs a Ronin proceeds address. There is still the tx to move the initial guild shards into the wallet. So the UI can be live while the treasury path is the thing you should actually be checking. Not the banner. Not the handle. Not whether the guild page has a clean vibe. And yeah, that bothers me because this is exactly how people get lazy in Web3 games. They see a fixed identity and assume the financial layer is fixed too. It is not. A locked handle is not a locked treasury. A nice guild name is not proof the fee route is safe. The front-end can look finished while the backend is still where the risk sits. Classic off-chain trust smell, just dressed up in guild UI.
The nasty part is the proceeds wallet. The guild can keep the same public face, but the wallet collecting future shard revenue can change underneath. Total rug-risk nobody wants to talk about because the page still looks familiar. Pixels sends 5 percent of shard purchase fees to the treasury wallet set by the guild owner. That is the part with teeth. Not some profile edit. Not a cosmetic setting. Actual fee flow. If the address changes, the money path changes. Simple. So if I am buying shards, I do not care that the handle looks legit. I care where the treasury is pointed. I care if that address changed. I care if the guild moved ownership. I care if the wallet is some random Ronin address or a multisig. I care if the guild suddenly starts pushing shard buys right after some quiet backend change. Like, come on. This is basic alpha-check stuff. People will spend more time looking at a guild name than the wallet that actually receives the fees. Maybe it is legit, maybe it is not, but pretending the locked handle means the guild is locked is cope. The handle is just the sticker on the box. The treasury route is the box. If that route changes, buyers might still be staring at the same front-end and thinking nothing moved. That is how you get farmed without even realizing what changed. Also from the operator side, this is not small either. If I am running a guild, I am not just naming a club and uploading a logo. I am choosing where future PIXEL from shard activity lands. That is a real control point. If there are multiple people involved, that wallet better not be some sloppy hot wallet setup. It should probably be a multisig or at least something that does not depend on one guy staying honest, awake, sober, and unphished. But buyers will not see all that from the guild page. They just see the front-end and assume the guild is the same object they saw yesterday.
That is the loophole-ish part. The visible identity can stay calm while the money route is the chaos layer. Devs can call it configuration, owners can call it treasury management, whatever. For shard buyers, it is still the address receiving the 5 percent fee stream. If a guild changes hands, gets louder about shards, starts pushing buys, talks about treasury upgrades, or suddenly looks like everyone is rushing into the curve, I am not looking at the name first. I am looking at the Ronin address. If you are not checking the Ronin address, you are basically just donating PIXEL to whoever bought the handle. #pixel $PIXEL @pixels
PSA because I clearly treated $PIXEL staking too much like a set it and forget it thing. I thought once I staked in game, the main job was done. Tokens in, position active, rewards later. Easy. Turns out, not really. The catch is the system doesn’t only care that I staked. It checks rewards at distribution time. So if I stake in game and then basically disappear, the balance sitting there doesn’t save me. I still need at least 100 $PIXEL , and the account has to stay active. That’s the annoying part I missed. The token side can look fine while the account side quietly becomes the thing that breaks the whole setup. So it’s not just stake and earn. It’s more like stake, keep enough $P$PIXEL , keep the account alive, and hope everything still qualifies when the check happens. Then I looked at the dashboard route like maybe that was the cleaner way around it. Kind of. But not really. You dodge the same in-game activity check and the same minimum deposit pressure, but you’re just swapping one set of hoops for another. Now the primary wallet has to be connected, and the first allowance has to be signed before staking even starts. So one route can punish me later because I acted like the account didn’t matter after staking. The other can stop me before I even start if the wallet approval side isn’t clean. And leaving isn’t instant either. I can unstake whenever I want, sure, but the funds still sit locked for 3 days before withdrawal. That’s why PIXEL staking feels way less passive than I first thought. The tokens might be parked, but the system is still checking the stuff around them. @Pixels $PIXEL #pixel
$BTC $11B BTC options rolling off today and max pain is still parked at $71k while spot is chilling around $78.2k. MASSIVE gap into settlement. Chart looks like a mess here. Feels more like liquidity games than clean direction. Eyes on $77.5k. That’s the obvious liquidity. Wouldn’t shock me if they sweep it, make everyone scream “breakdown,” then send it the other way once late longs are cleaned out. First candle is bait until proven otherwise. No trade zone for me until the wick shows.
BTC still grinding from that early Feb flush around $60k. Looking at the 4H now and it still feels like that was the washout low, market cleaned itself up there and just started crawling higher after. Slow move. Annoying move. Clean enough though. This is not some huge candle chase where everyone gets excited and then price dumps back into the same range. It is more like BTC keeps pressing up, then stalls, then absorbs the little sell attempts, then creeps again while anyone waiting for the perfect pullback just sits there watching it leave. Anyway, that March 29 higher low around $65k is still the level I keep coming back to because since that print BTC has not really given bears a proper door, every dip has stayed shallow, the range keeps holding, bids keep showing up in the right spots, and the whole thing feels like the market is front-running the obvious entry before most people get the clean retest they wanted. Still no sellers. I’m watching $90k now. If it gets stuffed there, fine, we probably chop sideways and reset a bit. If it clears with strength, $100k is the obvious magnet next. Would not surprise me if after the next push we get two or three weeks of messy chop. Funding cools off, late longs get bored, people start calling top again, same routine. Point being, I’m not fading this while structure keeps holding. Watching the $90k reaction closely today. $BTC
A $50M+ BTC short showing up right before Trump’s crypto speech is the kind of timing I’m not fading. Could be a hedge. Could be a vol play. Could be a straight sell-the-news bet. I’m not calling it insider info without proof. But size plus timing matters. When a whale leans this hard into a political crypto catalyst, BTC can get dragged into volatility before retail even figures out what the position was built around. I’m watching the reaction more than the speech. If this short starts steering liquidity, the chart won’t be the first warning. The positioning will be. $BTC $TRUMP #TRUMP
lunc/usdt 1W $LUNC finally doing something after that dead sideways grind. Not calling this a macro flip yet. Weekly bounce is there, but it still needs to prove it above real S/R instead of just wicking and fading again. 0.000048 is the line for me. Above .48, the thesis holds. Reclaim .60 on the weekly and the chart gets interesting, there’s a decent liquidity gap into .75 if buyers actually show up. Below .42 and I’m not interested. That turns this into another fakeout / floor retest. Key levels I care about: .48 / .42 support .60 / .75 resistance Personally not chasing the middle. Either long the .60 reclaim or wait for the .48 reaction.
I’m still not treating the Iran chatter as confirmed. Market is acting like it is though. That’s the problem... clean version doesn’t matter right now. Trump says something, Iran pressure starts circulating again, signals look messy, and bids immediately start acting weird. Like people are front-running a headline they don’t even have. Could just be noise. Could be positioning games. Either way the first move is already happening. Crypto trades the rumor, waits for the flush. Hormuz is back on my screen. Nobody cares until crude starts twitching, then suddenly everyone is an energy desk. Shipping-route rumors make it worse. Big numbers floating around, no clean source, no clean read. Just enough to make people cut risk. Not enough to size with any confidence. Garbage tape. PLAYUSDT looks like it’s taking the hit already. Selling feels heavy. Bids are thin. Entries look chased. Nobody looks comfortable holding size here. Feels like people are trying to force Iran risk and Hormuz risk into the chart before the story is even settled. No point chasing this. Fading early also feels dumb. PLAY is in that bad pocket now... headline comes in and the chart can snap fast. Bad candle and everyone starts reaching for the exit. $ENJ $TRUMP $PLAY
Pixels guild shards may seem safe due to verified checkmarks, but sales still carry risk.
Heads up on Pixels guild shards, because the verified checkmark can make these sales feel way safer than they actually are. A verified shard sale can still leave you bag-holding. The badge just means Pixels checked that the guild is the official one for that community. Cool, that helps. I’d rather see that than some random guild pretending to be a name people recognize. But don’t read it like protection, because the refund side is where this gets ugly. The kicker is if the guild gets flagged later for posing as another community or using someone else’s identity, Pixels can mark it suspicious or just disband it with no refund. So yeah, you can buy a shard that looked legit, had the right name, had the checkmark, didn’t look like an obvious rug at the time, and still end up holding the loss if they nuke the guild later.
What sucks is the badge does some trust work in your head before you even notice it. You see verified, you relax a bit, you think okay at least this isn’t some fake listing, then the rules basically go “DYOR” when the bad outcome actually matters. Like if you’re going to put a verification badge next to a paid shard sale, don’t be shocked when people treat it like more than decoration.
Not saying every verified guild is shady or anything. Just saying the no-refund policy makes the whole thing feel tilted against us. The checkmark might help you avoid a fake-name guild, but if leadership does something weird later or Pixels decides the guild has to go, the shard buyer can still be stuck as exit liquidity. So be careful clicking into these. The sale can look clean enough, then the refund path just isn’t there if the guild gets flagged. #pixel $PIXEL @pixels
I open PIXELS, see $PIXEL sitting there, tap withdraw and instantly get smacked by the rep wall again actually losing my mind over this a bit Balance is there. Wallet’s linked. Looks like I should be good. Then the game is like nah, your account hasn’t done enough chores yet, come back later That’s the part that annoys me. The token already exists in my account. I can see it. But I still need 1,500 rep before withdrawals even open, and marketplace buy and sell is locked behind that too So before 1,500, I’m basically just staring at a balance I can’t really use And guild creation is 2,205 rep, which is even more annoying because if I’m trying to build toward anything guild-side, the PIXEL path still gets stuck behind another chunky rep requirement I get that PIXELS is grindy, whatever, but rep gatekeeping withdraws feels rough when the value is already sitting there on screen and the only thing between me and using it is another pile of tasks 1,500 for withdraw and marketplace. 2,205 for guild creation. Just tired of hitting the same wall. @Pixels $PIXEL #pixel
Italy says it is ready to send as many as four naval vessels to the Strait of Hormuz: two minesweepers, an escort vessel, and a logistics ship. That is not a ceremonial package. Minesweepers are sent when governments think the threat may stop being a warning and become something physical in the water. Frankly, Rome is done watching the Gulf crisis through U.S. briefings while Europe waits for the fuel bill. For days, this looked like the familiar Washington-Tehran script. Trump warns Iran, Iran tests the edge, the U.S. Navy takes the risk, and markets pretend danger can be priced cleanly. Italy’s entry makes that harder for Tehran. Roughly a fifth of global oil and LNG normally moves through Hormuz, and Europe cannot treat that artery as someone else’s patrol lane forever. The real headache is the mission type. Mine-clearing is slow, exposed, and politically messy. One ambiguous blast can turn a shipping threat into a crisis before diplomats agree on the facts. For Rome, this is practical before it is ideological. A mined strait shows up in tanker routes, insurance costs, and cabinet rooms already short on patience. The uncomfortable truth for Tehran is that U.S. forces are an easy frame. European crews clearing mines are not. If the wrong ship is hit, or even nearly hit, the story stops being resistance against Washington and starts looking like a broader attack on commercial access. Italy does not rewrite the naval balance by itself. Four ships will not decide the Gulf. But flags change the politics of an incident, and politics is usually where these crises turn dangerous. Tehran can still probe, deny, and keep pressure just below the line. The problem is that the line is no longer being watched by Washington alone. #Hormuz #italy #Geopolitics #OilMarkets #iran
Login to explore more contents
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.