I don’t like wearing “square.” I never did. I don’t like boxes, fixed lanes, or platforms that force you to think in one direction.
But Binance Square isn’t a box.
It’s more like a live crypto street—open, noisy in a good way, full of real people, real opinions, and real updates happening at the same time. Every time I open it, I feel like I’m stepping into the place where crypto is actually being discussed properly, not just posted.
And that’s why I keep choosing it.
Binance Square doesn’t feel like a feed, it feels like a place
Most places feel like endless scrolling.
Binance Square feels like a place people meet.
You can literally watch the market mood change in real time. One moment everyone is calm, next moment something breaks out and the entire community is discussing it from different angles—news, charts, fundamentals, risk, narratives, timing. It feels alive because it’s not one-way content. It’s two-way conversation.
That’s what I mean when I say there is a full real community here. Everything gets discussed. Nothing feels too small, too early, or too “niche” to talk about.
If it matters in crypto, it’s already here.
The value-to-value creator culture is rare
What makes Binance Square special isn’t just that people post. It’s how people post.
There are creators here who consistently bring value. You can feel it immediately:
Posts that make you understand a move instead of fear it
Breakdowns that explain why something matters
Updates that feel fresh, not recycled
Warnings that save people from bad decisions
Research that feels like time was actually spent on it
This is the kind of environment where you naturally grow, because your mind stays sharp. You don’t just consume content, you learn patterns.
And when a platform becomes “value-to-value,” it stops being entertainment and starts becoming education.
Every crypto update feels different here
This is one of the biggest reasons I stay.
Even when everyone is talking about the same topic, Binance Square doesn’t feel copy-pasted. You’ll see ten people cover one update, but each one brings a different angle—market structure, macro view, on-chain perspective, risk management, timing, sentiment.
So instead of getting bored, you get layered understanding.
That’s why I can say this confidently:
Anything about the crypto space is always available on Binance Square. Not just available—explained, debated, broken down, and updated.
It’s where the whole crypto world gets connected in one place
Crypto is not only charts.
It’s also:
narrativesnew listings and rotationsstablecoin flowsbig wallets movingtoken unlock pressurehype cycles and reality checkssecurity issues and scamsregulation impactscommunity sentiment
On Binance Square, all of this lives together. That matters because crypto never moves because of one reason. It moves because many reasons collide.
This is why Binance Square feels complete: you’re not forced to leave the platform just to understand what’s going on.
The campaigns keep the community active and moving
One thing I genuinely like is the campaign culture. It keeps the community alive. It creates momentum. It makes creators show up, think, compete, and improve.
Campaigns don’t just give rewards—they create direction. They push people to contribute more, write better, and stay consistent. It keeps the ecosystem warm, not cold.
And if you’re active, you feel it immediately. You feel like you’re part of something happening, not just watching from outside.
Why I always prioritize Binance Square above everything else
I’m not even trying to “compare” in a loud way, but the difference is clear.
In other places, crypto discussion often turns into noise: people repeat the same lines, chase attention, and argue without adding any clarity. It’s loud, but it’s not helpful.
Binance Square has noise too sometimes—crypto is crypto—but it has a stronger backbone:
More focus on actual market reality
More creators trying to be useful
More community discussion that adds something
More learning if you pay attention
So even if other platforms exist, Binance Square still stays above them for me because I actually leave this place smarter than I entered.
My personal story with Binance Square (63.9K followers, and still learning daily)
This part matters to me.
I’m sitting at 63.9K followers on Binance Square, and that number didn’t happen from luck.
It happened because I stayed consistent.
I learned. I posted. I improved. I studied the market. I listened to the community. I kept showing up. And the more I stayed active, the more the platform gave me something back—knowledge, reach, growth, and opportunities.
I can say it honestly:
I learn almost everything from Binance Square about the crypto space.
Not because I can’t learn elsewhere, but because Binance Square gives it to me in the most practical format:
The update
The reaction
The debate
The lesson
The next move
And yes… I’ve earned from Binance Square in ways people wouldn’t even imagine. Not just “a little.” I mean real value. The kind of value that comes when you become consistent, active, and serious about what you’re doing.
I stay active, I participate, and I take every campaign seriously
I’m not the type to appear once and disappear for weeks.
I stay active.
I comment, I engage, I post, I contribute. And whenever there’s a campaign, I’m not watching it… I’m in it.
Because campaigns are not just rewards to me. They’re a signal that Binance Square is alive and expanding. They’re a reason to stay sharp, push harder, and stay consistent.
That’s why I actively participate in every campaign—because it keeps me connected to the community and keeps my growth moving forward.
Binance Square is the only “Square” I actually like
So yeah… I don’t like wearing square.
But Binance Square is the exception.
Because it doesn’t make me feel boxed in. It makes me feel plugged in—to the market, to creators, to discussions, to real-time updates, and to a community that actually understands crypto.
That’s why it’s my all-time favorite.
And that’s why, no matter what else exists out there, I’ll keep prioritizing Binance Square above everything else.
Because for me, Binance Square isn’t just where I post.
THE NEW CREATORPAD ERA AND MY JOURNEY AS A BINANCE SQUARE CREATOR
Introduction
The CreatorPad revamp did not arrive quietly. It arrived with clarity, structure, and a very clear message. Serious creators matter. Real contribution matters. Consistency matters.
I have been part of CreatorPad long before this update, and my experience in the past version shaped how I see this new one. I didn’t just try it once. I participated in every campaign. I completed tasks. I created content. I stayed active. And I earned rewards from every campaign I joined. That history matters, because it gives me a real comparison point.
This new CreatorPad feels like a system that finally understands creators who are in this for the long run.
What CreatorPad Really Is After the Revamp
CreatorPad is no longer just a place to complete tasks. It is now a structured creator economy inside Binance Square.
The idea is simple but powerful.You contribute value.You follow projects.You trade when required.You create meaningful content.And you earn real token rewards based on clear rules. In 2025 alone, millions of tokens are being distributed across CreatorPad campaigns. These are not demo points or vanity numbers. These are real tokens tied to real projects, distributed through transparent mechanisms.
What changed is not just the interface. The philosophy changed.
From Chaos to Structure
Before the revamp, many creators felt confused. Rankings were visible only at the top. If you were not in the top group, you had no idea how close you were or what to improve.
Now, that uncertainty is gone.
You can see:
Your total points even if you are not in the top 100
A clear breakdown of how many points came from each task
How your content, engagement, and trading activity contribute
This one change alone makes CreatorPad feel fair. You are no longer guessing. You are building.
This matters because it discourages spam and rewards real effort. Posting ten low-quality posts no longer helps. Creating fewer but better posts does.
There is also a cap on how many posts can earn points. This pushes creators to think before posting. It improves overall content quality across Binance Square.
Transparency Is the Real Upgrade
Transparency is not just a feature. It is the foundation of this revamp.
You can now:
See where your points come from
Track improvement day by day
Adjust strategy based on real data
This turns CreatorPad into something strategic. You are no longer just participating. You are optimizing.
Anti-Spam and Quality Control
One of the strongest improvements is how low-quality behavior is handled.
There are penalties. There are reporting tools. And there is real enforcement.
This protects creators who genuinely put time into writing, researching, and explaining things properly.
My Personal Experience as a Past CreatorPad Creator
My experience with CreatorPad has been very good from the start. I joined campaigns early. I stayed consistent. I followed rules carefully.
Every campaign I participated in rewarded me. Not because of luck, but because I treated it seriously.
This new version feels like it was designed for creators like me. Creators who:
Participate regularly
Understand project fundamentals
Create relevant content
Follow campaign instructions carefully
Now I am pushing even harder. Not because it is easier, but because it is clearer.
CreatorPad vs Others
This comparison matters because many creators ask it.
Others relies heavily on algorithmic interpretation of influence. Rankings can feel unclear. AI decides a lot. Many creators feel they are competing against noise.
CreatorPad is different. Here, you know the rules. You know the tasks. You know how points are earned.
It rewards action, not hype. It rewards structure, not chaos.
That is why serious creators are shifting focus here.
Revenue Potential After the Revamp
With the new system, revenue potential becomes predictable.
Why? Because campaigns are frequent. Token pools are large. Tasks are achievable.
$DOGE is moving because a sharp sell-off just swept a key demand zone and I’m seeing sellers lose momentum instead of pressing lower.
I’m watching DOGE after that drop from the 0.103 area into the 0.091 zone. That move flushed liquidity fast. What matters to me is the reaction. Price didn’t continue collapsing. Wicks showed up, candles tightened, and buyers started defending the lows. That usually tells me panic already played out.
Market read I’m seeing downside momentum fade after the flush. Each push lower is weaker, and price is holding above the recent low instead of breaking again. This looks like absorption, not fresh selling. As long as this base holds, a relief move stays in play.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 0.0905 – 0.0920 This zone sits directly on demand and gives clean, controlled risk.
Target point TP1: 0.0958 – first reaction resistance TP2: 0.1005 – prior breakdown area TP3: 0.1055 – liquidity target if recovery expands
Stop loss 0.0885 A clean break below this level invalidates the demand reaction I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a classic liquidity sweep followed by absorption. When price fails to continue lower after a heavy flush, relief rallies often follow as sellers exit and buyers rebalance price toward higher inefficiency zones. Structure and reaction are guiding this setup.
$SOL is moving because a heavy sell-off just swept a major demand zone and I’m seeing sellers lose strength instead of pushing price lower.
I’m watching SOL after that sharp drop from the 93 area into 82. That move cleared liquidity fast. The key detail for me is the reaction. Price didn’t collapse further. It slowed down, wicks formed, and buyers started defending the level around 82. That usually tells me panic already played out.
Market read I’m seeing downside momentum fade after the flush. Each push lower is getting weaker, and price is stabilizing above the recent low instead of breaking structure again. This looks like absorption, not fresh distribution. As long as this base holds, a relief move stays in play.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 81.8 – 83.0 This zone sits right on demand and gives clean, controlled risk.
Target point TP1: 86.5 – first reaction resistance TP2: 90.0 – prior breakdown level TP3: 94.5 – liquidity target if recovery expands
Stop loss 79.8 A clean break below this level invalidates the demand reaction I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a classic liquidity sweep into higher-timeframe demand followed by absorption. When price fails to continue lower after a strong flush, relief rallies often follow as sellers exit and buyers rebalance price toward higher inefficiency zones. Structure and reaction are guiding this setup.
$ETH is moving because a strong liquidity flush just hit higher-timeframe demand and I’m seeing sellers lose momentum instead of pushing price lower.
I’m watching ETH after that sharp drop from the 2,150 area into 1,927. That move cleared stops aggressively. The key for me is the reaction. Price didn’t continue sliding. Buyers stepped in fast, defended the zone, and ETH started stabilizing instead of cascading. That usually signals panic already played out.
Market read I’m seeing downside momentum slow after the sweep. Selling candles are getting smaller, wicks are forming, and price is holding above the recent low. Structure is still corrective, but this looks more like absorption than continuation. As long as demand holds, a relief move stays on the table.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 1,940 – 1,980 This zone sits right above demand and keeps risk clean and controlled.
Target point TP1: 2,030 – first reaction resistance TP2: 2,120 – prior breakdown zone TP3: 2,200 – liquidity target if recovery expands
Stop loss 1,890 A clean break below this level invalidates the demand reaction I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a classic stop sweep into higher-timeframe demand followed by absorption. When ETH fails to continue lower after such a flush, relief rallies often follow as sellers exit and buyers rebalance price toward higher inefficiency zones. Structure and reaction are guiding this setup.
$BTC is moving because a deep liquidity flush just hit a major higher-timeframe demand zone and I’m seeing selling pressure slow instead of expanding.
I’m watching BTC after that sharp sell-off from the 72k area into the 65.8k zone. That move cleared a lot of stops fast. The important part for me is what happened next. Price didn’t cascade lower. It paused, wicks formed, and buyers started absorbing pressure right where long-term demand sits. That tells me panic already played out.
Market read I’m seeing downside momentum weaken after the flush. Lower candles are losing size, and price is stabilizing above the recent low instead of breaking structure again. This looks like absorption after distribution, not the start of another impulsive leg down. As long as this zone holds, I’m focused on a relief move.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 65,500 – 66,300 This zone sits directly on demand and gives a clear structure-based risk.
Target point TP1: 68,200 – first reaction resistance TP2: 70,400 – prior breakdown level TP3: 72,800 – liquidity target if recovery expands
Stop loss 64,300 A clean break below this level invalidates the demand reaction I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a classic stop sweep into higher-timeframe demand followed by absorption. When BTC fails to continue lower after a heavy flush, relief rallies are common as sellers exit and buyers rebalance price toward inefficiency zones above. Structure and reaction are the key signals here.
$BNB is moving because a sharp liquidity flush just hit a major demand zone and I’m seeing sellers lose control instead of pressing lower.
I’m watching BNB after that heavy drop from the 700 area into 646. That move cleared stops aggressively, but price didn’t stay there. Buyers reacted fast, pushed price back up, and now we’re consolidating above the low. This tells me panic already played out and pressure is easing.
Market read I’m seeing downside momentum slow after the sweep. The bounce wasn’t weak, and pullbacks are getting absorbed instead of expanding. Structure is still corrective, but the reaction from demand is strong enough to look for a controlled recovery move rather than continuation down.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 648 – 655 This zone sits right above demand and keeps risk tight while price holds structure.
Target point TP1: 670 – first reaction resistance TP2: 688 – previous breakdown zone TP3: 705 – liquidity target if recovery gains strength
Stop loss 638 A clean break below this level invalidates the demand reaction I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a classic stop sweep into demand followed by quick absorption. When price fails to continue lower after such a move, relief bounces often follow as sellers exit and buyers rebalance price toward higher inefficiency zones. As long as demand holds, upside becomes the higher-probability path.
$HUMA is moving because selling pressure just hit exhaustion and I’m seeing price slow down right at a clean demand pocket.
I’m watching HUMA after the steady bleed from the 0.0188 area into 0.0157. That move flushed weak hands, but once price tagged the low, continuation failed. Candles tightened, downside momentum faded, and buyers started defending the level instead of letting price slide further. That’s usually where reversals or relief moves begin.
Market read I’m seeing a downtrend lose strength near demand. Each push lower is weaker, wicks are forming, and price is now holding above the recent low. This looks like absorption, not panic continuation. As long as the base holds, downside risk stays limited.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 0.0158 – 0.0162 This zone sits directly on demand and gives controlled risk after the flush.
Target point TP1: 0.0169 – first reaction zone TP2: 0.0181 – prior breakdown area TP3: 0.0200 – recovery target if momentum flips
Stop loss 0.0153 A clean break below this level invalidates the base and confirms further weakness.
How it’s possible I’m seeing selling exhaustion after a prolonged decline. When price stops accelerating down and starts holding a tight range at demand, sellers exit and buyers rebalance price toward higher inefficiency zones. Structure is shifting from pressure to stabilization.
$ZIL is moving because the sell pressure just ran out of fuel and I’m seeing price slow down right at a long-watched demand area.
I’m watching ZIL after that steady bleed from the 0.0051 region into 0.00448. The drop was controlled, not impulsive, and once price tagged that low, sellers failed to push further. Wicks started appearing, candles got smaller, and momentum clearly cooled. That usually tells me distribution is ending and absorption is starting.
Market read I’m seeing a clear downtrend lose strength near demand. Lower pushes are getting weaker, and price is now holding above the recent low instead of expanding down. This looks like a base forming, not continuation selling. As long as 0.00448 holds, downside risk is limited.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 0.00450 – 0.00460 This zone sits directly on demand and offers clean risk after the sell-off.
Target point TP1: 0.00485 – first reaction level TP2: 0.00515 – previous breakdown zone TP3: 0.00560 – recovery target if momentum flips
Stop loss 0.00432 A break below this level invalidates the base and confirms further weakness.
How it’s possible I’m seeing selling exhaustion after a prolonged decline. When price stops making strong lower extensions and starts holding a tight range at demand, relief moves often follow as sellers exit and buyers rebalance price toward prior inefficiencies.
$XRP is moving because a deep sell-off just hit a major demand zone and I’m seeing selling pressure slow instead of accelerating.
I’m watching XRP after that sharp drop from the 1.44 area into 1.21. That move flushed liquidity aggressively, but price didn’t continue collapsing. The reaction was immediate, buyers stepped in fast, and structure started stabilizing. This tells me panic selling already played out.
Market read I’m seeing downside momentum weaken after the sweep. Lower pushes are getting smaller, wicks are forming, and price is holding above the recent low. This looks like a base forming after distribution, not the start of another heavy leg down. As long as 1.21 holds, I’m focused on a relief move.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 1.23 – 1.26 This zone sits right above demand and keeps risk defined after the flush.
Target point TP1: 1.32 – first reaction resistance TP2: 1.38 – prior breakdown level TP3: 1.45 – liquidity target if recovery expands
Stop loss 1.19 A clean break below this level invalidates the base and confirms further weakness.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a classic liquidity sweep followed by absorption. When price stops trending down and holds above demand after a heavy sell-off, relief bounces are common as sellers exit and buyers rebalance price. Structure is the key here.
I’m focused on patience and confirmation, not chasing.
$ARDR is moving because the sell-off just hit exhaustion and I’m seeing price stabilize instead of continuing lower.
I’m watching ARDR after that sharp drop from the 0.047 area. Sellers pushed hard, but once price tagged the 0.0419 zone, momentum slowed immediately. The candles started tightening, wicks appeared, and follow-through selling failed. That usually tells me panic is fading and demand is starting to absorb supply.
Market read I’m seeing price base around a clear demand zone with lower momentum on each push down. Even after heavy pressure, sellers couldn’t break structure further. This looks like a slowdown phase where downside risk is getting limited and a relief move becomes possible.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 0.0418 – 0.0430 This zone sits directly on demand and keeps risk tight after the flush.
Target point TP1: 0.0452 – first reaction level TP2: 0.0478 – previous breakdown zone TP3: 0.0515 – recovery target if momentum shifts bullish
Stop loss 0.0406 A clean break below this level invalidates the base I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing selling pressure weaken after a strong downside move. When price stops accelerating lower and starts holding a base, relief bounces often follow as sellers exit and buyers step in quietly. As long as demand holds, price naturally seeks higher imbalance zones.
I’m patient and focused on structure, not emotion.
$EDU is moving because panic selling just hit exhaustion and I’m seeing price slow down right at a key demand zone instead of accelerating lower.
I’m watching EDU after that heavy sell-off from the 0.17 area. The drop was aggressive, but notice how price reacted near 0.127. Sellers pushed hard, but follow-through faded. Wicks started forming, momentum cooled, and price stopped making strong lower expansions. That usually tells me selling pressure is getting absorbed.
Market read I’m seeing price stabilizing after a sharp downtrend with downside momentum weakening. Lower highs are still there, but sellers are no longer in full control. This looks like a potential base-building phase where smart buyers start stepping in quietly while fear is high.
Entry point I’m looking to enter between 0.1275 – 0.1300 This zone sits right on short-term demand and offers a defined risk after the sell-off.
Target point TP1: 0.1360 – first reaction resistance TP2: 0.1425 – previous breakdown area TP3: 0.1550 – mean reversion target if relief bounce expands
Stop loss 0.1245 A clean break below this level confirms continuation weakness and invalidates the setup.
How it’s possible I’m seeing selling exhaustion after a long red sequence. When price stops accelerating lower and starts printing rejection wicks near demand, relief bounces often follow. As long as support holds, price naturally looks to rebalance toward prior inefficiencies.
I’m cautious but focused on structure and reaction.
$THE is moving because price swept liquidity from the lows and I’m seeing buyers step in with intent instead of panic selling.
I’m watching THE after that sharp move into the 0.215 area. That drop didn’t continue lower. It grabbed stops, reversed fast, and pushed back with strong candles. The recovery wasn’t slow or weak, which tells me sellers lost control and demand showed up at the right place.
Market read I’m seeing a clean reclaim of short-term structure with price now holding above 0.228. Pullbacks are shallow and getting absorbed, not expanded. Momentum cooled after the impulse, but structure stayed intact, which usually favors continuation rather than a full reversal.
Entry point I’m looking to enter between 0.2290 – 0.2320 This zone sits on reclaimed support and offers controlled risk with upside continuation.
Target point TP1: 0.2385 – near-term resistance TP2: 0.2460 – previous high liquidity TP3: 0.2580 – expansion target if momentum builds again
Stop loss 0.2240 A break below this level invalidates the higher-low structure I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a classic liquidity sweep followed by a strong reclaim and hold above structure. When price does this and refuses to give back gains, buyers usually aim for liquidity resting above recent highs. As long as support holds, continuation remains the higher-probability move.
$CHESS is moving because liquidity was swept aggressively and I’m seeing buyers step in with control after shaking out weak hands.
I’m watching CHESS after that sharp flush toward the 0.024 zone. That move wasn’t continuation selling, it was a clean stop sweep. Price reacted instantly, reclaimed structure, and pushed back into the range. Since then, sellers failed to push it lower, which tells me demand is active again.
Market read I’m seeing higher lows forming after the sweep with price holding above reclaimed support. Volatility expanded on the recovery, then compressed, which usually signals continuation building. Buyers are defending dips and not letting price revisit the lows.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 0.0266 – 0.0271 This zone sits on short-term demand and keeps risk tight while staying aligned with structure.
Target point TP1: 0.0283 – recent rejection zone TP2: 0.0300 – range expansion level TP3: 0.0324 – liquidity target if momentum accelerates
Stop loss 0.0258 A clean break below this level invalidates the recovery structure.
How it’s possible I’m seeing a textbook liquidity sweep followed by a strong reclaim. When price holds above reclaimed structure after such a move, buyers usually aim for higher liquidity zones. As long as demand holds, continuation is the higher-probability outcome.
$GPS is moving because buyers defended the base perfectly and I’m seeing pressure build after a controlled accumulation.
I’m watching GPS after it held the 0.0083–0.0086 zone and pushed higher with steady candles. That spike toward 0.0096 wasn’t chased and dumped. Price paused, absorbed sellers, and is now grinding higher again. This behavior usually shows strength, not exhaustion.
Market read I’m seeing higher lows forming with price holding above previous resistance. Volatility compressed after the impulse, which tells me sellers are getting weaker. Buyers are stepping in earlier on every dip, keeping structure clean and bullish.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 0.00910 – 0.00925 This area sits right above reclaimed support and offers a tight risk setup.
Target point TP1: 0.00960 – recent high TP2: 0.01020 – liquidity above the range TP3: 0.01110 – continuation expansion if momentum kicks in
Stop loss 0.00885 A breakdown below this level breaks the structure I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing accumulation after an impulse, not distribution. As long as price holds above reclaimed levels, buyers will likely push price toward untouched liquidity above highs. Momentum just needs a small trigger.
$PARTI is moving because sellers got fully exhausted near the lows and I’m seeing a sharp demand response that flipped short-term structure bullish.
I’m focused on PARTI after that clean reclaim from the 0.069 area. Price didn’t bounce weakly, it expanded with strong momentum and wide candles, which tells me buyers stepped in with intent. After tagging the high near 0.095, price didn’t dump back into the range. Instead, it’s holding above prior resistance, which is a healthy sign.
Market read I’m seeing a higher-low structure forming above 0.085 with price compressing just under resistance. Pullbacks are shallow and getting absorbed quickly. This kind of consolidation after an impulse usually signals continuation, not reversal. Momentum cooled, but control stayed with buyers.
Entry point I’m looking to enter between 0.0865 – 0.0880 This zone sits on reclaimed structure and offers clean risk while staying aligned with the trend.
Target point TP1: 0.0915 – short-term resistance retest TP2: 0.0958 – previous high liquidity TP3: 0.1025 – expansion target if breakout confirms
Stop loss 0.0832 A breakdown below this level invalidates the higher-low I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing strong demand defend previous resistance after a sharp impulse. As long as price holds above structure, buyers are likely targeting liquidity above highs. If momentum returns, continuation becomes the natural move.
$C98 is moving because buyers just flipped structure after a long compression phase, and I’m seeing real momentum step in instead of a fake spike.
I’m watching C98 after a clean breakout from the 0.025 area, where price absorbed sellers for hours before expanding. The impulsive move toward 0.035 wasn’t random. Volume expanded with strong bodies, showing that buyers were committed, not just chasing. Even after the spike, price didn’t collapse. That tells me demand is still active.
Market read I’m seeing a higher-low structure forming above 0.029 with price respecting previous breakout zones. Pullbacks are getting bought quickly, and candles are holding above key short-term support. This kind of behavior usually shows continuation rather than distribution. Momentum cooled down, but structure stayed bullish, which is exactly what I want to see.
Entry point I’m interested in entries between 0.0300 – 0.0310 This zone aligns with the prior breakout base and short-term demand. Risk stays controlled here while keeping upside open.
Target point TP1: 0.0338 – recent reaction high TP2: 0.0365 – liquidity resting above the last wick TP3: 0.0408 – continuation target if momentum expands again
Stop loss 0.0286 A clean break below this level invalidates the higher-low structure I’m trading.
How it’s possible I’m seeing price hold above reclaimed structure after a strong impulse, which usually signals that smart buyers are defending their positions. If momentum returns, price naturally seeks the next liquidity pocket above highs. As long as support holds, continuation is the higher-probability path.
I’m ready for continuation as long as structure stays intact.
This is exactly why every rally keeps getting sold into — and the chart isn’t lying
The move from $93K → $98K wasn’t pure strength. It was redistribution. Early buyers quietly passed bags to late momentum chasers while price looked “bullish” on the surface
Now zoom out 👇 Above $98.4K → $100K, there’s heavy overhead supply. Long-term holders who bought much lower are maturing into profit-taking mode, and they’re unloading into every push
What this means: • $98.4K = first major ceiling • $100K = psychological + structural supply wall • Every rally here invites sellers, not FOMO
Until strong, sustained demand steps in — the kind that absorbs this sell pressure — breakouts will keep failing
This isn’t weakness… It’s unfinished business before the real move begins 💰
I’m watching closely. When demand finally wins, the move will be violent