Dali654

$ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PUMP it Up

$ON the next $XNY ?? 🤔🤔💹

$ON is acting weird something is going to happen.

$XNY 🤔🤔

$OM liquidation risk ! TAKE your money out until the market gain stability again !

$OM this token/coin had some stability at 0,2...
when it fell below 0,185 it has gone straight to 0,16 /0,15 . it will go down to 0,019 and then it will restart to raise again but if it got below 0,0185 the coin will vanish and disappear. maybe the Dubaï meeting will bring investors , but with a group like the mantra group it will not grow easy and it has nothing to bring to the table that other RWA doesn't so october will tell us if investors invest it will gain some value but if they dont mantra is finished , whatever OM is bearish on long term very low bullish on short term.

i said it on their social media groups.
NOT enough marketing , AI generated content is not credible enough for people to buy the project ideas.

unlocking 0,3% tokens each day while bearish signals while growing unlocking quantity each month, migrating tokens to main chain and unlocking airdrops all that at the same time

its normal it will go down.

$OM / $ETH pair coming soon 🔥🔥
PUMP IT !

Confirmed increase finally ...

$OM 's transactions on blockchain are freaking fast with almost no cost !

$OM #MantraChain #ElevexAi
News about $OM !! 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

$OM going hOMe

$OM Part 4 last : what is $OM ?who is behind it ?

Legitimacy and Red Flags

No regulator has labeled MANTRA or OM a fraud, but the project has attracted intense scrutiny. The dramatic 90% crash in April 2025 led many in crypto forums to dub it a “rug pull” or “scam”. On-chain analyses found large insider‐linked transfers of ~4.5% of supply to exchanges just before the crash. The team and co-founder Mullin deny any “exit scam”, blaming external CEX liquidations instead. A crypto tax guide (Koinly) similarly notes “no definitive evidence” of a scam, but admits the token’s design had serious flaws (centralization, sudden supply inflation, poor liquidity).

Community complaints: Investors have vocally complained on Reddit/Twitter about the price collapse and lack of timely updates. Many compare Mantra to past collapses (e.g. Terra-LUNA).

Transparency: The sudden doubling of supply (888M new OM minted overnight) and rapid vesting schedule surprised holders. Critics cite this and slow public information as warning signs. The team has since promised more transparency (dashboards, reports).

Press coverage: Blockchain media highlights Mantra’s unfulfilled promises. For example, one report shows Mantra’s $500M Dubai asset deal was quietly replaced by a $10B partnership on Mavryk. Another analysis states Mantra *“prioritizes tokenomics over real-world asset integration”*.
Regulatory status: MANTRA holds a Dubai DeFi license, but no legal actions are known. It remains unregulated in most jurisdictions; token trading follows standard KYC/AML via exchanges.

In summary, OM/Mantra is a legitimate crypto project in that it is backed by an identifiable team and live blockchain, but its recent performance has raised red flags. The supply and vesting changes, coupled with a violent price crash and delayed project milestones, have eroded trust among investors. Ongoing community discussion and media reports reflect skepticism, even as the team works to address issues.

$OM Part 3 , what is $OM ? who is behind it?

Comparison with Similar Projects

Compared to other real‑world‑asset (RWA) tokenization chains, MANTRA is often seen as more tokenomics‑driven. For example, Mavryk (a Tezos‐based L1) has secured multibillion-dollar real estate deals (with MultiBank’s RWA Exchange) and focuses on regulatory compliance and institutional infrastructure. In contrast, Mantra’s early efforts (bridging tokens, staking incentives, sports assets) have been labeled speculative rather than execution‑driven. Analysts note that Mantra emphasizes liquidity pools and inflation settings, whereas platforms like Mavryk prioritize on‑chain deal flow and legal compliance. Crypto researchers have pointed out Mantra’s “deeply flawed” execution model (centralized control, supply shocks). Other RWA chains (e.g. Centrifuge/Realio on Ethereum) similarly stress compliance and real-world partner integrations, areas where Mantra’s adoption has lagged.

Technology: MANTRA is Cosmos‑SDK/Tendermint; supports CosmWasm. Mavryk is based on Tezos with an institutional token standard (MRC-30) for compliance. Both aim to integrate RWAs.

Adoption: Mavryk has already tokenized $3B+ real estate via MultiBank. Mantra’s large announced deal ($500M Dubai property) stalled and was overtaken by Mavryk’s later $10B launch. Overall, Mantra’s ecosystem is smaller to date.

Transparency: Observers note that Mantra’s tokenomics changes and governance have been less transparent (e.g. sudden supply change), whereas competing projects publicize compliance audits and partnerships. Mantra’s team has since pledged governance reforms, but comparisons favor chains with real‐world track records.

Read Next post to continue ====>

$OM
PART 2 === what is $OM ? who is behind it?

Genesis allocations: 5.6% (100M OM) for pre‑seed investors (3‑year vesting, 12 m cliff); 5.1% (90M OM) for seed investors (18‑month vesting, 6 m lock); 2.1% (37.78M OM) to ecosystem fund for projects and dev grants; 16.9% (300M OM) to core contributors (team/advisors) with 5‑year vesting (30 m cliff, then 30 m linear); and 2.8% (50M OM) for airdrops to early users (10% released Mar 2025, 6 m cliff, then linear to Mar 2027). (The rest of supply covers community pools and ongoing rewards.)

Inflation model: The chain now uses a 3% annual inflation (year 1), of which ~1.8% (60%) goes to validator staking rewards and 1.2% (40%) to the MANTRA Chain Association for funding liquidity/development incentives. The whitepaper notes inflation may be adjusted annually, and there is no fixed cap on OM.

Token burns: After the April 2025 market crash, the team burned 150M OM from its allocation and signaled another burn of 150M to reassure holders. Documentation also includes a real-time dashboard and planned transparency reports on vesting/tokennomics.

Exchange Listings

OM is listed on major centralized exchanges. According to CoinGecko, Binance is the leading platform for OM, with other listed exchanges including OKX, Gate, MEXC, LBank, Huobi (HTX), KuCoin, Bybit, etc. All of these are well-known cryptocurrency exchanges (Binance, OKX, Huobi/HTX, KuCoin, Bybit) except LBank which is smaller but still active. (There is no notable listing on major decentralized exchanges; trading is mainly via CEX orderbooks.) These platforms generally score high in industry trust ratings.

Binance (CEX) – top global exchange

OKX, Gate.io, Huobi/HTX, KuCoin, Bybit – large regulated CEXs

MEXC, LBank – smaller but known crypto exchanges

Read Next post to continue =====>

what is $OM ? who is behind it ? this is everything you need to know about $OM #mantra .

Mantra Chain (OM Token) – Legitimacy Analysis

Team and Background

The MANTRA blockchain was founded by several crypto entrepreneurs with fintech and blockchain experience. John Patrick Mullin (HK-based) is the CEO/co-founder. Other co-founders include Stephane Laurent Villedieu and Jayant Ramanand. In addition, Will Corkin and Rodrigo Quan Miranda – both co-founders of the related SOMA.finance platform – are listed as MANTRA co-founders. The team also includes Matthew Crooks (CTO) and advisors such as Nicholas Krapels (CSO). All core members have professional profiles (e.g. LinkedIn) and backgrounds in finance/tech; for example, Mullin and Corkin have promoted MANTRA in conferences and Mullin even taught blockchain courses.

John Patrick Mullin: Co-founder & CEO (ex-SOMA.finance, educator on blockchain).

Jayant Ramanand: Co-founder and lead developer (Cosmos/CosmWasm engineer).

Will Corkin: Co-founder (COO of SOMA.finance, background in Asian fintech).

Rodrigo Quan Miranda: Co-founder (former investment banker, co-founded MANTRA/SOMA).

Stephane Laurent Villedieu: Co-founder.

Matthew Crooks: CTO (systems architect).

Advisors/Investors: Early backers include firms like Shorooq, Hex Trust, etc. Several team members (e.g. Mullin, Miranda) are involved in other crypto ventures.

Tokenomics

The $OM token was originally an ERC‑20 and migrated to MANTRA’s native chain. Upon mainnet launch (Feb 2025), the total OM supply was doubled from 888,888,888 to 1,777,777,777 OM (888,888,888 newly minted). Market data indicate ~1.05 billion OM are in circulation now (meaning ~725 m tokens remain locked or unissued). Tokenomics include inflation and allocations as follows:

READ next post ===>

On OKX this is what i found About #mantra $OM

It will not hit 100$ or 10$ this year but it will get to 4$ or slightly touch the 7$ $OM is not just a token #mantra is the blockchain OM is the coin.

$OM #MantaRWA

$OM #MantraDao #mantra the start is near

$OM is heating UP! buy it now sell it in few months.
#mantra let's go !