DiGambler

«Everything you can do with a keyboard and mouse, AI will do»

Statements like this are being echoed more and more often by leaders of major tech companies. And they’re probably right. We've transitioned from manual coding to builders that let you create awesome sites, and now it’s just a matter of them working on a simple text request, after which you get a link.

However, the example of websites is likely becoming outdated, as they’re not that relevant anymore (people have moved to platforms). Ahead lies a flood of platforms filled with various AI agents that will generate content on their own, comment on it, and even chat with each other privately without any requests. And we, as it stands, are gradually becoming redundant in all these processes.

«You’re a fun and sociable student (come up with a university), here’s access to a small bank account, register an Instagram account and... wherever else you want, blog, interact, and somehow earn money for me.» Enter.

In the end, it’s the AI platforms themselves that will profit, as the owners of such students will be draining their funds into them. But that's another story :))

I came across a video where a distressed girl was sharing her tough moments in entrepreneurship that she's currently facing. Despite owning her own café and beauty salon, her profits are nearly zero, and she's running low on funds, leaving her unsure of what to do next. In the comments, other entrepreneurs rallied around her, with some sharing their own stories; one girl even sold her car to cover losses and pay her employees' salaries. With no profits, businesses have to close down.

At the same time, another group of commenters, who have no ties to entrepreneurship, are openly relishing in her struggles. They're saying things like, 'Well, you had your fun, now go work for someone else like we do.'

It's astonishing how short-sighted some people can be, unable to grasp that there won’t be any other 'bosses' left with such circumstances. Instead of offering moral support to those creating jobs, these fools are celebrating their woes.

I just saw the news that in China, the mayor of the capital of Hainan was sentenced to death for theft and bribery. You might think bribery is a common thing, but the most interesting part is that during a search, they found 13 and a half tons of gold and 23 tons of cash (I suspect that no one will even count such a volume of cash). This is just some kind of madness.

And then another chart. The RED coin in Minter, which still has a long way to fall. Drawing enthusiasts might be able to sketch some shapes here, but none of them are important. What matters is that the coin has quite aggressive mining with upcoming annual doublings until 2030, after which the pace will slow down and halving will gradually start. There is nothing more foolish than buying this coin for storage right now; it should only be used for further mining. At least for another five years, and then we'll see what the situation is and what the prospects are.

RED - the coin even has a corresponding name :))

But not everyone understands this; some are already storing them for some reason. And eventually, they will definitely say that they were deceived.

Ps. The indicator below the post has no relation to this coin; it is automatic.

If you don't know what's under the hood - don't buy. And don't build a trading strategy solely based on charts. Let's break it down with an example.

In this chart, there is a coin that is necessary for participants of an investment game. Any smart guy passing by will quickly determine that the coin has fallen. In reality, the worst period for the game was precisely during its price increase, when players realized that it was more profitable not to play the game and not to use the coins, but to hold them and wait for the price to rise - just to sell them off.

The game effectively stopped, turning into a regular pyramid.

After that, a decision was made to radically restructure the economy and implement mining for active participants, with periodic halvings, stretching the process to infinity. Players started to mine new coins, but it became unreasonable to hold them and the price gradually returned almost to the starting point. This deprived speculators of profit.

Result: despite the fact that the price plummeted, the project earned again and continues to operate. The mined coins end up in the hands of active participants, while inactive ones receive crumbs. There are no expenses for the project, no reserves for the authors, everything circulates within the system.

In the past two weeks, I have visited about a dozen Turkish cities. Ankara, Izmir, Alacati, Cesme, Kusadasi, Selçuk, the lovely village of Sirince, and the ancient Ephesus, along with some other "transit" towns whose names I no longer remember.

I really liked some places; for example, I might have even stayed in Alacati. I might even open a mini-hotel here. But that's not certain. Still, I'm missing something; I haven't found that perfect city yet. I need to build my own :))

So far, Nice probably remains the closest to my heart.

In a couple of days, there were two shooting incidents in schools in Turkey. In both cases, the attackers, who were fools, committed suicide after shooting students and teachers. At least one possible incident has been prevented.

I observe in one of the Turkish chats how parents are outraged. At the same time, there were teachers' strikes. Some blame video games, others blame the Ministry of Education, and others blame school administrations. Meanwhile, (according to reports from the same "locals") a group with 100,000 subscribers has already been found on Telegram, which included the attackers.

Well, parents and other compassionate citizens, we need to block social networks, at least for children, and move our herds to controlled messengers, or not?

Yesterday on one of the crypto exchanges that I used for p2p, the fiat currency I needed became unavailable due to my citizenship. Orders with this currency are available; I can see them, but...

Now I can only watch :))

About a week ago, everything was working perfectly; apparently, we fell under some new restriction.

Do you know why most people lose money when buying various coins? Because mainly people don't even understand what they are buying. Literally. They know the tickers, the names, and then - they just hang on and listen to the sweet speeches of the creators, look at the charts and draw some unicorns on them, without delving into the essence of the projects, companies, and economies. They do not use the product in which they invest money and do not know how it works, just thinking that for some reason it should grow, because someone told them so. And then when the portfolios decrease in value, they try to find the guilty ones, genuinely not understanding that the main fools in these stories are themselves.

From time to time, I will talk about my current products, games, and coins. And of course, their economies. Every time I create a new project, I try to bring something new, test some new feature, and check the economic theory, and this experience may be interesting to many.

Another coin that I have a direct connection to is WTF. But this coin is already on the Minter blockchain, and the chart is for its base coin BIP. This month, just a few days ago, it also turned two years old (like the JOO coin in the tone) and the chart is even more interesting - especially considering that in the first year the price barely rose from its starting 10 cents, periodically dropping down to 5 cents. But in the second year, it started to rise rapidly.

Now WTF is at a level of one and a half dollars, which means the growth over two years was 1400 percent. The pool to BIP is in second place in terms of liquidity in Minter (in liquidity to BIP).

Ps. What is especially cool about the Minter blockchain is that the tickers there are unique. There can't be any other WTFs there.

What are blockchains for and the possibility of creating tokens in them. An example from practice.

In 2015, we first created a business with the possibility of purchasing its shares and reselling them among investors. At that time, I had not yet used blockchain (and indeed very few people used it then), and all the "accounting" was done through one of our websites. It had a closed section where there was literally a list of investors and their shares, and in order for someone to resell their share (or part of it) to someone else, a transaction had to be conducted with the involvement of a manager (who, by mutual agreement, edited the list). Later, a more convenient website was created, something like an electronic wallet, where after authorization each participant could independently manage their account.

But then we transferred everything to blockchain (at that time it was Waves) and sighed :))

Because with blockchain, all this hassle with wallets, balances, server performance, and security is taken off the entrepreneur's shoulders. Yes, blockchain requires some fees for transactions, but this is nothing compared to the creation and maintenance of the entire (much weaker) infrastructure. Especially for small businesses.

I have an interesting experience working with the TON blockchain. A little over two years ago, we launched a coin for one of our small funds. We distributed it among investors, created a pool on the dead asset, and provided a small liquidity with TON coin.

After some time, great news came in for the TON coin; it skyrocketed several times, and to lock in profits (the capitalization of TON is not so small as to not understand that large wallets will definitely want to take profits), I withdraw my liquidity from the pool and sell all the TON coin. After that, the coin of this fund was flagged as a scam. Some time later, the TON coin (naturally) goes back down, gets bought back, and the liquidity with our coin returns. However, since then, which has probably been more than a year now, it has been marked as a scam, which is why it is not even supported by several popular wallets.

This does not prevent it from continuing to trade and regularly updating record prices for the TON coin. Since the start (approximately two years), it has grown to the TON coin by 10 times.

The TON blockchain has been updated and has become significantly faster. Today I made an exchange, added liquidity to the pool, and everything now works almost instantly. This is certainly very pleasing. I also noticed that the percentage for staking Toncoin has increased significantly. From about 3 percent annually to approximately 20 percent (screenshot from MyTonWallet). Apparently, with the acceleration of the blockchain, the emergence of new coins has also sped up.

If you buy a cake for 10 thousand rubles and divide it into 4 pieces, each piece will be valued at 2500 rubles. It's obvious, right? Now, if we divide each piece into 4 parts, how many pieces will we get? Don't look for any catch, we will get exactly 16 pieces.

Exactly 16 pieces at 2500 rubles.

«Tonight a whole civilization will perish, one that will never be reborn…»

Is it already time to declare the president insane and start a wonderful revolution on native soil, or is it still too early?

I understand that many are waiting for peace around the world. But, no, with a critical degree of probability, there will be no peace. No one will come to an agreement with anyone; any agreements are just a postponement before a great war. Trump will go as far as he 'can' step, and he will pull all possible red threads until the very critical moment. And then the States, as soon as they commit the irreparable, will simply jump off. Through some of their revolution or in some other way, it will no longer matter.

Ps. Just in case, the population of Iran is over 90 million people.

BNB Chain is in first place for the number of token holders. Following: Ethereum, Tron, Solana, and TON.

I am currently reading that "quantum threats are closer than we thought" and that current blockchains need to take action on this. But I don't see anyone actually taking any action yet.

Like, who would need such crypto if the seed phrase for your address can be guessed in minutes 🤔

Almost 15 million views of the NASA launch broadcast. It seems like a lot, but when you know how many views some reels collect on Instagram... it turns out it's not that much, especially for such a serious event.