Eric0512
High-Frequency Trader
4.3 Months
60 Following
101 Followers
292 Liked
89 Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
PINNED
Brothers, did I encounter a bug? Why does the score for the alpha airdrops from yesterday and the day before look incorrect? Didn't both of them only drop twice? Why is the displayed score showing a drop of four times? Did someone receive over 220 points? Are you experiencing the same thing?
Forget it, let's talk about vanry.
Recently, I've been able to understand more and more why Vanar's pace seems so slow.
While the market is still chasing "smarter AI outputs," Vanar seems to have assumed one thing:
the real value lies not in being smart, but in being able to take responsibility over the long term.
That's also why it repeatedly emphasizes No Resets, continuous memory, and intelligent continuity.
These concepts may not sound exciting,
even hard to translate into emotion and trading volume in the short term.
But what they address has never been about "demonstration issues,"
but rather the survival issue of whether AI can work in the real world over the long term.
If you look closely, you'll find that
Vanar's communication style is also replicating the same logic.
Not chasing trends, not piling on jargon,
much of the content even requires you to think a little deeper to understand.
This is not a matter of expressive ability,
but a deliberate slowing down.
Slowing down is actually about filtering.
It retains those willing to think, willing to understand "why,"
and not just those who care about "when it will rise."
So my attitude towards vanry has always been simple:
not rushing to give it a short-term label.
Until the infrastructure is genuinely needed,
it will always seem like self-talk.
When AI transitions from demonstration to hosting, from one-off tools to long-term agents,
the market will look back
and realize that some projects
haven't missed out on competition,
but have stood at the finish line from the very beginning.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Forget it, let's talk about vanry.
Recently, I've been able to understand more and more why Vanar's pace seems so slow.
While the market is still chasing "smarter AI outputs," Vanar seems to have assumed one thing:
the real value lies not in being smart, but in being able to take responsibility over the long term.
That's also why it repeatedly emphasizes No Resets, continuous memory, and intelligent continuity.
These concepts may not sound exciting,
even hard to translate into emotion and trading volume in the short term.
But what they address has never been about "demonstration issues,"
but rather the survival issue of whether AI can work in the real world over the long term.
If you look closely, you'll find that
Vanar's communication style is also replicating the same logic.
Not chasing trends, not piling on jargon,
much of the content even requires you to think a little deeper to understand.
This is not a matter of expressive ability,
but a deliberate slowing down.
Slowing down is actually about filtering.
It retains those willing to think, willing to understand "why,"
and not just those who care about "when it will rise."
So my attitude towards vanry has always been simple:
not rushing to give it a short-term label.
Until the infrastructure is genuinely needed,
it will always seem like self-talk.
When AI transitions from demonstration to hosting, from one-off tools to long-term agents,
the market will look back
and realize that some projects
haven't missed out on competition,
but have stood at the finish line from the very beginning.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Plasma——Steady Navigation in Branching Rivers
I have to say, the layout of plasma is truly vast, giving away 200u in airdrops in September, along with a series of competitions. Now there is also a creator task, with a total of 1000 reward slots, and every event is filled with sunshine. Thank you, plasma, thank you, Binance.
In the world of blockchain, the main chain is like a main river carrying all transactions, with turbulent waves when crowded and high transaction costs. Plasma, on the other hand, is like countless tributaries that disperse transaction flow to side chains, each carrying specific value flows, keeping the main chain clear while making the entire ecosystem smoother.
In the world of blockchain, the main chain is like a main river carrying all transactions, with turbulent waves when crowded and high transaction costs. Plasma, on the other hand, is like countless tributaries that disperse transaction flow to side chains, each carrying specific value flows, keeping the main chain clear while making the entire ecosystem smoother.
Vanar is not chasing the AI wave; it is waiting for AI to stabilize.
There is an airdrop at 4 PM, the threshold is 232, brothers with enough points remember to claim, the amount is not large, around 40u.
More and more AI projects are beginning to emphasize 'what can be done':
Whether it can trade, whether it can collaborate, how complex a strategy it can run.
These demonstrations are certainly important, but they assume a premise -
AI can be restarted, replaced, or treated as a one-time tool at any time.
Vanar chooses to approach from another direction.
What it repeatedly emphasizes is not capability, but continuity:
No Resets, Persistent Memory, Intelligence Continuity.
These words may not seem appealing at first glance,
More and more AI projects are beginning to emphasize 'what can be done':
Whether it can trade, whether it can collaborate, how complex a strategy it can run.
These demonstrations are certainly important, but they assume a premise -
AI can be restarted, replaced, or treated as a one-time tool at any time.
Vanar chooses to approach from another direction.
What it repeatedly emphasizes is not capability, but continuity:
No Resets, Persistent Memory, Intelligence Continuity.
These words may not seem appealing at first glance,
Brothers, there is an airdrop of 30,000 at 4 PM, the threshold is 232, can I get it with 226?
I have to say, the threshold for alpha is really high now. Looking back to September last year, everyone was a big fish, no one claimed anything below 100u, plasma could even be claimed with 70 points, meaning as long as you brushed alpha, you could claim it. Sigh, when will we reach that big fish month from last September? The current alpha is really hard to continue playing.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma
I have to say, the threshold for alpha is really high now. Looking back to September last year, everyone was a big fish, no one claimed anything below 100u, plasma could even be claimed with 70 points, meaning as long as you brushed alpha, you could claim it. Sigh, when will we reach that big fish month from last September? The current alpha is really hard to continue playing.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma
Stop treating AI as a daily worker, give it a 'long-term contract' — why Vanar bets on continuity, not narrative
Brothers, alpha is dead, there haven't been any airdrops for three consecutive days, and even old coin airdrops are gone. It won't be long before alpha is finished. No worries, remember what the sister said, when alpha is gone, something new will be invented to replace it. Looking forward to Binance's future development.
In the AI x Crypto field, there is a deliberately overlooked issue:
We have been pursuing 'smarter', yet almost no one seriously discusses 'can it work long-term'.
Today's AI agents seem very strong:
Can arbitrage, can converse, can write strategies, and even place orders by itself.
But the reality is, most of them are like 'daily temporary workers':
In the AI x Crypto field, there is a deliberately overlooked issue:
We have been pursuing 'smarter', yet almost no one seriously discusses 'can it work long-term'.
Today's AI agents seem very strong:
Can arbitrage, can converse, can write strategies, and even place orders by itself.
But the reality is, most of them are like 'daily temporary workers':
Ordinary people, is there still a chance in the crypto circle?
If you ask me, my answer is:
Yes, but the cost is much greater than imagined.
When I first entered the circle, I would scroll through the plaza and group chats every day,
Everywhere you see 'profit screenshots', 'precise entry points', 'one trade back to break even'.
The more I saw, the more a thought inevitably popped up in my mind:
Why is that trading genius never me?
Reality quickly gave me the answer.
I am a newcomer who entered the circle this January,
The first road I walked was not grand—
Collecting rewards, completing tasks, bringing in new users, Alpha, events, none missed.
To be honest, this road is not glamorous, but it's very real.
Yes, but the cost is much greater than imagined.
When I first entered the circle, I would scroll through the plaza and group chats every day,
Everywhere you see 'profit screenshots', 'precise entry points', 'one trade back to break even'.
The more I saw, the more a thought inevitably popped up in my mind:
Why is that trading genius never me?
Reality quickly gave me the answer.
I am a newcomer who entered the circle this January,
The first road I walked was not grand—
Collecting rewards, completing tasks, bringing in new users, Alpha, events, none missed.
To be honest, this road is not glamorous, but it's very real.
Brothers, I have found a way to reduce transfer wear. Look at the picture, the transfer fee on the plasma chain is only 0.001u, which is almost free, while the BSC transfer costs 0.01u. This means that the fee for transferring once on the BSC chain is enough to transfer ten times on the plasma chain. Now you know which chain to use for transfers.
Lastly, just a reminder, this only applies to transfers between exchanges, such as transferring usdt from bitget to Binance using the plasma chain, which only requires a fee of 0.001u.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma
Lastly, just a reminder, this only applies to transfers between exchanges, such as transferring usdt from bitget to Binance using the plasma chain, which only requires a fee of 0.001u.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma
The trading competition of $OWL is real, and there are only two days left until it ends. It's already close to 100,000 now, considering a wear of 0.02%, based on the current threshold, there is almost no profit left. In fact, the coins here are very squeezed, with at least 0.025% wear. I suggest that brothers don't get involved in this; it's a guaranteed loss. The three coins ending on the 5th are still okay, and the rewards are good. I recommend getting into these three.
Many people are still asking a question:
Why is Vanar so "quiet"?
There are no emotional pumps, no daily attempts to gain presence, and vanry's price has been moving sideways for a long time.
But if you really look at @vanar's technical route, you'll find that it deliberately avoids the hottest and most dangerous direction—one-time intelligence.
Most AI + Crypto projects nowadays are essentially solving the question of "being smart" rather than "lasting long".
Agents can write code, can arbitrage, can converse, but once the task is over, memory resets, and context disappears, starting over next time.
This is more like temporary workers paid daily, rather than a system capable of long-term asset management and accountability.
The path chosen by Vanar is not well-received by the market:
First, solve the underlying problem of "not resetting".
Persistent Memory, Intelligence Continuity, No Resets—
These terms may not sound sexy, but they point directly to a reality:
If AI is to participate in the real economy, it must possess continuity, a history, and verifiable past behavior.
Because of this, Vanar's pace seems very slow.
It is more like laying the foundation for future AI infrastructure rather than building a model home that can be sold today.
So I'm not surprised that vanry is not lively right now.
Infrastructure often seems redundant before it is needed;
But once it is needed, it is very difficult to replace.
When the market shifts from "Will AI be strong?" to "Can AI work long-term?",
Vanar's design, born for continuity, will truly come into focus.
Quiet does not mean there is no progress;
Slow variables often determine the long-term landscape.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Many people are still asking a question:
Why is Vanar so "quiet"?
There are no emotional pumps, no daily attempts to gain presence, and vanry's price has been moving sideways for a long time.
But if you really look at @vanar's technical route, you'll find that it deliberately avoids the hottest and most dangerous direction—one-time intelligence.
Most AI + Crypto projects nowadays are essentially solving the question of "being smart" rather than "lasting long".
Agents can write code, can arbitrage, can converse, but once the task is over, memory resets, and context disappears, starting over next time.
This is more like temporary workers paid daily, rather than a system capable of long-term asset management and accountability.
The path chosen by Vanar is not well-received by the market:
First, solve the underlying problem of "not resetting".
Persistent Memory, Intelligence Continuity, No Resets—
These terms may not sound sexy, but they point directly to a reality:
If AI is to participate in the real economy, it must possess continuity, a history, and verifiable past behavior.
Because of this, Vanar's pace seems very slow.
It is more like laying the foundation for future AI infrastructure rather than building a model home that can be sold today.
So I'm not surprised that vanry is not lively right now.
Infrastructure often seems redundant before it is needed;
But once it is needed, it is very difficult to replace.
When the market shifts from "Will AI be strong?" to "Can AI work long-term?",
Vanar's design, born for continuity, will truly come into focus.
Quiet does not mean there is no progress;
Slow variables often determine the long-term landscape.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
When Stablecoins Become Real 'Money': The Underlying Logic of Plasma Born for Settlement
Zama will open trading tomorrow night at eight o'clock. Brothers, should we just run directly?
In the world of cryptocurrencies, there is a fact that is being repeatedly verified yet has long been underestimated:
Stablecoins are already the most successful product in blockchain.
They are used for cross-border transfers, merchant settlements, capital hedging, on-chain transactions, and in some regions, they have already taken on the role of 'quasi-currency'. However, in strong contrast to this real usage is the lag of the underlying infrastructure—most blockchains are still not designed for the 'flow of money'.
In the world of cryptocurrencies, there is a fact that is being repeatedly verified yet has long been underestimated:
Stablecoins are already the most successful product in blockchain.
They are used for cross-border transfers, merchant settlements, capital hedging, on-chain transactions, and in some regions, they have already taken on the role of 'quasi-currency'. However, in strong contrast to this real usage is the lag of the underlying infrastructure—most blockchains are still not designed for the 'flow of money'.
Isn't this creator's task about the snapshot on the 29th? Why hasn't the reward been issued today? If we have to wait two weeks after the end to receive it, who knows where XPL will have dropped to, and the average of 200u will likely shrink to only around 100u. Can the officials issue the rewards more quickly?
If we shift our attention away from the 'narrative hype', Plasma becomes exceptionally clear.
It does not attempt to be a chain that does everything, but rather explicitly chooses a core issue that is the most realistic and easily overlooked: stablecoin settlement. Today, USDT and USDC are already being used as 'money', but the settlement experience on many chains is still at a level that crypto users can barely accept—slow, unpredictable, and with significant cost fluctuations. This is fatal for real payments.
The design logic of Plasma is very restrained: sub-second finality, gas-free stablecoin transfers, and resource scheduling tilted towards stablecoin scenarios. It does not pursue flashy features but places 'certainty' as the top priority. For merchants, institutions, and payment systems, certainty is more important than speed and more important than narrative.
More critically, it is security-oriented. Plasma chooses to anchor settlement security in a trust model at the Bitcoin level, essentially preparing for larger-scale capital flows in the future. It is not about telling a 'decentralization story', but rather ensuring the system remains stable after scaling up.
Therefore, XPL is more like a long-term participation in settlement infrastructure rather than speculation on short-term trends. As the scale of stablecoins continues to expand, and on-chain payments become the norm rather than an experiment, what truly matters is not who has the loudest voice, but who can sustainably support 'the flow of money'.
Plasma may not be bustling, but it stands on a position that is difficult to replace.
When the market starts to seriously discuss 'which chains are really handling actual funds', its value will become even clearer.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
If we shift our attention away from the 'narrative hype', Plasma becomes exceptionally clear.
It does not attempt to be a chain that does everything, but rather explicitly chooses a core issue that is the most realistic and easily overlooked: stablecoin settlement. Today, USDT and USDC are already being used as 'money', but the settlement experience on many chains is still at a level that crypto users can barely accept—slow, unpredictable, and with significant cost fluctuations. This is fatal for real payments.
The design logic of Plasma is very restrained: sub-second finality, gas-free stablecoin transfers, and resource scheduling tilted towards stablecoin scenarios. It does not pursue flashy features but places 'certainty' as the top priority. For merchants, institutions, and payment systems, certainty is more important than speed and more important than narrative.
More critically, it is security-oriented. Plasma chooses to anchor settlement security in a trust model at the Bitcoin level, essentially preparing for larger-scale capital flows in the future. It is not about telling a 'decentralization story', but rather ensuring the system remains stable after scaling up.
Therefore, XPL is more like a long-term participation in settlement infrastructure rather than speculation on short-term trends. As the scale of stablecoins continues to expand, and on-chain payments become the norm rather than an experiment, what truly matters is not who has the loudest voice, but who can sustainably support 'the flow of money'.
Plasma may not be bustling, but it stands on a position that is difficult to replace.
When the market starts to seriously discuss 'which chains are really handling actual funds', its value will become even clearer.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
When Blockchain No Longer Serves Narratives: The Long-Term Logic of Vanar and VANRY
If we extend the timeline, we will find an increasingly clear trend:
Blockchain is transforming from a 'storytelling tool' to 'infrastructure that is repeatedly used'.
In the early days of the crypto world, it was more like an experiment in technology and financial imagination. TPS, consensus mechanisms, and new models have emerged one after another, but there are actually not many systems that can operate long-term and continuously support user behavior. The issue is not that the technology is not new enough, but that the assumptions used have deviated — most chains still default to serving crypto users rather than the high-frequency demands of the real world.
Blockchain is transforming from a 'storytelling tool' to 'infrastructure that is repeatedly used'.
In the early days of the crypto world, it was more like an experiment in technology and financial imagination. TPS, consensus mechanisms, and new models have emerged one after another, but there are actually not many systems that can operate long-term and continuously support user behavior. The issue is not that the technology is not new enough, but that the assumptions used have deviated — most chains still default to serving crypto users rather than the high-frequency demands of the real world.
I really don’t know who came up with this ridiculous design of updating every two hours. I’m doing 16,000 daily and still can’t reach the threshold. I can’t even imagine how much more competitive it will get later. You all can compete; I’ll just go with the flow. After all, the reward is only around 30u. Good luck, competition kings.
Sometimes when I look back at Vanar, I find that it has been doing something that isn’t very market-friendly:
shifting the focus from “narrative” to “real usage”.
While many projects are still discussing future blueprints, Vanar has already positioned itself in high-frequency, continuously running scenarios like gaming, entertainment, branding, and AI. The Virtua metaverse and VGN gaming network are not one-off demos; they are products that truly require long-term stable support. Because these products are running, Vanar has no way back; it must be stable enough and predictable enough.
This is also why Vanar emphasizes AI-first. It’s not simply about integrating AI; it’s about assuming that in the future, a large number of actions will no longer be triggered by humans but completed automatically by systems and agents. In such a world, the chain must function like infrastructure, not just assembled functionality.
Under this logic, the significance of vanry becomes very clear. It is not meant to carry emotional fluctuations, but rather the value mapping generated through the repeated use and ongoing validation of the entire network. Its growth comes from the accumulation of real demand, not from some narrative climax.
Perhaps Vanar won’t be the loudest chain, but when the market starts looking for “what can really run long-term,” it will actually be seen more and more.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
Sometimes when I look back at Vanar, I find that it has been doing something that isn’t very market-friendly:
shifting the focus from “narrative” to “real usage”.
While many projects are still discussing future blueprints, Vanar has already positioned itself in high-frequency, continuously running scenarios like gaming, entertainment, branding, and AI. The Virtua metaverse and VGN gaming network are not one-off demos; they are products that truly require long-term stable support. Because these products are running, Vanar has no way back; it must be stable enough and predictable enough.
This is also why Vanar emphasizes AI-first. It’s not simply about integrating AI; it’s about assuming that in the future, a large number of actions will no longer be triggered by humans but completed automatically by systems and agents. In such a world, the chain must function like infrastructure, not just assembled functionality.
Under this logic, the significance of vanry becomes very clear. It is not meant to carry emotional fluctuations, but rather the value mapping generated through the repeated use and ongoing validation of the entire network. Its growth comes from the accumulation of real demand, not from some narrative climax.
Perhaps Vanar won’t be the loudest chain, but when the market starts looking for “what can really run long-term,” it will actually be seen more and more.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
When stablecoins begin to take on real settlement, why does Plasma choose the 'slow but accurate' approach?
Last night, the alpha surprisingly only dropped twice, requiring 230 points to claim. It seems the points have been restored, and it will take some time before we see high scores again. Sigh, when can we return to the great bull market of September last year?
If we take a step back from market trends and narratives, we will notice a fact that is happening but often overlooked:
Stablecoins are no longer just a 'medium of exchange' in the cryptocurrency system; they are increasingly taking on the role of real settlement tools in more and more real-world scenarios.
Cross-border transfers, on-chain clearing, merchant payments, and fund scheduling—these demands place very stringent requirements on blockchain technology. They do not need flashy features, nor do they care about ecological concepts; they only care about four words: fast, stable, and certain. Ironically, many public chain designs do not fit these needs.
If we take a step back from market trends and narratives, we will notice a fact that is happening but often overlooked:
Stablecoins are no longer just a 'medium of exchange' in the cryptocurrency system; they are increasingly taking on the role of real settlement tools in more and more real-world scenarios.
Cross-border transfers, on-chain clearing, merchant payments, and fund scheduling—these demands place very stringent requirements on blockchain technology. They do not need flashy features, nor do they care about ecological concepts; they only care about four words: fast, stable, and certain. Ironically, many public chain designs do not fit these needs.
I feel that the trading competition of owl is very competitive. Just a few days have passed, and thresholds have already appeared, and they are not low. This competition has few participants and low rewards. It is recommended not to deliberately compete in trading competitions; instead, aim for a daily trading volume of 64,000 alpha to see if you can make it to the end.
Looking at Plasma, the more I look, the more I feel it is taking an anti-consensus path.
While most chains are still competing on functionality and narrative, Plasma focuses on something fundamental yet easily overlooked: settlement. Stablecoins are already being used as money, but many chains' settlement experiences still remain at a level that "crypto players can tolerate." This is far from sufficient for real payments.
Plasma's design is very straightforward: sub-second finality, gas-free USDT transfers, and system resource scheduling that prioritizes stablecoins. It does not try to please all developers but clearly serves those scenarios that require certainty and high reliability in capital flows. This restraint is, in itself, a trade-off.
In terms of security, Plasma introduces the Bitcoin anchoring concept to maintain neutrality and trust even as scale increases. This is not for storytelling but to accommodate the future demands of larger scale stablecoin settlements.
The significance of $XPL lies not in short-term popularity but in the real demand for underlying settlement networks after the use scale of stablecoins continues to expand. Perhaps Plasma will not be the most popular project, but when "money really flows on the chain" becomes the norm, its value will be re-evaluated.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
Looking at Plasma, the more I look, the more I feel it is taking an anti-consensus path.
While most chains are still competing on functionality and narrative, Plasma focuses on something fundamental yet easily overlooked: settlement. Stablecoins are already being used as money, but many chains' settlement experiences still remain at a level that "crypto players can tolerate." This is far from sufficient for real payments.
Plasma's design is very straightforward: sub-second finality, gas-free USDT transfers, and system resource scheduling that prioritizes stablecoins. It does not try to please all developers but clearly serves those scenarios that require certainty and high reliability in capital flows. This restraint is, in itself, a trade-off.
In terms of security, Plasma introduces the Bitcoin anchoring concept to maintain neutrality and trust even as scale increases. This is not for storytelling but to accommodate the future demands of larger scale stablecoin settlements.
The significance of $XPL lies not in short-term popularity but in the real demand for underlying settlement networks after the use scale of stablecoins continues to expand. Perhaps Plasma will not be the most popular project, but when "money really flows on the chain" becomes the norm, its value will be re-evaluated.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
CZ held an AMA yesterday
Last night at midnight, cz held an AMA in the square, mainly responding to recent online slanders against Binance. It can be seen that the Binance team is very concerned about the interests of retail investors, specially holding an AMA to address these issues, hoping for Binance to get better and better
When the noise fades away, what Vanar actually wants to solve is a very 'honest' question
If you look at time from a longer perspective, you will find that Vanar has never been a project that relies on narrative to rush into the spotlight. It is more like being in a relatively quiet position, repeatedly contemplating the same question: when blockchain is really used for the long term, can the underlying support it?
When the noise fades away, what Vanar actually wants to solve is a very 'honest' question
If you look at time from a longer perspective, you will find that Vanar has never been a project that relies on narrative to rush into the spotlight. It is more like being in a relatively quiet position, repeatedly contemplating the same question: when blockchain is really used for the long term, can the underlying support it?
What happened with yesterday's trading competition? Why is the threshold so low? I overspent by more than 60,000, and now I've really become a clown. Can someone tell me why this time spending so little is enough to get in?
Many times, Vanar gives me the feeling of not being in a 'windfall' but rather quietly building a road that will eventually be needed.
When market sentiment is high, everyone cares about narratives, price increases, and rotations; but once it cools down, the real lingering question becomes very simple: Does this chain have anyone who will use it long-term?
Vanar has never placed its bets on speculators from the beginning, but rather on real scenarios like games, entertainment, brands, and AI systems that 'must continue to operate.'
The Virtua Metaverse and VGN gaming network are not meant for storytelling; they are creating real interactions every day. Because these products are already in operation, Vanar's underlying infrastructure must be stable, predictable, and scalable, rather than just performing well in testnets and PPTs. This infrastructure, pressured by real usage, is destined not to move quickly, but it often goes further.
This is also why Vanar emphasizes AI-first. Not because AI is trendy, but because many future behaviors will not be triggered by humans, but will be completed automatically by systems and agents. For this usage model, the chain is not a 'collection of functions' but must be as reliable as water and electricity.
When viewed in this framework, $VANRY appears more like the fuel for the long-term operation of the entire system, rather than an amplifier of emotions. Its value does not come from a single narrative climax, but from the process of the network being repeatedly used and continuously validated.
Perhaps Vanar will not be the loudest chain, but as the market starts to reassess 'what can really be utilized,' its presence will become increasingly clear.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
Many times, Vanar gives me the feeling of not being in a 'windfall' but rather quietly building a road that will eventually be needed.
When market sentiment is high, everyone cares about narratives, price increases, and rotations; but once it cools down, the real lingering question becomes very simple: Does this chain have anyone who will use it long-term?
Vanar has never placed its bets on speculators from the beginning, but rather on real scenarios like games, entertainment, brands, and AI systems that 'must continue to operate.'
The Virtua Metaverse and VGN gaming network are not meant for storytelling; they are creating real interactions every day. Because these products are already in operation, Vanar's underlying infrastructure must be stable, predictable, and scalable, rather than just performing well in testnets and PPTs. This infrastructure, pressured by real usage, is destined not to move quickly, but it often goes further.
This is also why Vanar emphasizes AI-first. Not because AI is trendy, but because many future behaviors will not be triggered by humans, but will be completed automatically by systems and agents. For this usage model, the chain is not a 'collection of functions' but must be as reliable as water and electricity.
When viewed in this framework, $VANRY appears more like the fuel for the long-term operation of the entire system, rather than an amplifier of emotions. Its value does not come from a single narrative climax, but from the process of the network being repeatedly used and continuously validated.
Perhaps Vanar will not be the loudest chain, but as the market starts to reassess 'what can really be utilized,' its presence will become increasingly clear.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
I am increasingly confused about why the trading volume for these two competitions is so high, yet the entry requirements are so low? Last time, the stable I brushed with a coefficient of 0.5 didn't even make it, this time I specifically brushed with a coefficient of 0.6, and the result exceeded by so much, wasting over 10 u.
Last time the trading competition was just over ten thousand short to get in, this time I've learned my lesson and brushed a bit more, surely I can get in this time?
The competition is about to end, those who haven't participated yet should hurry!
The two trading competitions will end at nine o'clock tonight, one for 10u and one for 30u. Not many people are participating, so it feels like there's an opportunity to sneak in. Good luck, brothers!
If you shift your focus away from the market trends and narratives, you'll notice a very real change is happening:
Stablecoins are no longer just tools in DeFi; they are being used as real circulating currency in an increasing number of scenarios.
Cross-border transfers, on-chain settlements, merchant payments, fund scheduling... these needs arise every day. But the problem is that most public chains are not designed for such 'high certainty settlements.' Gas fluctuations, congestion, confirmation delays, and failed rollbacks are experiences that are taken for granted in the crypto world, but are unacceptable in real payment scenarios.
If you shift your focus away from the market trends and narratives, you'll notice a very real change is happening:
Stablecoins are no longer just tools in DeFi; they are being used as real circulating currency in an increasing number of scenarios.
Cross-border transfers, on-chain settlements, merchant payments, fund scheduling... these needs arise every day. But the problem is that most public chains are not designed for such 'high certainty settlements.' Gas fluctuations, congestion, confirmation delays, and failed rollbacks are experiences that are taken for granted in the crypto world, but are unacceptable in real payment scenarios.
It seems that everyone has been scoring lately; the alpha at 7 PM actually requires 241 points, and the one at 3 AM hasn't been released yet, but it probably won't be too low. You guys should sleep early and not stay up late; let me handle it, hahaha.
The more I watch Plasma recently, the more I understand why it focuses on stablecoin settlement.
Many chains like to talk about "ecosystems," "narratives," and "imaginative spaces," but when it comes down to actual usage, stablecoins represent the most honest demand. Transfers need to be fast, stable, and cheap, and ideally, ordinary users shouldn't have to understand details like gas fees or failed retries on-chain. Plasma's direction is very straightforward: sub-second finality, gas-free USDT transfers, and stablecoin-prioritized system design; these are not for aesthetics, but for real usability.
More importantly, it doesn't try to please everyone. Plasma knows its positioning: to be a settlement layer, rather than an all-purpose public chain. As stablecoins begin to take on more real payment and cross-border settlement needs, this focus becomes an advantage.
$XPL corresponds not to short-term popularity but to the long-term demand for underlying settlement networks after the expansion of stablecoin scale. Perhaps it won't be the liveliest project, but at the moment when "money really flows on the chain," Plasma's presence may be stronger than expected.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
The more I watch Plasma recently, the more I understand why it focuses on stablecoin settlement.
Many chains like to talk about "ecosystems," "narratives," and "imaginative spaces," but when it comes down to actual usage, stablecoins represent the most honest demand. Transfers need to be fast, stable, and cheap, and ideally, ordinary users shouldn't have to understand details like gas fees or failed retries on-chain. Plasma's direction is very straightforward: sub-second finality, gas-free USDT transfers, and stablecoin-prioritized system design; these are not for aesthetics, but for real usability.
More importantly, it doesn't try to please everyone. Plasma knows its positioning: to be a settlement layer, rather than an all-purpose public chain. As stablecoins begin to take on more real payment and cross-border settlement needs, this focus becomes an advantage.
$XPL corresponds not to short-term popularity but to the long-term demand for underlying settlement networks after the expansion of stablecoin scale. Perhaps it won't be the liveliest project, but at the moment when "money really flows on the chain," Plasma's presence may be stronger than expected.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
Login to explore more contents