Htp96
Verified Creator
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.6 Years
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
86 Following
22.8K+ Followers
10.5K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
See original
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
See original
If DeFi stays flat for many years, how does Lorenzo survive?
If DeFi stays flat for many years, how does Lorenzo survive?” hits exactly the point that many DeFi projects avoid.
Because most are designed with an underlying assumption: sooner or later there will be a bull run to save the model. Lorenzo is different. If you look closely, they seem to assume the opposite from the very beginning: the market can stay flat for a long time, and the system must be able to sustain itself.
My first observation is: Lorenzo does not rely on price cycles to survive, but on becoming a part of the operational costs of the ecosystem.
Because most are designed with an underlying assumption: sooner or later there will be a bull run to save the model. Lorenzo is different. If you look closely, they seem to assume the opposite from the very beginning: the market can stay flat for a long time, and the system must be able to sustain itself.
My first observation is: Lorenzo does not rely on price cycles to survive, but on becoming a part of the operational costs of the ecosystem.
See original
Where does Falcon Finance stand between users, liquidity, and other protocols?
To answer the question of where Falcon Finance stands between users, liquidity, and other protocols, I believe we cannot see Falcon as a 'destination' in DeFi.
If we try to place them in that role, we will almost certainly misunderstand. Falcon does not stand at the top of the value chain like an app, nor at the end like pure technical infrastructure.
They stand in the middle, but it's a kind of 'in the middle' very different from what DeFi is used to.
See original
How will APRO develop if the market is sideways for 2–3 years?
In my opinion, the question "How will APRO develop if the market is sideways for 2–3 years" is not a pessimistic assumption, but the most reasonable scenario when viewing Web3 through the eyes of someone who has experienced several cycles.
Most sustainable value systems in crypto are not formed during a bull run, but in prolonged sideways market phases, when the hype fades away and only real decisions remain.
See original
Should Lorenzo's Token be Completely Separated from the Adoption Story?
In crypto, especially in DeFi and Web3, there is a fairly common mindset: tokens must be closely linked to adoption to have value.
The faster the adoption, the bigger the story, and the easier it is to value the token highly. But as the market goes through enough cycles, this assumption begins to be questioned.
With Lorenzo, the question "should the token be completely separated from the adoption story?" is not just a matter of communication, but also a matter of long-term value design.
The faster the adoption, the bigger the story, and the easier it is to value the token highly. But as the market goes through enough cycles, this assumption begins to be questioned.
With Lorenzo, the question "should the token be completely separated from the adoption story?" is not just a matter of communication, but also a matter of long-term value design.
See original
How is Falcon Finance more suitable for practical DeFi than speculative DeFi?
In the development journey of DeFi, two parallel trends are clearly visible: speculative DeFi and practical DeFi.
Speculative DeFi focuses on narrative, high yields, rapid growth, and short-term cash flows. Practical DeFi, on the other hand, prioritizes capital efficiency, risk management, and sustainability across multiple cycles.
Falcon Finance clearly belongs to the second trend, and this is what makes the platform more suitable for a maturing DeFi, rather than a DeFi reliant on speculation.
See original
Bitcoin enters a decisive phase as on-chain profit signals weaken
Bitcoin $BTC is approaching a decisive volatility phase as on-chain profit indicators continue to weaken.
From my perspective, the current on-chain data clearly reflects that transactions are no longer generating the typical profits of a strong bullish trend, indicating that cautious sentiment is gradually prevailing among short and medium-term holders.
From my perspective, the current on-chain data clearly reflects that transactions are no longer generating the typical profits of a strong bullish trend, indicating that cautious sentiment is gradually prevailing among short and medium-term holders.
See original
Is APRO addressing issues for active or passive users?
When asking whether APRO is addressing the issues for active or passive users, I think the interesting answer lies in the fact that APRO does not choose one over the other, but rather chooses to resolve the conflict between these two groups.
And that's why, if you look at APRO through the lens of 'who is served more', it's easy to miss the core point in their design.
In Web3 and DeFi, active users and passive users have almost opposing needs.
See original
Bitcoin Enters A New Cycle As The Number Of Active Addresses Sharply Decreases Despite Price Increase
The number of active Bitcoin addresses has continuously declined since April 2021, contrary to the pattern usually seen in previous market cycles.
Typically, when entering a bullish phase, the number of active addresses will increase due to cash flow and new investors joining, then sharply decrease when the market shifts to a bearish trend. However, the current cycle shows a completely different structure.
Typically, when entering a bullish phase, the number of active addresses will increase due to cash flow and new investors joining, then sharply decrease when the market shifts to a bearish trend. However, the current cycle shows a completely different structure.
See original
Is Lorenzo solving the builder's problem instead of the user?
When asking the question @Lorenzo Protocol is Lorenzo solving the builder's problem instead of the user's, I think this is a very sharp perspective, as it touches directly on the essence of Lorenzo and also touches on an important transitional phase of Web3.
The short answer is: yes, Lorenzo is prioritizing solving the builder's problem more than the end user, but this is not avoiding the user; rather, it is a strategic choice about the order of construction.
The short answer is: yes, Lorenzo is prioritizing solving the builder's problem more than the end user, but this is not avoiding the user; rather, it is a strategic choice about the order of construction.
See original
Is Falcon Finance ahead of the actual needs of the market?
When asking whether Falcon Finance is ahead of the actual needs of the market, I think this is a very natural form of doubt, especially in the context where DeFi is still heavily influenced by short-term sentiment.
Any project that does not closely follow the current hype, does not optimize for surface growth, is easily perceived as being 'too far ahead' or 'building something that no one needs'. But if we look more closely at how Falcon Finance is designed and the direction that DeFi is being forced to take, I believe Falcon is not ahead of the actual needs, but ahead of the moment the market is ready to acknowledge that need.
See original
UPDATE MARKET FOR YOU
Blackrock continues to deposit BTC and $ETH before this round, more than the previous one, my friends.
In total, there have been 2,256.53 $BTC ($197.63M) and 74,973 $ETH ($220M) that continue to be deposited on the exchange. After a week of silence, Blackrock has transferred again.
In previous instances, after Blackrock deposited on the exchange, the market adjusted, but it is unclear how it will be this time??
THIS IS A PERSONAL OPINION DYOR PLEASE
#BTC
Blackrock continues to deposit BTC and $ETH before this round, more than the previous one, my friends.
In total, there have been 2,256.53 $BTC ($197.63M) and 74,973 $ETH ($220M) that continue to be deposited on the exchange. After a week of silence, Blackrock has transferred again.
In previous instances, after Blackrock deposited on the exchange, the market adjusted, but it is unclear how it will be this time??
THIS IS A PERSONAL OPINION DYOR PLEASE
#BTC
See original
Why shouldn't we evaluate APRO based on short-term TVL?
Today I scrolled through square and saw many people evaluating APRO based on short-term TVL. In my opinion, we need to start with a straightforward observation: TVL is a good measure for protocols that require capital lock-up, but it is a very poor measure for protocols designed to operate systems.
APRO belongs to the second group.
If we use short-term TVL to evaluate them, we will almost certainly misinterpret the role and true value of the project.
See original
NEW TIN 🟠 for you guys here, more than 60% of the total Bitcoin supply has not moved in over 1 year.
According to River, there are currently about 12,1 million $BTC held for at least 1 year, of which 6 million BTC have not been traded for more than 5 years.
In my observation, long-term holdings decreased slightly in 2025 as some long-term coins began to move when Bitcoin established a new all-time high (ATH), reflecting a more selective profit-taking behavior rather than a long-term trend change.
The number of bitcoins mined is becoming less and less, and the supply is increasingly scarce. Do you think $BTC will reach ATH by the end of this year?
#BTC
According to River, there are currently about 12,1 million $BTC held for at least 1 year, of which 6 million BTC have not been traded for more than 5 years.
In my observation, long-term holdings decreased slightly in 2025 as some long-term coins began to move when Bitcoin established a new all-time high (ATH), reflecting a more selective profit-taking behavior rather than a long-term trend change.
The number of bitcoins mined is becoming less and less, and the supply is increasingly scarce. Do you think $BTC will reach ATH by the end of this year?
#BTC
See original
$BTC rarely trades below one standard deviation from the target average MVRV value of short-term holders.
In my opinion, when this happens, the market reflects a relatively low valuation state, indicating that most short-term investors are experiencing unrealized losses.
Historically, such periods do not occur frequently and are often accompanied by pessimistic sentiment or dwindling selling pressure.
The MVRV index is an important tool for assessing the relationship between market price and the average cost price of investors. I believe that Bitcoin $BTC trading below the one standard deviation range indicates that the risk of a deep decline has somewhat been reflected in the price.
This is not a definitive signal for an immediate reversal, but it is a zone where the probability of long-term profits becomes more attractive compared to the risks.
In my personal view, this is the right environment for a daily DCA strategy with Bitcoin. Regular capital allocation helps me reduce the impact of short-term volatility, optimize the average cost, and maintain investment discipline.
In many previous cycles, low valuation regions according to MVRV often open up good accumulation opportunities for the next growth phase.
#BTC
In my opinion, when this happens, the market reflects a relatively low valuation state, indicating that most short-term investors are experiencing unrealized losses.
Historically, such periods do not occur frequently and are often accompanied by pessimistic sentiment or dwindling selling pressure.
The MVRV index is an important tool for assessing the relationship between market price and the average cost price of investors. I believe that Bitcoin $BTC trading below the one standard deviation range indicates that the risk of a deep decline has somewhat been reflected in the price.
This is not a definitive signal for an immediate reversal, but it is a zone where the probability of long-term profits becomes more attractive compared to the risks.
In my personal view, this is the right environment for a daily DCA strategy with Bitcoin. Regular capital allocation helps me reduce the impact of short-term volatility, optimize the average cost, and maintain investment discipline.
In many previous cycles, low valuation regions according to MVRV often open up good accumulation opportunities for the next growth phase.
#BTC
See original
Is Lorenzo increasing the complexity of DeFi?
In my opinion, the question "Is Lorenzo increasing the complexity of DeFi?" is a valid question, but stopping there is not enough.
The more important question is: Is Lorenzo creating new complexity, or are they consolidating and managing the complexity that already exists? These two things are very different, and misunderstanding this point can easily lead to an incorrect assessment of Lorenzo's role in the ecosystem.
My first observation is quite clear: Lorenzo does not make DeFi more complex in essence; they make the complexity more structured.
See original
Which phase of the DeFi cycle is Falcon Finance building for?
In my opinion, to answer the question @Falcon Finance which phase of the DeFi cycle it builds for, it needs to be placed in the full picture of the cycle, instead of viewing it through the lens of 'bull or bear'.
Falcon Finance is not designed for the early cycle boom phase, nor to save the market at the bottom. They are building for the post-hype DeFi phase, which has not yet become a mature financial infrastructure — a phase where most projects often face the greatest difficulties.
Falcon Finance is not designed for the early cycle boom phase, nor to save the market at the bottom. They are building for the post-hype DeFi phase, which has not yet become a mature financial infrastructure — a phase where most projects often face the greatest difficulties.
See original
What makes APRO different from most other Web3 projects?
Have you ever wondered what makes APRO different from most other Web3 projects? In my opinion, we shouldn't start with the product or token, but rather with how APRO defines its role in the ecosystem.
The difference of APRO does not lie in a specific feature, but in the set of choices that most Web3 projects do not choose, especially in the context of a market that rewards hype, speed, and easily told stories.
See original
Who is the Lorenzo token suitable for in the current market?
In the current market, when crypto is no longer in a state of extreme excitement but has not completely fallen into gloom, the important question for any token is no longer 'is there a pump', but rather who is this token suitable for.
Lorenzo is also not outside that rule.
Instead of targeting the majority looking for quick profits, the Lorenzo token is clearly positioned for a specific group of users and investors — those who think differently from the previous bull run stage.
See original
Lorenzo Protocol and the neutral role in the restaking ecosystem
To answer the question of whether Lorenzo is more suitable for DeFi retail or institutional DeFi, I believe we need to start with a not-so-'pleasant' observation: Lorenzo was not built to optimize for the experience of DeFi retail, but it is also not a product solely for institutions.
They are building for a layer in between – where technical decisions and systemic risks are more important than the feeling of being 'user-friendly' or 'immediate high returns'.
Login to explore more contents