林三哥

Bored, I went to claim an airdrop. This airdrop is not bad today; I can have a late-night snack, sold for over 60 U.
Sending some red envelopes 🧧 to you all, the red envelope password: RAVE

Binance Alpha is the first platform to launch RaveDAO (RAVE). Alpha trading will start on December 12, 2025, at 20:00 (UTC+8).
🌟 After trading starts, users holding at least 230 Binance Alpha points can claim 400 RAVE token airdrop. First come, first served. If the event is not over, the score threshold will automatically decrease by 5 points every five minutes.

【Breaking News】Suspected hacker controls He Yi's WeChat account, Mubarakah is driven by "call order style"
🧧 Red envelope password: Bull returns
The market experienced sudden abnormal fluctuations today.
A suspected hacker intruded into the WeChat account of Binance executive He Yi and used that account to publish content related to Mubarakah, leading to misjudgment in the market, causing the relevant tokens to surge significantly in a short time.

Due to the highly sensitive identity of He Yi, this information quickly spread within the community, interpreted by some investors as an "official signal," directly igniting liquidity.

⸻

【On-chain Tracking】Hacker lays out plans in advance, precisely harvesting

On-chain monitoring data shows:
• The hacker created 2 new wallets about 7 hours ago
• Used a total of $19,479 USDT
• Purchased about 21.16 million Mubarakah

After the news fermented and the price of coins surged rapidly:
• Sold 11.95 million Mubarakah
• Cash out about $43,520 USDT
• Currently still holding about 9.21 million, with a market value of about $31,000

⸻

【Profit Estimation】A standard information manipulation arbitrage

Comprehensive calculation:
• Initial cost: ≈ $19,500
• Realized gains + unrealized floating profits combined
• Total profit of about $55,000

This is a very typical fast in-and-out attack of
"account hijacking + identity endorsement + low market cap token pump."

⸻

【Market Warning】Identity equals liquidity, social accounts become new attack vectors

This incident once again exposes a cruel reality:
• In the crypto space, the identity of executives is itself a "market-making tool"
• A piece of unverified information
• Is enough to pry open the short-term price structure of low liquidity tokens

Such attacks do not rely on contract vulnerabilities or exchange systems,
just need —
A compromised social account + a pre-positioned wallet.

⸻

【Risk Reminder】
• WeChat, X, Telegram and other social accounts do not equal official decisions
• All "sudden positive news" and "executive hints" must be verified twice
• Emotional trading ≠ value support, chasing high often provides an exit for hackers.

UXLINK released a complete security review report on the 9·22 asset theft incident

UXLINK CEO Rolland Saf recently published a security incident review report, systematically explaining the asset theft that occurred on September 22, and emphasizing that the incident was neither an internal malicious act by the project team nor a case of 'running away'.

Event Review

The report disclosed that the attack did not stem from vulnerabilities in the contract itself, but was a long-term, organized social engineering attack. The attacker gradually breached the personal devices of several SAFE authorized key holders over several months by disguising as business partners and using **deepfake video conferencing** techniques, stealing sensitive information such as passwords and private keys.

After gaining the relevant permissions, the hackers took control of the old arb-UXLINK smart contract, subsequently illegally issued tokens, and transferred and sold assets, resulting in total losses exceeding 11 million dollars.

Emergency Response and Handling

The incident occurred during the Korea Blockchain Week, with many core members present on-site.
The team acted quickly:
• Coordinated with multiple exchanges
• Notified cooperating security agencies
• Reported to law enforcement agencies in multiple countries

And quickly confirmed:
👉 The attack came from an external hacker organization and not from internal personnel.

Rolland Saf stated that the stolen assets mainly included mainstream assets such as USDT, ETH, and BTC, some of which have been recovered with the help of exchanges and are intended for future repurchase and follow-up processing.

I f*** your ancestors' boards, the transactions are cluttered, the last round is empty... I blew up my $TRADOOR

Latest news: a certain institution announced that it will launch Rayls (RLS). If liquidity conditions are met and trading is supported, the RLS-USD trading pair will open later today. Don't believe it? Check the official Twitter. Red envelope code🧧: RLS

The bull market is coming soon, make some money and send out some red envelopes 🧧, wishing you good fortune and prosperity, December 1st is also coming soon $GIGGLE is about to be destroyed... prices are about to rise, the total amount is just one million, why haven't you bought in yet?
Red envelope answer: $GIGGLE good fortune and prosperity

Just when everyone thought the matter had come to a conclusion, the Upbit hacking incident suddenly took a significant turn.
🧧 Red envelope password: Binance
The leaked amount was officially 'revised down', the frozen asset scale was 'cut in half', and South Korea's top financial regulatory authority directly arrived at the scene.

Why has this attack, originally regarded as a 'routine security incident', become increasingly bizarre?
Why did Upbit's data need to be corrected?
Why did the South Korean regulatory agency have to intervene directly and conduct continuous inspections for eight days?

All of this is far more complex than it appears.

In the afternoon, Upbit released the latest supplementary announcement.
The originally announced scale of leaked assets related to the Solana network was 54 billion won, but now the official suddenly revised this number to 44.5 billion won—
a decrease of 9.5 billion won, approximately 6.6 million dollars.

On the other hand, the Solana-related assets frozen by Upbit
were also revised down from 12 billion won to 2.3 billion won,
leaving only 1.57 million dollars.

Why was the amount adjusted?
Was the initial count too hasty?
Or is the scale of the incident actually more complex than imagined, with related assets still fluctuating in real-time?
Or perhaps—Upbit is afraid to disclose the true figure?

No one can provide an answer, but what is certain is:
It is not common for officials to proactively revise down amounts in security incidents at large exchanges.

Speeding Bottom Fishing $IRYS Immediately go to another big exchange abroad, the price is low enough, I have bottomed out anyway
Red Packet 🧧 Password: Speeding Bottom Fishing $IRYS

Asset management firm VanEck submitted the latest version of the S-1 filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 21. The document clearly states that the BNB ETF will eliminate the staking feature, meaning that the product will not participate in any form of BNB staking after listing, and therefore will not naturally earn any related staking rewards.

VanEck also stated that the suspension of staking may cause the overall performance of the ETF to be slightly inferior compared to directly holding and participating in staking of BNB.

Pump member Sapijiju clarified on platform X that,
🧧 the answer to the red envelope is one of the 26 letters
The information provided by Lookonchain is "completely inaccurate." He stated that the PUMP team does not engage in cash-out behavior, and the current fund movements on the chain are part of the project's daily fund management process.
He explained that the USDC raised by PUMP in the ICO has been gradually transferred to different wallets for subsequent project expansion and business investments; the team has never directly collaborated with Circle.

Previously, data indicated that the pump.fun project's address transferred approximately 405 million USDC to Kraken in the past week, while Kraken also transferred about 466 million USDC to the Circle address, sparking speculation in the community.

The overall momentum of this rebound in Bitcoin is relatively weak, and the risk of the market continuing to refresh its lows has actually increased.
However, it should be emphasized that $85,000 remains a highly attractive long-term allocation range.

In the next three to four months, the market is likely to move in a rather tangled and repetitive manner.
During this stage, only holding spot can maximize the avoidance of anxiety from missing out and unnecessary losses caused by frequent operations.

The truly suitable time for aggressive buying, leveraging, and grasping trends is after this round of bear market completely ends.
Before that, holding onto spot and patiently waiting is the better strategy.
Red envelope 🧧 password: immediate rebound

Suspected start of 'debt collection'? The Alpha airdrop arbitrage incident escalates, and multiple user accounts are temporarily frozen.

🧧 Red envelope benefits, answer: Support censorship.

Recently, many users reported that the platform has activated a tracing mechanism for abnormal arbitrage activities that occurred during the Alpha airdrop, and some account assets have been forcibly frozen.
Screenshots show that one user's account was frozen with 14,457 USDT, and the system page even displayed a prompt stating 'Amount payable 10,525.77 USDT', with the reason being:

'Engaged in violations on the Alpha platform and obtained airdrop qualifications that should not be enjoyed.'

This situation quickly sparked discussions in the community.

Subsequently, Binance co-founder He Yi responded, stating:
'Ordinary participants will not be affected.'
She emphasized that the targets of this action are mainly accounts that exploit loopholes for abnormal arbitrage, and normal users participating in the airdrop need not worry.

Currently, this incident is still ongoing, and whether it will expand in scope or whether the freeze will be lifted needs further observation.

How should the currency standard reconcile? Grandma is fine, it's only 5 times,