脱壳的鲶鱼

$USDC Only USDC's collapse gives hope for the cryptocurrency market to rise. It has drained all the USDT.

$PIPPIN This rise is somewhat like CORE. Binance hasn't listed it, and it's like this on OKEx. Then after rising like this, it started to fall all the way.

$XRP $So you all found out that without USDT pulling the price, it can't be raised. The price raised by continuous manipulation can't be sustained. Initially, before the Ripple coin was raised, a large amount of USDT was used for buying on the exchange, which lasted for several weeks. So where has the USDT gone now? The market has seen so many various stablecoins trading with USDT. The stablecoin market pricing has absorbed all the USDT.

$OM don't be afraid, the project has hundreds of bitcoins supporting it. Just copy it directly.

$OM get in, go all in, and start running

$OM 诱多, 2.30 started to crash again. The short position is losing 5 million US dollars.

$OM Are these coins being manipulated by the trading platform? They have plenty of funds and plenty of coins.

$OM is not played like this, right?

$OM This coin is 1 to 4. The current price has multiplied several times, and I've made a fortune!

$OM What operation is this? Is there no one selling spot to brush the data?

$OM Just fall if you have to. It would be great if it falls to a point where everyone can buy the dip.

$BNB Why has the traditional 'high pull and sell' strategy become less appealing?

The traditional 'high pull - sharp drop' model has several fatal weaknesses:

1. High cost: It requires a significant amount of real money to be continuously invested to create a strong upward trend.
2. High uncertainty: During the high pull process, it may attract other savvy large funds to 'hitch a ride', becoming competitors for selling, and may even lead to a backlash.
3. Obvious targets: Severe price fluctuations easily attract regulatory attention and strong community backlash.

Why has 'grinding stop-loss' become a better strategy?

Today's traders are essentially engaged in a 'liquidity hunt'. Their target is not the entire capital of retail investors, but rather to precisely strike at the most vulnerable and predictable part of the market - the stop-loss orders of leveraged long positions and the liquidation lines of pledged loans.

The underlying market structure changes are:

· Widespread high leverage environment: Futures trading has become mainstream, with a large number of retail investors entering the market with 10x, 20x, or even higher leverage. Their stop-loss points are like bright lights in the dark, clearly marked on the order book.
· Prevalence of automated trading: Programmatic trading and stop-loss orders make market behavior predictable. Traders know that as long as the price touches a key point, a series of automatic sell orders will be triggered, creating a 'liquidity pit'.

The brilliance of the 'grinding stop-loss' strategy lies in:

1. Extremely low cost: There is no need to significantly raise prices; just a relatively small amount of funds can repeatedly cause minor fluctuations and false breaks below key resistance levels, continuously triggering high leverage long stop-losses.
2. Controllable risks: Prices fluctuate within a range, and the trader's own position risk is minimal, making it less likely to trigger systemic collapse or intense scrutiny.
3. Sustainable harvesting: As long as there are leveraged players in the market, this strategy can be executed periodically and repetitively, like collecting rent. Each small drop ('smashing a bearish candle') can capture a batch of concentrated stop-loss orders, making it highly efficient.

$GIGGLE Why has the traditional 'pump and dump' become less appealing?

The traditional 'pump and dump' model has several fatal weaknesses:

1. High cost: It requires a substantial investment of real money to continuously buy in order to create a strong upward trend.
2. High uncertainty: During the pumping process, it may attract other savvy large funds to 'ride along', becoming their selling opponents, and may even face a counterattack.
3. Obvious targets: Dramatic price fluctuations easily attract regulatory attention and strong community backlash.

Why has 'grinding stop loss' become a better strategy?

Today's traders are essentially engaged in a 'liquidity hunting' game. Their target is not the entire capital of retail investors, but rather to precisely strike at the most vulnerable and predictable portion of the market — the stop-loss orders of leveraged long positions and the liquidation lines of collateralized loans.

The market structure change behind this is:

· Widespread high leverage environment: Contract trading (futures) has become mainstream, with a large number of retail investors entering the market with 10x, 20x, or even higher leverage. Their stop-loss points are like beacons in the dark, clearly marked on the market.
· Prevalence of automated trading: Programmatic trading and stop-loss orders make market behavior predictable. Traders know that as soon as the price touches a certain key point, it will trigger a series of automatic sell orders, forming a 'liquidity pit'.

The brilliance of the 'grinding stop loss' strategy lies in:

1. Extremely low cost: There is no need to significantly raise prices; it only requires a relatively small amount of capital to create repeated small fluctuations and false breakouts below key resistance levels, continuously triggering the stop losses of high-leverage longs.
2. Controllable risk: Price fluctuations within a range mean that the trader's own position risk is very low, making it unlikely to trigger a systemic collapse or strong attention.
3. Sustainable harvesting: As long as there are leveraged players in the market, this strategy can be executed periodically and repetitively, like collecting rent. Every small decline ('smashing a bearish line') can capture a batch of concentrated stop-loss orders, making it highly efficient.

$BTC Why has the traditional "pump and dump" strategy lost its appeal?

The traditional "pump and dump" model has several fatal weaknesses:

1. High costs: It requires a substantial amount of real money to be continuously invested to create a strong upward trend.
2. High uncertainty: During the pumping process, it may attract other savvy large funds to "ride the wave," becoming their selling opponents, and might even lead to a counterattack.
3. Obvious targets: Severe price fluctuations can easily attract regulatory attention and provoke strong backlash from the community.

Why has "grinding stop-loss" become a superior strategy?

Today's traders are essentially engaged in a "liquidity hunt." Their target is not the total principal of retail investors but rather to precisely strike at the most vulnerable and predictable portion of funds in the market—stop-loss orders of leveraged long positions and liquidation lines of pledged loans.

The market structure changes behind this are:

· Widespread high-leverage environment: Contract trading (futures) has become mainstream, with a large number of retail investors entering the market with 10x, 20x, or even higher leverage. Their stop-loss points are like beacons in the dark, clearly marked on the chart.
· Prevalence of automated trading: Programmatic trading and stop-loss orders make market behavior predictable. Traders know that as soon as the price touches a certain key point, a series of automatic sell orders will be triggered, forming a "liquidity pit."

The brilliance of the "grinding stop-loss" strategy lies in:

1. Extremely low cost: There is no need to significantly raise prices; only a relatively small amount of funds is needed to create repeated small fluctuations and false breakouts below key resistance levels, continuously triggering stop-loss orders of high-leverage long positions.
2. Controllable risks: Prices fluctuate within a range, and the trader’s own position risk is minimal, making it less likely to trigger systemic collapse or strong attention.
3. Sustainable harvesting: As long as there are leveraged players in the market, this strategy can be executed cyclically and repeatedly, like collecting rent. Each small decline ("smashing a bearish candle") can capture a batch of concentrated stop-loss orders, achieving high efficiency.

$OM Why has the traditional "pump and dump" strategy lost its appeal?

The traditional "pump and dump" model has several fatal weaknesses:

1. High costs: It requires a significant amount of real money to continuously buy in order to create a strong upward trend.
2. High uncertainty: During the pumping process, it may attract other savvy large funds to "ride along," becoming competitors in selling, and may even lead to a counterattack.
3. Clear targets: Dramatic price fluctuations easily attract regulatory attention and strong community backlash.

Why has "grinding stop-loss" become a better strategy?

Today's traders are essentially engaged in a "liquidity hunt." Their goal is not the total capital of retail investors, but to precisely target the most vulnerable and predictable segments of the market—stop-loss orders from leveraged long positions and liquidation lines from collateralized loans.

The changes in market structure behind this are:

· Widespread high leverage environment: Contract trading (futures) has become mainstream, with many retail investors entering with 10x, 20x, or even higher leverage. Their stop-loss points are like beacons in the dark, clearly marked on the charts.
· Prevalence of automated trading: Programmatic trading and stop-loss orders make market behavior predictable. Traders know that as soon as prices hit a certain key point, a series of automatic sell orders will be triggered, forming a "liquidity pit."

The brilliance of the "grinding stop-loss" strategy lies in:

1. Extremely low cost: There is no need to significantly raise prices; just a relatively small amount of capital is needed to create repeated minor fluctuations and false breakouts below key resistance levels, continuously triggering stop-loss orders from high-leverage longs.
2. Controllable risk: Prices fluctuate within a range, and the trader's own position risk is minimal, making it less likely to trigger a systemic collapse or attract intense scrutiny.
3. Sustainable harvesting: As long as there are leveraged players in the market, this strategy can be executed cyclically and repetitively, like collecting rent. Each minor drop ("smashing a bearish candle") can capture a batch of concentrated stop-loss orders, making it highly efficient.$BTC

$OM It's already 2025, and the cryptocurrency world hasn't changed; it's still the old tricks. New coins have 5 billion pieces, the price is so low, and large funds manipulate it, pulling it up to sell off in a few months. You can play for a lifetime.

$OM Don't chase too much, the project party doesn't need to push the price at all, they just need to place long stop-loss orders, and after grinding to stop-loss funds of several million dollars at one position, they will dump the price and harvest.

Why did these altcoins on Binance have a frenzy of sell orders appearing in advance before Bitcoin's crash, while the price didn’t drop? Once Bitcoin crashed, they fell together $BTC

This month, $BCH will definitely plummet by 90%.

Why does the crypto world start blaming various policies after offloading? The crypto world is now filled with some old veterans who are even older than seasoned pros. Does publishing such articles make one seem a bit smarter than other old veterans? $BTC