The market has nothing new except that I expect next week to be green, and God knows. You have near and sol and s Good opportunities to take deals at around 10%, God willing.
Therefore, once the money enters and exits the protocol, it becomes purely a matter of patience between the criminal and the protocol auditors.
In the year 2022, the developers of this protocol were arrested, and the platform was banned in the USA because it is considered a real haven for criminals (those who have been in this market for a while have surely heard of the case at that time). However, this year 2025, they were released on the grounds that sanctions should be against individuals, not against software.
Here ends the simple research on the Tornado protocol, which is considered a means of money laundering. Thank you for your attentive listening and following. We meet again in another research and new information 😘
Okay, here comes the one who stole an amount of 50 million dollars for the protocol and does not want to deposit the entire amount at once because there are not many people who have such amounts. It means that if he deposits it all at once and withdraws it all at once, he will be immediately known, even if he changes all the information.
Therefore, he deposits the amount in installments, as the Tornado protocol provides internal boxes in installments, for example, owners of 10 Ethereum separately and 100 separately, and so on. In the case of this criminal, he is depositing 50 million dollars as an example into 100 wallets, with each wallet containing, let's say, 20 pieces of Ethereum, so his money mixes here with the money of others. Here comes another point: if the criminal withdraws the money at certain times heavily, he will be exposed as well. There is also another vulnerability that can expose him, which is the accumulation of money in one wallet. Even if he withdrew his money and waited, withdrawing 100 pieces of Ethereum every day to a new wallet, everything would be fine. When he accumulates the money in one wallet, wallet trackers can expose and identify him through time auditing and so on.
Okay, here comes the one who stole an amount of 50 million dollars for the protocol and does not want to deposit the entire amount at once because there are not many people who have such amounts. It means that if he deposits it all at once and withdraws it all at once, he will be immediately known, even if he changes all the information.
Therefore, he deposits the amount in installments, as the Tornado protocol provides internal boxes in installments, for example, owners of 10 Ethereum separately and 100 separately, and so on. In the case of this criminal, he is depositing 50 million dollars as an example into 100 wallets, with each wallet containing, let's say, 20 pieces of Ethereum, so his money mixes here with the money of others. Here comes another point: if the criminal withdraws the money at certain times heavily, he will be exposed as well. There is also another vulnerability that can expose him, which is the accumulation of money in one wallet. Even if he withdrew his money and waited, withdrawing 100 pieces of Ethereum every day to a new wallet, everything would be fine. When he accumulates the money in one wallet, wallet trackers can expose and identify him through time auditing and so on.
Everyone has heard about the recent theft of 50 million dollars where the owner of the funds made a mistake in the wallet address. Let's delve a little into the aspect of the criminal transferring the money from one address to another and how he ended up fleeing through the Tornado protocol.
The blockchain, my dear, can be described as an open ledger where everyone can know who sent to whom and when. The thief created a wallet address similar to that of the victim, both at the beginning and the end, and the theft was successful. Here, he started transferring the money from wallet to wallet, and everyone knew where the money was moving with a simple tracking until it reached Tornado, where the tracking ended.
The Tornado protocol is a protocol that breaks the link between the sender and the receiver, making it extremely difficult to trace the money mathematically.
A very simple explanation of how the protocol works: Imagine it as a box where people come to deposit money, and the box gives each person a secret number but mixes the funds, so all the money gathers in that box. Later, you come with the secret number to a new wallet, the box verifies the secret number, finds it correct, and extracts the amount deposited associated with that secret number (this is the simplest explanation you might find about the Tornado protocol).
Everyone has heard about the recent theft of 50 million dollars where the owner of the funds made a mistake in the wallet address. Let's delve a little into the aspect of the criminal transferring the money from one address to another and how he ended up fleeing through the Tornado protocol.
The blockchain, my dear, can be described as an open ledger where everyone can know who sent to whom and when. The thief created a wallet address similar to that of the victim, both at the beginning and the end, and the theft was successful. Here, he started transferring the money from wallet to wallet, and everyone knew where the money was moving with a simple tracking until it reached Tornado, where the tracking ended.
The Tornado protocol is a protocol that breaks the link between the sender and the receiver, making it extremely difficult to trace the money mathematically.
A very simple explanation of how the protocol works: Imagine it as a box where people come to deposit money, and the box gives each person a secret number but mixes the funds, so all the money gathers in that box. Later, you come with the secret number to a new wallet, the box verifies the secret number, finds it correct, and extracts the amount deposited associated with that secret number (this is the simplest explanation you might find about the Tornado protocol).
The protocol that comes to solve the two problems while maintaining privacy and is very suitable for organizations and companies is the BITE protocol or the POE system entirely, but currently, BITE is the leader in this industry. As for the Ethereum and Solana networks, their place in this competition is technically considered distant because transactions in them are very transparent, which is why companies and entities do not fully adopt them for privacy reasons; no company wants to disclose billion-dollar transactions directly. And certainly, this is where the role of L2 networks comes in.
The BITE protocol is developed by Skale
$SKL
The Top Summit
--
As an example, xmr, despite its recent rise and brilliance, was removed from 73 platforms last year, 2024. Technically, it is a network whose developers are unknown and decentralized. It will remain forever regardless of any entity, but the tightening of restrictions continues and will continue. As for zec, it chose to hold the stick in the middle; it is not absolute privacy but optional. It can either be transparent like Bitcoin or have privacy, and even the privacy is not absolute. Even if the transaction executor chooses encryption, the details can be accessed if legally necessary. So, zec is a diplomatic network.
As an example, xmr, despite its recent rise and brilliance, was removed from 73 platforms last year, 2024. Technically, it is a network whose developers are unknown and decentralized. It will remain forever regardless of any entity, but the tightening of restrictions continues and will continue. As for zec, it chose to hold the stick in the middle; it is not absolute privacy but optional. It can either be transparent like Bitcoin or have privacy, and even the privacy is not absolute. Even if the transaction executor chooses encryption, the details can be accessed if legally necessary. So, zec is a diplomatic network.
The Top Summit
--
Let's be realistic. It's true that crypto and blockchain are great technologies and considered a revolution. But when the network or blockchain is against regulations, it will not last long because countries prohibit that. Here we point out zec and xmr because they are simply a haven for criminals. Therefore, they are heavily targeted by regulators.
Let's be realistic. It's true that crypto and blockchain are great technologies and considered a revolution. But when the network or blockchain is against regulations, it will not last long because countries prohibit that. Here we point out zec and xmr because they are simply a haven for criminals. Therefore, they are heavily targeted by regulators.
The market broke the liquidity area above and extended above 87k more than expected, which is positive so far because a new liquidity area has currently been added around 90k, making it a target for the price. However, so far a target has appeared to hit the b&r stops and the trend. Therefore, God knows, we may drop to hit the liquidity of both teams and then monitor the price; we might have an opportunity to rise to around 90k. And God is the Most High and Knows Best.
Write transferred You have copied and pasted it exactly from me
دكتور ابوبكر النادى
--
@$SKL @ A proposal to vote on burning currency $SKL will be raised in the network forum. Fabio proposed a comprehensive plan to align the price with the power of technology, and Jack, the CEO, agreed, and the plan will be voted on. Those who want to be sure should enter the Skale network forum. And surely everyone knows what burning means and its specific impact. The burning process is not a one-time event; it increases with the adoption of the network, and the proposal mentioned that the first phase will burn 10% of the total supply. Don't hold back on us with a like @@@!! {future}(SKLUSDT)
I initially have a liquidity level hit by a tail, and this is pure bot liquidity. It can drop from now, which is not unlikely. But I think it will hit the level above again and may extend to hit 87k. But the direction is this way or that way, we will drop again, and God knows best.
I think the strong shocks that hit the crypto community recently have produced stronger people, and in other words, people have become bored with the promises of 100x and 200x and so on. They have become bored with the nonsense that is spreading everywhere. They have become bored with the scam coins that are widespread. In other words, people are looking for rationality, a person who understands what they are doing and does not sell illusions. We ask God for success.
The currency project no longer matters This is partly true in the bear market because everyone comes to it descending from the larger to the smaller But 90% of the smaller ones completely disappear in the downturn As for the strong projects, they have sustainability and often 90% of cases survive downturn crises From another perspective, why do you look for strong projects when you want to buy and not buy just anyone if everyone is equal?
The level that was hit today is a strong level, but the reaction was not the best; it was a bad reaction. Therefore, there is a strong possibility that it will drop to the two lines below and then return to hit the red line above. The strategy is (of course assuming the attachment) to sell a small part here and repurchase it at the two lines below with the target hit above, God willing, I will reduce another part.
A decline looms on the horizon to break these flat bottoms Because the decline was sharp and strong and left a long tail indicating strength And God knows best
Does privacy threaten the future of Arkham (ARKM)?
With the strong market trend towards privacy, an important question arises: What is the point of the Arkham (ARKM) project if privacy is widely adopted?
Current privacy protocols can be divided into two main categories:
1️⃣ Full Privacy (ZK): The transaction is fully encrypted from start to finish, neither the value, nor the sender, nor the receiver is revealed; only that a transaction has occurred is known. If this model is widely adopted, there will be no actual role left for Arkham, as the data it relies on will completely disappear, effectively killing the project.
2️⃣ Temporary Privacy (like Bite): The transaction is encrypted only during execution, protecting whales from transaction tracking and MEV attacks, and after its completion and passing through liquidity pools, the results become visible. This model is less confrontational with regulatory bodies and does not hide crimes, but it partially reduces Arkham's role without completely eliminating it.
In summary:
ZK Privacy = Total existential threat to Arkham
Bite-like Privacy = Partial threat and reduction in value
Privacy is the direct adversary of the ARKM project
The market is rapidly heading in this direction
Unless Arkham's business model evolves in the future, coin holders are advised to pay attention to this structural shift in the market.