Lilia Grundy hbkO

*Pre‑emptive Strike by Israel ("Operation Rising Lion"):
On June 12–13, 2025, Israel launched what it described as a pre‑emptive air and missile strike across Iran, targeting nuclear facilities (Natanz, Khondab, Khorramabad), missile and military sites, and allegedly assassinating high‑ranking officials including IRGC Commander Hossein Salami and Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri.
The strike also reportedly involved Mossad coordination and triggered a national state of emergency in Israel with air‑raid sirens and airspace restrictions
*Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Advancements:
Iran has intensified uranium enrichment to ~60% purity, stockpiling over 408 kg, a nearly 50% increase since February—just below weapons‑grade levels.
In early May, Iran unveiled the Qassem Bassir solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile (approx. 1,200 km range), touted for precision and counter‑defense capabilities.
*Risk of Regional Escalation & Retaliation:
Iran still possesses thousands of medium‑range missiles capable of striking U.S. bases across the Middle East, as well as proxies in Iraq, Syria, Yemen (Houthis), and Lebanon (Hezbollah).
Previous Iranian missile attacks on Israel (October 2024) and Houthi strikes (May 2025 near Ben Gurion) illustrate the contagious escalation pattern.
Global oil prices spiked over 6% following strike announcements, underlining economic risk via disruptions to Strait of Hormuz and Persian Gulf shipping.
*Diplomatic Front & U.S. Position:
Negotiations for a revived nuclear accord have been ongoing, but recent UN IAEA reports confirm Iran is non‑compliant and expanding enrichment sites.
The U.S. has evacuated some embassy staff and military dependents from the region; former President Trump has warned of “massive conflict” if diplomacy fails.
Israel’s military indicated it will not proceed unless the U.S. signals diplomacy has failed—certainly not before.
*Outlook for Crypto Markets:
Volatility surges amid geopolitical crises—assets like Bitcoin and Gold often draw investor attention.
Energy-related tokens and commodities (like oil-linked stablecoins) may also reflect supply‑side risks from Middle East instability.
#IsraelIranConflict
#IsraelIranWar #NuclearTensions
#IranIsraelConflict nIsraelConflict

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has pulled back from his recent criticisms of President Donald Trump following significant outreach from top administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance. On Wednesday, Musk acknowledged that he may have gone "too far" in some of his statements, signaling an effort to deescalate the public feud that had been building over the past week.
The tension began when Musk criticized Trump’s sweeping tax and spending bill, calling it a “disgusting abomination” and labeling it too expensive. The disagreement soon turned personal, with both figures taking jabs at each other online. At one point, Musk even threatened to launch a new political party and hinted that Trump should face impeachment.
This public clash wasn’t just a political spectacle—it carried real implications for Musk’s business empire. With Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink relying heavily on government partnerships and regulatory stability, a deteriorating relationship with the administration could have serious consequences.
In a post on X, Musk expressed regret, stating: “I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far.” Although he didn’t specify which posts he was referring to, he has since deleted some of them, including the one supporting impeachment. Interestingly, he has not retracted his criticism of the tax bill itself.
Behind the scenes, several influential figures worked to mediate the conflict. Vice President Vance, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and David Sacks—Trump’s crypto advisor and a close Musk ally—were all involved in efforts to ease tensions. Two sources familiar with the discussions confirmed that these individuals played key roles in encouraging Musk and Trump to reconcile.
When asked about his role in the situation, Vance told reporters at the Kennedy Center that he had been in touch with both Musk and Trump, aiming to ensure that Musk remained supportive of the president’s agenda both publicly and privately. He noted that while Trump was understandably frustrated by Musk’s comments, he wasn’t interested in prolonging the conflict with someone who remains a significant donor and influential figure.
One source mentioned that Musk was genuinely considering starting a new political party, which could have introduced serious risks for the Republican Party ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In the 2024 cycle, Musk contributed around \$300 million to Republican candidates, helping them secure control of the White House and both chambers of Congress.
This situation highlights the complex intersection of politics, personal influence, and business. Musk's ability to shift public narratives and his financial weight make him a key player on the political stage—one whose words can ripple far beyond social media.
#trumpvsmuskfight
#TrumpVsMusk।