唐华斑竹

Damn it, a serious reminder! Someone is impersonating me, pretending to be Tang Hua the bamboo for scams! The profile picture and name are exactly the same, but the TG number is completely different! Identifying the scammer is very simple; just enter the Binance Square chat room and ask me, DM me on Twitter, or add me on V to verify, and you can see through it! Remember, if someone approaches you in my name to talk about money, cooperation, or relationships, it’s all fake! Don't fall for it! Thank you everyone for sharing so more people can see it! In the crypto world, as soon as money is involved, never let your guard down, and always verify repeatedly! Take care!

Is Elon Musk really human? I'm seriously doubting it!\nOn the left: SpaceX, Tesla, Starlink, Neuralink, The Boring Company, xAI, Twitter…\nOn the right: 14 kids, countless relationships, from twins to triplets to surrogacy, from divorce to remarriage to breakups.\nIn the middle, he's live-streaming sales, tweeting arguments, going head-to-head with Wall Street, and occasionally dropping prophecies on the world.\nA normal person would be exhausted just doing one of those things. He's juggling over a dozen, and nailing them all to be number one globally.\nYou call him a workaholic? Even workaholics need sleep. At 3 AM he's tweaking rocket parameters, by 7 AM he's at the Tesla factory, and at noon he finds time to tweet dozens of times, then heads home in the evening to spend time with his kids.\n'Time management master' doesn't even cover it. This is clearly 'time folding technique' or 'human plus version.'\nI'm really starting to wonder—Is Musk's real identity an alien sent to Earth to upgrade civilization's operating system?\nWhatever the case, I'm impressed. \n$SPCX \n

Haha, found a throwback pic of the "Starship Queen" Guo Can as a fresh-faced student! So pure!
Guo Can was snapped at her SpaceX workstation by a colleague, and the photo went viral, showcasing this cool tattooed Asian girl alongside her team at the #SpaceX top-notch rocket lab.
The tattooed gal Guo Can breaks the stereotype of "aerospace engineer = old-school nerd." It’s said that the average age at SpaceX is 31, with 25-year-olds leading the core module development. Over 70% of the staff have undergrad degrees or less, and only 1.6% hold PhDs. This group of young guns in the SpaceX Starship team conquered the world’s toughest full-flow staged combustion technology, enabling 33 Raptor 3 engines to push a 120-meter behemoth into space with 35MPa pressure and 75,000 kilonewtons of thrust.
This leaves the hundred-thousand aerospace professionals in the mainland with some serious feelings...
$SPCX

Looks like Trump doesn't want to be used as a pawn by Israel anymore, criticizing the Israeli strike on Beirut as something that shouldn't have happened, especially close to the special day of reaching a peace agreement. On June 14, Trump condemned the Israeli attack on Beirut, claiming it was an 'attempt to sabotage' the upcoming US-Iran peace deal. This statement is part of the recent series of moves in the critical 'last stretch' of US-Iran negotiations, with the core being Trump's effort to secure a landmark diplomatic achievement before the 'super weekend' of June 12-14, which includes his 80th birthday and the G7 summit. Israeli Defense Minister Katz had already clearly warned on June 4 that if they faced attacks at home, they would reserve the right to strike Beirut. This attack occurred at a sensitive point when Trump was hinting at an imminent agreement, highlighting Netanyahu's government’s ongoing efforts to stir the pot and vie for regional dominance, putting Trump’s 'art of the deal' under public scrutiny from allies. On June 14, Trump voiced his condemnation of Israel's 'attempt to sabotage' the US-Iran agreement. He stated: The attack on Beirut this morning should not have happened, especially on this special day when we are close to reaching a peace agreement with Iran. Israel has the right to defend itself against threats, but the attack it responded to was very minor and insignificant; no one was injured, disabled, or killed, therefore it should not interfere with this important process. We are very close to reaching an agreement that can bring peace to the region (including Lebanon), and all parties should exercise restraint. Israel should not launch any more attacks anywhere in Lebanon, nor should any other party (including Hezbollah) launch attacks against Israel. This could be the start of a long and beautiful peace — let’s not mess it up. $BTC

Top 15 AI Video Generation Tools to Watch in 2026
Here’s the lowdown on the 15 AI video generation tools you should keep an eye on in 2026, from the movie-level realism of Kling AI 3.0 to the open-source and free WAN 2.2, featuring the consistency king Seedance 2.0 and the go-to choice in China, CapCut. This covers everything from newbie to pro needs, helping you quickly find the best creative tools.
I’ve put together a table for easy viewing—check it out below.
Usage Recommendations:
For Newbies: Start with CapCut /剪映 or Vidu AI. They offer plenty of free credits, a solid Chinese ecosystem, and no need for VPNs.
For Quality Chasers: Jump straight into Kling AI 3.0, which is widely recognized as the best for overall quality, with daily free credits to try it out.
For Series Content: Choose Seedance 2.0 or Vidu; character/scene consistency is the lifeblood of series videos.
On a Zero Budget: Install the open-source WAN 2.2 model on your local GPU, or take advantage of Hailuo's generous free tier.
For Professional Use: Runway or Higgsfield provide a complete post-production workflow, perfect for ad agencies and film studios.
Network Considerations: Overseas tools like Google Veo 3.1, Sora 2, and Grok may require a VPN; domestic users should prioritize Vidu, CapCut, and Kling AI (which are accessible in China). $SPCXB

Not sure if it's legit, but if it is, should we jump in?
'BTC OG Insider Whale' agent placed a limit buy order for about $24.54 million in ZEC, aiming for an average buy price of $409.12.
Garrett Jin recently executed a precise two-way trade on ZEC. He built a large short position at an average price of around $626 in late May, and when ZEC got halved due to the 'infinite issuance exploit' on June 5, he pocketed over $16 million in unrealized gains, closing for a profit of $11.24 million on June 7. Then, on June 9, he switched to a 2x leverage long position at an average price of $460. The $24.54 million spot buy order at $409 is a further move into spot after his leveraged long.
His order price of $409 is below the current market price of $427, and there's a significant price difference compared to the average entry price of $460 for the leveraged long on June 9. This indicates he isn't chasing highs but is instead utilizing market fluctuations to gradually build a low-cost spot position, thereby reducing overall holding risk. This move contrasts his previous high-leverage, high-volatility contract style and may hint at a shift in his expectations for ZEC from short-term trading towards a more medium to long-term accumulation.
On June 14, according to HyperInsight monitoring, 'BTC OG Insider Whale' agent Garrett Jin set a limit buy order for 60,000 ZEC at a price of $409.12, totaling about $24.54 million. As per HTX market info, the current price of ZEC is $427. $ZEC

Bitcoin's 42.6% hash power is concentrated in the U.S.; is this a blessing or a curse?
U.S. publicly listed mining companies now control 31.5% of the global hash rate. This is not just a result of geographical migration, but also a direct reflection of capital and regulatory frameworks reshaping the mining landscape. After the mining ban in 2021, the shift of hash power to North America has nearly completed, and the current concentration of 42.5% is a solid signal of this trend.
The real risk in the power structure lies within the mining pool level. The top mining pools collectively control about two-thirds of the hash rate, holding key control over transaction selection and packaging, which poses a more substantial governance challenge than geographical concentration. Recently, major pools like Antpool, F2Pool, and Foundry joined the Stratum V2 working group, aiming to return block construction rights to individual miners through a new protocol, directly addressing this core contradiction.
The most noteworthy detail is that the analysis defines the current state as a "trend signal rather than a definitive conclusion." This suggests that regulatory pressure and capital intentions shaping hash power are far from over, while technical protocols (like Stratum V2) and miners' freedom to switch pools represent key variables in this dynamic game. The ultimate test of network security may lie in the actual effectiveness of these checks and balances under extreme pressure.
On June 14, despite the Bitcoin network's design emphasizing decentralization and censorship resistance, about 42.5% of the global hash power is currently concentrated in the U.S., sparking a renewed market discussion on the network's censorship resistance capabilities.
Data shows that U.S. publicly listed mining companies have captured about 31.5% of the global hash rate, while broader statistics suggest their total influence could be even higher. At the same time, pools represented by Foundry USA have long held the largest global share, with a single pool's hash power approaching one-third at one point.
Analysts believe the real risk is not simply "geographical concentration" but rather the concentration at the mining pool level, as pools hold critical control over transaction packaging and block template generation. Currently, the leading pools can control about two-thirds of the hash power, resulting in a highly centralized transaction selection authority.
The Bitcoin network has proven to be highly adaptable following the mining bans in 2021; after a sharp decline in global hash power, it quickly shifted to the U.S., Canada, and other regions, with network security remaining intact. $NVDAB $SPCXB

Is the U.S. really about to lift oil sanctions on Iran?! Not joking? So who actually wins in the end?! The U.S.-Iran agreement draft reveals: Iran agrees not to pursue nuclear weapons and to open the Strait of Hormuz, while the U.S. will lift sanctions on Iranian oil within a specified timeframe. This memo draft is the result of the U.S.-Iran "60-day breathing room" negotiations since May, focusing on trading navigability in the Strait of Hormuz for oil revenue and asset unfreezing, creating a window for subsequent nuclear talks. Trump had previously called for stronger nuclear clauses at the end of May, and the current version clearly states the commitment of "not producing or acquiring," but the specific handling mechanism for high-enriched uranium still needs to be finalized in the next 60 days, leaving a critical variable. The most noteworthy detail is the agreement's wording regarding "diluting the stock of high-enriched uranium within Iran." This represents a significant operational difference from the earlier U.S. stance of "destroying and removing it from the country," effectively allowing Iran to retain some nuclear material processing capability and site control, laying down a technical foundation for the next phase of negotiations. On June 14, senior Iranian officials stated that based on the memo draft with the U.S., Tehran agrees neither to produce nor acquire nuclear weapons. The U.S. agreed in the memo draft to allow Tehran to dilute its high-enriched uranium stockpile within Iran, with specific mechanisms to be discussed in the next 60 days. Iran will immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz for all merchant vessels, while the U.S. will lift the maritime blockade. The U.S. will lift sanctions on Iranian oil within the specified timeframe, allowing Iran to sell oil and receive revenue. The U.S. agrees to release $25 billion of Iranian frozen assets, including through direct cash transfers, regional cooperation, and financial credit lines. $SPCX

It's super easy for the king to rake in billions.
Saudi Kingdom Holdings owns 42.4 million shares of SpaceX, with an unrealized gain of about $2.36 billion.
After SpaceX pulled off the largest IPO in history at $135 per share, Saudi Kingdom Holdings revealed that its 42.4 million shares of Class A common stock have recorded a $2.36 billion unrealized gain. This isn't a one-off; it's part of Saudi capital's strategic positioning before tech giants hit the market. Kingdom Holdings, as a key investment vehicle for Saudi's sovereign wealth fund PIF, shows that its unrealized gains directly reflect the massive windfall IPO pricing has provided for early investors. Notably, the disclosed book value of $4.47 billion and fair value of $6.83 billion, both calculated based on the March 31 financials and last Friday's closing price of $160.95, reveal that the secondary market pricing has quickly surpassed the issue price. However, there's still a significant gap compared to the estimated fair value of $780 billion provided by some institutions, suggesting a notable tension between market sentiment and fundamental valuations.
On June 14, Saudi Kingdom Holdings stated that as of its financial report ending March 31, the company currently holds 42.4 million shares of SpaceX Class A common stock, with a book value of $4.47 billion.
The company noted that based on SpaceX's closing price of $160.95 last Friday, the fair value of its SpaceX shares is approximately $6.83 billion (around 25.6 billion Saudi Riyals), reflecting an unrealized increase of about $2.36 billion. $SPCX

SpaceX went public, and the Asian girl Guo Can is totally on fire, but what's her current net worth?
At just 27, Guo Can is a launch control engineer for SpaceX's Starship, holding the power to halt launches, with a solid engineering master's background.
Based on SpaceX's hiring info, her cash salary is around $130K, which is way below her Silicon Valley peers, but she's holding 80,000 to 150,000 shares. At an IPO price of $135, her net worth post-IPO is approximately $15 million (≈ 100 million RMB), making her about 10 times richer than that welder making $28 an hour who's already hit the million-dollar mark since SpaceX's IPO. Yesterday, SpaceX's closing price was already near $161, and Guo Can's net worth is still climbing.
With her tank tops and floral tattoos, she's breaking the traditional elite stereotype. Elon Musk's hiring logic is straightforward: he doesn't care about educational background or appearance; he just looks for problem solvers.
Many companies get trapped by 'proper appearances,' while true talent never needs labels to define their worth. $SPCX

SpaceX priced at $135 for its Nasdaq debut, with a staggering $1.77 trillion valuation reflecting the market's intense pricing narrative around "Space + AI" vertical integration. Institutions like Morningstar and Damodaran peg the fair value between $780 billion and $1.3 trillion, revealing a gap of over 55% from the IPO price. The core disagreement lies in whether SpaceX should be classified as a space infrastructure company or an AI-driven tech giant.
Recent analyses highlight that its 52x price-to-sales ratio is significantly higher than that of major tech firms, yet lower than some pure-play space competitors. This valuation confusion indicates that investors are still sorting out its business attributes—be it the telecom cash flows from Starlink, the rocket launch infrastructure, or the potential of the xAI merger modeling dominating the pricing.
The crucial detail comes from Wedbush Securities, which estimates an 80%+ probability of a merger with Tesla by 2027. This suggests that Musk's asset chess game is far from over; the SpaceX IPO may not be the end but rather a high-liquidity chip for more complex ecosystem integration and capital maneuvers. The market's fierce battle between short-term FOMO and long-term narratives is actually paving the way for subsequent related transactions.
On June 12, SpaceX's IPO priced at $135, correlating to a valuation of approximately $1.77 trillion, with the market's extreme pricing narrative around "Space + AI" vertical integration. Institutions like Morningstar and Damodaran estimate fair value only in the $780 billion to $1.3 trillion range, revealing a gap of over 55% from the IPO price. The core disagreement centers on whether SpaceX should be seen as a space infrastructure company or an AI-driven tech behemoth.
Its 52x price-to-sales ratio is significantly higher than large tech companies but lower than some pure-play space peers. This valuation chaos reflects that investors are still classifying its business attributes—whether it’s the telecom cash flows from Starlink, the rocket launch infrastructure, or the potential of the xAI merger model dominating the pricing.
The key detail is the "over 80% probability of merging with Tesla by 2027" given by Wedbush Securities. This hints that Musk's capital chess game is far from over; SpaceX's listing might not be the end but rather a high liquidity chip for more complex ecosystem integration and capital operations. $NVDAB

The UAE has taken a hardline stance against Iran after the escalation of conflict, but now it's pivoting towards diplomatic engagement. This shift is backed by its grand plans for AI data centers and oil production increases, which need regional stability as a prerequisite. Previously, data centers from Amazon and Oracle in the UAE faced attacks from Iran, making tech infrastructure a clear target in the conflict.
The UAE is following the lead of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, attempting to navigate its economic agenda through diplomacy. Since the outbreak of hostilities, Iran has attacked the UAE more than any other country, yet the UAE remains a key channel for its sanctioned oil exports. This contradictory relationship of "the fiercest attacks yet the deepest reliance" is the underlying logic that compels both sides to sit down and talk.
On June 11, Bloomberg reported that sources revealed UAE and Iranian senior national security officials held their first face-to-face meeting since the US-led offensive against Tehran began. Sources indicate that this week's meeting marks a significant shift in both parties' attitudes, with an increasing recognition of the importance of establishing smoother bilateral relations. UAE leaders hope their major economic ambitions (including billions in investments to boost oil output and build AI data centers) can proceed as planned.
For Iran, the relationship with the UAE is equally crucial, as the UAE was one of Iran's largest trading partners before the conflict and is a key route for Iran's sanctioned oil exports. Since the war broke out at the end of February, Iran has attacked the UAE more than any other nation. Abu Dhabi has retaliated multiple times and has taken the hardest stance against Iran among its Arab neighbors. The UAE currently seems to be advancing along the same path as Qatar and Saudi Arabia, attempting to ease tensions through diplomatic channels. $BNB

Glassnode's data shows that the 30-day average trading volume of the US spot Bitcoin ETF has plummeted from $4.4 billion in October of last year to $960 million, marking a 78% drop. This isn't just a standalone figure; when you combine it with the previous 49% drop in trading volume from DAT, it clearly points to a systematic cooling of speculative demand for Bitcoin in the traditional financial market (TradFi).
Since hitting an all-time high in mid-last year, the market has entered a 'strong supply, weak demand' phase. Reports from August, October, and December have consistently indicated weak ETF inflows, lackluster spot demand, and a cooling off of speculative fervor in the futures market. The current 78% drop serves as a quantifiable confirmation of the slowdown in traditional capital inflows over the past year, signaling the end of the institutional speculative cycle dominated by ETFs.
The conclusion that 'speculative demand for BTC in the traditional market has significantly waned' strictly analyzes two types of exposure channels in the traditional financial market. This suggests that while the speculative hot money in traditional avenues is retreating, other dimensions of demand, such as on-chain native capital, long-term holders, or emerging markets, may be undergoing a silent transition. Power is shifting from the volatility-chasing TradFi speculators to the core holders of the next cycle.
On June 11, Glassnode published that the 30-day moving average of the US spot Bitcoin ETF trading volume has dropped from $4.4 billion per day in October 2025 to the current $960 million per day, a decrease of 78%.
Combining this with the previous 49% drop in DAT's trading volume, the two types of exposure channels for Bitcoin in the traditional financial market are sending the same signal: speculative demand for BTC in the traditional market has significantly waned. $BNB

What’s launching isn’t your typical crypto asset, but tokenized securities tied to the market cap heavyweights in US stocks (Nvidia, Tesla) and key infrastructures (Micron, Western Digital). This marks a shift in Binance's spot trading pair structure from pure Crypto to a broader exposure to traditional finance, with their 'bStocks' brand previously covering giants like Apple and Microsoft.

The associated signals indicate that starting in 2024, Binance will continuously open algorithmic trading bot services for new spot trading pairs, aiming to boost liquidity and user retention. However, the nature of the underlying assets has fundamentally changed.

All five stocks belong to the AI computing and core hardware sectors, and they will be traded against USDT instead of stablecoins or fiat. This suggests that Binance is channeling the excess dollar liquidity in the crypto market into the hottest narratives in traditional tech stocks through compliant or quasi-compliant security token avenues, effectively creating a cross-market capital conduit.

On June 11, according to the official announcement, the Binance trading platform will launch bStocks tokenized securities trading pairs for Circle (CRCLB), Micron (MUB), NVIDIA (NVDAB), Sandisk (SNDKB), and Tesla (TSLAB), while activating spot algorithmic trading bot services:
· June 12, 2026, 01:00 (UTC+8): MUB/USDT;
· June 12, 2026, 02:00 (UTC+8): CRCLB/USDT, NVDAB/USDT, SNDKB/USDT, and TSLAB/USDT. $BNB

SpaceX is pricing its $1.75 trillion IPO at about a 52x price-to-sales ratio, and the valuation disagreement essentially revolves around the narrative anchors at play. The market is debating whether it should be viewed as space infrastructure, a telecom operator, or an AI-driven tech company. The merger with xAI in February has injected a key variable into the AI narrative, and the prospectus also shows the company facing a net loss of $4.94 billion in 2025, partly due to strategic investments in its AI business.
This pricing bypassed traditional book-building, forcibly setting each share at $135, demonstrating Musk's grip on market discourse. The most noteworthy detail is that, compared to its space peers, its valuation appears lower, highlighting the market's general skepticism about the growth potential of traditional aerospace companies, while being more willing to pay a hefty premium for the 'AI + space' fusion narrative.
On June 11, SpaceX is set to go public, and there are clear discrepancies in valuation comparisons between the space and AI industries: compared to its space field peers, SpaceX looks undervalued; however, when compared to AI and cloud computing companies, its valuation seems higher. At an expected valuation close to $1.75 trillion, SpaceX's trading price-to-sales ratio is around 52x, significantly above the average for large tech companies, but below some peers in the space sector.
The valuation methods for Starlink, space operations, and the AI business vary greatly, and investors are still debating whether SpaceX should be priced as an infrastructure company, a telecom company, or an AI-driven tech company. $BNB