🚨 $FIL : MINERS ARE “LEAVING”… SO WHY IS BIG MONEY DOING THE OPPOSITE? 🚨
Everyone keeps saying “FIL miners are exiting”.
But here’s the part nobody is talking about 👇
One group, Shun Tai, just spent 14 MILLION RMB to buy 150 mining servers with a combined storage capacity of 70 PB — specifically for FIL mining.
And that’s not all.
Between April and December 2025, they also accumulated 1 MILLION FIL for around 16 million RMB, preparing everything for long-term operations.
So let’s ask the real question:
Are they foolish?
Or are they early?
🤔 This is how markets usually work:
Those who are pessimistic sell
Those who see value add quietly
It’s that simple.
A project with this kind of market cap, infrastructure, and ecosystem doesn’t collapse because of a few negative headlines — especially not at these prices.
📉 Short term? Pressure is real.
A move toward 0.6 wouldn’t surprise many.
📈 Long term? That’s where opinions start to divide.
Accumulation during fear often looks stupid — until it doesn’t.
If price rebounds, expectations remain conservative for now, possibly below 3.
But markets rarely reward consensus thinking.
💡 The key takeaway isn’t prediction — it’s positioning.
When retail gives up, someone else usually steps in.
The chart will decide who was right.
👇 Watch $FIL closely. This story isn’t as simple as it looks.
Trendline touch alone isn’t enough — volume reaction decides everything here . Strong defense = continuation. Weak reaction = one last shakeout. This zone separates patience from FOMO.
Professor Mike Official
--
Bullish
Guys On the 2-hour chart, #bitcoin $BTC is once again testing a well-defined ascending trendline, which has already acted as strong support multiple times in the past. .....
The current price action suggests that $BTC is approaching a critical decision zone, where either a healthy pullback completion or a strong continuation move can begin......... !!!!!
What makes this area important is the repeated validation of the same support trendline. ........ Each previous touch has resulted in a solid upside reaction, and structurally, the market is still respecting higher lows. This increases the probability that BTC may bounce for the third time, especially if buyers defend this level with volume confirmation.
From a technical perspective, this looks like a controlled pullback within an overall bullish structure, not a breakdown. As long as BTC holds above this trendline and reclaims short-term resistance, momentum can shift quickly back in favor of bulls, opening the door for a move toward the $93,000 $95,000 zone.
This is a zone where smart entries are formed, not chased. Traders should remain patient, wait for confirmation, and manage risk properly. If support holds, this could be a high probability opportunity but discipline and confirmation remain key.
This flew under the radar for many — but it matters.
Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has now confirmed that his personal holding of ASTER is worth MORE than $2 million, not less, as many previously assumed.
And here’s the key detail most people missed 👇
He didn’t just buy once.
He openly stated that he continued buying ASTER even after earlier posts, without disclosing exact prices or timing.
That alone was enough to spark serious discussion across the community.
📌 Why does this matter?
CZ is not known for:
• Short-term flips
• Publicly shilling positions
• Chasing hype
In fact, he has repeatedly said his investments are long-term and personal, not trading plays. This aligns with his well-known philosophy of buy and hold, something he demonstrated years ago by holding BNB through extreme volatility when most wouldn’t.
That history is why the market pays attention — not because of guarantees, but because of pattern and behavior.
💡 For ASTER, this disclosure has already changed perception.
Mentions are rising.
Awareness is growing.
And sentiment is shifting — even during a pullback.
That said, it’s important to stay grounded.
A project’s future isn’t decided by who holds it alone.
Long-term value still depends on:
• Technology
• Token economics
• Execution
• Ecosystem growth
CZ himself has warned against blind FOMO — including FOMO based on his own actions.
🧠 The real takeaway?
When someone like CZ increases exposure quietly and consistently, it’s a confidence signal, not a promise.
What you do with that information should always be your own decision.
China has “killed” Bitcoin 100 times. Bitcoin survived 100 times. Pattern never fails. 👀📉📈
Trader达人
--
Bullish
$BTC {future}(BTCUSDT) 🚨 BITCOIN IS CRASHING AND THIS IS THE REASON WHY!!! 🤔📢
Bitcoin is down today for a very simple reason, and almost nobody is explaining it properly 📢
It’s coming straight from China, and the timing matters 🤔
That’s right, china’s crashing bitcoin, AGAIN.
Here’s what’s happening 📢📢
China just tightened regulations on domestic Bitcoin mining again 📢
In Xinjiang alone, a huge chunk of mining operations were shut down in December 📢
Roughly 400,000 miners went offline in a very short window 🤔
You can already see it in the data: Network hashrate is down around 8%.
When miners are forced offline like this, a few things happen fast:
– They lose revenue immediately – They need cash to cover costs or relocate – Some are forced to sell BTC into the market – Uncertainty spikes short term
That creates real sell pressure, not the other way around.
This isn’t a long-term bearish signal for Bitcoin.
It’s a temporary supply shock caused by a dumb policy, not demand.
We’ve seen this movie before.
China cracks down → miners shut off → hashrate dips → price wobbles → network adjusts → Bitcoin moves on.
We should expect more pain in the short term, but long term this doesn’t even matter 🔥📢
🚨 $XRP : THE PART OF THE CYCLE THAT SHAKES EVERYONE OUT 🚨
XRP is still hovering just above $1.85, after failing to hold the $2 push.
And to most people, it feels… disappointing.
But this exact feeling has shown up before.
📊 A long-term comparison shared by analyst ChartNerd shows something uncomfortable — and interesting.
XRP’s current structure looks very similar to 2016.
Back then, XRP went through:
• A brutal 69% pullback
• Months of boredom and doubt
• Almost zero excitement
And then came a move most people remember only in hindsight —
a five-figure percentage rally.
🔍 The key detail?
In 2016, XRP also rejected its accumulation range, rolled over, and flushed lower before starting a historic bull run.
If history rhymes, XRP may not be done shaking people out yet.
⚠️ Some projections suggest a deeper test could happen — potentially even below $1, with levels like $0.8 acting as a final reset zone into early 2026.
That sounds scary.
But markets don’t build massive rallies without first breaking confidence.
💡 Here’s the part most people miss:
Big moves are usually born after patience runs out — not when optimism is high.
If this correction plays out fully, the next phase could be explosive.
Some long-term targets discussed reach as high as $27, which would mean a 2,000%+ move from current levels.
🚀 The market isn’t asking whether XRP can move again.
It’s asking who will still be around if it does.
👇 Click the chart below and look at the structure carefully
$XRP
⚠️ Not financial advice. History doesn’t repeat exactly — but it often rhymes.
If Japan hikes interest rates this week, Bitcoin could face heavy downside pressure.
Let me explain why 👇
📊 What history shows In past Japan rate hikes, Bitcoin has corrected roughly 20–25%.
📉 Why does this happen?
1️⃣ Higher rates = money becomes more expensive 💸 2️⃣ Liquidity gets pulled from risk assets 3️⃣ Crypto behaves like a risk asset (similar to stocks) 4️⃣ Capital rotates out of BTC & alts 5️⃣ Prices react lower
📅 Why this matters right now
Japan is expected to raise rates again next week, possibly by up to 75 bps.
⚠️ If confirmed, BTC could see: Increased volatility
Strong selling pressure A move below 80K
In an aggressive scenario, even a sub-70K liquidity sweep
📆 Key window to watch: Around 19th December
🚫 This is not fear-mongering
✅ This is preparation
Markets don’t move on manipulation —
they move on liquidity.
Smart traders don’t react late.
They plan ahead 🧩
👀 Keep a close watch on Japan’s rate decision. For context:
Just yesterday, BTC got a relief pump from the 88K zone back toward 90K, exactly as expected 🎯
🚨 WHALES JUST BOUGHT 3.4 BILLION $HBAR IN SILENCE — WHILE PRICE BLEEDS 🚨
HBAR looks weak. Down nearly 29% this month. Flat today. Retail is bored, scared, or already gone. But behind the scenes… something very different is happening.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth most people miss 👇 While price drifts lower, whales are loading like it’s a clearance sale.
Over the last 48 hours alone, wallets holding 10M+ and 100M+ HBAR exploded higher.
That’s 3.42 BILLION HBAR added quietly — nearly $445M absorbed near the lows.
Think of it like this:
The crowd is selling umbrellas because the sky looks dark…
Smart money is buying land because they see the storm ending.
Yes, demand looks weak on the surface.
OBV is falling — meaning retail participation is thin. But OBV tracks exchange flow, not OTC transfers, custody moves, or whale positioning.
And here’s where it gets interesting 👀 📉 Price keeps making lower lows 📈 RSI keeps making higher lows
That’s a classic bullish divergence — the same signal that sparked 15% and 12% bounces earlier.
Those rallies failed before… but this time they’re backed by massive accumulation.
HBAR is compressing inside a falling wedge — sellers are getting tired.
Whales don’t buy wedges for fun. They buy before structure flips.
🔑 The line that changes everything: • A daily close above $0.159
Break that, and the wedge cracks open toward $0.198 → $0.219
⚠️ The danger zone: • Lose $0.122, and sellers stay in control longer Right now, signals are fighting each other. Retail is hesitant.
Indicators are coiling.
Whales have already chosen a side.
The question is not if volatility returns… It’s who’s positioned when it does.
👇 Click the chart below and watch this level closely.
Is Ethereum’s $3,200–$3,400 Zone Signaling a Pending Liquidation Break?
$ETH is trading within a narrow range between $3,200 and $3,400, a zone that derivatives data identifies as a dense liquidation cluster. The positioning suggests that a move outside this band could trigger rapid price acceleration.
Data from Coinglass shows that more than $500 million in short liquidations sit above $3,400, indicating that a break higher could force short positions to unwind quickly. Analysts noted that many shorts were built near current levels, creating conditions for a squeeze if upward pressure continues. On the downside, nearly $1.2 billion in long liquidations are concentrated around $3,200, reflecting heavy long positioning that could unwind if support fails.
Open interest has risen sharply in the past day. Researchers said elevated open interest paired with compressed price ranges often precedes volatility driven by automated liquidation flows. Similar setups in previous cycles produced rapid directional moves when liquidation thresholds were triggered.
Market observers indicated that the current structure reflects heightened sensitivity to small price changes. They noted that liquidity depth may be insufficient to absorb forced liquidations cleanly, increasing the likelihood of sudden extensions once momentum develops.
The implications for the market center on how Ethereum reacts at the boundaries of the range. A confirmed move above $3,400 would point to short-side pressure, while a breakdown below $3,200 would signal long-side stress. Analysts added that higher-timeframe confirmation will be needed to determine whether any move establishes a sustained trend.
Key levels include resistance at $3,400 and support at $3,200. Secondary levels sit around recent intraday highs and lows. How $ETH behaves as it approaches either boundary will determine whether the next phase is expansion or continued consolidation.
Could Do Kwon’s Legal Case Signal a Broader Shift in Crypto Accountability?
Recent developments in Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon’s legal proceedings have drawn attention to how courts may treat major crypto failures. Reports indicate discussions of a plea agreement, but legal analysts stressed that sentencing remains at the judge’s discretion.
A plea deal does not guarantee leniency. Under U.S. federal guidelines, judges may impose sentences based on statutory ranges, and the charges related to the Terra collapse carry significant potential penalties. This underscores the seriousness of the matter in judicial and regulatory circles.
The TerraUSD and $LUNA unwind produced multibillion-dollar losses and rapid contagion across centralized and decentralized markets. Investigations documented large liquidations and capital outflows as the algorithmic stablecoin lost its peg, prompting probes in multiple jurisdictions.
Legal scholars observed that plea outcomes in complex financial cases hinge on cooperation, evidence, and the systemic impact of the alleged conduct. Historically, courts have sometimes prioritized deterrence when market disruptions were extensive.
Industry commentators said the Terra episode intensified scrutiny of stablecoin design, disclosure, and consumer protections. Analysts noted that the Kwon proceedings may influence enforcement expectations and regulatory responses going forward.
For markets, the case has contributed to episodic volatility in LUNA Classic ($LUNC ). Traders are monitoring broader liquidity and regulatory signals rather than single headlines. Key technical levels include recent consolidation support and resistance formed during speculative moves. Confirmation of a sustained trend will depend on how liquidity and sentiment evolve as the case advances.
Is Ethena’s Planned $ENA Supply Reduction Signaling a Market Shift?
Ethena has confirmed a buyback-and-burn event for $ENA on December 17–18 after a near-unanimous community vote. The reduction comes as ENA trades near $0.27, prompting questions about whether the token’s current price reflects recent ecosystem changes.
The burn is part of Ethena’s broader supply-management plan while the platform expands its stablecoin and staking products. ENA’s price has been range-bound even as related activity increased, so traders are watching for supply-driven effects.
Key data points show USDe’s TVL holding between $7 billion and $8.5 billion, with yields recovering to roughly 5% APY. ENA volume rose more than 100% in 24 hours, and whale-tracking tools indicate about $96 million in accumulation across major exchanges over the past month.
Institutional access has improved with the ETP ENA listing in Europe, offering regulated exposure. Integrations with restaking platforms, Pendle, Berachain, and sUSDe have extended ENA’s footprint across multiple chains. Research groups monitoring multi-chain adoption said sustained cross-chain engagement often precedes heightened market attention.
Analysts noted that burns can affect market structure when paired with growing utility, but outcomes depend on liquidity and sentiment. Historical burn events produced mixed results based on timing and participation.
Traders should monitor liquidity flows after the burn. Key levels include support near $0.25 and resistance at the upper consolidation band. A sustained close above resistance would suggest improving momentum, while a break below support would weaken the current setup. Higher-timeframe closes will be needed for confirmation.