Binance Square

web3小金

Web3 內容創作者 |幣安廣場創作者| 🎮 鏈遊玩家|00後的生活碎片 & Web3 交流 💡|保持熱愛,持續進化中|入圈三年的全職韭菜
Frequent Trader
4 Days
84 Following
1.0K+ Followers
27 Liked
1 Shared
Posts
·
--
Don't just focus on the BTC K-line, take a look at the USDT printing machine!Recently, although the market is tough, there is a piece of data that many people have overlooked: the total market capitalization of stablecoins is quietly reaching a historical high. What does this mean? It means that the money from outside the market has actually come in, but it is still observing and hasn't bought BTC or ETH. In the past few years, VCs and project teams have collaborated to create a scenario. They have invented countless fancy terms—modularization, parallel execution, re-staking nesting. They have built hundreds of thousands of 'highways' (public chains) with TPS in the hundreds of thousands, valued at several billion dollars. However, there are no cars on the road.

Don't just focus on the BTC K-line, take a look at the USDT printing machine!

Recently, although the market is tough, there is a piece of data that many people have overlooked: the total market capitalization of stablecoins is quietly reaching a historical high.
What does this mean? It means that the money from outside the market has actually come in, but it is still observing and hasn't bought BTC or ETH.
In the past few years, VCs and project teams have collaborated to create a scenario. They have invented countless fancy terms—modularization, parallel execution, re-staking nesting. They have built hundreds of thousands of 'highways' (public chains) with TPS in the hundreds of thousands, valued at several billion dollars.
However, there are no cars on the road.
ZAMA has torn off the cover of 'fair launch', where should we invest our money?Looking at $ZAMA's current price of 0.031, while the public offering price is still above 0.05, I really feel that it's not worth it for the brothers who are picking up the pieces. Buff is maxed out: $200 million financing, Binance and Coinbase dual launch, and what happened? It peaked upon launch, with a circulating market value of only $70 million. This is not a project; it's simply a 'one and a half level harvesting scheme' carefully designed by capital. The so-called 'fair launch of the Dutch auction' now appears to be a cover for the project party to squeeze retail liquidity and force a high price. After this battle, market logic must change. In the future, when seeing new projects with high FDV, high financing, and still doing 'Dutch auctions', just blacklist them directly. At this stage of stock game, rather than being the 'fuel' for these new scythes, it's better to look back at those projects that truly have industrial resources supporting them.

ZAMA has torn off the cover of 'fair launch', where should we invest our money?

Looking at $ZAMA's current price of 0.031, while the public offering price is still above 0.05, I really feel that it's not worth it for the brothers who are picking up the pieces.
Buff is maxed out: $200 million financing, Binance and Coinbase dual launch, and what happened? It peaked upon launch, with a circulating market value of only $70 million. This is not a project; it's simply a 'one and a half level harvesting scheme' carefully designed by capital. The so-called 'fair launch of the Dutch auction' now appears to be a cover for the project party to squeeze retail liquidity and force a high price.
After this battle, market logic must change.

In the future, when seeing new projects with high FDV, high financing, and still doing 'Dutch auctions', just blacklist them directly. At this stage of stock game, rather than being the 'fuel' for these new scythes, it's better to look back at those projects that truly have industrial resources supporting them.
Many people look down on the hard-earned money from tasks, thinking that TRIA gives too little at 40 dollars. But what if I told you that the next $XPL is an average of 500 dollars? This time, the $XPLL task at the Binance Creator Center has a threshold that is essentially **“diligence.”** Write three pieces of content (Twitter/short posts/articles) every day, and you can share in this grand prize pool. The quota is limited to 1000 people, which means that as long as you are willing to work, there are actually very few competitors. Even setting aside airdrops, the Plasma project itself is worth studying: It addresses the most painful point in Web3 – payments. Current chain transfers are too expensive and too slow. Plasma XPL directly delivers an experience of “sub-second confirmation + 0 Gas,” and directly uses stablecoins to pay fees, even anchoring the security layer to Bitcoin. This is what I often refer to as **“infrastructure-type Alpha.”** It doesn’t do anything superficial; it’s meant to allow institutions and retail investors to smoothly use stablecoins for payments. #plasma $XPL @Plasma
Many people look down on the hard-earned money from tasks, thinking that TRIA gives too little at 40 dollars.

But what if I told you that the next $XPL is an average of 500 dollars?

This time, the $XPLL task at the Binance Creator Center has a threshold that is essentially **“diligence.”** Write three pieces of content (Twitter/short posts/articles) every day, and you can share in this grand prize pool. The quota is limited to 1000 people, which means that as long as you are willing to work, there are actually very few competitors.

Even setting aside airdrops, the Plasma project itself is worth studying:
It addresses the most painful point in Web3 – payments.

Current chain transfers are too expensive and too slow. Plasma XPL directly delivers an experience of “sub-second confirmation + 0 Gas,” and directly uses stablecoins to pay fees, even anchoring the security layer to Bitcoin.

This is what I often refer to as **“infrastructure-type Alpha.”** It doesn’t do anything superficial; it’s meant to allow institutions and retail investors to smoothly use stablecoins for payments.

#plasma $XPL @Plasma
BTC is sucking blood at high levels, where should we look for the next hundredfold narrative?Let's talk about the recent market. $BTC's trend is actually very 'institutional' - stable to a frightening degree, but also uniquely frightening. It's like a huge black hole, sucking the liquidity out of the market. Has anyone noticed that in the past when Bitcoin was flat, altcoins would soar; but now when Bitcoin is flat, altcoins are on a downward trend? This illustrates a cruel reality: the underlying logic of the market has changed. The current incremental funds are no longer retail investors coming for the 'gambling', but ETFs and institutions holding compliant reports. When institutions enter, the rules of the game change. They won't buy air coins with only MEME attributes, nor will they use those public chains that offer no privacy and are completely exposed. They hold trillions in RWA (real-world assets) wanting to go on-chain, but what is the biggest obstacle in front of them?

BTC is sucking blood at high levels, where should we look for the next hundredfold narrative?

Let's talk about the recent market.

$BTC's trend is actually very 'institutional' - stable to a frightening degree, but also uniquely frightening.

It's like a huge black hole, sucking the liquidity out of the market. Has anyone noticed that in the past when Bitcoin was flat, altcoins would soar; but now when Bitcoin is flat, altcoins are on a downward trend?

This illustrates a cruel reality: the underlying logic of the market has changed. The current incremental funds are no longer retail investors coming for the 'gambling', but ETFs and institutions holding compliant reports.
When institutions enter, the rules of the game change.

They won't buy air coins with only MEME attributes, nor will they use those public chains that offer no privacy and are completely exposed. They hold trillions in RWA (real-world assets) wanting to go on-chain, but what is the biggest obstacle in front of them?
【ZAMA This lesson is too expensive: Who will dare to believe in 'fair launch' in the future?】 Current price 0.031, public offering price 0.05. Looking at the $ZAMA candlestick, it really hurts for those brothers who participated in the public offering. Buff is stacked: listed on Binance and Coinbase, raised 200 million dollars, and what happened? The peak was reached upon launch, and the public offering price was never touched. The circulating market value is less than 70 million, where did the 200 million dollars actually go? This is simply a joke. The so-called 'Dutch auction fair launch' now looks like a trap designed by the project party to squeeze the last drop of liquidity. In the future, when seeing the words 'Dutch auction', it's recommended to blacklist them directly; this is not a fair launch, this is 'fairly being cut.' This also serves as a wake-up call: do not blindly trust those new projects that only draw big cakes and engage in high valuation financing. In this market where harvesting is rampant, I would rather focus on honest people like @Dusk_Foundation who are doing solid work. While new projects are busy calculating how to cut the public offering, Dusk is working hard on 'compliance privacy' and RWA. It does not play the game of inflated valuation, #dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
【ZAMA This lesson is too expensive: Who will dare to believe in 'fair launch' in the future?】
Current price 0.031, public offering price 0.05.
Looking at the $ZAMA candlestick, it really hurts for those brothers who participated in the public offering. Buff is stacked: listed on Binance and Coinbase, raised 200 million dollars, and what happened? The peak was reached upon launch, and the public offering price was never touched. The circulating market value is less than 70 million, where did the 200 million dollars actually go?
This is simply a joke. The so-called 'Dutch auction fair launch' now looks like a trap designed by the project party to squeeze the last drop of liquidity. In the future, when seeing the words 'Dutch auction', it's recommended to blacklist them directly; this is not a fair launch, this is 'fairly being cut.'
This also serves as a wake-up call: do not blindly trust those new projects that only draw big cakes and engage in high valuation financing. In this market where harvesting is rampant, I would rather focus on honest people like @Dusk who are doing solid work.
While new projects are busy calculating how to cut the public offering, Dusk is working hard on 'compliance privacy' and RWA. It does not play the game of inflated valuation,

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Recently, the events in Zama have made everyone see the reality: in this market of existing stock games, primary Alpha users have a cost protection of 0.025, while public offerings have a 0.045 takeover. For the majority of us who can only fight in the secondary market, without this "price privilege," we must seek "resource privilege." This is why, despite the bloodsucking of the market and the general decline of imitation, I still dare to heavily invest in @vanar's logic. Breaking out of the mutual cutting cycle: When most L1s are still entangled in mutual TVL competition, Vanar directly brought Google Cloud and NVIDIA into its circle. This is not a simple platform; it's a direct injection of top Web2 computing power and infrastructure. AI Native's dimensionality reduction strike: The Alpha of this round of bull market is not purely in finance (DeFi), but in the combination of AI and large-scale applications. Vanar positions itself as AI + entertainment L1, essentially doing Web3 things with Web2 standards. Conclusion: If you can't obtain the "privileged low price" of the primary market, then buy projects in the secondary market that have "big companies backing them." In the current situation of liquidity exhaustion, projects like Vanar, which have self-generating capabilities and endorsements from giants, are the biggest safety cushion in the secondary market. #vanar $VANRY @Vanar
Recently, the events in Zama have made everyone see the reality: in this market of existing stock games, primary Alpha users have a cost protection of 0.025, while public offerings have a 0.045 takeover.
For the majority of us who can only fight in the secondary market, without this "price privilege," we must seek "resource privilege."
This is why, despite the bloodsucking of the market and the general decline of imitation, I still dare to heavily invest in @vanar's logic.
Breaking out of the mutual cutting cycle: When most L1s are still entangled in mutual TVL competition, Vanar directly brought Google Cloud and NVIDIA into its circle. This is not a simple platform; it's a direct injection of top Web2 computing power and infrastructure.
AI Native's dimensionality reduction strike: The Alpha of this round of bull market is not purely in finance (DeFi), but in the combination of AI and large-scale applications. Vanar positions itself as AI + entertainment L1, essentially doing Web3 things with Web2 standards.
Conclusion:
If you can't obtain the "privileged low price" of the primary market, then buy projects in the secondary market that have "big companies backing them."
In the current situation of liquidity exhaustion, projects like Vanar, which have self-generating capabilities and endorsements from giants, are the biggest safety cushion in the secondary market.

#vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain
Bitcoin (BTC) real-time market Current price is approximately $78,900 USD, with a 24-hour increase of about 2.1%. The market is showing a strong oscillating trend. On the daily chart, it is still operating within an upward channel, with short-term bulls in control, but there is strong selling pressure in the $79,000–$80,000 range. The 4-hour chart shows that the price has tested $79,000 multiple times without effectively breaking through, with trading volume slightly increasing. Key support: $76,800 → $74,500 Key resistance: $79,000 → $81,200 Short-term suggestion: mainly wait and see, waiting for clear breakout signals. A rise above $79,500 can be a light long position; a drop below $76,800 should be taken as a signal to reduce positions or wait and see. $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
Bitcoin (BTC) real-time market

Current price is approximately $78,900 USD, with a 24-hour increase of about 2.1%. The market is showing a strong oscillating trend.
On the daily chart, it is still operating within an upward channel, with short-term bulls in control, but there is strong selling pressure in the $79,000–$80,000 range. The 4-hour chart shows that the price has tested $79,000 multiple times without effectively breaking through, with trading volume slightly increasing.
Key support: $76,800 → $74,500
Key resistance: $79,000 → $81,200
Short-term suggestion: mainly wait and see, waiting for clear breakout signals. A rise above $79,500 can be a light long position; a drop below $76,800 should be taken as a signal to reduce positions or wait and see. $BTC
·
--
Bullish
I really can't believe it, you can get $XPL from Plasma so easily. 500 people can claim money together, and as long as you spend a few minutes every day to post some content and do some basic trading, you can get rewards! The daily basic posting + trading of $XPL , worth over a hundred U, can consistently rank on the list. Even I, a small player, only do the simplest tasks every day, and I'm already able to climb the rankings! There is still a chance until the 12th, the spots are not full yet, and the rewards pool for what's coming looks quite appealing. You really don't need to be a high-level player, no need to watch the market, no need to go all in; it's just a matter of moving your fingers every day, it's ridiculously quick. How do the brothers and sisters who have already participated feel? Those who haven't come can really give it a try, the threshold is ridiculously low, you won't lose anything, just a feeling of earning some pocket money~ Come on! $XPL @Plasma #Plasma {spot}(XPLUSDT)
I really can't believe it, you can get $XPL from Plasma so easily. 500 people can claim money together, and as long as you spend a few minutes every day to post some content and do some basic trading, you can get rewards!

The daily basic posting + trading of $XPL , worth over a hundred U, can consistently rank on the list. Even I, a small player, only do the simplest tasks every day, and I'm already able to climb the rankings!

There is still a chance until the 12th, the spots are not full yet, and the rewards pool for what's coming looks quite appealing.

You really don't need to be a high-level player, no need to watch the market, no need to go all in; it's just a matter of moving your fingers every day, it's ridiculously quick.

How do the brothers and sisters who have already participated feel? Those who haven't come can really give it a try, the threshold is ridiculously low, you won't lose anything, just a feeling of earning some pocket money~

Come on!
$XPL @Plasma #Plasma
This xxx market, I don't want to say anything! This is a mutual follow post A greeting will get your attention 🫡 #BTC何时反弹? $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT)
This xxx market, I don't want to say anything!

This is a mutual follow post

A greeting will get your attention 🫡

#BTC何时反弹? $BTC
I'm really going to explode with frustration... I was waiting for the opening of Zama's $ZAMA at midnight, my speed was ridiculously fast, the K-line just jumped a little (only about 10%+), in a moment of excitement, I directly sold everything at market price, thinking I successfully escaped the peak. But less than a minute after selling, it started to rise like a rocket, and I was on the sidelines like an ATM, watching the big profits fly away. After all the hard work participating in Zama's new listing, I only made 100u in the end, while the profits of several hundred u even thousands of u were all given away by me. This feeling of having the 'ticket in my hand but the train derailing' is a thousand times worse than losing money... (By the way, I really have high hopes for Zama's FHE technology, I think the long-term value is very strong, but I left in the dumbest way 😭) Also, @Plasma and $XPL are from another project, I just tagged them casually, so don’t misunderstand them as the same thing, haha. Are there any brothers who sold out during the opening of $ZAMA like me? Please come out and let me know I’m not the only one who messed up, seeking to be scolded awake, seeking warmth in numbers 🙏
I'm really going to explode with frustration...
I was waiting for the opening of Zama's $ZAMA at midnight, my speed was ridiculously fast, the K-line just jumped a little (only about 10%+), in a moment of excitement, I directly sold everything at market price, thinking I successfully escaped the peak.
But less than a minute after selling, it started to rise like a rocket, and I was on the sidelines like an ATM, watching the big profits fly away.
After all the hard work participating in Zama's new listing, I only made 100u in the end, while the profits of several hundred u even thousands of u were all given away by me.
This feeling of having the 'ticket in my hand but the train derailing' is a thousand times worse than losing money...
(By the way, I really have high hopes for Zama's FHE technology, I think the long-term value is very strong, but I left in the dumbest way 😭)
Also, @Plasma and $XPL are from another project, I just tagged them casually, so don’t misunderstand them as the same thing, haha.
Are there any brothers who sold out during the opening of $ZAMA like me? Please come out and let me know I’m not the only one who messed up, seeking to be scolded awake, seeking warmth in numbers 🙏
Who killed RWA? Let's talk about the truth of why institutions are hesitant to go on-chain.The pessimistic sentiment about the RWA track is spreading in the square. Everyone has realized that after two years of calling for 'institutional entry,' the on-chain liquidity is still pitifully low. Many people are starting to doubt whether RWA is just a story concocted by VCs to trick retail investors into taking over. But what I see is another dimension of opportunity. The privacy paradox of institutions The traditional public chain architecture is nothing short of a nightmare for financial giants. Imagine if every transaction by BlackRock were monitored in real-time by on-chain robots; how could its strategies run? This is currently the biggest bottleneck for RWA: transparency is no longer an advantage, but a poison that hinders capital from entering the market. The market urgently needs an infrastructure that can 'validate authenticity while keeping details invisible.'

Who killed RWA? Let's talk about the truth of why institutions are hesitant to go on-chain.

The pessimistic sentiment about the RWA track is spreading in the square. Everyone has realized that after two years of calling for 'institutional entry,' the on-chain liquidity is still pitifully low. Many people are starting to doubt whether RWA is just a story concocted by VCs to trick retail investors into taking over.
But what I see is another dimension of opportunity.
The privacy paradox of institutions
The traditional public chain architecture is nothing short of a nightmare for financial giants. Imagine if every transaction by BlackRock were monitored in real-time by on-chain robots; how could its strategies run? This is currently the biggest bottleneck for RWA: transparency is no longer an advantage, but a poison that hinders capital from entering the market. The market urgently needs an infrastructure that can 'validate authenticity while keeping details invisible.'
In the past few days, I've seen several hot posts in the square, all criticizing RWA as a thoroughly dead narrative. Where are the trillion-dollar institutions that were promised? Why are we still the only old retail investors cutting each other up on the chain? Actually, these people haven't grasped a fundamental business logic: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase would absolutely never trade on Ethereum. Why? Because on public chains, every adjustment to their holdings is public, which is like revealing their cards to the whole world. This is why Smart Money has recently been quietly accumulating Dusk ($DUSK). This project addresses a core pain point: it uses ZK technology to provide institutions with a layer of "anti-peeping clothing." It meets regulatory requirements while protecting trade secrets. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
In the past few days, I've seen several hot posts in the square, all criticizing RWA as a thoroughly dead narrative. Where are the trillion-dollar institutions that were promised? Why are we still the only old retail investors cutting each other up on the chain?
Actually, these people haven't grasped a fundamental business logic: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase would absolutely never trade on Ethereum.

Why? Because on public chains, every adjustment to their holdings is public, which is like revealing their cards to the whole world.

This is why Smart Money has recently been quietly accumulating Dusk ($DUSK). This project addresses a core pain point: it uses ZK technology to provide institutions with a layer of "anti-peeping clothing." It meets regulatory requirements while protecting trade secrets.

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Anxiety over frozen cards in the square: Why is Smart Money buying PayFi?In the past couple of days, there has been a heavy atmosphere in Binance Square. Half of the people are cursing the market, while the other half are complaining about the difficulty of withdrawing funds. This actually exposes the biggest hidden danger in the middle of a bull market: our liquidity is trapped on-chain. No matter how well the BTC and ETH in everyone's hands rise, as long as they cannot be converted into bread and water, they are just a string of numbers. Revaluation of the payment sector It is this kind of anxiety of 'having money but unable to spend' that has triggered the explosion of PayFi (payment finance). Pay attention to the recent sector rotation; funds are withdrawing from those purely governance-based DeFi tokens and flowing into payment protocols supported by real cash flow.

Anxiety over frozen cards in the square: Why is Smart Money buying PayFi?

In the past couple of days, there has been a heavy atmosphere in Binance Square. Half of the people are cursing the market, while the other half are complaining about the difficulty of withdrawing funds. This actually exposes the biggest hidden danger in the middle of a bull market: our liquidity is trapped on-chain. No matter how well the BTC and ETH in everyone's hands rise, as long as they cannot be converted into bread and water, they are just a string of numbers.
Revaluation of the payment sector
It is this kind of anxiety of 'having money but unable to spend' that has triggered the explosion of PayFi (payment finance).
Pay attention to the recent sector rotation; funds are withdrawing from those purely governance-based DeFi tokens and flowing into payment protocols supported by real cash flow.
Everyone come and play 😄
Everyone come and play 😄
CipherX零号
·
--
[Ended] 🎙️ Let's build Binance Square together!$BNB
You're commenting too fast, please wait a moment and try again
I just saw a hot post in Binance Square, where a guy finally made a profit of A7 in this wave, but as a result of withdrawal issues, his card was frozen for half a year, and now he can't even pay his mortgage. This is simply the biggest dark humor in the crypto world: we are wealthy beyond measure on-chain, yet we struggle to make ends meet off-chain. These days, I've noticed an interesting phenomenon where funds are starting to flood into the PayFi sector, especially protocols like Plasma ($PP) that focus on underlying payment settlement. Smart money has understood that instead of being anxious in this minefield of fiat channels, it's better to bet directly on "crypto-native payments." What Plasma does is convert your coins directly into purchasing power, skipping those annoying intermediaries. Don't just focus on making money; think about how to spend it. This is the underlying logic that can enable PayFi to take off this round. #plasma $XPL @Plasma
I just saw a hot post in Binance Square, where a guy finally made a profit of A7 in this wave, but as a result of withdrawal issues, his card was frozen for half a year, and now he can't even pay his mortgage.

This is simply the biggest dark humor in the crypto world: we are wealthy beyond measure on-chain, yet we struggle to make ends meet off-chain. These days, I've noticed an interesting phenomenon where funds are starting to flood into the PayFi sector, especially protocols like Plasma ($PP) that focus on underlying payment settlement.

Smart money has understood that instead of being anxious in this minefield of fiat channels, it's better to bet directly on "crypto-native payments." What Plasma does is convert your coins directly into purchasing power, skipping those annoying intermediaries.

Don't just focus on making money; think about how to spend it. This is the underlying logic that can enable PayFi to take off this round.

#plasma $XPL @Plasma
Everyone come and play🎁
Everyone come and play🎁
欧吉巴克
·
--
[Replay] 🎙️ 恭喜发财~抄底btc
06 h 00 m 00 s · You're commenting too fast, please wait a moment and try again
2026 Token Selection Logic: Finding Alpha among the 'Preferred Children' of Big CorporationsToday's trending topics in Binance Square are all about the denunciation of 'VC token bloodsucking'. To be honest, I completely understand this kind of anger. We see those L2 project teams holding hundreds of millions of dollars in financing, creating products that are not only slow but also charging retail investors high Gas fees, and ultimately harvesting a fortune through token unlocks. This model will be completely unworkable by 2026. Who is swimming naked? The logic of the current market has changed. The explosive success of DeepSeek has made everyone realize that the real technological revolution is 'cost reduction and efficiency improvement', rather than 'issuing tokens to make money'. Amidst the cries in the square, ($VANRY

2026 Token Selection Logic: Finding Alpha among the 'Preferred Children' of Big Corporations

Today's trending topics in Binance Square are all about the denunciation of 'VC token bloodsucking'. To be honest, I completely understand this kind of anger. We see those L2 project teams holding hundreds of millions of dollars in financing, creating products that are not only slow but also charging retail investors high Gas fees, and ultimately harvesting a fortune through token unlocks.
This model will be completely unworkable by 2026.
Who is swimming naked?
The logic of the current market has changed. The explosive success of DeepSeek has made everyone realize that the real technological revolution is 'cost reduction and efficiency improvement', rather than 'issuing tokens to make money'. Amidst the cries in the square, ($VANRY
I just browsed through Binance Square, and it was truly a sight to behold. All posts were criticizing the project parties for unlocking and dumping the tokens. A few months ago, the once-hyped 'heavenly doomed' AI project is now falling so hard that even its mother wouldn't recognize it. This is actually a good signal, indicating that the market has finally woken up: people no longer believe in those projects valued at tens of billions, yet have not a single real user. In this 'anti-VC' sentiment, I found that funds are starting to flow back to Vanar ($VANRY). These main players are quite clever; they know that only projects backed by true giants like Google and NVIDIA can make the cut. Vanar doesn't engage in those fake point tasks but directly lowers the Gas to zero. This kind of 'hardcore infrastructure' is where risk-averse funds are headed now. Stop looking for gold in a junkyard; following the big companies will help you avoid pitfalls. #vanar $VANRY @Vanar
I just browsed through Binance Square, and it was truly a sight to behold.
All posts were criticizing the project parties for unlocking and dumping the tokens. A few months ago, the once-hyped 'heavenly doomed' AI project is now falling so hard that even its mother wouldn't recognize it.

This is actually a good signal, indicating that the market has finally woken up: people no longer believe in those projects valued at tens of billions, yet have not a single real user.
In this 'anti-VC' sentiment, I found that funds are starting to flow back to Vanar ($VANRY). These main players are quite clever; they know that only projects backed by true giants like Google and NVIDIA can make the cut.

Vanar doesn't engage in those fake point tasks but directly lowers the Gas to zero. This kind of 'hardcore infrastructure' is where risk-averse funds are headed now.
Stop looking for gold in a junkyard; following the big companies will help you avoid pitfalls.

#vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain
From the myth of the '10,000 dollar airdrop' to the current free basic income, does Plasma still have a chance?Family, we must talk about Plasma ($XPL ) today. If anyone in the crypto world can be called 'historically the most extravagant', @Plasma is definitely on the list. Old investors remember that myth: during the presale, someone only invested 1 dollar for fun, and as a result, the TGE was directly hit with tokens worth 10,000 dollars! This kind of 'sunshine and abundance' force has directly led to its legendary status. 👋 Is the current event still appealing? The data speaks for itself! Although the coin price has experienced a sharp decline, the project's vision is still intact. I just took a glance at the latest activity leaderboard, and I'm solidly stuck in the top 500. This event focuses on a 'short and fast' approach: my daily actions involve posting and processing a transaction of 1000U, which totals to an overall wear cost of around 10U.

From the myth of the '10,000 dollar airdrop' to the current free basic income, does Plasma still have a chance?

Family, we must talk about Plasma ($XPL ) today.

If anyone in the crypto world can be called 'historically the most extravagant', @Plasma is definitely on the list. Old investors remember that myth: during the presale, someone only invested 1 dollar for fun, and as a result, the TGE was directly hit with tokens worth 10,000 dollars! This kind of 'sunshine and abundance' force has directly led to its legendary status.
👋 Is the current event still appealing? The data speaks for itself!
Although the coin price has experienced a sharp decline, the project's vision is still intact.

I just took a glance at the latest activity leaderboard, and I'm solidly stuck in the top 500. This event focuses on a 'short and fast' approach: my daily actions involve posting and processing a transaction of 1000U, which totals to an overall wear cost of around 10U.
From the 'reverse harvesting' of Binance Alpha, let's talk about why I'm now stubbornly pursuing the Vanar creator task?The current Binance Alpha has become distorted. It used to be 'participation means rewards', but now it's simply a war without gunpowder. Yesterday I checked the newly listed INX and KIN, and the points threshold skyrocketed to 230+; looking at the trading competitions, the thresholds for CLO and eSports are often several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars in trading volume. Where is the airdrop? This is clearly screening for 'big players' and 'transaction fee contributors'. @Vanar the creator task is simply a breath of fresh air You just need to move your mouth and write a bit ⚠️ Key point: Time is extremely tight! This event occurs every 14 days, and a snapshot is scheduled for February 4th. The rewards for the top 100 are roughly estimated at 400U based on market value, isn't that better than just giving away heads in trading competitions?

From the 'reverse harvesting' of Binance Alpha, let's talk about why I'm now stubbornly pursuing the Vanar creator task?

The current Binance Alpha has become distorted.
It used to be 'participation means rewards', but now it's simply a war without gunpowder. Yesterday I checked the newly listed INX and KIN, and the points threshold skyrocketed to 230+; looking at the trading competitions, the thresholds for CLO and eSports are often several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars in trading volume. Where is the airdrop? This is clearly screening for 'big players' and 'transaction fee contributors'.
@Vanarchain the creator task is simply a breath of fresh air
You just need to move your mouth and write a bit

⚠️ Key point: Time is extremely tight!
This event occurs every 14 days, and a snapshot is scheduled for February 4th. The rewards for the top 100 are roughly estimated at 400U based on market value, isn't that better than just giving away heads in trading competitions?
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs