🚨 CryptoQuant warns: the bear market may already be underway — $BTC under pressure. ⚠️ On-chain analysts at CryptoQuant note that Bitcoin demand growth has significantly slowed since October 2025, which historically often marks a shift in the market cycle. Demand previously fueled by ETFs, elections, and institutional accumulation has largely faded — and key support drivers are now disappearing. 📉
According to CryptoQuant, if this slowdown continues, an intermediate support zone lies around $70,000, while a deeper correction toward ~$56,000 could unfold in the second half of 2026. This level aligns with historical realized prices and has often acted as a macro bottom reference in past cycles.
📊 Institutional demand is cooling: Bitcoin ETFs are turning into net sellers, speculative activity is declining, and overall market sentiment is weakening — all classic signals of a market losing momentum.
🧠 Bottom line: This isn’t panic yet — but a key pillar of BTC support has weakened. The growth phase appears exhausted, and the market may now be entering a period of re-pricing, lower demand, and structural fragility, which often precedes a deeper correction.
Some will call this a healthy consolidation. Others will see it as a full cycle shift. 👀
▪️ Meteora $MET — $1.22B ▪️ Jupiter $JUP — $1.1B ▪️ Uniswap $UNI — $1B Sounds like success? Not exactly.
📉 Despite leading in revenue, Meteora’s token (MET) failed to attract demand after its long-awaited airdrop in October — the price remains in a clear downtrend.
💡 The protocol makes billions. ❓ The token keeps bleeding.
Is this a broken token model — or is the market seeing something others don’t?
👇 What do you think: do protocol revenues still matter for token price?
🚨 Liquidity Alert: The Fed quietly revealed its real firepower
This isn’t market speculation or a rumor. In official documents, the Federal Reserve outlined its theoretical maximum liquidity capacity in extreme stress scenarios — up to $5 trillion could be injected into the system.
💰 Why this number matters $5T is several times larger than the entire crypto market cap and exceeds the GDP of many major economies. This figure defines the upper boundary of what the Fed can do when financial stability is at risk. It’s not a promise — but it’s a signal.
🔍 How markets may read this 1️⃣ Psychological backstop — the message is clear: liquidity won’t simply disappear. 2️⃣ Expectation framing — markets now have a concrete reference point for future easing scenarios. 3️⃣ Risk assets angle — liquidity of this scale, even partially deployed, historically favors assets with higher beta.
📊 The bigger picture The Fed didn’t press the button. But it openly showed how big the button actually is.
Sometimes, knowing the size of the safety net is enough to change behavior — even before it’s used.
❓ Do you think markets are underestimating how powerful this signal really is?
🚨 Trust Wallet reveals details of a $8.5M hack — and it’s not that simple. ⚠️
The Trust Wallet team has published a detailed report on the incident that occurred on December 26: attackers compromised the browser extension (v2.68) and drained crypto assets worth approximately $8.5 million from 2,520 wallets. The attackers uploaded a malicious version of the extension via a spoofed domain and used stolen keys to bypass security checks, after which the update was automatically distributed to users. Once detected, the issue was quickly contained by rolling back to version 2.69 and disabling the compromised keys.
The compensation process has already started — affected users must submit claims and pass verification. However, due to the high volume of requests, the process is delayed, and the team has warned about an increased risk of phishing and scam attempts.
Why this matters: most hacks are linked to smart contract bugs or faulty features. This case is different. The vulnerability appeared in the software supply chain — when attackers gained access to distribution keys. This kind of incident undermines trust not in the code itself, but in how software is delivered — even through official channels.
🧠 Bottom line: this is not just another hack with losses. It’s a systemic warning about infrastructure-level risks, where security depends not only on code, but on key management and distribution controls. Markets may be reacting calmly for now — but most users haven’t fully grasped the implications yet.
Some will see this as an isolated incident. Others will see a much bigger problem. 👀
🚨 $2,000,000 stolen — and the “anonymous” thief was exposed. 🧨💰
A crypto hacker thought the usual tricks would work: new wallets, on-chain gymnastics, digital smoke screens.
They didn’t.
A blockchain investigator traced the funds, connected the dots, and linked the theft to a real person — not just an address on the network.
This isn’t about the money anymore.
It’s about a hard truth many still ignore: 🧠 anonymity in crypto is fragile 🔍 every transaction leaves a trail ⚠️ one mistake is enough to collapse the entire illusion
The system doesn’t forgive arrogance. And time is often the hacker’s worst enemy.
Some call this decentralization at work. Others see it as a warning shot.
👉 Do you think true anonymity in crypto still exists — or is it already a myth?
🚨 A massive crypto whale just bet $748 M on BTC, ETH & SOL — but this isn’t your typical “bullish signal” 😏 A whale with around $11 billion in assets shifted 330 M in ETH and opened three long positions across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana totalling roughly $748 M 📊 — suggesting confidence in a market rebound.
Transitioning capital into these major assets definitely catches attention, but headline positions rarely tell the full story 👁️🧠. Whales often move before markets react, and what looks like optimism can sometimes be hedging against something else.
Meanwhile, smart money has net short exposure in BTC and SOL totalling millions — meaning not all sophisticated players are on the same page.
🧠 MarketNerve takeaway: Institutional-sized bets are part of capital rotation, not a guaranteed breakout. Headlines are noise until the market’s reaction confirms direction. Most won’t notice the shift until after it begins.
Some will call this bullish. Others will say it’s just repositioning.
🚨 Crypto, espionage, and national security — South Korea draws a hard line 🇰🇷⚖️
South Korea’s Supreme Court has upheld a 4-year prison sentence for a crypto exchange employee involved in a spy operation linked to North Korean hackers 🕵️♂️💻.
🔍 According to investigators:
The employee helped hackers recruit a South Korean army captain
Military secrets were to be exchanged for Bitcoin
💰 The employee received $487,000 in BTC
💸 The officer was paid $33,500 in BTC
⚠️ Authorities ruled this as a direct violation of the National Security Act, calling it a threat to state security.
📌 Even more concerning: Hackers reportedly instructed the employee to provide: ⌚ a “watch-shaped device” 💾 a malicious USB — both intended to gain remote access to US–South Korea command systems. The attempt failed, but the intent was clear.
🔒 The army captain was previously sentenced to 10 years in prison under military secrecy laws.
🧠 Market takeaway: Crypto isn’t just finance anymore — it’s infrastructure. And when it intersects with geopolitics, regulation stops being theoretical.
⚠️ Strategy and BitMine are adding more crypto to their treasuries — but let’s be honest about what this really means 👀
💰 Strategy announced the purchase of 1,229 BTC for roughly $108.8M, bringing its total holdings to ~675,497 BTC (around $58.8B). 🔥 BitMine, meanwhile, keeps expanding its position with 4,110,525 ETH (~$11.9B), maintaining its lead among corporate Ether treasuries.
📈 On the surface, it looks like a bullish arms race. But the market reality is far less romantic.
⚠️ These massive buys do not represent fresh retail demand. This is institutional repositioning — large balance sheets reshuffling capital to fit internal strategies. When companies accumulate at this scale, price often stays flat because the market has already priced it in.
🧠 Big money is already in. Retail is usually the last to react.
📌 Market takeaway: Don’t read this as a simple “bullish signal.” This is a capital-heavy treasury game, not a crowd-driven breakout. Algorithms and funds accounted for this long ago.
⚠️ Trust Wallet moved to strict verification after the breach — but thousands of claims turned out to be false or duplicated 👀
🧩 The team confirmed that a malicious browser extension update (v2.68) affected 2,596 addresses. 📨 Around 5,000 compensation claims were submitted — many of them invalid or fraudulent. 🔍 Verification is now a critical step to ensure refunds go only to real victims.
🚫 Opening a claim form and clicking “submit” is not enough. A wave of false requests is slowing down the process for users who actually lost funds. This isn’t just another “wallet got hacked” story — it’s a reminder that responsibility and proof matter.
📌 Market takeaway: When large platforms launch compensation programs, they attract not only victims but also opportunists. The market keeps proving one thing: security, verification, and accountability matter more than headlines.
🚨 What exactly China wants to control — and why it’s unsettling
Under the new rules, AI providers must: 🔒 take full responsibility for security throughout the product’s lifecycle 🛡 audit algorithms to protect user data and privacy 🧩 assess users’ emotional states ⚠️ intervene if psychological dependency is detected
And yes — the bans are strict: ❌ threats to national security ❌ rumor spreading ❌ violence and obscene content
AI is no longer treated as just a tool. It’s viewed as a psychological influence — and that’s what China wants to control.
🚨 What exactly China wants to control — and why it’s unsettling
Under the new rules, AI providers must: 🔒 take full responsibility for security throughout the product’s lifecycle 🛡 audit algorithms to protect user data and privacy 🧩 assess users’ emotional states ⚠️ intervene if psychological dependency is detected
And yes — the bans are strict: ❌ threats to national security ❌ rumor spreading ❌ violence and obscene content
AI is no longer treated as just a tool. It’s viewed as a psychological influence — and that’s what China wants to control.
🤖🔥 China is getting serious about human-like AI. And this is no joke.
While the world is busy admiring “smart” chatbots and emotional AI, China is switching to strict regulation mode ⚠️
The country’s cybersecurity regulator has released a draft of new rules targeting AI services that: 🧠 think “like humans” 💬 communicate on an emotional level 🎥 use text, images, audio, and video
This is not cosmetic regulation. This is a clear signal to the market: the “do whatever you want” era for AI is over.
👉 The real question isn’t if this will happen. It’s who will control AI tomorrow.
🤖🔥 China is getting serious about human-like AI. And this is no joke.
While the world is busy admiring “smart” chatbots and emotional AI, China is switching to strict regulation mode ⚠️
The country’s cybersecurity regulator has released a draft of new rules targeting AI services that: 🧠 think “like humans” 💬 communicate on an emotional level 🎥 use text, images, audio, and video
This is not cosmetic regulation. This is a clear signal to the market: the “do whatever you want” era for AI is over.
👉 The real question isn’t if this will happen. It’s who will control AI tomorrow.
Think your crypto transactions are safe? 🤡 Wrong! Scammers are using fake addresses to steal your funds. Even experienced users can fall for it if they’re not paying attention ⚡️
Changpeng Zhao proposed a tough system to fight “address poisoning.” Yes, this is a real blow to scammers — but only if you actually check the addresses 👀
🔥 Bottom line: Crypto isn’t about “click and send,” it’s about brains, focus, and keeping your hands on the wheel. Ignore this — you lose.
💬 Do you double-check every address before sending, or just click blindly like everyone else?
🎄📉 The crypto market slipped into Christmas mode… but not without surprises
While the market slowed down for the holidays and volatility almost vanished 😴 Trust Wallet users faced an unpleasant reality — hacks and fund losses once again proved that it’s too early to relax ⚠️💥
📌 What happened this week: — the market moved sideways 📊 — trading volumes dropped, activity faded — scammers became more active amid the silence 👀 — wallet security was questioned once again 🔐
🎯 The takeaway is simple: Even when the market is “resting,” risks don’t disappear. Holidays are a favorite time not only for traders, but for hackers too 😬
⚡️ I’m honestly fed up with this nonsense already! ⚡️😡
Half of Telegram is now spamming ridiculous posts about some “gift crafting concept.” Seriously? It’s an obvious fantasy invented by some kid, and big channels — who should know better — keep pushing this nonsense for their gullible audience 🐘🔥
If regular gifts start getting burned, their rarity will increase 📈 If they give out rarer ones in return, their rarity will drop 📉 That’s basic market logic.
And what about the rarity already written into the NFT metadata? Is it supposed to change dynamically in real time — the background, pattern, model? 🤡 It just makes zero sense.
❗️ Stop promoting this useless fake concept. It’s not a mechanic — it’s a joke.
So, since you don’t want to hit that like button — there will be no more predictions. Looks like you forgot that everything happening on the market right now was already predicted by me at the start of the month. 😏🔥 And yes, I nailed it. 🎯