yosreia
10.7k Posts
yosreia
success
Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
2.3 Years
1.3K+ Following
10.8K+ Followers
20.1K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
What if transaction execution speed is no longer the most important factor in Web3?
What if the decision before execution determines the future of decentralized finance?
This is what Newton Protocol offers through the Decision Layer—a smart layer that checks every transaction before it reaches the blockchain, by assessing risk, applying compliance policies, verifying permissions, and then allowing execution or rejecting it.
With the rise of AI Agents, RWA, and institutional wallets, the real question may no longer be: “How many transactions can be executed?” but: “How many correct transactions deserve to be executed?”
Do you think Verify First will become the new standard that leads the next generation of Web3 protocols? 🤔
@NewtonProtocol #newt $NEWT
$RPL $EPIC
What if the decision before execution determines the future of decentralized finance?
This is what Newton Protocol offers through the Decision Layer—a smart layer that checks every transaction before it reaches the blockchain, by assessing risk, applying compliance policies, verifying permissions, and then allowing execution or rejecting it.
With the rise of AI Agents, RWA, and institutional wallets, the real question may no longer be: “How many transactions can be executed?” but: “How many correct transactions deserve to be executed?”
Do you think Verify First will become the new standard that leads the next generation of Web3 protocols? 🤔
@NewtonProtocol #newt $NEWT
$RPL $EPIC
PINNED
The Central Bank of Brazil classifies stablecoins as “electronic money” within a new regulatory framework
Recent reports indicate that the Central Bank of Brazil is moving toward considering stablecoins as a form of electronic money, subjecting them to a regulatory framework similar to those of traditional financial systems.
This shift means that the use of stablecoins in Brazil will become subject to clear regulatory requirements, including compliance standards, identity verification, and oversight of transfer operations, ensuring their integration into the official financial system rather than keeping them in an unregulated environment.
The decision reflects a gradual change in central banks’ stance toward digital assets; stablecoins are no longer treated as a tool outside the financial system, but rather as a potential part of the structure of modern payments—provided that regulatory controls are followed.
Observers believe this step could increase the use of stablecoins in payments and transfers within Brazil, but in turn may raise compliance requirements for users and projects operating in this field.
This move comes amid a growing global wave aimed at integrating digital assets into traditional financial systems, while maintaining oversight and financial stability.
#BrazilCentralBankSaysStablecoinsElectronicMoney
Recent reports indicate that the Central Bank of Brazil is moving toward considering stablecoins as a form of electronic money, subjecting them to a regulatory framework similar to those of traditional financial systems.
This shift means that the use of stablecoins in Brazil will become subject to clear regulatory requirements, including compliance standards, identity verification, and oversight of transfer operations, ensuring their integration into the official financial system rather than keeping them in an unregulated environment.
The decision reflects a gradual change in central banks’ stance toward digital assets; stablecoins are no longer treated as a tool outside the financial system, but rather as a potential part of the structure of modern payments—provided that regulatory controls are followed.
Observers believe this step could increase the use of stablecoins in payments and transfers within Brazil, but in turn may raise compliance requirements for users and projects operating in this field.
This move comes amid a growing global wave aimed at integrating digital assets into traditional financial systems, while maintaining oversight and financial stability.
#BrazilCentralBankSaysStablecoinsElectronicMoney
.....
yosreia
·
--
BullishWhat if transaction execution speed is no longer the most important factor in Web3?
What if the decision before execution determines the future of decentralized finance?
This is what Newton Protocol offers through the Decision Layer—a smart layer that checks every transaction before it reaches the blockchain, by assessing risk, applying compliance policies, verifying permissions, and then allowing execution or rejecting it.
With the rise of AI Agents, RWA, and institutional wallets, the real question may no longer be: “How many transactions can be executed?” but: “How many correct transactions deserve to be executed?”
Do you think Verify First will become the new standard that leads the next generation of Web3 protocols? 🤔
@NewtonProtocol #newt $NEWT
$RPL $EPIC
What if the decision before execution determines the future of decentralized finance?
This is what Newton Protocol offers through the Decision Layer—a smart layer that checks every transaction before it reaches the blockchain, by assessing risk, applying compliance policies, verifying permissions, and then allowing execution or rejecting it.
With the rise of AI Agents, RWA, and institutional wallets, the real question may no longer be: “How many transactions can be executed?” but: “How many correct transactions deserve to be executed?”
Do you think Verify First will become the new standard that leads the next generation of Web3 protocols? 🤔
@NewtonProtocol #newt $NEWT
$RPL $EPIC
A drop in support for BIP110 update to below 1% leads to its failure on the Bitcoin network
The proposed Bitcoin improvement known as BIP110 failed to gain sufficient support from the network’s miners, as the level of endorsement did not exceed 1% of the total hashrate. In practice, this means the absence of the required consensus to activate the update.
This failure again shows that Bitcoin protocol development depends not only on the quality of theoretical proposals, but also on broad economic and technical agreement among network participants—especially miners, who play a crucial role in securing the network and implementing updates.
According to how Bitcoin works, any protocol change cannot go into effect unless it receives real backing from a large share of mining power, making it difficult to pass updates that do not receive widespread acceptance.
This event also reflects Bitcoin’s conservative nature, where stability and security are preferred over rapid change, even if the proposals carry potential technical improvements.
#BIP110FailsWithUnder1%HashrateSupport
The proposed Bitcoin improvement known as BIP110 failed to gain sufficient support from the network’s miners, as the level of endorsement did not exceed 1% of the total hashrate. In practice, this means the absence of the required consensus to activate the update.
This failure again shows that Bitcoin protocol development depends not only on the quality of theoretical proposals, but also on broad economic and technical agreement among network participants—especially miners, who play a crucial role in securing the network and implementing updates.
According to how Bitcoin works, any protocol change cannot go into effect unless it receives real backing from a large share of mining power, making it difficult to pass updates that do not receive widespread acceptance.
This event also reflects Bitcoin’s conservative nature, where stability and security are preferred over rapid change, even if the proposals carry potential technical improvements.
#BIP110FailsWithUnder1%HashrateSupport
$CAKE
PancakeSwap (CAKE) — LONG at 1.407$
Plan
Entry: 1.407
Confirmation: a hold above 1.42 with trading volume
🛑 Stop Loss
1.33 (if broken = a major support break)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 1.48
TP2: 1.58
TP3: 1.72
PancakeSwap (CAKE) — LONG at 1.407$
Plan
Entry: 1.407
Confirmation: a hold above 1.42 with trading volume
🛑 Stop Loss
1.33 (if broken = a major support break)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 1.48
TP2: 1.58
TP3: 1.72
$POL
Polygon (POL) — LONG at 0.0737$
Plan
Entry: 0.0737
Confirmation: stability above 0.0742 with trading volume
🛑 Stop Loss
0.0715 (if broken = clear weakness in support)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 0.0765
TP2: 0.0790
TP3: 0.0830
Idea
Entry at short-term support + attempt a gradual rebound
Needs overall positive momentum in the market to support continued upside
Polygon (POL) — LONG at 0.0737$
Plan
Entry: 0.0737
Confirmation: stability above 0.0742 with trading volume
🛑 Stop Loss
0.0715 (if broken = clear weakness in support)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 0.0765
TP2: 0.0790
TP3: 0.0830
Idea
Entry at short-term support + attempt a gradual rebound
Needs overall positive momentum in the market to support continued upside
$EIGEN
EigenLayer (EIGEN) — LONG at 0.232$
Plan
Entry: 0.232
Confirmation: close above 0.235 with trading volume
🛑 Stop Loss
0.219 (if broken = break of short-term support)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 0.245
TP2: 0.265
TP3: 0.290
Idea
Entry at a support zone + attempt to rebound with momentum
Depends on the return of liquidity to the restaking sector
Needs overall market stability to support the upward move
EigenLayer (EIGEN) — LONG at 0.232$
Plan
Entry: 0.232
Confirmation: close above 0.235 with trading volume
🛑 Stop Loss
0.219 (if broken = break of short-term support)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 0.245
TP2: 0.265
TP3: 0.290
Idea
Entry at a support zone + attempt to rebound with momentum
Depends on the return of liquidity to the restaking sector
Needs overall market stability to support the upward move
$PIVX
PIVX — LONG at 0.046$
Plan
Entry: 0.046
Best confirmation: holding above 0.0465 with volume
🛑 Stop Loss
0.0435 (if broken = clear weakening in momentum)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 0.0490
TP2: 0.0520
TP3: 0.0560
Idea
The overall market needs to be stable (especially BTC) to support the move
PIVX — LONG at 0.046$
Plan
Entry: 0.046
Best confirmation: holding above 0.0465 with volume
🛑 Stop Loss
0.0435 (if broken = clear weakening in momentum)
🎯 Targets
TP1: 0.0490
TP2: 0.0520
TP3: 0.0560
Idea
The overall market needs to be stable (especially BTC) to support the move
Revolut is considering removing USDT from its platform
Reports indicate that fintech firm Revolut may consider removing support for Tether (USDT) in some European markets in response to regulatory compliance requirements.
This step does not mean the currency will collapse, but it reflects a clear trend toward tightening rules on stablecoins within centralized platforms.
The main outcome: greater pressure on liquidity inside regulated platforms, while USDT remains widely used outside them.
#RevolutToDelistUSDT
Reports indicate that fintech firm Revolut may consider removing support for Tether (USDT) in some European markets in response to regulatory compliance requirements.
This step does not mean the currency will collapse, but it reflects a clear trend toward tightening rules on stablecoins within centralized platforms.
The main outcome: greater pressure on liquidity inside regulated platforms, while USDT remains widely used outside them.
#RevolutToDelistUSDT
$SAGA
Saga — Long deal at $0.0143
Entry plan
Entry: 0.0143
Best confirmation: close above 0.0145 with strong trading volume
Buy addition (DCA): 0.0140 → 0.0136 if the price drops
🛑 Stop loss
Stop loss: 0.0132 (breaking this level means the uptrend structure has failed)
Targets
First target: 0.0152
Second target: 0.0165
Third target: 0.0180
Trade idea
The trade is based on a level retest + momentum push
You need liquidity and trading volume higher than the 0.0145 zone
If the price stays below 0.0145 without breaking through → it’s likely just a ranging/sideways move, not strong upside
Saga — Long deal at $0.0143
Entry plan
Entry: 0.0143
Best confirmation: close above 0.0145 with strong trading volume
Buy addition (DCA): 0.0140 → 0.0136 if the price drops
🛑 Stop loss
Stop loss: 0.0132 (breaking this level means the uptrend structure has failed)
Targets
First target: 0.0152
Second target: 0.0165
Third target: 0.0180
Trade idea
The trade is based on a level retest + momentum push
You need liquidity and trading volume higher than the 0.0145 zone
If the price stays below 0.0145 without breaking through → it’s likely just a ranging/sideways move, not strong upside
$BEAT
Short BEAT $2.91
Entry Points:
Main entry: 2.91 – 2.92 (retest of resistance)
Additional entry: 2.95 (breakout failure / price rejection)
Plan:
Confirmation: price remains below 2.91
Cancel the short: close above 2.95
Targets:
TP1: 2.85
TP2: 2.78
TP3: 2.70
Stop Loss:
2.95 close a clear candle above it
Short BEAT $2.91
Entry Points:
Main entry: 2.91 – 2.92 (retest of resistance)
Additional entry: 2.95 (breakout failure / price rejection)
Plan:
Confirmation: price remains below 2.91
Cancel the short: close above 2.95
Targets:
TP1: 2.85
TP2: 2.78
TP3: 2.70
Stop Loss:
2.95 close a clear candle above it
$COMP
COMP at 17.33$ — Long plan
Attempt a rebound from a short-term support area around 17.30, with the possibility of continued upside if the price holds.
Entry:
Conservative entry: wait for a candlestick close confirming a hold above 17.40
Aggressive entry: from 17.33 with a clear rebound signal (price rejection + increased volume)
Stop Loss:
16.90
(Breaking support invalidates the bullish scenario)
Take Profit:
TP1: 17.90
TP2: 18.60
TP3: 19.40
Trade management:
At TP1: secure the trade and move SL to the entry point
Take partial profits to reduce risk
Monitor momentum at 18.60 for signs of slowdown or continuation
Condition for continuation of the uptrend:
Holding above 17.30 with higher highs and higher lows.
Break 16.90 = complete invalidation of the Long idea.
COMP at 17.33$ — Long plan
Attempt a rebound from a short-term support area around 17.30, with the possibility of continued upside if the price holds.
Entry:
Conservative entry: wait for a candlestick close confirming a hold above 17.40
Aggressive entry: from 17.33 with a clear rebound signal (price rejection + increased volume)
Stop Loss:
16.90
(Breaking support invalidates the bullish scenario)
Take Profit:
TP1: 17.90
TP2: 18.60
TP3: 19.40
Trade management:
At TP1: secure the trade and move SL to the entry point
Take partial profits to reduce risk
Monitor momentum at 18.60 for signs of slowdown or continuation
Condition for continuation of the uptrend:
Holding above 17.30 with higher highs and higher lows.
Break 16.90 = complete invalidation of the Long idea.
$BAND
BAND at 0.161$ — Short Plan
Entry Point:
Conservative entry: 0.160 – 0.161 after a rejection appears (reversal candle)
Aggressive entry: 0.161 immediately with confirmation of weakening upward momentum
Stop Loss:
0.169
(Clear break of the resistance and invalidation of the bearish scenario)
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: 0.155
TP2: 0.150
TP3: 0.145
Trade Management:
At TP1: take a portion of the profits
Move the stop loss to the entry point after the first strong pullback
Short Success Condition:
Price staying below 0.161 with a clear weakness in attempts to break through.
If closed above 0.168 → the trade is fully canceled
.
BAND at 0.161$ — Short Plan
Entry Point:
Conservative entry: 0.160 – 0.161 after a rejection appears (reversal candle)
Aggressive entry: 0.161 immediately with confirmation of weakening upward momentum
Stop Loss:
0.169
(Clear break of the resistance and invalidation of the bearish scenario)
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: 0.155
TP2: 0.150
TP3: 0.145
Trade Management:
At TP1: take a portion of the profits
Move the stop loss to the entry point after the first strong pullback
Short Success Condition:
Price staying below 0.161 with a clear weakness in attempts to break through.
If closed above 0.168 → the trade is fully canceled
.
$ICP
ICP at 2.26$ — Long plan
Entry points:
Conservative entry: wait for a firm break and hold above 2.30
Aggressive entry: from 2.26 with a clear reversal (reversal candlestick + volume)
Stop Loss:
2.10
(Breaking support invalidates the entire bullish scenario)
Take Profit targets:
TP1: 2.45
TP2: 2.65
TP3: 2.90
Trade management:
At 2.45: secure the trade (move SL to the entry point)
Take partial profits to reduce risk
Monitor momentum; if the rally weakens near 2.65, exit gradually
Condition for continuation of the uptrend:
Hold above 2.26 and form higher lows.
Break of 2.10 = full cancellation of the Long idea and trend shifts to bearish.
ICP at 2.26$ — Long plan
Entry points:
Conservative entry: wait for a firm break and hold above 2.30
Aggressive entry: from 2.26 with a clear reversal (reversal candlestick + volume)
Stop Loss:
2.10
(Breaking support invalidates the entire bullish scenario)
Take Profit targets:
TP1: 2.45
TP2: 2.65
TP3: 2.90
Trade management:
At 2.45: secure the trade (move SL to the entry point)
Take partial profits to reduce risk
Monitor momentum; if the rally weakens near 2.65, exit gradually
Condition for continuation of the uptrend:
Hold above 2.26 and form higher lows.
Break of 2.10 = full cancellation of the Long idea and trend shifts to bearish.
$HYPE
HYPE at $70 — Long plan
Continuation of the uptrend after consolidating above the 70 area as a support/accumulation level.
Entry:
Conservative entry: after a candle closes with consolidation above 70
Aggressive entry: from 70 with a clear rebound and increased momentum
Stop Loss:
66.5
(Breaking the zone means failure of the short-term bullish structure)
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: 74
TP2: 78
TP3: 85
Trade Management:
At 74: secure the trade (move SL to the entry point)
Take part of the profits to reduce risk
Follow momentum; any weakness in buying volume = partial exit
Condition for continuation of the uptrend:
Holding above 70 with the formation of higher highs and higher lows.
A break below 66.5 = cancel the entire Long scenario and shift to caution or selling.
HYPE at $70 — Long plan
Continuation of the uptrend after consolidating above the 70 area as a support/accumulation level.
Entry:
Conservative entry: after a candle closes with consolidation above 70
Aggressive entry: from 70 with a clear rebound and increased momentum
Stop Loss:
66.5
(Breaking the zone means failure of the short-term bullish structure)
Take Profit Targets:
TP1: 74
TP2: 78
TP3: 85
Trade Management:
At 74: secure the trade (move SL to the entry point)
Take part of the profits to reduce risk
Follow momentum; any weakness in buying volume = partial exit
Condition for continuation of the uptrend:
Holding above 70 with the formation of higher highs and higher lows.
A break below 66.5 = cancel the entire Long scenario and shift to caution or selling.
$AVAX
AVAX trade at $7 (Long)
Scenario: Bounce from a key support area around 7.00
Entry:
Conservative entry: Wait for a candle close to confirm a hold above 7.00
Aggressive entry: From 7.00 immediately with a bounce confirmation
Stop Loss:
6.70
(A clear break of support cancels the bullish scenario)
Take Profit:
TP1: 7.40 (first short resistance)
TP2: 7.90 (medium liquidity zone)
TP3: 8.50 (extension of the move + momentum)
Trade management:
After reaching 7.40, it’s preferable to move the stop to the entry point (Breakeven)
Take partial profits at TP1 to reduce risk
Main condition for keeping the trade bullish:
Holding above 7.00 without breaking 6.70
Any clear break below 6.70 = full cancellation of the Long idea.
AVAX trade at $7 (Long)
Scenario: Bounce from a key support area around 7.00
Entry:
Conservative entry: Wait for a candle close to confirm a hold above 7.00
Aggressive entry: From 7.00 immediately with a bounce confirmation
Stop Loss:
6.70
(A clear break of support cancels the bullish scenario)
Take Profit:
TP1: 7.40 (first short resistance)
TP2: 7.90 (medium liquidity zone)
TP3: 8.50 (extension of the move + momentum)
Trade management:
After reaching 7.40, it’s preferable to move the stop to the entry point (Breakeven)
Take partial profits at TP1 to reduce risk
Main condition for keeping the trade bullish:
Holding above 7.00 without breaking 6.70
Any clear break below 6.70 = full cancellation of the Long idea.
$OPEN
Open at 0.167$
Short plan:
Entry: 0.167 (or wait for a retest and rejection)
Stop loss: 0.173 (above the last top / cancel the idea)
Targets:
First target: 0.160
Second target: 0.152
Third target: 0.145
The direction remains bearish only if price stays below 0.167.
If it returns above 0.173 with strong momentum, the short trade is considered canceled.
Open at 0.167$
Short plan:
Entry: 0.167 (or wait for a retest and rejection)
Stop loss: 0.173 (above the last top / cancel the idea)
Targets:
First target: 0.160
Second target: 0.152
Third target: 0.145
The direction remains bearish only if price stays below 0.167.
If it returns above 0.173 with strong momentum, the short trade is considered canceled.
Tightening oversight of digital asset ethics opens a new debate about conflicts of interest in U.S. legislation
U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand reignited the discussion on the ethics of handling digital assets within government institutions by calling for stronger restrictions on the ownership or trading of cryptocurrencies by officials involved in drafting policies.
The proposal focuses on a sensitive issue in the sector: the need to separate legislative decision-making from personal investment interest, especially as the influence of digital assets grows in the economy and financial policies.
Although the primary goal is to enhance transparency and prevent conflicts of interest, this direction opens a broad space for debate about the limits of officials’ participation in a fast-evolving market like crypto, and how to achieve a balance between fair regulation and supporting innovation.
In the end, the issue is no longer only about digital assets themselves, but about who has the right to shape their rules in the next phase of the digital economy.
#GillibrandCallsForDigitalAssetEthicsBan
U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand reignited the discussion on the ethics of handling digital assets within government institutions by calling for stronger restrictions on the ownership or trading of cryptocurrencies by officials involved in drafting policies.
The proposal focuses on a sensitive issue in the sector: the need to separate legislative decision-making from personal investment interest, especially as the influence of digital assets grows in the economy and financial policies.
Although the primary goal is to enhance transparency and prevent conflicts of interest, this direction opens a broad space for debate about the limits of officials’ participation in a fast-evolving market like crypto, and how to achieve a balance between fair regulation and supporting innovation.
In the end, the issue is no longer only about digital assets themselves, but about who has the right to shape their rules in the next phase of the digital economy.
#GillibrandCallsForDigitalAssetEthicsBan
🇺🇸 The United States boosts its ambition to become the world’s crypto capital
In a new indication of a shift in US policy toward digital assets, the Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Paul Atkins, stated that President Donald Trump directed the agency to work toward making the United States “the crypto capital of the world.”
This statement reflects a move toward a more innovation-friendly regulatory environment, which could pave the way for greater expansion of blockchain companies, increased institutional investment, and faster adoption of digital assets within the world’s largest economy.
If this vision continues and is translated into clear policies, the crypto market may enter a new phase of growth and global competition, with more projects and capital moving to the US market.
The market isn’t just watching statements... it’s waiting for the practical steps that will shape the future of this direction.
In a new indication of a shift in US policy toward digital assets, the Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Paul Atkins, stated that President Donald Trump directed the agency to work toward making the United States “the crypto capital of the world.”
This statement reflects a move toward a more innovation-friendly regulatory environment, which could pave the way for greater expansion of blockchain companies, increased institutional investment, and faster adoption of digital assets within the world’s largest economy.
If this vision continues and is translated into clear policies, the crypto market may enter a new phase of growth and global competition, with more projects and capital moving to the US market.
The market isn’t just watching statements... it’s waiting for the practical steps that will shape the future of this direction.
Log in to explore more content