币圈老杨_

I have been in the cryptocurrency industry for 7 years, focusing on trading BTC, ETH, BNB, SOL, and stablecoins, dedicated to providing clients with high-quality investment opportunities. With precise market analysis and strict risk control, my trading services have achieved a 44% return over the past 90 days. Join now and start your journey to wealth enhancement! #带单大神

$JUP This +15% bullish candle has a bit of “product line” flavor behind it—not just casually riding Solana’s hype.

I looked at the last few X posts from Jupiter and found three signals that feel more solid: Forecast beta is already live, starting with the 15-minute BTC prediction market; Jupiter Mobile is still pushing mobile prediction plus cashback/referral campaigns; and Jupiter Lend continues to talk about yield entry points like Earn Vaults and JUICED. Put together, it’s not just slogans—it’s consolidating Solana’s trading, prediction, and lending entry points into a single app.

That’s a positive for JUP’s mid-term trend: if these entry points truly drive retention and trading volume, then JUP isn’t only a DEX-token narrative anymore—it’s more like a traffic layer for Solana’s trading front end. But don’t ignore the short-term order book: on Binance, the JUP spot is around 0.2345, up +14.7% in 24h; the perp is about 0.2341, with roughly 24M USDT volume in 24h, and funding rates are still slightly negative. When it rises fast, it means attention is coming in—but it also means the cost of chasing has been pushed up.

My take: project updates look more like real delivery than a pure pump-and-dump, so the trend is healthier than just “pulling up the chart.” However, you still need to hold near the 1H MA20 around 0.218 to confirm someone is stepping in. If it falls back into the 0.199–0.204 range, then treat this move as short-term heat driven by the Forecast narrative—don’t force a fundamental thesis.

#JUP #Jupiter #Solana #DeFi #币安广场

$SEI This round, I don’t really want to write it as “back on the hot search again.” What’s truly interesting is that a few of Sei’s recent updates on X are pointing toward trading infrastructure.

One is the discussion around Giga / a multi-proposer chain still being amplified by official accounts. The core message is pretty straightforward: if a chain wants to support trading applications, ordinary throughput narratives aren’t enough—block production and latency need to hold up. Another is Monaco. On June 29, Sei reposted a project introduction, and the team background features names with a strong trading/market-making flavor, like GSR, Goldman, Jump Crypto, and Robinhood. A bit earlier, Sei Labs launched Ambulance, claiming that consensus latency in severely delayed scenarios can drop by up to 10.8x.

These don’t feel like pure marketing slogans. They feel more like pushing Sei further toward being an “on-chain trading-dedicated base layer.” In the medium term, I’d lean slightly positive, but I’m not blindly chasing it right now. On Binance, SEIUSDT perpetuals are hovering around 0.0475, down about -3.6% over 24h. Contract volume is roughly 11.3 million USDT. The price is hugging the 1H MA20, and the funding rate is still slightly negative.

My take: the project story is getting points, but the market hasn’t confirmed it yet. Only if $SEI regains 0.049–0.050 can the market start pricing in this trading-infrastructure narrative. If the near-term low at 0.0464 gets broken with volume, then treat it as a failed “heat returning” move first—don’t use “technical updates” to muscle through short-term stops.

#SEI #DeFi #Layer1 #交易策略 #币安广场

$ZEC This time, I don’t just want to watch that one small green candle. What’s genuinely getting interesting for Zcash over the past couple of days is that the official side and the ecosystem are actively shoring up the underlying user experience.

The Zcash Foundation has just released an engineering update: the release of Zebra is starting to make reproducible, signed versions; the sync stutter around the near chain tip has been fixed too; and NU6.3 “Ironwood” has already broken ground. Zodl Android 3.7.1 also addresses the “Quote unavailable” issue in BTC swaps/payments. On the other side, Kalshi has listed ZEC Perpetuals, with the positioning being US-regulated Zcash perpetuals.

I’ll categorize this cluster of signals as “privacy-coin infrastructure patching + compliant derivatives being exposed,” not the kind of marketing that just shouts slogans. If Zebra and Zodl keep filling in these experience gaps in the medium term, ZEC’s narrative will gradually shift from old-school privacy coins toward “usable, tradable, and able to be picked up by compliant products.”

But the market still hasn’t reached the point where you can close your eyes and chase. On Binance, the ZECUSDT spot price is around 401, up about +1.2% over 24h; for perpetuals, 24h volume is roughly 476 million U. The 1H MA20 is around 399, and the 24h high is 411. If 399/396 can’t be held, these updates should be treated as fundamental noise for now. Only if it can hold should you go test 411—then it would really look like the market is repricing.

#ZEC #Zcash #隐私币 #交易策略 #币安广场

$XLM This move isn’t just a simple pump. I’m more interested in whether these new lines for Stellar have staying power.

Stellar’s official account just (18 hours ago) posted about Open USD: this stablecoin will be integrated into Stellar. The positioning is a low-cost, high-throughput USD network for enterprises. Denelle Dixon also said Stellar is the launch partner for Open USD—not merely a token mention to ride the stablecoin hype.

In addition, Allium and Stellar recently split and shared Franklin Templeton’s on-chain data for the fund platform/asset-backed offerings. The logic is still the same: get real financial assets to run on-chain, rather than only doing payment-story narratives. Cointelegraph also brought attention to the topic of Open USD’s 140+ partners, which boosted market interest.

The market has already priced in some of this in advance: Binance’s XLM spot is up about 10.7% over 24 hours, with derivatives trading volume around 220 million USDT. Price is hovering near 0.201, clearly above the 1H MA20 around 0.1886. My take is that Stellar’s mid-term trend is improving, and the stablecoin/RWA track is shifting from the “old payment rails” toward enterprise settlement infrastructure. But don’t treat a single bullish candle as certainty in the short term: if the 0.188–0.185 support zone can’t hold, or if there’s no real issuance/circulation data after Open USD, then this thesis needs to be discounted.

#XLM #Stellar #稳定币 #RWA #币安广场

$TAIKO This surge doesn’t look like a typical pump-and-dump driven by a retail ticket pull-up—it feels more like the market is re-scoring the project’s “incident handling progress.”

What I’m watching is Taiko’s official updates from the past few days: on June 29, the Security Council executed the proposal and the fix/deployment was completed; on June 30, Taiko said the network is back online, bridge assets have been restored to a 1:1 mapping, and only the step of reopening the bridge remains. Developer accounts also reminded node operators to upgrade to taiko-alethia-client-v2.3.1 and to check the block hash at height 8,110,008.

These signals aren’t marketing copy—they’re part of the risk remediation process. For the project’s trajectory, the most important thing in the short term isn’t pitching a new narrative, but whether trust can be rebuilt: chain restoration, bridge settlement, node synchronization, and follow-up postmortems must all keep up.

The order book has already reacted a bit too. On Binance, the TAIKOUSDT perpetual’s current price is around 0.0878, up roughly 17% over 24h, with trading volume around 48.2 million USDT. The 1H MA20 is near 0.0773, and the funding rate is still slightly negative. In other words, longs are vying for the “recovery expectation,” but the broader market still hasn’t reached a fully bullish consensus state.

My take: this time Taiko isn’t just riding hype—there really is progress in the project’s recovery. But it’s still a risk-repair and remediation setup, not a mindless trend trade. If the 0.077–0.074 area can’t be held, or if the bridge reopening is delayed again and the postmortem isn’t clear enough, then this medium-term recovery logic will get discounted first.

#TAIKO #L2 #链上安全 #交易策略 #币安广场

$GALA This round, I don’t just want to see whether it’s going to heat up on the trending topics. What Official X has been putting out lately feels more like: “GalaChain first fills in the DeFi infrastructure, then uses game content to drive activity.”

Over the past few hours, GalaSwap has been adding traded assets like FET, AAVE, ARB, ONDO, CRV, ETHFI, JTO, and GRASS, while also promoting the ARB/WBTC pools: TVL is about $47,000, 24h volume about $44,000, and the APR marked at 103%. At the same time, Gala Games is also pushing real-time PvP mini-games like Greedy Cubes, which suggests it isn’t only relying on a single narrative to shill chain gaming.

My take is a bit cautious: this is an update with actual product actions, not just pure call-and-praise. But the scale is still small. For GALA to move from the “old game narrative” back to “on-chain apps + the Swap ecosystem,” the key is whether GalaSwap’s pools and real game users can continue to amplify.

The chart still hasn’t given a strong confirmation: Binance spot is around 0.002283, up only 0.26% in 24h. Derivatives trading volume is about $7.34 million USDT, and the price has just moved above the 1H MA20 of 0.00225. Holding 0.00225 is what tells you there are buyers. If it falls back near 0.00218, I’ll treat this run as short-lived attention brought by the official update and won’t chase.

#GALA #GalaChain #GalaSwap #GameFi #币安广场

$PYTH This isn’t a typical coordinated pull— the core message is solid: Nasdaq has connected TotalView’s deep order book and order-imbalance data to the Pyth Data Marketplace, so on-chain apps, trading platforms, and prediction markets can all directly consume this dataset.

I scoured Pyth’s recent X posts, and the signals are more grounded than just repeating an “oracle” storyline: about 14 hours ago, the official account published a Nasdaq announcement stating it selected Pyth; later, it added that the Marketplace already includes data sources such as the U.S. Department of Commerce, Kalshi, Euronext, SGX FX, and Tradeweb. CoinDesk and CMC are also covering the same line, suggesting this isn’t just small-circle self-hype.

My take: Pyth’s mid-term trend is moving from a “price-feeding oracle” toward a “financial data distribution layer.” If that path is executed successfully, the upside ceiling could be higher than that of a typical DeFi oracle. But in the short term, don’t treat the word “Nasdaq” as an invincibility token.

On Binance, PYTHUSDT spot is up roughly 8.6%; perpetuals 24h volume is about $66 million USDT. The price is around 0.0394 and has just climbed above the 1H MA20 at 0.03845; the funding rate is still slightly negative. A healthy path would be a pullback near 0.038 that holds, with continued volume expansion. If it falls back below 0.037, it suggests this move is more like a headline-driven spike—don’t stubbornly hold through it.

#PYTH #PythNetwork #预言机 #RWA #币安广场

$LDO Today it feels more like: “The product is moving, but the coin price is still hesitating.”

Over the past two days, Lido’s official team has been issuing consecutive updates around EarnUSD: the vault has already reached $30 million in deposits; over the past month it’s up +300%. Mellow also mentioned that its 7-day average APY exceeds 7%. Lido itself has added a 14-day average of roughly 7.2%, supporting USDT/USDC deposits and withdrawals. Another on-chain signal is that Onchain Lens monitored the Ethereum Foundation staking 4,938 ETH (about $7.86 million) into Lido—meaning it may keep adding further.

My take: this isn’t just the old story of “staking leader” being promoted. Lido is extending the infrastructure behind stETH into US-dollar yield products and a more convenient vault entry point. The trend is definitely a plus. But the price action hasn’t gotten excited along with it: Binance LDOUSDT perpetual is hovering around 0.243, down about -3.4% over 24h; the 1H MA20 is also around 0.243, and trading volume is only about $12.28 million USDT.

So I’m not in a rush to treat this as a reversal. If it can hold the 0.235 low, and then reclaim the 0.254 area while EarnUSD TVL keeps rising, then that would look like a mid-term recovery. But if TVL stalls and 0.235 breaks again, then it’s a case of: the product update is solid, yet the market isn’t buying it—for now.

#LDO #Lido #ETH #DeFi #币安广场

@NewtonProtocol 的 Newton Mainnet Beta，我更愿意把它看成 DeFi 缺的“交易前刹车”。现在很多 vault 的风控还在链下表格、后台流程和人工判断里，真出事时只能复盘。Newton 的做法是结算前先按策略检查合规、身份、安全威胁、杠杆和预言机风险，通过就签名放行，不通过就挡住。$NEWT 后面真正要看的，不只是活动热度，而是这个授权层能不能先在 vault 跑出真实用量，再扩到 RWA、稳定币和 AI agent。#Newt

$SUI This round I’ll first look at Hashi, not that little red K.

In the past few hours, the Sui team has been reposting a series of things: Fluid is preparing to build a BTC credit market based on Hashi—meaning BTC doesn’t leave its original chain, but can be used as collateral through a formally verified contract on Sui; TBook and Paga are also bringing tokenized RWA to Africa-user entry points; and going further back, Sui Basecamp is set for October’s TOKEN2049—still the same new narrative: agentic commerce / machine trading.

This isn’t just Sui shouting “the ecosystem is strong.” It’s more like Sui is trying to push itself in two directions: BTC-collateralized credit + a real-world asset on-ramp. I’ll give it points for the medium-term trend, but not to the level of blindly chasing.

On Binance, $SUI for the perpetual is roughly 0.688; over 24h it’s only down slightly by about 0.6%, with volume around 106 million USDT. The price is still hovering near the 1H MA20 around 0.691. My take: the project updates are becoming more practical, but the market hasn’t fully bought in yet. Only when it can reclaim the 0.691–0.698 range will it look like the market is starting to recognize this line; if it falls back to around 0.676, treat it as the narrative not catching—don’t stubbornly hold on.

#SUI #SuiNetwork #RWA #DeFi #币安广场

Today, the news about OpenUSD just around the corner has made Circle $CRCL drop by $2.7 billion! So what is OpenUSD? 👇

1. OpenUSD (oUSD) is a new stablecoin launched by the Open Standard Alliance. Members include Visa, Mastercard, Coinbase, BlackRock, Stripe, and more.

2. The driving force behind oUSD should be Stripe and Bridge, because
i) The CEO of Open Standard is Zach Abrams, who is also the co-founder and CEO of Bridge.
ii) Bridge is a stablecoin project that was acquired by Stripe. It was originally meant to issue stablecoins—so launching oUSD now makes a lot of sense.

3. Why is oUSD definitely awesome? Reserve yield sharing
The core benefit for traditional stablecoin issuers comes from the yield on their reserve assets—mainly U.S. Treasury interest. For example, Tether (USDT)’s issuer earns about $10 billion a year by basically keeping the interest. But with oUSD, the reserve yield is shared with ecosystem partners. Whoever distributes more oUSD gets more interest; they only collect a portion of management fees themselves. That way, companies have incentives to distribute oUSD, and the market becomes more active.

Positive: Stripe (not listed)
Negative: $CRCL
oUSD will first be listed on the Base and Solana networks. You can keep an eye on the related assets.
$SOL

$ARB This time I’m looking at Arbitrum—not because it’s #1 in the 6-hour trending searches, but because these official updates finally look like they’re forming a real line.

Today on X, Arbitrum has been continuously talking about enterprise on-chain business: one is confidentiality—meaning enterprises can put sensitive transaction workflows on-chain, but selectively disclose them only to clients, auditors, and regulators; the other is an advertising network on Arbitrum’s pilot chain by LG Electronics, used to verify ad delivery performance, not relying entirely on a single platform’s self-reported metrics.

Looking further back, that programmable finance narrative from mid-June wasn’t just about “L2 low fees.” It was talking about an compliance engine, configurable privacy, faster settlement, and priority gas auctions—basically enterprise requirements.

My take: ARB’s mid-term story is shifting from a “general-purpose L2” toward enterprise-ready on-chain financial/data verification infrastructure. That’s a development signal, not pure marketing. But the order book hasn’t priced it in early yet. Binance ARBUSDT spot is around 0.0762, up only about 0.13% in 24h. Perpetuals成交 is roughly 18.13M USDT, and the price has just moved above the 1H MA20 of 0.0753; the funding rate is only 0.01% as well.

So here I don’t want to chase the narrative. First, I want to see whether it can hold around 0.075. If it holds, the market may start re-pricing this line for enterprise adoption; if it falls back below 0.0735, it would mean “trending is trending”—and that capital still isn’t taking these updates seriously.

#ARB #Arbitrum #Layer2 #交易策略 #币安广场

$POL This time isn’t just piggybacking on the “payments narrative.” In the past few hours, Polygon’s official messaging has been all about Open Money Stack: using a stablecoin balance to deliver local-currency payouts to recipients in different countries, with everything—bank deposits, cash withdrawals, and on-chain transfers—handled within a single workflow.

I looked at the latest few posts on X, and the signals are a bit stronger than typical marketing:
Polygon says that in May, there were 198 million stablecoin transactions, about $80 billion in volume—ranking first by transaction count;
Open Money Stack is still pushing pay-ins, wallets, accounts, and orchestration—not just a single wallet feature;
Uquid is also integrating with Polygon, highlighting 1.75-second block times, around 5 seconds finality, and low fees to improve the payment experience.

If this line really plays out, then $POL ’s mid-term story will shift from “old L2 / old MATIC” toward stablecoin payment infrastructure—which is, in my view, the most worth watching part. The problem is the price hasn’t caught up yet: POLUSDT perpetual is around 0.0683, down about 3% over 24 hours, with roughly $7.5 million USDT in volume, and the price is still below the 20-day moving average (1H MA20) at 0.0696.

So I’m not treating it as already reversed. If it reclaims the 0.0696–0.0708 area, that would suggest the market is starting to price in the payments/stablecoin theme; if it continues to fall below the 0.068 area, that would imply the delivery narrative on X is temporarily being overwhelmed by selling pressure.

#POL #Polygon #稳定币 #PayFi #币安广场

$AIGENSYN This round isn’t just a simple AI-cash-ticket-style pull-up; I’d rather see it as a market where “a research line + a listing line” collide.

Over the past day, Gensyn has had several signals: the Gensyn Foundation transferred to Upbit spot, with the official time at 16:00 KST on June 30; Gensyn’s official account has also been talking about seven papers in ACL Findings, ICML, and ACM EC; the team continues to push Delphi’s agent TUI and the London multiagent hackathon. Founder Ben Fielding’s message is also very direct: AI shouldn’t only run on remote machines of big companies—at-home PCs will be here soon.

When you put all these together, it’s not all marketing. At least Gensyn is pushing “decentralized machine intelligence” along several tracks—research, developer tooling, and offline developer events. But the short-term tape has already started sprinting: Binance spot 24h is up +19.6%, perpetuals turnover is about 324 million USDT, price is around 0.0345, 1H MA20 is roughly 0.0343, and the funding rate is still negative.

My view: the mid-term story is becoming more solid, but the short term isn’t suitable for blindly chasing. As long as levels around 0.034 can hold, and trading doesn’t collapse, the market will likely continue to award a premium for “AI + decentralized compute/intelligent networks.” But if it falls back below 0.032, or later on X turns into only reposts of the exchange listing—without new tools and papers actually landing—then this move looks more like a heat-driven rebound.

#AIGENSYN #Gensyn #AIAgent #交易策略 #币安广场

$JUP I don’t really want to treat this as a typical Solana rebound ticker this time.

Jupiter’s X updates these past couple of days have been a bit intense: the Forecast prediction market beta has already gone live—first doing a 15-minute BTC market; Jupiter Wallet has also re-enabled fingerprint/Face ID login; and JupUSD has been added into JLP as a custody asset. Going further down, Jupiter Lend is still pushing stablecoin yield and a SOL validator entry.

This isn’t a marketing post like “something new is launching.” It feels more like they’re stacking features for Jupiter—moving from a swap aggregator toward an on-chain finance entry point. The direction is a plus: trading, prediction, wallet, and lending are all being pulled into one front-end.

But the coin price hasn’t fully caught up yet. The JUPUSDT perpetual contract is currently around 0.2087, down about 4.3% over the past 24 hours, with roughly 13.26M in volume (U). The 1H MA20 is near 0.2074, and the funding rate is still slightly negative. In other words: the project is delivering, but the chart is only just pressing up against the moving averages, breathing for a moment.

My take: the medium-term trend is more solid than just trading the Solana beta, but don’t chase it on the short-term like it’s a faith play. If the 0.207 area can’t hold—especially if it drops back below 0.20—then this “consecutive product launches” logic will be treated by the market as not being bought. Only once it can stabilize above 0.219 should we talk about sentiment returning.

#JUP #Jupiter #Solana #DeFi #币安广场

$UNI This time it’s not another ordinary announcement “supporting new assets.”

Uniswap’s official account reposted Ondo from 6 hours ago: 430+ tokenized stocks and ETFs are already tradable from the Uniswap front end, covering both the Ethereum and BNB Chain ecosystems, and they can also be routed via the UniswapX API.

Looking ahead, it’s also connecting further: on June 29, MegaETH integrated with the Uniswap Web App / Wallet / API; the official figures cite 100,000 TPS and 10ms block time. On June 25, Spark migrated $150 million in liquidity to Uniswap v4, and the next step is to use a DualPool hook for the stablecoin FX layer.

My take on UNI is this: the project line isn’t stuck in the “DEX trading fee” narrative—it’s moving toward an “on-chain asset gateway + API routing + stablecoin liquidity infrastructure.” This is product-side expansion, not merely shouting RWA slogans.

But the market hasn’t cooperated yet. On Binance, the UNIUSDT perpetual is currently around 2.78, down about 6.7% over the past 24h, with trading volume around $51.2 million USDT. The price is still below the 1H MA20 of 2.818. The overall trend is improving, but the coin price hasn’t yet confirmed.

For the short term, I won’t chase purely because of RWA news. First, see whether it can reclaim 2.82. If it can’t—and especially if it breaks down below the 2.745 area near the 24h low—then this “tokenized asset gateway” thesis should be handled according to the news momentum first, without forcing a hold.

#UNI #Uniswap #RWA #DeFi #币安广场

$SEI After this round is on the hot search, I’d rather see whether it’s genuinely rebuilding transaction infrastructure—rather than just staring at that small bearish candle.

The last few posts from X are pretty concentrated: Sei on X talking about Monaco, saying it’s an agreement built for traders, with team backgrounds including GSR, Hudson River Trading, Jump Crypto, Robinhood, and Point72. Then on June 26, Sei Labs posted about the Ambulance, claiming it’s the consensus scheme behind Autobahn—under high-latency scenarios, it can cut waiting time by up to 10.8x. Earlier than that, there was Sedna, aiming to handle MEV without relying on the traditional crypto mempool-style approach.

My take: this doesn’t feel like pure marketing; at least the direction is clear—Sei wants to push itself from being “just another high-TPS chain” toward trading-dedicated infrastructure. Whether the medium-term trend improves depends on whether applications like Monaco can produce real transaction volume, not just talk about team credentials on X.

The market still hasn’t fully bought in. On Binance, SEIUSDT perpetuals are hovering around 0.048, down about -4.2% over 24 hours. 24-hour trading volume is roughly 10.8M USDT, and the price is still below the 1H MA20 at 0.0490. If it can reclaim and hold above 0.049–0.050, I’ll treat it as the market starting to re-price this trading-chain narrative; if it breaks down below the low around 0.0477, then don’t treat technical updates as a buy point for now.

#SEI #SeiNetwork #MEV #交易策略 #币安广场

$AAVE This round I’m not so keen on only watching the -7% red market. The things Aave’s team and its ecosystem published today, however, feel more like they’re pushing V4 toward a “real lending-capable market.”

Put a few signals together: Aave V4 active loans have already crossed $75 million. When Stani forwarded it, he said the next step is to release more audits, formalized verifications, AI-assisted security reviews, and additional third-party new spokes. TokenLogic also mentioned that WBTC deposits in V4 have surpassed $40 million, setting a new high. The official team is also talking about Aave V4 as a fintech credit engine and opportunities for tokenized assets.

This isn’t just shouting about a DeFi revival—at least three lines are moving: lending scale, security audits, and asset expansion. My take: Aave’s medium-term trajectory looks more grounded than pure marketing; but the token price hasn’t acknowledged it yet. AAVEUSDT perpetual is roughly 85.5, down 7.2% in 24h, with trading volume of $108 million USDT, and the 1H MA20 is near 88.9.

So for the short term, don’t treat the fundamentals update as an immediate buy signal. If it can reclaim 89–90, then we can reassess whether the market has started pricing V4. If the move can’t hold around the 84.8 area (the low), or if V4’s lending growth is only a short-term push, then this line should cool off for now.

#AAVE #DeFi #借贷协议 #币安广场

$ENA This wave, I don’t just want to be bearish by almost 10%. Ethena’s latest update is essentially pushing USDe into traditional finance entry points.

On June 29, the official announcement said that USDe would integrate with BlackRock Aladdin. BUIDL would become the main underlying asset for a white-label product, and liquidity arrangements would be made around BlackRock’s tokenization offerings. On June 26, StablecoinX was already trading as USDE on the Nasdaq Global Market; and the Ethena ecosystem account also posted the news that the USDe vault on Coinbase has broken through 150 million.

Taken together, I’d rather view this as a signal that “stablecoin yield products are moving toward institutional distribution,” not just a normal partnership poster. But the market isn’t giving face right now: Binance ENAUSDT perpetuals are around 0.071, about -9.6% over 24h, with turnover around 141 million USDT. Price is also still below the 1H MA20 at 0.0747, and the funding rate is leaning negative.

My take: Ethena’s mid-term narrative is getting tougher—especially the line around USDe, BUIDL, and Nasdaq. But in the short term, it’s still sell pressure after the news is priced in. If it can’t reclaim 0.074–0.075, don’t rush to treat the institutional narrative as a buy point. If it breaks below the nearby low around 0.070, then this observation is invalid for now.

#ENA #Ethena #稳定币 #RWA #币安广场