Rulsher_
6.8k Posts
Rulsher_
Square Verified
On The Creator🌟. X (Twitter) @Mungati_
215 Following
62.4K+ Followers
89.4K+ Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
·
--
🎙️ Let's check out the candlesticks together and analyze the market.
End
02 h 47 m 37 s
21.2k
30
Good Morning
As a football fan today's happiness is sponsored by VOZINHA
As a football fan today's happiness is sponsored by VOZINHA
The feature that kept tugging at me was the uniBTC unstaking mechanism. It’s marketed as a flexibility upgrade — a way for holders to reclaim control over their exit. And yes, on paper it works: you request, you wait, you claim.
But the mechanics tell a different story. There’s an 8‑day processing window, a 0.5% exit fee, and rewards stop the instant you initiate unstake — not when tokens actually return to your wallet. That means eight days in limbo, queued and earning nothing.
I couldn’t help but juxtapose this with the upcoming June 20 unlock — 40.63M BR flowing out of team and seed wallets. Their exits don’t queue through a dApp; they follow a vesting schedule, clean and predictable. Regular uniBTC holders get a withdrawal mechanism. Early participants get a release schedule. Both are exits, but the friction is asymmetric.
Maybe the 8‑day window is structural, a constraint inherited from Babylon’s lock dynamics that ripple upstream. Fair enough. Still, the question lingers: is this enhancement truly designed for the holder’s benefit, or is it another safeguard for the protocol itself?
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
But the mechanics tell a different story. There’s an 8‑day processing window, a 0.5% exit fee, and rewards stop the instant you initiate unstake — not when tokens actually return to your wallet. That means eight days in limbo, queued and earning nothing.
I couldn’t help but juxtapose this with the upcoming June 20 unlock — 40.63M BR flowing out of team and seed wallets. Their exits don’t queue through a dApp; they follow a vesting schedule, clean and predictable. Regular uniBTC holders get a withdrawal mechanism. Early participants get a release schedule. Both are exits, but the friction is asymmetric.
Maybe the 8‑day window is structural, a constraint inherited from Babylon’s lock dynamics that ripple upstream. Fair enough. Still, the question lingers: is this enhancement truly designed for the holder’s benefit, or is it another safeguard for the protocol itself?
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
With the current momentum, $BTC will hit $66K. Bears are seeing dust at the moment😂
#SaylorHintsStrategyBitcoinBuy
#SaylorHintsStrategyBitcoinBuy
The upcoming $BR unlock is less about narrative and more about mechanics. On June 20th this year, CoinGecko flags 40.63M tokens set to release — about 4.1% of total supply, valued near $4.17M at current prices. The split matters: 25M to the Founding Team, 15.63M to Seed Investors. When the protocol talks “ecosystem expansion,” it’s worth asking who that expansion routes liquidity toward first.
The veBR governance model is elegant in design — lock BR, gain voting power, direct gauge allocations, shape incentive flows. But the base it operates on is still narrow. Circulating supply sits at just 26–27%, meaning retail governance is layered over a float still dominated by insiders. In practice, you’re voting on distribution while the bulk of future supply remains in the hands of those who seeded the protocol.
This isn’t unique to Bedrock. Most restaking protocols carry the same tension: governance pitched as community-owned while insider allocations remain the majority of locked supply. The real question is structural — at what circulating supply threshold does governance shift from being a design feature in the docs to genuine community ownership in practice?
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
The veBR governance model is elegant in design — lock BR, gain voting power, direct gauge allocations, shape incentive flows. But the base it operates on is still narrow. Circulating supply sits at just 26–27%, meaning retail governance is layered over a float still dominated by insiders. In practice, you’re voting on distribution while the bulk of future supply remains in the hands of those who seeded the protocol.
This isn’t unique to Bedrock. Most restaking protocols carry the same tension: governance pitched as community-owned while insider allocations remain the majority of locked supply. The real question is structural — at what circulating supply threshold does governance shift from being a design feature in the docs to genuine community ownership in practice?
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
Verified
My opinion on $WLD will surprise many...
For years Worldcoin chart has been gradually
bearish and on my thinking, this is due to the ban of data collection in parts of the world creating many questions of how the iris data could be used in future.
This project is almost "DEAD" and many who still have hope I can simply advise them to rethink their decisions and probably they can see the bigger picture.
Always DYOR
#MuskBecomesFirstTrillionaireAfterSpaceXIPO
#TrumpSharesIranDealClaim #WLD
For years Worldcoin chart has been gradually
bearish and on my thinking, this is due to the ban of data collection in parts of the world creating many questions of how the iris data could be used in future.
This project is almost "DEAD" and many who still have hope I can simply advise them to rethink their decisions and probably they can see the bigger picture.
Always DYOR
#MuskBecomesFirstTrillionaireAfterSpaceXIPO
#TrumpSharesIranDealClaim #WLD
$BTC Has again regained $64K mark after more than 3 days surfing slowly around $60K-$63K.
At the moment it has shown a 1.31% gain in the last 24 hours.
Am very bullish on BTC, what about you?
Always DYOR
#MuskBecomesFirstTrillionaireAfterSpaceXIPO #TrumpSharesIranDealClaim
At the moment it has shown a 1.31% gain in the last 24 hours.
Am very bullish on BTC, what about you?
Always DYOR
#MuskBecomesFirstTrillionaireAfterSpaceXIPO #TrumpSharesIranDealClaim
$BNB is back trading above $610 with a 0.94% in the last 24 hours
#MuskBecomesFirstTrillionaireAfterSpaceXIPO #TrumpSharesIranDealClaim
#bnb
#MuskBecomesFirstTrillionaireAfterSpaceXIPO #TrumpSharesIranDealClaim
#bnb
Bedrock’s pitch is elegant as the infrastructure that finally makes Bitcoin productive. Passive holdings become on‑chain yield, liquidity radiates across 19+ chains, governance gains real teeth. The narrative is clean.
But the schedule tells a different story. On June 20, just seven days away, 40.63M BR tokens unlock — 4.1% of total supply. Of that, 25M go to the founding team and 15.63M to seed investors. This isn’t a community yield event; it’s early capital gaining liquidity while the protocol is still building its productivity layer.
The veModel is clever in theory: lock BR 1:1 for veBR, longer lock equals more voting power, seasonal resets keep the field level. Yet the asymmetry is obvious. Today, one group is locking tokens for governance; another is about to receive liquid supply. Their incentives diverge, and the docs don’t highlight that gap.
It’s not malicious — most early‑stage DeFi looks like this. But the framing of “passive to productive” lands differently when the first scale movers are insiders and seed capital, not the BTC holders the story is written for. The real question is which layer speaks louder right now: the yield mechanics, or the unlock schedule.
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
But the schedule tells a different story. On June 20, just seven days away, 40.63M BR tokens unlock — 4.1% of total supply. Of that, 25M go to the founding team and 15.63M to seed investors. This isn’t a community yield event; it’s early capital gaining liquidity while the protocol is still building its productivity layer.
The veModel is clever in theory: lock BR 1:1 for veBR, longer lock equals more voting power, seasonal resets keep the field level. Yet the asymmetry is obvious. Today, one group is locking tokens for governance; another is about to receive liquid supply. Their incentives diverge, and the docs don’t highlight that gap.
It’s not malicious — most early‑stage DeFi looks like this. But the framing of “passive to productive” lands differently when the first scale movers are insiders and seed capital, not the BTC holders the story is written for. The real question is which layer speaks louder right now: the yield mechanics, or the unlock schedule.
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
Verified
Michael Saylor congratulating Elon Musk $SPCXB shows how Crypto bros should celebrate and recognise each other wins.
#SpaceXIPOUSStocksOpenHigher #DogeRisesNearly6PctOnSpaceXIPO
#SpaceXIPOUSStocksOpenHigher #DogeRisesNearly6PctOnSpaceXIPO
Bedrock’s ambition to make Bitcoin the universal liquidity layer for emerging chains runs into a revealing reality check. Pulling DeFiLlama’s live uniBTC TVL on June 12 shows $134M on Bitcoin L1, $90M on Ethereum, $67M on Mode, and $28M on BOB. But Rootstock, Hemi, TAC, and Taiko—the very “emerging chains” this narrative is aimed at—sit at essentially zero. Even Rootstock’s active incentive campaign, dangling a $2,500 prize pool, hasn’t moved the needle.
This isn’t failure so much as structural timing mismatch. Liquidity follows confidence, and confidence follows activity. Mode and BOB had traction before uniBTC arrived, so capital flowed naturally. The newer deployments haven’t crossed that threshold, and no wrapper—no matter how elegant—can shortcut the sequence. The $338M in uniBTC TVL is real, but most of it settled on chains that didn’t need the universal liquidity pitch to attract it.
That reframes the harder question. It’s not whether Bitcoin can become the universal layer in theory. It’s whether a liquid restaking protocol can actually redirect capital toward the chains that need it most—or whether it simply consolidates liquidity where it’s already comfortable.
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
This isn’t failure so much as structural timing mismatch. Liquidity follows confidence, and confidence follows activity. Mode and BOB had traction before uniBTC arrived, so capital flowed naturally. The newer deployments haven’t crossed that threshold, and no wrapper—no matter how elegant—can shortcut the sequence. The $338M in uniBTC TVL is real, but most of it settled on chains that didn’t need the universal liquidity pitch to attract it.
That reframes the harder question. It’s not whether Bitcoin can become the universal layer in theory. It’s whether a liquid restaking protocol can actually redirect capital toward the chains that need it most—or whether it simply consolidates liquidity where it’s already comfortable.
@Bedrock #bedrock $BR
4 minutes after the listing $SPCXB is facing a slight rejection, many traders are selling to push the price lower and repurchase.
#SpaceXIPOUSStocksOpenHigher #OilSlidesOnMiddleEastPeaceDealProspects #SpaceXSharesOpen29PercentAboveIPOPrice
#SpaceXIPOUSStocksOpenHigher #OilSlidesOnMiddleEastPeaceDealProspects #SpaceXSharesOpen29PercentAboveIPOPrice
Log in to explore more content