zerohype
3,362 views
4 Discussing
Hot
Latest
See original
🚨 My Survival Filter for 2030. This is How I Separate Hype from Real Utility.
In 5 years, 99% of today’s projects will not exist. But how can you identify the 1% that will?
I don't focus on the price; I only focus on these 4 filters, and if a project fails on 1, for me it's a red flag.
Filter 1️⃣: Does It Solve a Real World Problem TODAY?
Not "could" or "in the future". Examples:
Does it provide reliable data to banks? $LINK
Does it offer decentralized GPU to 3D studios? $RENDER
If its utility is just "being money" or "another blockchain", the risk is very high.
Filter 2️⃣: Does It Have Paying Customers for Its Service, Not Just Speculators?
Demand must come from use, not from resale.
E.g.: Companies pay in LINK for oracles. Artists pay in RENDER for GPU power. That is a floor of REAL demand.
Filter 3️⃣: Is Its Token ESSENTIAL for the Network to Function?
If the token can be replaced by a dollar subscription without anything changing, it’s a serious problem. The token must be the fuel or the unique security mechanism of the network.
Filter 4️⃣: Can It Survive Without Its Founder or Constant Hype?
If the project depends on the personality of a leader or announcements on X to remain relevant, it’s a cult, not a technology. Critical infrastructures operate quietly.
In short, my dear friends, the most valuable community is not the one that shouts "To infinity and beyond!". It is the one of developers building, companies integrating, and users paying for an irreplaceable service.
My personal portfolio is built under these filters. It’s not perfect, but I sleep peacefully knowing that I invest in Web3 infrastructure and not in promises.
(This is not financial advice; it is my analytical framework).
What filter do YOU consider the most important to separate a serious project from an empty promise? I look forward to reading your comments.
#Zerohype #UtilidadReal
In 5 years, 99% of today’s projects will not exist. But how can you identify the 1% that will?
I don't focus on the price; I only focus on these 4 filters, and if a project fails on 1, for me it's a red flag.
Filter 1️⃣: Does It Solve a Real World Problem TODAY?
Not "could" or "in the future". Examples:
Does it provide reliable data to banks? $LINK
Does it offer decentralized GPU to 3D studios? $RENDER
If its utility is just "being money" or "another blockchain", the risk is very high.
Filter 2️⃣: Does It Have Paying Customers for Its Service, Not Just Speculators?
Demand must come from use, not from resale.
E.g.: Companies pay in LINK for oracles. Artists pay in RENDER for GPU power. That is a floor of REAL demand.
Filter 3️⃣: Is Its Token ESSENTIAL for the Network to Function?
If the token can be replaced by a dollar subscription without anything changing, it’s a serious problem. The token must be the fuel or the unique security mechanism of the network.
Filter 4️⃣: Can It Survive Without Its Founder or Constant Hype?
If the project depends on the personality of a leader or announcements on X to remain relevant, it’s a cult, not a technology. Critical infrastructures operate quietly.
In short, my dear friends, the most valuable community is not the one that shouts "To infinity and beyond!". It is the one of developers building, companies integrating, and users paying for an irreplaceable service.
My personal portfolio is built under these filters. It’s not perfect, but I sleep peacefully knowing that I invest in Web3 infrastructure and not in promises.
(This is not financial advice; it is my analytical framework).
What filter do YOU consider the most important to separate a serious project from an empty promise? I look forward to reading your comments.
#Zerohype #UtilidadReal
See original
I show you the exact flow I use to give superpowers of transparency to a traditional business
My logistics clients do not ask me about smart contracts. They tell me: "That their customers question the delivery times and want more transparency about the status of their goods in real time.
My job is not to sell them #crypto but to SOLVE that problem, and sometimes, the best tool is blockchain.
This is how I do it:
1. I listen to the pain:
Everything begins with a diagnosis.
In the specific case of my client, their real problem was the distrust in the supply chain.
The end customer did not know where their goods were until they arrived.
My job is not to sell them #crypto but to SOLVE that problem, and sometimes, the best tool is blockchain.
This is how I do it:
1. I listen to the pain:
Everything begins with a diagnosis.
In the specific case of my client, their real problem was the distrust in the supply chain.
The end customer did not know where their goods were until they arrived.
See original
NO, AI is not going to take jobs, it will take tasks and that is a great opportunity.
🚨 Are you afraid that AI will take your job? My friend, you are asking the wrong question.
In every meeting with clients, I hear the same concern: “Grikzo, AI is going to replace us.” And believe me, I understand it; the headlines are alarmist, but today I want to show you the reality. AI IS NOT COMING FOR YOUR POSITION, it is coming for the repetitive, tedious, and low-value tasks that consume your day. It's not about the end of human work; it's about the beginning of more strategic human work.
History Always Repeats Itself
In every meeting with clients, I hear the same concern: “Grikzo, AI is going to replace us.” And believe me, I understand it; the headlines are alarmist, but today I want to show you the reality. AI IS NOT COMING FOR YOUR POSITION, it is coming for the repetitive, tedious, and low-value tasks that consume your day. It's not about the end of human work; it's about the beginning of more strategic human work.
History Always Repeats Itself
churca123:
nos va a facilitar la vida, que hagan un robot para realizar todas las tareas del hogar, sería excelente
Login to explore more contents