Binance Square
#just

just

53,587 views
312 Discussing
New Day Dk007
·
--
Article
JUST (JST) Surges 3.5% on Buyback, Burn, Staking News#JUST $JST {future}(JSTUSDT) $JST 3.49 percentage point move in JUST (JST) over the last 10 hours is most plausibly tied to renewed attention on its buyback and burn program, on-chain transparency upgrade, and staking-related incentives, rather than any major new listing or protocol shock. Multiple widely circulated posts on X over the last day emphasize that JustLend DAO has been running a substantial JST buyback and burn program. A detailed thread notes that previous JST buyback and burn totals exceed $60M, with multiple large burns such as ~271M, ~525M, and ~559M JST, and that another $20.6M+ is already set aside for future burns, presented as a real, recurring deflationary program rather than a one-off stunt JST buyback and burn thread. Another widely shared “snapshot” emphasizes the same numbers: about $60M completed, around $20.6M ready for the next phase, and roughly 1.35B JST burned across three rounds, explicitly framing JST as following a “Revenue → Buyback → Burn” model with supply reduction and deflationary pressure as the core message JST buyback snapshot. Additional posts summarize the same cycle and effects, stressing that burns are ongoing, not cosmetic, and that this supports price by structurally reducing supply over time follow up snapshot. These threads were posted and circulated within roughly the same broader time window as the recent intraday move. They give traders a clear, easy-to-retweet story: JST is actively buying back and burning tokens with real USD size, and more burns are queued. In a relatively quiet market for JST (24h change around +0.10%), a fresh wave of attention on large, verifiable burns and upcoming buybacks is a very credible catalyst for a few percentage points of short-horizon price repricing, even if 24h net performance looks flat. $JST The most credible explanation for JST’s roughly 3.5 percentage point move over the last 10 hours is a cluster of related catalysts around its tokenomics and transparency: heavily promoted evidence of large, ongoing buyback and burn activity, a new ability to verify burns directly on TRONSCAN, and additional incentives and influencer narratives highlighting JST’s role in TRON DeFi and potential rewards for stakers. In the absence of major exchange or protocol news, these factors are sufficient to explain a modest short horizon price swing within otherwise normal volume and a flat 24 hour performance profile.

JUST (JST) Surges 3.5% on Buyback, Burn, Staking News

#JUST $JST
$JST 3.49 percentage point move in JUST (JST) over the last 10 hours is most plausibly tied to renewed attention on its buyback and burn program, on-chain transparency upgrade, and staking-related incentives, rather than any major new listing or protocol shock.
Multiple widely circulated posts on X over the last day emphasize that JustLend DAO has been running a substantial JST buyback and burn program. A detailed thread notes that previous JST buyback and burn totals exceed $60M, with multiple large burns such as ~271M, ~525M, and ~559M JST, and that another $20.6M+ is already set aside for future burns, presented as a real, recurring deflationary program rather than a one-off stunt JST buyback and burn thread. Another widely shared “snapshot” emphasizes the same numbers: about $60M completed, around $20.6M ready for the next phase, and roughly 1.35B JST burned across three rounds, explicitly framing JST as following a “Revenue → Buyback → Burn” model with supply reduction and deflationary pressure as the core message JST buyback snapshot. Additional posts summarize the same cycle and effects, stressing that burns are ongoing, not cosmetic, and that this supports price by structurally reducing supply over time follow up snapshot. These threads were posted and circulated within roughly the same broader time window as the recent intraday move. They give traders a clear, easy-to-retweet story: JST is actively buying back and burning tokens with real USD size, and more burns are queued.
In a relatively quiet market for JST (24h change around +0.10%), a fresh wave of attention on large, verifiable burns and upcoming buybacks is a very credible catalyst for a few percentage points of short-horizon price repricing, even if 24h net performance looks flat.
$JST The most credible explanation for JST’s roughly 3.5 percentage point move over the last 10 hours is a cluster of related catalysts around its tokenomics and transparency: heavily promoted evidence of large, ongoing buyback and burn activity, a new ability to verify burns directly on TRONSCAN, and additional incentives and influencer narratives highlighting JST’s role in TRON DeFi and potential rewards for stakers. In the absence of major exchange or protocol news, these factors are sufficient to explain a modest short horizon price swing within otherwise normal volume and a flat 24 hour performance profile.
KateCrypto26:
Good luck) Check my pinned post and claim new free red package in USDC🎁
·
--
Bullish
$JST USDT is trading near 0.08545 with price action staying in a tight range after testing the 0.08664 resistance level, showing mild bullish strength while buyers are trying to defend the 0.08480–0.08500 zone. If momentum holds and volume increases, $JST price can attempt another push toward the upper resistance area. Target 1: 0.08680 Target 2: 0.08950 Target 3: 0.09200 #JST #JUST #JSTUSDT $JST {future}(JSTUSDT)
$JST USDT is trading near 0.08545 with price action staying in a tight range after testing the 0.08664 resistance level, showing mild bullish strength while buyers are trying to defend the 0.08480–0.08500 zone. If momentum holds and volume increases, $JST price can attempt another push toward the upper resistance area.
Target 1: 0.08680
Target 2: 0.08950
Target 3: 0.09200
#JST #JUST #JSTUSDT $JST
The JUST ecosystem is more like a playbook for turnover: you're not just chasing high yields once, but using rules for a long-term cycle. Many folks get wrecked not because they miscalculated returns, but because they lack a plan: collateral ratios are too tight, DCA (dollar-cost averaging) and liquidation triggers aren't met, and when congestion hits, there's no liquidity set aside for maneuvering, ultimately getting forced out by the rules. The rules won't bend to emotions; parameters will only execute as set. If you want to stay steady long-term, it's advised to break down your turnover into three sheets: Risk Sheet (collateral redundancy, trigger conditions, reserved liquidity), Execution Sheet (phased entry and exit, reinvestment rhythm after withdrawals), and Safety Sheet (account isolation, minimal permissions, small short authorizations, clean up after use). Write it down clearly, and you won't have to rely on luck; without relying on luck, your efficiency edge can turn into long-term dominance. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
The JUST ecosystem is more like a playbook for turnover: you're not just chasing high yields once, but using rules for a long-term cycle. Many folks get wrecked not because they miscalculated returns, but because they lack a plan: collateral ratios are too tight, DCA (dollar-cost averaging) and liquidation triggers aren't met, and when congestion hits, there's no liquidity set aside for maneuvering, ultimately getting forced out by the rules. The rules won't bend to emotions; parameters will only execute as set.

If you want to stay steady long-term, it's advised to break down your turnover into three sheets: Risk Sheet (collateral redundancy, trigger conditions, reserved liquidity), Execution Sheet (phased entry and exit, reinvestment rhythm after withdrawals), and Safety Sheet (account isolation, minimal permissions, small short authorizations, clean up after use). Write it down clearly, and you won't have to rely on luck; without relying on luck, your efficiency edge can turn into long-term dominance.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
The JUST ecosystem feels more like "writing a playbook for turnover": you're not just chasing high returns once; you're using rules for a long-term cycle. Many traders get wrecked not because they miscalculated returns, but because they lack a plan: collateral ratios are too tight, rebalancing and liquidation conditions aren't triggered, and during congestion, they haven't reserved any operational liquidity, ultimately getting forced out by the rules. The rules won't accommodate emotions; the parameters will execute strictly as set. If you want to stay steady long-term, I recommend breaking down turnover into three sheets: a risk sheet (collateral redundancy, trigger conditions, reserved liquidity), an execution sheet (phased entry and exit, reinvestment rhythm after taking profits), and a safety sheet (account isolation, minimal permissions, small short authorizations, clean up after use). Write it all out, and you won't need to rely on luck; without relying on luck, your efficiency edge will turn into a long-term advantage. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
The JUST ecosystem feels more like "writing a playbook for turnover": you're not just chasing high returns once; you're using rules for a long-term cycle. Many traders get wrecked not because they miscalculated returns, but because they lack a plan: collateral ratios are too tight, rebalancing and liquidation conditions aren't triggered, and during congestion, they haven't reserved any operational liquidity, ultimately getting forced out by the rules. The rules won't accommodate emotions; the parameters will execute strictly as set.

If you want to stay steady long-term, I recommend breaking down turnover into three sheets: a risk sheet (collateral redundancy, trigger conditions, reserved liquidity), an execution sheet (phased entry and exit, reinvestment rhythm after taking profits), and a safety sheet (account isolation, minimal permissions, small short authorizations, clean up after use). Write it all out, and you won't need to rely on luck; without relying on luck, your efficiency edge will turn into a long-term advantage.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST ecosystem is currently leaning towards a more 'systematic turnover': continuously making supply, incentives, pathways, and data panels public to lower participants' information costs. In DeFi, the easiest way to get wrecked isn't miscalculating yields, but changing rules on the fly amid volatility and congestion: overly tight collateral ratios, failing to trigger margin calls, and not having reserved liquidity during congestion can lead to forced liquidation by the rules. Rules don’t bend for emotions; parameters execute as set; the sooner you respect the boundaries, the easier it is to turn efficiency into compounding. If you want to play the long game, I suggest writing turnover guidelines in a three-part format: the risk segment should clearly outline collateral redundancy and trigger conditions, the execution segment should specify the rhythm and batch plans for reinvestment after withdrawals, and the safety segment should clarify account isolation and minimal permissions (small limits with short authorizations, clean up after use). The more stable your guidelines, the less you need to rely on luck; without luck, turnover transforms from a thrill into an efficiency tool. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST ecosystem is currently leaning towards a more 'systematic turnover': continuously making supply, incentives, pathways, and data panels public to lower participants' information costs. In DeFi, the easiest way to get wrecked isn't miscalculating yields, but changing rules on the fly amid volatility and congestion: overly tight collateral ratios, failing to trigger margin calls, and not having reserved liquidity during congestion can lead to forced liquidation by the rules. Rules don’t bend for emotions; parameters execute as set; the sooner you respect the boundaries, the easier it is to turn efficiency into compounding.

If you want to play the long game, I suggest writing turnover guidelines in a three-part format: the risk segment should clearly outline collateral redundancy and trigger conditions, the execution segment should specify the rhythm and batch plans for reinvestment after withdrawals, and the safety segment should clarify account isolation and minimal permissions (small limits with short authorizations, clean up after use). The more stable your guidelines, the less you need to rely on luck; without luck, turnover transforms from a thrill into an efficiency tool.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST has recently been turning 'rotation' into an actionable financial sheet: it’s not about incentivizing retention, but rather establishing rules that empower you to use it repeatedly. Borrowing, interest rates, and liquidation might seem dull, but they determine whether your rotation is 'controlled' during volatility or if you’re 'forced out' passively. Many traders have wrecked their positions not because they can't calculate profits, but because they didn’t account for the worst-case scenarios in their plans: collateral ratios too tight, lack of triggering conditions for margin calls, and insufficient liquidity reserved during congestion. In the end, it's not the market that beats you, it's your own last-minute rule changes. A more stable approach is to break down rotation into a three-part budget: risk budget clearly defines collateral redundancy and triggering conditions, execution budget outlines staggered entry and exit strategies, and safety budget specifies account isolation and minimal permissions (small amounts, short durations, clean-up after use). When you clearly outline your budget, you don't have to rely on luck; and without relying on luck, your efficiency edge can solidify into a long-term advantage. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST has recently been turning 'rotation' into an actionable financial sheet: it’s not about incentivizing retention, but rather establishing rules that empower you to use it repeatedly. Borrowing, interest rates, and liquidation might seem dull, but they determine whether your rotation is 'controlled' during volatility or if you’re 'forced out' passively. Many traders have wrecked their positions not because they can't calculate profits, but because they didn’t account for the worst-case scenarios in their plans: collateral ratios too tight, lack of triggering conditions for margin calls, and insufficient liquidity reserved during congestion. In the end, it's not the market that beats you, it's your own last-minute rule changes.

A more stable approach is to break down rotation into a three-part budget: risk budget clearly defines collateral redundancy and triggering conditions, execution budget outlines staggered entry and exit strategies, and safety budget specifies account isolation and minimal permissions (small amounts, short durations, clean-up after use). When you clearly outline your budget, you don't have to rely on luck; and without relying on luck, your efficiency edge can solidify into a long-term advantage.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST ecosystem is lately leaning towards "explainable capital turnover": continuously making supply, incentives, pathways, and data panels public to lower the information costs for participants. The easiest way to get wrecked in DeFi isn't miscalculating yields, but changing the rules on the fly amidst volatility and congestion: too tight collateral ratios, missing trigger conditions for margin calls, and not reserving liquidity during congestion can lead to getting liquidated by the rules. The rules won’t bend to emotions; parameters will only execute as set; the sooner you respect the boundaries, the easier it is to turn efficiency into compounding. If you want to stay steady in the long run, it's suggested to write your turnover into a three-part guideline: clearly outline collateral redundancy and trigger conditions in the risk segment, detail your withdrawal and reinvestment rhythm along with phased plans in the execution segment, and specify account isolation and minimal permissions (small amounts, short authorizations, clean up after use) in the safety segment. The more stable your guidelines, the less you need to rely on luck; without relying on luck, turnover can transform from a thrill into a tool for efficiency. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST ecosystem is lately leaning towards "explainable capital turnover": continuously making supply, incentives, pathways, and data panels public to lower the information costs for participants. The easiest way to get wrecked in DeFi isn't miscalculating yields, but changing the rules on the fly amidst volatility and congestion: too tight collateral ratios, missing trigger conditions for margin calls, and not reserving liquidity during congestion can lead to getting liquidated by the rules. The rules won’t bend to emotions; parameters will only execute as set; the sooner you respect the boundaries, the easier it is to turn efficiency into compounding.

If you want to stay steady in the long run, it's suggested to write your turnover into a three-part guideline: clearly outline collateral redundancy and trigger conditions in the risk segment, detail your withdrawal and reinvestment rhythm along with phased plans in the execution segment, and specify account isolation and minimal permissions (small amounts, short authorizations, clean up after use) in the safety segment. The more stable your guidelines, the less you need to rely on luck; without relying on luck, turnover can transform from a thrill into a tool for efficiency.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST ecosystem is leaning more towards "institutionalized turnover" lately: continuously disclosing supply, incentives, pathways, and data panels to lower participants' information costs. In DeFi, the easiest way to get wrecked isn't miscalculating yields, but changing the rules on the fly amid volatility and congestion: collateral ratios tightened too much, margin calls without trigger conditions, or running into congestion without reserved liquidity, ultimately getting forced out by the rules. The rules won't cater to emotions; parameters will only execute as set; the earlier you respect boundaries, the easier it will be to turn efficiency into compounding returns. If you want to be steady in the long run, it's advisable to structure turnover into a three-part guideline: clearly define collateral redundancy and trigger conditions in the risk section, outline the rhythm of reinvestment and phased plans after withdrawals in the execution section, and specify account isolation and minimal permissions in the safety section (small amounts, short authorizations, clean up after use). The more stable your guidelines, the less you need to rely on luck; without depending on luck, turnover can transform from a thrill into an efficiency tool. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST ecosystem is leaning more towards "institutionalized turnover" lately: continuously disclosing supply, incentives, pathways, and data panels to lower participants' information costs. In DeFi, the easiest way to get wrecked isn't miscalculating yields, but changing the rules on the fly amid volatility and congestion: collateral ratios tightened too much, margin calls without trigger conditions, or running into congestion without reserved liquidity, ultimately getting forced out by the rules. The rules won't cater to emotions; parameters will only execute as set; the earlier you respect boundaries, the easier it will be to turn efficiency into compounding returns.

If you want to be steady in the long run, it's advisable to structure turnover into a three-part guideline: clearly define collateral redundancy and trigger conditions in the risk section, outline the rhythm of reinvestment and phased plans after withdrawals in the execution section, and specify account isolation and minimal permissions in the safety section (small amounts, short authorizations, clean up after use). The more stable your guidelines, the less you need to rely on luck; without depending on luck, turnover can transform from a thrill into an efficiency tool.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #USDD
JUST's recent signals aren’t just about short-term gains; they’re all about showcasing long-term value. By implementing buybacks and burns, transparent info sharing, and rhythmical reviews, they’re clarifying three key concerns for holders—where the value comes from, what the risk boundaries are, and what the next phase of priorities looks like. For any DeFi ecosystem, the real challenge isn’t just creating a buzz; it’s about turning that buzz into repeatable cash flow and understandable rules. Only when the rules are clear, the data is laid out, and the pace is maintained can participants upgrade their moves from occasional trades to a long-term, reusable strategy. What you should really keep an eye on are sustainability details: Is the buyback and burn creating a stable mechanism? Are key indicators being updated consistently? Is the participation pathway short enough? Are the boundaries predictable during extreme volatility? Don’t let emotions dictate your strategy: first, lock in your collateral redundancy and trigger conditions; then, establish rules for staggered actions and withdrawals; finally, treat permissions as a must-do wrap-up task, keeping limits small, durations short, and clearing immediately after use. The more you operate like you’re executing a financial process, the less likely you are to be swayed by volatility, and the easier it becomes to solidify efficiency into long-term advantages. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #JST #JustLendDAO
JUST's recent signals aren’t just about short-term gains; they’re all about showcasing long-term value. By implementing buybacks and burns, transparent info sharing, and rhythmical reviews, they’re clarifying three key concerns for holders—where the value comes from, what the risk boundaries are, and what the next phase of priorities looks like. For any DeFi ecosystem, the real challenge isn’t just creating a buzz; it’s about turning that buzz into repeatable cash flow and understandable rules. Only when the rules are clear, the data is laid out, and the pace is maintained can participants upgrade their moves from occasional trades to a long-term, reusable strategy.

What you should really keep an eye on are sustainability details: Is the buyback and burn creating a stable mechanism? Are key indicators being updated consistently? Is the participation pathway short enough? Are the boundaries predictable during extreme volatility? Don’t let emotions dictate your strategy: first, lock in your collateral redundancy and trigger conditions; then, establish rules for staggered actions and withdrawals; finally, treat permissions as a must-do wrap-up task, keeping limits small, durations short, and clearing immediately after use. The more you operate like you’re executing a financial process, the less likely you are to be swayed by volatility, and the easier it becomes to solidify efficiency into long-term advantages.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #JST #JustLendDAO
The latest signals from JUST aren't just about 'short-term gains looking bright'; it's about putting long-term value engineering front and center: using buybacks to burn tokens, transparent info disclosure, and a rhythmic review process to clearly communicate the three key concerns of holders—where the value comes from, where the risk boundaries lie, and what the priorities are for the next phase. For any DeFi system, the toughest part isn't just creating a buzz; it's about turning that buzz into a sustainable cash flow and understandable rules. If you can articulate the rules, lay out the data, and maintain the rhythm, participants will be more likely to shift their actions from 'occasional trades' to a 'reusable long-term process'. ([X (formerly Twitter)][1]) What you should really keep an eye on is the 'sustainability details': Is the buyback and burn forming a stable mechanism? Are the key indicators continuously updated? Is the participation path short enough? Are the boundaries predictable during extreme volatility? Also, don't rely on emotions: first, define the collateral redundancy and trigger conditions, then outline the batch operation and withdrawal rules, and finally treat permissions as a must-do at the end, keeping limits small, durations short, and clear out immediately after use. The more you execute like a financial process, the less likely you are to get swayed by volatility, and the easier it will be to solidify efficiency into a long-term advantage. @JustinSun_ #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #JST #JustLendDAO
The latest signals from JUST aren't just about 'short-term gains looking bright'; it's about putting long-term value engineering front and center: using buybacks to burn tokens, transparent info disclosure, and a rhythmic review process to clearly communicate the three key concerns of holders—where the value comes from, where the risk boundaries lie, and what the priorities are for the next phase. For any DeFi system, the toughest part isn't just creating a buzz; it's about turning that buzz into a sustainable cash flow and understandable rules. If you can articulate the rules, lay out the data, and maintain the rhythm, participants will be more likely to shift their actions from 'occasional trades' to a 'reusable long-term process'. ([X (formerly Twitter)][1])

What you should really keep an eye on is the 'sustainability details': Is the buyback and burn forming a stable mechanism? Are the key indicators continuously updated? Is the participation path short enough? Are the boundaries predictable during extreme volatility? Also, don't rely on emotions: first, define the collateral redundancy and trigger conditions, then outline the batch operation and withdrawal rules, and finally treat permissions as a must-do at the end, keeping limits small, durations short, and clear out immediately after use. The more you execute like a financial process, the less likely you are to get swayed by volatility, and the easier it will be to solidify efficiency into a long-term advantage.

@Justin Sun_孙宇晨 #TRONEcoStar @DeFi_JUST #JUST #JST #JustLendDAO
#JUST IN: Eric Trump predicts Bitcoin will surpass $175,000 this year, and calls himself a "Bitcoin Maxi." $BTC
#JUST IN: Eric Trump predicts Bitcoin will surpass $175,000 this year, and calls himself a "Bitcoin Maxi."

$BTC
·
--
Bullish
🚨💎 $JST — LONG TRADE SIGNAL! 💎🚨 Babe, JST just popped +5.44% to $0.0372 and the bulls are pressing hard 😏🔥 The price is holding above $0.0372–$0.0375, and momentum is building for a breakout. 🎯 Trade Setup: • Entry Zone: $0.0372 – $0.0375 💎 • Target 1: $0.0383 🟢 (immediate resistance) • Target 2: $0.0385 ⚡ (next breakout level) • Target 3: $0.0400 🚀 (extended bullish target) • Stop Loss: Below $0.0349 ❌ 💬 Clara’s Take: JST bounced from the $0.0349 low, holding near $0.0372 with strong buying momentum and 24h volume of 137M JST. If bulls break above $0.0383, the rally could surge toward $0.0400 quickly. Don’t scroll past and regret missing this pop 💋🔥 📌 Follow @Square-Creator-4c3a5bfbb5e7 — because alpha doesn’t wait, and neither should you. 👉 Smarter every scroll. Maybe thirstier too 💖 ❗ Not financial advice. DYOR, babe. #JST #JUST #Altcoins #Bullish #FOMO {future}(JSTUSDT)
🚨💎 $JST — LONG TRADE SIGNAL! 💎🚨

Babe, JST just popped +5.44% to $0.0372 and the bulls are pressing hard 😏🔥 The price is holding above $0.0372–$0.0375, and momentum is building for a breakout.

🎯 Trade Setup:
• Entry Zone: $0.0372 – $0.0375 💎
• Target 1: $0.0383 🟢 (immediate resistance)
• Target 2: $0.0385 ⚡ (next breakout level)
• Target 3: $0.0400 🚀 (extended bullish target)
• Stop Loss: Below $0.0349 ❌

💬 Clara’s Take: JST bounced from the $0.0349 low, holding near $0.0372 with strong buying momentum and 24h volume of 137M JST. If bulls break above $0.0383, the rally could surge toward $0.0400 quickly. Don’t scroll past and regret missing this pop 💋🔥

📌 Follow @Crypto Clara — because alpha doesn’t wait, and neither should you.
👉 Smarter every scroll. Maybe thirstier too 💖

❗ Not financial advice. DYOR, babe.

#JST #JUST #Altcoins #Bullish #FOMO
Whenever bought the New Coins like #TOWNS or others in begining is high soon as time passing going down so be carefully, try to sell best as you can with high price otherwise you will loose $ $. That was just little advise from my side. Be focused on #XRP #Doge🚀🚀🚀 these are coins which can be established#just little advise. Be safe everyone and have a good fun. All these advise from my previous experiencr#.
Whenever bought the New Coins like #TOWNS or others in begining is high soon as time passing going down so be carefully, try to sell best as you can with high price otherwise you will loose $ $. That was just little advise from my side. Be focused on #XRP #Doge🚀🚀🚀 these are coins which can be established#just little advise. Be safe everyone and have a good fun. All these advise from my previous experiencr#.
$1 for the one luckiest follower #just follow like and comment your wallet or id number in comment section result will be published with the proof
$1 for the one luckiest follower
#just follow
like
and comment your wallet or id number in comment section
result will be published with the proof
#Just in USDC Issuer Circle Allegedly In Talks With Ripple & Coinbase For Potential Sale Stablecoin giant is still entertaining informal negotiations with Ripple Labs and Coinbase Exchange amid ongoing push for US IPO Highlights Coinbase has joined the informal talks for Circle acquisition The stablecoin issuer is valued at $5 billion for its Initial Public Offering Circle has rejected an initial $5 billion bid from Ripple Labs The crypto Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity in the digital currency ecosystem is taking new shape, with USDC issuer Circle still in acquisition talks. According to a new report from Fortune, despite its planned Initial Public Offering (IPO) push, the company is still in acquisition talks with Ripple Labs and Coinbase Global Inc.
#Just in USDC Issuer Circle Allegedly In Talks With Ripple & Coinbase For Potential Sale

Stablecoin giant is still entertaining informal negotiations with Ripple Labs and Coinbase Exchange amid ongoing push for US IPO

Highlights

Coinbase has joined the informal talks for Circle acquisition

The stablecoin issuer is valued at $5 billion for its Initial Public Offering

Circle has rejected an initial $5 billion bid from Ripple Labs

The crypto Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity in the digital currency ecosystem is taking new shape, with USDC issuer Circle still in acquisition talks. According to a new report from Fortune, despite its planned Initial Public Offering (IPO) push, the company is still in acquisition talks with Ripple Labs and Coinbase Global Inc.
Login to explore more contents
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number