quantumcomputers

Bitcoin developers just formalized a proposal to freeze over $450 billion worth of Bitcoin.

> Quantum computers are coming. Old wallets with exposed public keys will eventually be crackable.

> They want to freeze them before someone else cracks them.

> The proposal is BIP-361. Co-authored by Jameson Lopp. It just hit Bitcoin's official repo this week.

> The mechanism is a soft fork. Three years after activation, you can no longer send Bitcoin to old wallet types.

> Two years after that, those coins become permanently unspendable.

> Around 6.5 MILLION $BTC affected. Roughly 25% of all supply.

> Lopp himself acknowledges what this is. He rejects the word "confiscation" and prefers "burning."

> Here is the part nobody is talking about.

> The chain cannot tell the difference between Satoshi's dormant coins and a longterm holder waiting for $500,000 to sell.

> They look identical on chain. The early miner who set up a wallet in 2011 and forgot about it.

> The OG who bought at $200 and never moved them.

> The cold storage wallet sitting in a safe. All burned together.

> But the deeper question is how this is even possible.

> Five people have merge authority on Bitcoin Core. One person merges roughly 65% of all code.

> Six mining pools control 96 to 99% of all blocks. Activation requires their signaling.

> A coordinated decision by maybe two dozen people can change the rules and burn 25% of the supply.

> Bitcoin has done this before. In 2010, a bug created 184 BILLION $BTC out of thin air.

> Satoshi himself coordinated a fork to erase it. The chain rolled back 50 blocks.

> Ethereum did it in 2016. The DAO got hacked for $60 MILLION.

> Developers rewrote history to take the money back from a wallet whose owner had not signed off.

> The principled chain that refused to fork is now called Ethereum Classic and it is a fraction of the size.

> The lesson is the same in both cases. When the cost of the principle is high enough, the principle bends.

> Bitcoin was supposed to be the one thing nobody could touch.

> What Bitcoin actually is and what this proposal is forcing into the open, is a network that can be changed when enough of the right people agree.

> Most of the time they don't but the option has always been there.

> Decentralized at the participation layer. Coordinated at the change layer.

> The freeze might never happen. Activation requires consensus that does not exist yet.

> Tether's CEO Paolo Ardoino has already pushed back. "Code is law" he says. Don't touch the rules.

> The plan is already written down. The way to do it is already worked out. The list of people who would need to say yes already exists.

> The only question left is whether someone, someday, decides the reason is good enough.

The freeze might never happen. The fact that it could is the part that matters.

#quantumcomputers $BTC

NVIDIA Launches Ising, the World’s First Open AI Models to Accelerate the Path to Useful Quantum Computers NVIDIA Ising Delivers Breakthrough Performance in Quantum Calibration and Error Correction, Empowering Researchers and Enterprises to Build Scalable, High-Performance Quantum Systems.
The NVIDIA Ising open model family delivers the world’s best AI-based quantum processor calibration capabilities, as well as quantum error-correction decoding that is up to 2.5x faster and 3x more accurate than traditional approaches.

The quantum threat isn't coming - it's here. Smart investors are already positioning themselves in quantum-resistant cryptocurrencies that will survive and thrive in the post-quantum world.
### 🥇 **Top Quantum-Resistant Champions**
#### **1. Algorand (ALGO)** - The Quantum Pioneer
- **Quantum Defense**: Algorand leads with Falcon technology, securing blockchain history against quantum threats
- **Why It's Hot**: First major blockchain to implement quantum-resistant signatures
- **Bullish Factor**: Considered by many the only project that is truly quantum-safe
- **Investment Thesis**: Early mover advantage in quantum resistance with proven technology

#### **2. Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR)** - Government-Grade Security
- **Quantum Shield**: Employs SHA-384 cryptography, a level of security that even the most powerful quantum computers are unlikely to breach
- **Secret Weapon**: Compliance with top-secret government standards
- **Market Position**: Enterprise adoption accelerating rapidly
- **Growth Potential**: Massive institutional backing driving adoption

#### **3. Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL)** - Purpose-Built Protection
- **Core Focus**: Uses QRL to protect transactions on a platform built with resistance against quantum computing attacks
- **Technical Edge**: Incorporating advanced cryptographic techniques like XMSS and Winternitz One-Time Signature
- **Investment Case**: Pure-play quantum resistance with dedicated development team

#### **4. IOTA (MIOTA)** - IoT Quantum Shield
- **Unique Position**: Exploring quantum-resistant solutions with advanced cryptographic techniques
- **Market Opportunity**: IoT device security in quantum era
- **Bullish Catalyst**: Growing IoT market needs quantum-safe solutions
**singularityNet(AGIX)
**Fetch.ai(FET)
**Virtual protocol(VIRTUAL)
**Grass network($GRASS)
This are the to Next gen-Ai Tokens
#Trade smart
#quantumcomputers #NextGenToken
#CryptoBullish

🔐 The future of Bitcoin and digital security might be under threat much earlier than many anticipated. Google has revealed that recent breakthroughs in quantum computing could significantly reduce the resources required to crack the encryption protecting crypto wallets and sensitive data.

⚠️ Quantum Leap: From 20 Million Qubits to Under One Million
Craig Gidney, a quantum researcher at Google, stated that factoring a 2048-bit RSA key — one of the core cryptographic standards — may no longer require 20 million qubits, as he estimated in 2019. Instead, it could now be achieved with fewer than one million qubits in under a week.
This leap is possible thanks to:

🔹 advanced quantum algorithms,

🔹 improved error correction techniques,

🔹 and denser qubit encoding that allows for more efficient operations.

⚡ Willow Chip Solves "10 Septillion-Year" Problem in 5 Minutes
In December 2024, Google unveiled its new quantum chip Willow, capable of solving a problem in five minutes that would take traditional supercomputers 10 septillion years. Critics quickly raised alarms, suggesting that such power could potentially rewrite the Bitcoin blockchain or even access dormant wallets, including those possibly linked to Satoshi Nakamoto.

🧠 What This Means for Crypto Security
Bitcoin uses elliptic curve cryptography, which is mathematically similar to RSA. If quantum computers can crack RSA faster than expected, Bitcoin's security timeline might have just shortened significantly.
Google warned that some state actors or tech rivals might already be collecting encrypted data now to decrypt later when quantum machines become viable.

🧪 Magical States and Quantum Efficiency
Google researchers also employed so-called T-states (magical quantum states) to boost computing power without increasing system load. This technique allows for more efficient operations, saving time and physical space.

🔎 Project 11: Quantum Bounty on Bitcoin Security
Meanwhile, Project 11, a quantum research group, has offered a $85,000 bounty to anyone who can break a simplified version of Bitcoin's encryption using a quantum computer. While the test targets short key lengths (1 to 25 bits), far below Bitcoin’s 256-bit standard, it helps assess how urgent the quantum threat really is.
The group argues that Shor’s algorithm, a key quantum technique, could eventually break Bitcoin’s elliptic curve encryption altogether.

📅 Timeline: Is 2030 Too Late?
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recommends phasing out vulnerable systems starting in 2030. But Google’s findings suggest this timeline may be too conservative.
Tech giants are already making moves:

🔹 IBM aims to build a 100,000-qubit quantum computer by 2030

🔹 Quantinuum plans to deliver a quantum-secure system by 2029

🧩 Bottom Line: Bitcoin Is Safe… For Now — But the Clock Is Ticking
Google reassures that user digital assets are currently safe. However, the trajectory of quantum progress is undeniable. The crypto industry must start preparing now if it hopes to remain secure in the quantum age.

#quantumcomputers , #BitcoinSecurity , #crypto , #BTC , #DigitalAssets

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Quantum computers are considered one of the most promising technologies of the future. They promise computing power far beyond that of classical computers. However, this revolution could also pose a threat to modern cryptography—and thus to systems like Bitcoin.
The critical question is: Can quantum computers break Bitcoin? And if so, will Bitcoin need an upgrade?
How Quantum Computers Threaten Cryptography
The security of modern cryptography relies on mathematical problems that are difficult for classical computers to solve. Bitcoin primarily uses two algorithms:
1. SHA-256 (for hash functions)
2. ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm, for digital signatures)
Quantum computers could specifically attack ECDSA using Shor’s Algorithm, which can break elliptic curve cryptography. In theory, this would allow an attacker to derive private keys from public addresses—a nightmare scenario for Bitcoin.
Does This Also Affect SHA-256?
Fortunately, SHA-256 (and similar hash functions) are only minimally vulnerable to quantum attacks. Grover’s Algorithm could theoretically cut search times in half, but even then, attacking Bitcoin mining or transaction hashes would be extremely resource-intensive.
Is Bitcoin Really at Risk?
The good news: Not anytime soon.
1. Quantum computers are not yet powerful enough
- Current quantum computers have only a few error-prone qubits.
1. Breaking ECDSA would require thousands of error-corrected qubits—something that is still years or decades away.
2. Bitcoin transactions are often "quantum-resistant"
- As long as Bitcoin addresses are used only once (as recommended), the risk is low.
- Only publicly known addresses (e.g., unused funds in old wallets) would be vulnerable.
3. The community can adapt
- If quantum computers become a real threat, Bitcoin can upgrade to quantum-resistant cryptography (e.g., Lamport signatures or lattice-based cryptography).
Will Bitcoin Need an Upgrade? Long-term: Yes.
Once quantum computers become practically viable, Bitcoin will need to update its signature algorithms. However, progress is slow enough that the community will have time to respond.
Possible Solutions:
- Post-quantum cryptography (e.g., XMSS, SPHINCS+)
- Schnorr signatures (already part of Bitcoin’s protocol, offering better scalability and serving as a foundation for quantum-resistant upgrades)
- Hybrid systems (combining ECDSA with quantum-resistant signatures)
Conclusion: Bitcoin is (Still) Safe
Quantum computers pose a potential threat, but not an immediate one. Bitcoin developers have time to prepare, and promising quantum-resistant solutions already exist.
Bitcoin won’t be cracked overnight—but the community must stay vigilant. Once quantum computing makes significant advances, an upgrade will be necessary. Until then, the network remains secure.

Further Topics:
- Post-quantum cryptography
- Quantum-Resistant Ledger (QRL)
- Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) for quantum security
#quantumcomputers #Cryptography
$BTC