I actually... slowly understand one thing... When we talk about
@SignOfficial , most of the time we are busy with these big words - trust, attestation, sovereign infrastructure. But the real game inside is a bit different. This whole system actually exists due to operational management. I mean - who manages it, how it happens, and what happens if there is a problem. For example, who manages this on a daily basis? DevOps and validators - these are basically the mute layers. From the outside, nothing is visible, but if they fail, the whole system will stop. Then SLA - uptime, latency... it’s boring to listen to, but in the real world, it’s trust. If you experience latency during verification, trust immediately decreases. Incident management is also interesting. What happens if there is an error? A patch is provided, management is needed, a decision is made... this means there is decentralization, but the response is not always immediate. But here again, there is friction. No, from the audit side - there is data on the chain, but institutions do not read raw data. They need dashboards, reports. This means that again a bit of "structured control" comes into play. The most real things I need are guides, escalation paths - these are absolutely wonderful things. Without them, decentralization is just an idea, not a system. So honestly… @@SignOfficial.Strong? Yes.Simple? No.And the biggest question…Will this complexity scale smoothly, or will it become a bottleneck?🤔Actually - thora samajlo to totally free hy yaar....Bina fees ke, totally free yaar...🚀