Home
Notification
Profile
Trending Articles
News
Bookmarked and Liked
History
Creator Center
Settings
mteamisloading
--
Follow
testnet infra wasn't working so we're testing on mainnet
i love this company
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.
ย
See T&Cs.
3
0
Explore the latest crypto news
โก๏ธ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
๐ฌ Interact with your favorite creators
๐ Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sign Up
Login
Relevant Creator
mteamisloading
@mteamisloading
Follow
Explore More From Creator
Only 2% of validators have consolidated stake since Pectra and EIP 7251. Validator count has actually increased since Pectra after an initial decline. This is important for L1 scaling, we need to up the social pressure on this.
--
6s slot times sound great. Very pro Ethereum prioritizing this for Glamsterdam. With that being said, scaling blob capacity should not be neglected until we have the best DA possible with the existing Ethereum nodes.
--
the based and native and immutable rollup propoganda will not stop until morale improves
--
A couple weeks ago a debate between @smyyguy and @_Jonahw aired on @theempirepod . Jonah made a point along the lines of: we need to forecast a forex rate when doing a DCF because yield for stakers is native yield (denominated in the staking token of the L1, not in USD). Dan returned that forecasts for amount of activity is often denominated in USD. He also makes the point that native token price doesn't proportionally affect that amount of activity in USD (i.e. 10% drop in ETH doesn't mean 10% drop in USD denominated amount of activity). Combined these indicate that the forex rate is kinda being double counted and thus doesn't need to be considered in the DCF. Jonah kinda dodged this point and emphasized that stakers are getting the native asset, not USD. I think this misses Dan's point by not getting at the idea that future cash flows are not (entirely) denominated in the native asset, so there is inherently some exchange rate already. I think it's interesting to think about my own user behaviors. I still think about gas fees in USD (i.e. subcent fees on Base is better than 30c on mainnet, not ETH). My demand to transact on Ethereum, though, isn't really denominated in ETH or USDC, it's denominated in the utility that it provides to me and the opportunity cost of the fees i need to pay. For example I spend much more freely from a crypto debit card I have vs a bank-issued card I have. It's the same USD cost, but it's annoying to withdraw to my bank. On the other hand, I have no idea how this translate to analyzing a population of users' aggregate demand to transactโcould be much different from a macro perspective.
--
All the smartest people I know in crypto listen to crypto podcasts regularly
--
Latest News
BNB Drops Below 890 USDT with a 0.34% Decrease in 24 Hours
--
Bitcoin's Bull Market Cycle Faces Significant Decline, Analyst Predicts
--
JPMorgan to Launch Tokenized Money Market Fund on Ethereum
--
Do Kwon Faces Potential Second Trial in South Korea After U.S. Sentencing
--
Whale Investor Reenters Market with Significant Ethereum Position
--
View More
Trending Articles
๐ค Bitcoin oversold 1H RSI ยท LONG entry opportunity ยท Higher high next
GK-ARONNO
Solana Bearish Trend Scenarios โ Whatโs Really Happening?
Zoro-Shoro
3,500 XRP to a Million? Here Is Why One Analyst Says That Narrative Falls Apart
BeMaster BuySmart
Hereโs a clean, easy-to-read version in your preferred Big P
BlockchainBentar
XRP ETFs Top $1 Billion in Assets as Steady Inflows Set Stage for $10 Billion Boom
BeInCrypto Global
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs
