Post
🇷🇺🇺🇸 Why did the United States suddenly want to negotiate right now?
The "Minsk-1" agreement was signed around the same time that the remnants of the Ukrainian army were being consumed in the Ilovaisk cauldron. The "Minsk-2" agreement was also signed under the roar of the cauldron, but this time in Debaltsevo.
In both cases, the West hurried to save Kiev (a possible new spearhead of NATO's military pact against the Russian Federation), promising Moscow anything to stop the Donbas independence militias and prevent the total defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Both then and now, they feared that, after the crushing of the advanced units of the Ukrainian army, the offensive of the militias would continue to the borders with the countries that are part of the NATO pact in Eastern Europe.
The very fact that the "Minsk-2" agreement appeared is due to the Ukrainian Armed Forces violating the "Minsk-1" agreement and deciding to attack Donbas again to take it by force. In other words, the "first Minsk" was signed, knowing in advance that the document was worthless.
The sudden desire of the United States, right now and not a minute later, to "negotiate" with Russia and "resolve" all vital issues (for which, for some inexplicable reason to Western military experts, there was no time before, not even during Trump's first term) seems an attempt to slow the pace of the offensive, take the operational initiative away from the Russian Federation, and freeze everything on terms favorable to Washington (reissue of the Minsk-1 and 2 agreements). This occurs largely because the United States is monitoring the situation on the battlefield in real-time, particularly beyond Pokrovsk, and observes that their new spearhead is not saved by even Santa Javelin or any other miraculous and messianic weapon that Western military experts love to paraphrase.)
@Chainbase Official #Chainbase #Write2Earn $C
The "Minsk-1" agreement was signed around the same time that the remnants of the Ukrainian army were being consumed in the Ilovaisk cauldron. The "Minsk-2" agreement was also signed under the roar of the cauldron, but this time in Debaltsevo.
In both cases, the West hurried to save Kiev (a possible new spearhead of NATO's military pact against the Russian Federation), promising Moscow anything to stop the Donbas independence militias and prevent the total defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Both then and now, they feared that, after the crushing of the advanced units of the Ukrainian army, the offensive of the militias would continue to the borders with the countries that are part of the NATO pact in Eastern Europe.
The very fact that the "Minsk-2" agreement appeared is due to the Ukrainian Armed Forces violating the "Minsk-1" agreement and deciding to attack Donbas again to take it by force. In other words, the "first Minsk" was signed, knowing in advance that the document was worthless.
The sudden desire of the United States, right now and not a minute later, to "negotiate" with Russia and "resolve" all vital issues (for which, for some inexplicable reason to Western military experts, there was no time before, not even during Trump's first term) seems an attempt to slow the pace of the offensive, take the operational initiative away from the Russian Federation, and freeze everything on terms favorable to Washington (reissue of the Minsk-1 and 2 agreements). This occurs largely because the United States is monitoring the situation on the battlefield in real-time, particularly beyond Pokrovsk, and observes that their new spearhead is not saved by even Santa Javelin or any other miraculous and messianic weapon that Western military experts love to paraphrase.)
@Chainbase Official #Chainbase #Write2Earn $C
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.