Guys we are on the 13th position in top 100 content creators | crypto-kitty- on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

Guys we are on the 13th position in top 100 content creators list ..... amazin ... thank you all guys for all of your support ...
$BNB $XRP $SOL 
SOL
132.55
-3.10%

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

315

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@crypteow

Explore More From Creator

$BB is at a crossroads — hype meets structural stress. Fresh updates: BounceBit is actively exploring a fee-switch mechanism: diverting a portion of platform fees from BounceBit Trade to fund ongoing BB buybacks. PANews The team repurchased 8.87 million BB tokens in a recent week, backed by ~$16 million in projected revenue. On the infrastructure side, BounceBit now integrates BBTC — a wrapped BTC for use within its chain. This enhances utility, letting BTC act natively in DeFi apps. The protocol remains Friday-focused on RWA + restaking convergence: combining real-world assets, tokenized yield instruments, and BTC staking within one unified CeDeFi stack. Key structural risks to call out: Unlock pressure & dilution — Upcoming release events (insider / vesting schedules) risk flooding supply and undoing buyback effects. Fee allocation complexity — The fee switch is bold but harder than it looks. Misallocation or execution delays could erode trust or cause tokenomics mismatch. Custodial & institutional risk — RWA integration and BTC restaking via licensed custodians bring counterparty risks. If partners mismanage or fail, BB holders suffer. Over-promise vs product adoption — Many projects claim CeDeFi + RWAs; real adoption (TVL, users) matters most. Provocative thought: Is BB’s tokenomics becoming too engineered? The buybacks, fee redirection, RWA stacking — it all looks polished. But if market sentiment sours or unlocks misfire, the house of cards may wobble. Question to readers: Do you believe BB’s multi-layered design (fee switch, buybacks, BTC + RWA stacking) is sustainable — or too ambitious, risking fragility in a downturn?#BounceBitPrime @BounceBit

--

BB is heating up — but let’s not drink the kool-aid too fast. What’s new? BounceBit repurchased 8.87 million BB in one week as part of its buyback program, funded by projected $16M annualized revenue. In parallel, the “fee switch” mechanism is under discussion: redirecting part of BounceBit Trade’s fees straight into BB buybacks instead of external payouts. On infrastructure, BounceBit is pushing its identity as a Bitcoin restaking CeDeFi chain — letting BTC holders make their holdings productive without exiting Bitcoin. On the RWA front: BB Prime now includes Franklin Templeton’s tokenized fund (Benji), bridging Treasuries into DeFi strategy. Notably, a large unlock event dropped ~42.89M BB (≈ 6.3% of circulating supply) on 10 September, putting real sell pressure on the market. Analysis & Risks Buybacks and fee-switch designs are strong signals in favor of token-value support. Yet they may only partially offset the unlocked supply pressure. The success of BB depends on disciplined execution, careful timing of buybacks, and real adoption of the restaking / yield product suite. Also, centralization creep (custodians, institutional partners) could backfire under regulatory scrutiny. Question to audience: Do you see BB’s buyback engine, combined with its restaking + RWA plans, sustaining momentum — or is the unlocking schedule too much overhead to overcome? @BounceBit #BounceBitPrime $BB

--

Tokenized Treasuries meet DeFi — promising, but messy. BounceBit’s recent moves (BB Prime with Franklin Templeton and V3 “Big Bank”) push real-world yields on-chain and introduce a rebasing BB token plus a native perpetuals DEX. This could attract institutional liquidity and make Treasury yields accessible on-chain. But ask: who owns the downside? Positive: tokenized Treasuries give a yield floor; the Franklin Templeton tie adds credibility. Rebasing BB tokens plus perps could simplify compounding. Critical points: 1) Counterparty & custody risk — tokenized funds depend on off-chain assets and custodians, adding operational exposure. 2) Centralization — tight institutional ties can erode DeFi ethos and invite regulatory oversight. 3) Tokenomics — scheduled unlocks and staking allocations risk dilution and volatility. 4) Complexity — yield-stacking is opaque and can magnify losses in market stress. Latest: V3 'Big Bank' went live Oct 2 with rebasing BB-token standards and a built-in perpetuals DEX — turning BB into a yield-native asset. BounceBit calls this move “Bringing the T-bill playbook onchain.” Progress — but it raises custody, audit, and regulatory questions beyond the marketing. Watch upcoming token unlocks and examine custody terms before allocating capital; act cautiously. Bottom line: BB’s roadmap is ambitious — institutional rails plus composable DeFi is powerful, yet adoption depends on transparent audits, clear custody/legal frameworks, and disciplined token supply management. Question: Are you willing to trade simplicity for higher yield? Sources: Franklin Templeton integration / BB Prime coverage. CoinDesk BB V3 “Big Bank” announcement (rebasing token + perpetuals DEX). Binance Media pieces on BB Prime and RWA yield product. FinanceFeeds Tokenomics / scheduled unlocks and dilution risk analysis. CoinMarketCap BounceBit official X post (quote: “Bringing the T-bill playbook onchain”). @BounceBit #BounceBitPrime $BB

--

an BB Prime make BTC yields safe and durable? Big question: Are BounceBit Prime’s tokenized Treasuries and RWA integrations (e.g., Franklin Templeton) a reliable, sustainable way for BTC holders to earn yield via restaking? Short answer: BB Prime materially improves yield access by pairing BTC restaking with tokenized institutional assets, but it adds new counterparty and composability risks that creators must acknowledge. Deep dive: BounceBit Prime tokenizes money-market and treasury products and stitches them into on-chain yield stacks, creating predictable cashflows that feed BTC restaking returns. That institutional link — “Franklin Templeton’s tokenized money market fund is now integrated into BounceBit Prime” — brings regulated asset exposure to on-chain yields, giving protocols a firmer income base. X (formerly Twitter Risk profile: blending CeFi tokenized RWAs with DeFi automation raises custody, regulatory, and liquidity-mismatch risks. If tokenized Treasuries face redemptions or new regulatory constraints, yield stacking strategies can compress or pause rewards despite high APY headlines. Independent coverage flags rapid Prime adoption, active $BB buybacks, and material token unlocks that could pressure secondary markets. Binance Social proof: BounceBit’s official feed explicitly celebrated the Franklin Templeton integration, while community posts show Prime promos filling fast and AMAs scheduled on Square — clear demand signals, but also FOMO-driven short-term volume. X (formerly Twitter) Conclusion question: BB Prime is promising for yield hunters, but is it a core portfolio tool or a tactical yield play for cautious, experienced allocators? Share your view below. @BounceBit #BounceBitPrime $BB

--

Can Pyth’s low-latency oracle replace Chainlink for latency-sensitive trading and tradFi feeds? Short answer: Not universally — but for ultra-low-latency market data Pyth is now the preferred choice for many trading apps. Pyth pulls first-party price ticks from exchanges and market makers, and its new ‘Lazer’ layer is explicitly built for latency-sensitive use. Recent expansion added real-time ETF and equities feeds and the network now publishes over 1,600 asset feeds across crypto, equities, FX and commodities — that breadth plus streaming ticks is why traders and tick-sensitive protocols are integrating Pyth. Messari’s Q2 report shows growing adoption (Pyth secured ~$5.3B in TVS that quarter), while Chainlink still leads in total value secured. Practical rule: use Pyth when you need streaming, high-frequency ticks (trading bots, tokenized stocks); keep Chainlink as a conservative fallback for broad oracle services. Social proof matters — Pyth’s official updates tout “scale” and Binance highlights its broad feed coverage. Would you run your bot on Pyth or keep Chainlink as the safety layer? @Pyth Network #PythRoadmap $PYTH Sources & notes: Pyth newsroom / ‘Lazer’ & onchain scale (Pyth official). Pyth Network — (Pyth mediaroom / Lazer launch & scale) Binance Square writeup: “more than 1,600 feeds” and real-time ETF/equities coverage. Binance — (Binance Square coverage / project note) Messari — State of Pyth Q2 2025: ~$5.3B TVS (adoption metric). Messari — (Q2 TVS / adoption) Binance post on Pyth integrations (BNB Chain & ecosystem access). Binance — (integration note) Pyth official price-feeds page: first-party feeds & developer docs. Pyth Network — (technical & feed catalog) Next post (BounceBit) ready — I’ll produce it now unless you want a different order.

--

Latest News

Pakistan Integrates Bitcoin into Economic Infrastructure

--

Bitcoin Miners Shift to Renewable Energy Amid Economic Challenges

--

Bitcoin Short-Term Holders Show Resilience Amid Market Volatility

--

Wintermute Transfers 435.91 BTC to Anonymous Address

--

Polychain Capital Receives Significant PENDLE Transfers

--

Trending Articles

🚫 Market Strategist: “Do Not Touch XRP Anymore” — Here’s Why Analysts Are Sounding the Alarm

$SOL 🔥 SOL/USDT Quick Update ✅More Drop If: ✅15m or 1h cand

🔥 MOST PEOPLE HAVE ONLY $10–$50 TO TRADE… READ THIS CAREFUL

Crypto Research Expert

I’ll never buy Ethereum again.

$LUNC One statement from yesterday’s court hearing that many

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences