Tiburon-23(@Tiburon-23)'s insights

📢 Is it time for Binance Square to implement a "P2P

Tiburon-23 · 2026-03-14T17:21:03.000Z

📢 Is it time for Binance Square to implement a "P2P Accuracy Score"? 📊 🔥 Trading is not a game of screenshots Have you ever followed a signal from a "KOL" that ended in a loss, while they only post screenshots of their profits? 😤 The reality in Binance Square is breeding controversy: many creators gain reputation (and commissions from referrals or Write to Earn) with successful trades, but incorrect signals "disappear" or simply do not affect their profile. They do not lose the same as you. 🛑 The problem: The asymmetry of risk Currently, Binance introduced the Trader Profile (where some show their PNL and Badges), but it is optional. If a creator does not want to show their losses, they simply do not activate the feature. In P2P, we see the percentage of completed orders. In Copy Trading, we see the actual ROI and the Drawdown. Why is it not mandatory in Square? 💡 My proposal (Let's make Binance listen to us): If a creator posts an entry/exit signal, Binance should: Link the signal to the profile: A system that automatically detects if the price reached Take Profit or Stop Loss. Public Accuracy Score: Next to the creator's name, a real percentage (e.g., 65% accuracy in the last 30 days). Total Transparency: Let the follower know how many signals have failed, not just how many "went to the moon." "Transparency is not an option, it must be the norm to protect the community." 👇 OPEN DEBATE A- Less "To the Moon" 🚀 without fundamentals. More real and verifiable "Win Rate" (Accuracy Rate). B- Creators who risk their reputation on every signal. C- If a P2P trader is blocked for non-compliance, why can a content creator fail 10 signals in a row and still appear as a guru? Leave your opinion below and tag @Binance Square Official #BinanceSquareTalks #TradingStrategies💼💰 #CryptoTrading. #ProteccionAlUsuario