Just now, I was staring at the computer screen thinking, what was the most troublesome thing when we used to buy graphics cards and mining machines?

It wasn't the electricity bill, but depreciation. Once this thing is powered on, its lifespan starts a countdown, and eventually turns into a pile of scrap metal.

But I carefully reviewed the logic of @Fabric Foundation Fabric and found that it wants to put the 'wear and tear' of robots on the blockchain as well.

Just think about it, if a robot is working in a factory, every time it moves, the wear on the drive shaft and the battery cycles will all be recorded on the chain.

What Fabric is doing with that verifiable data is actually to create a 'real-time health check list' for robots.

The most hardcore part of this is: if the remaining lifespan and health of this robot are transparent and auditable, then it is no longer just a depreciating piece of scrap metal, but a financial asset that can be pledged or even resold.

This logic of 'depreciation assetization' has actually given new life to the DePIN track after I pondered it for a while.

If in the future, every street is filled with robots that have this 'on-chain health check list', then $ROBO will no longer just be a small tip coin, but will become the 'notary fee' in this machine asset evaluation system.

I plan to closely monitor the interface regarding the sensor data feedback in Q2. If it can really make every bit of wear on the robot become a transparent account, then the ceiling for $ROBO might be even higher than what we see now.

#robo