I can’t help but notice the market is still taking the lazy route on SIGN.

Most discussions start and stop at supply — “Oh, fully diluted, overhang risk, move along.” Sure, that explains caution, but it doesn’t tell the whole story.

What gets ignored? SIGN is already in motion actual usage, distribution infrastructure, activity happening. That doesn’t erase dilution, but it makes the usual “overhang doom” narrative feel weaker than people assume 💡.

So yeah, my beef isn’t with the dilution argument itself — it’s how people use it instead of doing a bit of digging.

#SignDigitalSovereignInfra @SignOfficial $SIGN

SIGN

--

--

What do you think — is the market too lazy to see SIGN for what it really is?