Post
--
小猪天上飞-Piglet
·
--
Just got this damn Schema Hook error sorted out, turned to take a look at the market, and the same thought crossed my mind: infrastructure like this needs to find opportunities in the dirtiest and hardest work. Recently stuck in the SDK of Sign Protocol and can't get out, although the documentation reads like a piece of uncooked meat, especially that layer of Relay network, the response delay sometimes makes one practice self-cultivation in front of the computer, but its narrative of full-chain proof is indeed wilder than EAS, which only knows to guard its own little plot of land in Ethereum.
Many people look down on this kind of middleware, thinking that moving credentials around is meaningless. But just look at those big shots in Dubai and Riyadh who are throwing money at digital sovereignty; what they want is a hard currency identity that can penetrate different ledgers. Without the mainnet, EAS becomes a kite with a broken string, while Sign's Hybrid storage plus ZK proof hits the dead spot of decentralized trade perfectly. In practice, the overhead of cross-chain verification is much lower than that of EAS's "noble protocol." As for Arweave, although permanent storage sounds mystical, where is there logic in commercial use that doesn't modify data? Sign's Schema, which supports dynamic iteration, is obviously more down-to-earth, allowing you to update credit dimensions without having to start from scratch.
Of course, Sign is not yet at the point of charging in with closed eyes. Its TVM struggles quite a bit when running complex ZK circuits; just adding a bit of logic can lead to memory overflow errors. But this tenacity in finding a balance between anti-censorship and practicality is exactly the trump card we want to see. $SIGN as the consumption logic for fuel at the Relay layer is tougher than those governance tokens that purely rely on hype to survive. The logic is still the same; this hardcore infrastructure has good long-distance endurance, but positions must be kept within the line that allows for sipping coffee even when it drops by half. Once this "difficult to use" thing becomes easier to use, it's likely that there won't be any opportunities left for us early adopters.
@SignOfficial $SIGN
{future}(SIGNUSDT)
#Sign地缘政治基建
Many people look down on this kind of middleware, thinking that moving credentials around is meaningless. But just look at those big shots in Dubai and Riyadh who are throwing money at digital sovereignty; what they want is a hard currency identity that can penetrate different ledgers. Without the mainnet, EAS becomes a kite with a broken string, while Sign's Hybrid storage plus ZK proof hits the dead spot of decentralized trade perfectly. In practice, the overhead of cross-chain verification is much lower than that of EAS's "noble protocol." As for Arweave, although permanent storage sounds mystical, where is there logic in commercial use that doesn't modify data? Sign's Schema, which supports dynamic iteration, is obviously more down-to-earth, allowing you to update credit dimensions without having to start from scratch.
Of course, Sign is not yet at the point of charging in with closed eyes. Its TVM struggles quite a bit when running complex ZK circuits; just adding a bit of logic can lead to memory overflow errors. But this tenacity in finding a balance between anti-censorship and practicality is exactly the trump card we want to see. $SIGN as the consumption logic for fuel at the Relay layer is tougher than those governance tokens that purely rely on hype to survive. The logic is still the same; this hardcore infrastructure has good long-distance endurance, but positions must be kept within the line that allows for sipping coffee even when it drops by half. Once this "difficult to use" thing becomes easier to use, it's likely that there won't be any opportunities left for us early adopters.
@SignOfficial $SIGN
{future}(SIGNUSDT)
#Sign地缘政治基建
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.