$GAIN After the hacker attack, the project team has been warning against buying in, and the trading alerts on the Binance platform also indicated an increase of 5 billion, warning of the risks of buying in. Insisting on buying in after the hacker attack is equivalent to being willing to take the risk for a gamble; if you lose the bet, you have to accept it.

Let's see if the project team has any goodwill solutions for the retail investors who bought in later, but a 1:1 compensation is impossible; otherwise, would you treat the buyers before the hacker attack like pigs to be slaughtered?!! Those who bought in before the hacker attack are the innocent ones!

After the hacker attack, the hackers bear the main responsibility, and retail investors who are willing to take the risk to buy in must also bear a reasonable proportion of the risk, while the project team should take on an appropriate goodwill proportion of the risk. Moreover, the price at which buyers bought in after the hacker attack is already very low, so compensating proportionally is sufficient. Buyers who bought in before the hacker attack have already lost a lot at the current price; those who bought in after the hacker attack shouldn't expect to profit, as you should know you are benefiting at the expense of those who bought in before the hacker attack!