Synchronize the latest two actions, one is the newly announced token unlocking proposal, and the other is the USD1 financial renewal here, holding in spot, funds, contracts, and leverage accounts, can share 15 million WLFI. One side is dealing with the uncertainty of the supply side, and the other side is enhancing the reasons for funds to continue staying. Grasp both hands, and both must be strong!

The core logic of the proposal - extend the lock-up, reduce supply.

This time it involves about 62.28 billion WLFI, the core is to replanning the release rhythm. If the team chooses to join the new plan, they need to first destroy 10%, which is about 4.52 billion, then lock the remaining for two years, and slowly release it over three years, fully unlocked by the fifth year;

The early supporters' portion is not involved in destruction, but will also be changed to a two-year lockup, followed by two years of linear release. If this plan isn't accepted, it will continue to be locked indefinitely. The logic is quite straightforward: a portion is directly reduced, and the rest is pushed back uniformly to suppress potential short-term sell pressure.

The significance of this matter isn't just about locking up tokens; it's about addressing a more fundamental issue—expectations. Many projects struggle not due to a lack of narrative, but because the chip structure makes people uneasy. As long as the market fears there could be selling pressure at any moment, prices will struggle to stabilize. WLFI is at least directly responding to this issue this time, and the team's self-imposed constraints are more convincing than mere verbal promises.

Of course, this arrangement won't satisfy everyone. For early supporters, liquidity being stretched and emotional fluctuations are normal. This is essentially a trade-off: the project chooses to prioritize structural stability over satisfying everyone's short-term liquidity needs.

Now looking at #USD1 financial management renewals. Many people might interpret this as issuing rewards, but a more accurate description is that WLFI is using strategy to retain funds.

In the current market environment, if a stablecoin has both liquidity and can provide some yield, it's naturally more likely to be held long-term. USD1 has been focused on attracting funds first, then retaining them as much as possible, and finally guiding them towards trading, DeFi, and RWA scenarios.

So when you put these two things together, it becomes clear: the proposal addresses whether to sell, while the financial management concerns 'why continue holding'. By controlling supply and stabilizing demand, and using practical scenarios to support it, it's evident that WLFI is trying to build a complete funding loop.

But the key isn't the mechanism itself; it's whether it can be supported afterward. Locking tokens can delay issues, and yield can attract funds, but the ultimate factor determining whether this system can hold together is the real demand for USD1. If demand can continue to grow, the effects of structural optimization will truly manifest.

In the end, I hope everyone can stay patient, reduce the fud, and give the @worldlibertyfi team some time to keep building!