I’ve been thinking about land in Pixels again… and honestly, I’m still not fully convinced what to make of it.

At first, it sounds simple. You own land, other players use it, and you earn a cut in PIXEL. Cool. Feels like passive income inside a game. But when I looked a bit deeper, it started to feel a little… looped?

Like, land has value because it earns PIXEL. But PIXEL has value partly because people want land. So both kind of feed each other. And yeah, that makes sense on paper, but also makes me stop and think for a second.

What makes it NOT completely weird is that the land actually does something. It’s not just sitting there. People farm on it, produce stuff, generate activity. So the rewards aren’t coming out of nowhere. There is some real in-game productivity behind it.

But still… it’s only partially backed by that activity. And I think that “partially” part is bigger than most people realize.

I feel like a lot of buyers see the earnings and assume it’s solid. But they don’t always question how much of that value is coming from actual gameplay… and how much is just players entering the system.

I’m not saying it’s bad. Just saying it’s not as straightforward as it looks. And yeah… I’m still trying to figure out if this model really holds up long term or if it just works while everything is growing.
@Pixels #pixel $PIXEL