To be honest, @Pixels this farming-type chain game is quite special in the Web3 gaming circle. It's not like those early P2E projects that desperately issued tokens to attract users, boosting short-term activity, and once the incentives stopped, everyone ran away. Pixels, on the other hand, is more pragmatic; they created something called RORS (Return on Reward Spend). Simply put, before issuing rewards, they calculate whether this 'investment' is worth it, rather than throwing around traffic subsidies. The core logic of RORS is: how much value can the rewards issued by the project ultimately recover from the user's real behavior. If the rewards given out can generate income that approaches or even exceeds their value, then a positive cycle can slowly be established. This metric is impressive because it transforms the act of issuing tokens from a 'marketing tool' into a 'quantifiable investment' that must be accountable for user retention and long-term results like repurchases. Personally, I really appreciate this approach. Previously, too many chain games had rough growth methods; users would just take the rewards and leave, making it impossible for the ecosystem to sustain itself. Pixels is at least pushing chain games from 'whoever issues the most wins' to 'how to use more reasonable incentives to retain high-quality users'. This is somewhat similar to how traditional internet shifted from blindly buying traffic to performance advertising; the reasoning is the same.