Tamala S(@Square-Creator-2ede2ffa0571a)'s insights

#pixel $PIXEL Many people ask me why I am optimistic about

Tamala S · 2026-04-21T15:39:14.000Z

#pixel $PIXEL Many people ask me why I am optimistic about Pixels, and my answer has always been the same—it's not because of its innovative farming gameplay, but because it has figured out the question of 'who should receive the rewards'. What is the most classic way for a blockchain game to fail? Issue rewards, and bots come to exploit; do not issue rewards, and real players leave. You can never tell whether the person on the other side of the screen is a real person or a script. Pixels also stumbled early on this, and founder Luke himself said that they initially thought the hardest part was designing the economic model; later, they found out the hardest part was knowing who to give rewards to, how much to give, and when to give it. Thus, Stacked was born. To put it simply, it is an automated reward decision-making system that does not generate game content but is responsible for one thing: calculating how much retention can be gained from every dollar spent on rewards. This system has run billions of times within Pixels, withstanding countless waves of bot attacks, and the accumulated data is substantial enough to train an AI model#btc $BTC Now this AI asks three questions every day based on the data: Who is about to leave? How much can retain them? Is this money well spent? The third question is crucial because in traditional games, this is left to operators' instincts, while Stacked calculates it automatically based on data. So my interest in $PIXEL is not because of what it has promised, but because it really has the goods in hand—over two hundred million reward records and twenty-five million dollars in protocol revenue, all of which were genuinely earned in a bear market. While other projects are still writing roadmaps on PowerPoint, Pixels has already grown that layer of armor to withstand hits.@Pixels