大家好才是真的好好(@Square-Creator-4fcbdb4f9c52f)'s insights

#bedrock I've noticed that in the current staking scene,

大家好才是真的好好 · 2026-06-03T13:20:55.000Z

#bedrock I've noticed that in the current staking scene, most projects are opting to 'grind out a single asset', especially focusing on $BTC . This route sounds pretty professional: clear boundaries, simple narratives, and low engineering pressure, allowing for an extreme optimization of a single asset's yield path. But if you think a bit deeper, this kind of 'focus' sometimes feels more like a shortcut in engineering. It shifts the complexity of multi-asset support directly onto the user, and firmly ties its ceiling to the cycles of a single asset—when the asset pumps, it shines; when the asset adjusts, it falls silent. Bedrock, on the other hand, is taking a different path. From the get-go, it’s positioned itself as a multi-asset liquidity staking protocol, supporting re-staking of BTC, ETH, and IOTX, consolidating assets that were originally scattered across different protocols into a single management entry point. For users, this means no more flipping between platforms, separately monitoring positions, or calculating yields. Fewer cross-protocol operations mean fewer potential risks and a significant reduction in energy expenditure; the difference in user experience is very tangible. Of course, a multi-asset strategy comes at a cost. It can't slam all resources into BTC like a single-coin project for extreme optimization, and it might not have the edge in yield competitions for a single asset at times. Meanwhile, the complexity and pressure of designing smart contracts that cross multiple assets, building risk models, and real-time risk management have increased exponentially. But @Bedrock is truly betting on a longer-term trend: as users' assets become increasingly fragmented, what they really need isn’t four specialists managing their own corners, but a unified base that can reliably hold all mainstream assets. Whoever can solidify this 'universal entry point' first is likely to occupy a more strategically advantageous position in the next phase. This isn't a contest to see who can make re-staking BTC more appealing; it's a bet on whether re-staking itself will become the foundational infrastructure of the multi-asset era. $BR