When I saw a lot of things being automatically handled on the Genius order page, my first reaction wasn't just about convenience.
To be honest, convenience is certainly a plus. Users come in from the asset page, fill in the amount, and the system helps streamline some of the paths, default parameters, and execution methods. The process becomes shorter, and it’s definitely more comfortable than jumping between tools on my own. But I also have a bit of unease: among those steps that were skipped, are there any judgments I should have personally checked?
This point is easily overlooked.
Some steps are merely mechanical operations, and skipping them is fine. For instance, not having to copy contract addresses, not repeatedly switching pages, or not piecing together a bunch of basic data—all of these are part of experience optimization. But some things aren’t just pure operations; they are inherently part of the judgment process. For example, which execution method is currently in use, what conditions the expected results are based on, whether a certain path is being defaulted, if a specific risk might impact the trade, and even whether I need to recheck the asset page status before confirming.
If these are also smoothly handled by the system, users might fall into the illusion: the page has already sorted it out for me, so I just need to hit confirm.
But in real trading, skipping steps doesn’t equal skipping judgment.
The value of Genius isn’t to turn users into blind button pushers, but to make complex processes easier to understand. It can help me do fewer repetitive operations, but it cannot hide aspects that influence cost, paths, execution results, and risk boundaries. Especially after entering the order page from the asset page, the smoother the page is, the more I need to know: which parts the system handled for me, and which still require my confirmation.
I don’t oppose Genius making the trading process shorter.
What I oppose is when the process becomes so short that I can’t tell if I’m making judgments or just moving forward with the default settings.
For practical users, true simplification isn’t about me seeing less; it’s about cutting out meaningless steps while keeping the key judgments intact. @GeniusOfficial $GENIUS #genius
To be honest, convenience is certainly a plus. Users come in from the asset page, fill in the amount, and the system helps streamline some of the paths, default parameters, and execution methods. The process becomes shorter, and it’s definitely more comfortable than jumping between tools on my own. But I also have a bit of unease: among those steps that were skipped, are there any judgments I should have personally checked?
This point is easily overlooked.
Some steps are merely mechanical operations, and skipping them is fine. For instance, not having to copy contract addresses, not repeatedly switching pages, or not piecing together a bunch of basic data—all of these are part of experience optimization. But some things aren’t just pure operations; they are inherently part of the judgment process. For example, which execution method is currently in use, what conditions the expected results are based on, whether a certain path is being defaulted, if a specific risk might impact the trade, and even whether I need to recheck the asset page status before confirming.
If these are also smoothly handled by the system, users might fall into the illusion: the page has already sorted it out for me, so I just need to hit confirm.
But in real trading, skipping steps doesn’t equal skipping judgment.
The value of Genius isn’t to turn users into blind button pushers, but to make complex processes easier to understand. It can help me do fewer repetitive operations, but it cannot hide aspects that influence cost, paths, execution results, and risk boundaries. Especially after entering the order page from the asset page, the smoother the page is, the more I need to know: which parts the system handled for me, and which still require my confirmation.
I don’t oppose Genius making the trading process shorter.
What I oppose is when the process becomes so short that I can’t tell if I’m making judgments or just moving forward with the default settings.
For practical users, true simplification isn’t about me seeing less; it’s about cutting out meaningless steps while keeping the key judgments intact. @GeniusOfficial $GENIUS #genius