When Liv’s Stargrace Foundation started accepting donations, the ETH community rushed in to show their support for Liv and the foundation. The timing was just perfect!
I just wanna ask: what were you guys up to before the foundation was set up?
It's not about whether you guys tweeted or posted doll pics. I'm asking: when Rebecca's account got hacked, who was the first to step in and help her? It was the SOL community. When Rebecca faced challenges and needed tangible support, who jumped in first? It was the SOL community. The BAGS royalty fees injected into the Liv Foundation amounted to around $300,000, and this money is generated automatically with every trade, no one needs to make a special 'statement,' and we don't have to wait for the foundation to launch to show support.
ETH has been promoting that 0.5% of tokens were donated to St. Jude, which has no direct connection to Liv or Rebecca. They clearly state in their Telegram group: 'Donating to hospitals is a more cost-effective hype, donating to Vitalik doesn’t mean much.' This isn’t something I made up; this is what they said themselves.
Now that the foundation has been established, the ETH community leader says they will continue to donate their tokens to the foundation.
Let me translate the real meaning of this sentence: I'm going to shove my tokens into the foundation and make the market mistakenly believe that the foundation recognizes us, while giving my bags a bit of hype.
If you want to do charity, wouldn’t it be better to directly donate BTC or ETH, instead of your own tokens? The goal of donating tokens has never been to help Liv; it’s to use Liv’s name to back your own market cap.
Is this a donation or marketing? We all know, including the previous bounty on Musk—what’s the rush to leech around? If you're really promoting a long-term community, why the urgency to leech? I believe everyone can see through this. Moreover, you repeatedly state that you are just the SpaceX mascot; didn’t you say you were going to Liv's narrative? Didn’t you say trading memes and IPs has nothing to do with it? Didn’t you say you were separating from Liv's charity narrative? How now do you want to leech off charity?
It's truly contradictory, with narratives flipping back and forth, completely following market cap trends, trying to defame while also leeching; it's disgraceful.
————————
Let’s talk about copyright again: Asteroid, this Shiba Inu, was drawn by Liv herself. She holds the copyright and authorship, and after Liv passes away, the copyright will belong 100% to Rebecca as inheritance. You can’t just alter it a bit to get away with it.
Who does Rebecca recognize? It’s BAGS; her exact words: 'Any profits we make from Bags will be used to establish the foundation in her name.'
ETH's response was: first claiming to be the 'native, legitimate IP,' then changing their tune to say 'we are a derivative creation unrelated to the IP.' They distort the IP yet still claim authenticity.
These two sets of statements cannot coexist. Choose one, stand firm, and then talk about authenticity. The logical narrative is contradictory, and the promotional direction is also swaying.
Not to mention what they have done to Rebecca.
She said 'it's chilling'; they insulted and attacked Liv's mom, her account was hacked, and they used fake posts from hackers to attack her. She receives BAGS royalties, and they accuse her of 'exploiting her daughter.' Even after the foundation is officially established, there are still many smear campaigns and attacks—those who say this are simultaneously using Liv's story to create hype for their own tokens.
This kind of operation is hypocritical and disgusting.
I've said it many times: relying on charity models is unsustainable and unpredictable!
The whales will leave, the hype will fade, and KOLs will move to the next project. ETH's charity has been built on the premise that 'someone is willing to donate' from day one, and this premise can disappear at any moment. If there’s profit, they’ll donate to 'leech' a bit; if there’s no profit, they’ll go silent. The BAGS mechanism doesn't require anyone to be particularly altruistic— as long as the community is still trading, the foundation can continue to receive funds, and the Liv Foundation can keep using this money to help sick children fulfill their dreams.
Which is more trustworthy: a charity that needs to 'leech' everywhere to survive, or a quietly running mechanism that doesn’t require anyone to push it? No need for me to say, let’s bet on which community can donate longer!
The Liv Foundation is not a tool for you to create FOMO.
The foundation has just taken its first step, the story is only beginning to unfold. Time will tell who has always been here and who just jumped in for the hype; the truth will become clear.
What's closer to the native narrative is Sol(asteroid)
The one helping Liv's mom solve problems is Bags(asteroid).
Liv Foundation's royalty revenue is based on Bags(asteroid).
From the start, the community has been built by Bags(asteroid).
The narrative logic remains unchanged: Bags(asteroid).
Keep doing the right thing 🎗️🙏✨🚀
@Liv_Stargrace $ASTEROID #ASTEROID #Bags #Liv @TGBMichaelE @TheGivingBlock