I was looking through an old Bitcoin wallet recently and realized how different my thinking used to be. Back then, owning BTC felt simple. You bought it, stored it somewhere safe, and waited. There were very few decisions to make after that.

Today feels different.

What I notice is that Bitcoin itself hasn't changed much, but the infrastructure around it has. There are now more ways for capital to move, earn, and participate in different parts of the ecosystem. The challenge is no longer just holding Bitcoin. It's deciding what role that Bitcoin should play.

A simple comparison is keeping money in a savings account versus running a business. In one case, the goal is preservation. In the other, the goal is deciding where resources can be put to work most effectively.

That's what caught my attention about @Bedrock.

What interests me is the shift from passive ownership to active capital management. Looking at tools like BRclaw and the broader role of $BR, the focus seems to be on helping users think about allocation rather than simply storage.

From a system perspective, that creates a different set of questions. How should capital be distributed? How should opportunities be evaluated? And how can those decisions be coordinated without adding unnecessary complexity?

In my experience, the biggest changes in crypto are often changes in mindset. Bitcoin may still be something we hold, but it is increasingly becoming something we manage.

@Bedrock
#Bedrock
$BR $BTC