I used to think multi-asset restaking was mostly a distribution play for protocols like $BR .
More supported assets = wider audience. Simple.
That assumption feels incomplete now.
I’ve watched multiple restaking protocols launch with broad asset support early… but eventually the same problem appeared. Capital flowed in during incentive periods, then quietly rotated out the moment yields compressed elsewhere. The asset list grew. The sticky capital didn’t.
No real cross-asset utility.
No compounding reason to stay.
No economy forming underneath the yield.
So now I look at something else.
Interconnection.
Not the technical kind — the economic kind.
Does supporting multiple assets actually create relationships between them inside the protocol?
Does BTC restaker behavior affect ETH restaker outcomes in meaningful ways?
Can the system build interdependency between assets, not just host them side by side?
Because without interconnection, multi-asset support is just a feature list.
And without an economy forming underneath, restaking stays a yield product instead of becoming infrastructure.
That’s the layer I’m starting to watch more closely with $BR .
Not enough to call it solved.
But enough to stay interested.
Still approaching it carefully.
Just watching whether the assets inside start to interact…
not just coexist.
Want to run it?
