Post
BTC_Fahmi
·
--
Most “AI + blockchain” pitches miss the real failure mode: users don’t leave because tech is slow. They leave because the product feels unreliable. The file doesn’t load. The agent can’t finish a task. The payment step breaks. That’s the retention problem, and AI makes it worse because AI workflows touch more moving parts.
Vanar’s interesting angle is that it’s trying to reduce those moving parts. If memory, reasoning, automation, and settlement are treated as one stack, you don’t need a fragile chain of add ons just to ship something that works. That’s what “AI first” should mean in practice: fewer external dependencies, fewer breakpoints, cleaner execution.
Add distribution and you get leverage. Being available on isn’t a badge it’s access to where users and builders already live.
If that stack drives repeat usage through and , $VANRY stops being a theme and starts being infrastructure demand.
#vanar $VANRY @Vanar
Vanar’s interesting angle is that it’s trying to reduce those moving parts. If memory, reasoning, automation, and settlement are treated as one stack, you don’t need a fragile chain of add ons just to ship something that works. That’s what “AI first” should mean in practice: fewer external dependencies, fewer breakpoints, cleaner execution.
Add distribution and you get leverage. Being available on isn’t a badge it’s access to where users and builders already live.
If that stack drives repeat usage through and , $VANRY stops being a theme and starts being infrastructure demand.
#vanar $VANRY @Vanar
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.