Join the group to trade the positions we are currently running with us.
All signals are shared in the group first before being posted anywhere else. Some exclusive trades are only available in the group, including certain Alpha coins that won’t be posted elsewhere.
Join the group, connect with me there, and feel free to message me directly.
For the past 9 months, $BTC has dumped into the monthly open 5 times.
Today marks another monthly open.
Each time we've seen BTC dump into the start of a new month, the market has eventually moved in the opposite direction, catching the majority off guard.
If that pattern repeats, we could see a push higher the start of this month.
$BTC update We finally got the selloff into my reaction zone.
Price reacted almost perfectly at the HTF .618 / internal .886, so the analysis is playing out well so far.
Why was my limit order still lower? > liquidity is still largely untapped > additionally, OI has barely reset, which i would want to see for a stronger move mid term
Yes, we saw a solid reaction off passive bids, but I'd still prefer to see a proper liquidity flush before looking for a larger movement
For now I'm staying patient and letting the market finish its job.
$BTC is trending towards the lowest daily candle close of this bear market. (Again) Blue line -> Green line - Yellow line -> Pink line -> Few reasons for Purple line This bear market has not been different. Charts > Noise
$BTC Normally, when analyzing charts with TA, both the daily and the 4H timeframe paint a similar picture.
This time is different.
While I would interpret the market structure on the daily as a symmetrical triangle, which has an equal chance of acting as either a continuation or reversal pattern, the 4H timeframe has more characteristics of a bear flag.
This could give us a hint as to which direction the breakout from the symmetrical triangle is more likely to occur.
In this case, it would be to the downside, as a bear flag is strictly a continuation pattern.
Of course, for either of these patterns to be validated, we would need a confirmed break and acceptance below.
It took 1,190 days for $BTC to print a new ATH in the first cycle.
It took 1,085 days in the second cycle.
It took 854 days in the third cycle.
Using the same historical timing, we're looking at a minimum of a new ATH in Jan 2028, with a strong possibility it happens even earlier if the diminishing cycle effect continues. (Late 2027 Q4).
That means a move from the current price of $59.2K back to $126K would be a gain of over 110% in roughly 1.5 years.
Newton Protocol Is Building The Rulebook Before Capital Starts Moving
One detail kept standing out while I explored @NewtonProtocol - DeFi has become remarkably efficient at moving assets, yet the decision behind whether a transaction should proceed often depends on fragmented checks outside the blockchain. As more institutional capital enters decentralized finance, that gap no longer feels like a minor inconvenience. It starts looking like infrastructure that should have existed much earlier. Newton Mainnet Beta approaches this from a different direction. Instead of producing reports after activity is already recorded, it evaluates active policies before settlement and publishes an onchain pass or fail attestation. That simple shift changes the role of blockchain security. The protocol is no longer limited to explaining what happened. It becomes part of deciding what is allowed to happen. This idea becomes even more practical when looking at modern DeFi vaults. Strategies continue growing more sophisticated, but many investment limits, eligibility requirements and operational controls still depend on offchain coordination. Once those rules are enforceable directly onchain, a vault no longer relies on trust that every participant follows the intended process. The protocol itself helps enforce it, giving $NEWT a role inside an ecosystem focused on authorization rather than observation. Another reason this architecture feels compelling is the way different policy categories are combined. Compliance screening, identity verification, security protection and risk evaluation are treated as parts of one continuous decision instead of isolated products. A transaction is evaluated from multiple perspectives before execution, reducing the need to patch together separate workflows after deployment. The partnerships behind Newton also deserve attention because each contributes expertise from a different layer of the stack. Chainalysis and Hexagate strengthen compliance and security capabilities, while Vaults.fyi, RedStone and Credora expand the intelligence available for policy decisions. Combined with infrastructure secured alongside projects such as Eigen Labs, Succinct, Rhinestone and Octane, the ecosystem reflects collaboration instead of isolated development. The connection with Magic Labs adds another interesting dimension. A team that has already supported millions of embedded wallets and a massive developer community understands that infrastructure only succeeds when integration is straightforward. That experience could become one of the biggest advantages as more builders look for ways to introduce enforceable policies without redesigning existing applications from scratch. Reading deeper into #Newt changed the way I think about onchain infrastructure. Faster execution and lower fees remain valuable, but they do not answer whether a transaction should have been approved. Newton Protocol focuses on that missing decision layer first, then allows execution to follow. If decentralized finance continues expanding toward institutional vaults, stablecoins, RWAs and AI-driven systems, an authorization network may become just as fundamental as the blockchain itself.
The Biggest Problem In DeFi Was Never Speed, It Was Who Gets To Say "No"
Everyone celebrates faster execution, but execution has never been the hardest part of onchain finance. The real challenge begins before assets move. Every serious financial system depends on rules that decide which transactions are acceptable and which are not. Until now, most of those rules have remained outside the blockchain, creating a gap between how DeFi operates and how institutions are expected to manage risk.
That is where @NewtonProtocol is approaching the problem from a different angle. Newton Mainnet Beta does not simply process transactions; it evaluates them against active policies before settlement and records the outcome onchain. Compliance, identity, security, and risk checks become part of the transaction flow instead of existing as separate operational procedures. This shifts policy enforcement from something people document into something the network can actually verify.
Another detail that deserves more attention is the role of $NEWT Rather than existing only as an ecosystem token, it powers a protocol designed around programmable authorization. If vaults, RWAs, stablecoins, and even AI-driven financial systems eventually require policy enforcement before execution, the value of the network comes from making those decisions transparent, consistent, and verifiable instead of leaving them to fragmented offchain processes.
Discussions around scalability often focus on processing more transactions per second. I think the next stage is making every transaction accountable before it reaches the blockchain. That idea is why #Newt stands out to me not because it promises another evolution of DeFi, but because it addresses a layer that has quietly been missing since the beginning.
I'm sorry, but this level of confidence is actually insane.
I'm not saying $BTC can't see $50K, but when 76% of people are convinced it's going to happen, that's exactly why we could see a much more prolonged period of chop first.
The market loves to punish consensus, and to be honest, I now see more shorts exposed than longs.
If we lose $54K, $48K is likely next... (IBIT ETF Approval wick high)
If we can hold the PWL, I'd like to see some relief.
We've already liquidated the majority of longs, and to be honest, I now see more shorts becoming exposed than longs.
Just my current thoughts on the LTF. Bear markets can be ruthless so acceptance is key.
Price is approaching the timing window where previous bear markets have bottomed, yet everyone is starting to lower their targets.
With price down roughly 50% from the ATH, the risk/reward is becoming increasingly favourable. Could price still drop another 10-15%? Absolutely. But the risk is now skewed to the upside.
I'm buying. My spot allocation is currently 80%, and I remain swing long from 59.4K.
Watch how price develops into Monday. If Monday forms a pivot low, it would suggest Wednesday is likely to form a pivot high. Conversely, if Monday forms a pivot high, it would suggest Wednesday is likely to form a pivot low.
The Wednesday pivot typically drives price into Thursday.
This intra-week correlation has played out 8/9 times.
Weekend positioning is becoming noticeably more balanced.
> Long liqLevels: 243 I Short liqLevels: 432 (Δ: -189) > cumulative liquidation levels delta has dropped to roughly $4B, down from $12- $15B a few days ago.
Looking only at 100M+ positions, the picture even flips:
7 major longs vs. 4 major shorts.
> Yesterday we cleared the ~$300M liquidity level around 60.8k and got rejected almost immediately. > That FVG rejection offered a clean short.
On the HTF, nothing has changed for me. The largest liquidity concentration is still around 57.7k-57.3k, which remains my primary swing POI.
Short term there’s still liquidity around 61-62k, but the larger liquidity cluster remains below price, which still fits my weekend thesis.
So far, the roadmap is clear for me, nothing to do for me in between my POIs