HASSII-

Intro:

Looking for a simple yet powerful crypto trading method? This strategy combines Heikin Ashi candles with streak detection and progressive lot sizing to catch trend reversals in BTC, ETH, GOLD and other top crypto pairs.
What is Heikin Ashi Streak Trading?
Heikin Ashi (HA) is a smoothed candlestick chart that filters out market noise.By watching for streaks of green (bullish) or red (bearish) candles, traders can identify strong trends and reversals.Instead of guessing market direction, this method follows the trend and reacts to streak changes.

How This Strategy Works:

Detect HA streak: Watch for green or red streaks on your chosen timeframe (15m–1h works best).Enter Trade on First Candle of Streak:Green streak → BuyRed streak → SellHold Trade Until Streak Breaks: No additional trades during the same streak.Reversal Logic:When the streak flips (green → red or red → green), open a new trade with next lot in the series.
Why Lot Scaling?
The strategy uses a progressive lot size series: 0.01, 0.03, 0.05, … up to 0.39 (20 levels).This ensures that as trends flip and strengthen, your position size increases smartly, allowing higher potential profits without overtrading in the same streak.Lot size only increases after a trend reversal, reducing risk in choppy markets.
Lot Size Series (Top 20 Levels):

0.01 → 0.03 → 0.05 → 0.07 → 0.09 → 0.11 → 0.13 → 0.15 → 0.17 → 0.19 → 0.21 → 0.23 → 0.25 → 0.27 → 0.29 → 0.31 → 0.33 → 0.35 → 0.37 → 0.39

This strategy is market-friendly, simple to follow, and disciplined. It avoids overtrading, catches real streak reversals, and increases lot size progressively to maximize trend profits. Perfect for BTC, ETH, XAU and other high-liquidity crypto pairs.

Note from HASSII:

I have been using this Beat the Market with Math Strategy for over 1 year and have consistently generated profits every month. I’m sharing this strategy with you as a gift, so you can benefit from the same disciplined, math-driven approach to crypto trading that has worked for me.
#Mathematical #hassii

Market Reality

• Gold and silver have seen sharp pullbacks after an aggressive rally earlier this year

• Profit-taking accelerated as the US dollar strengthened and yields remained firm

• Major banks are warning investors about heightened short-term volatility

• Physical demand remains stable, but futures markets are driving price swings
Similar corrections followed the 2020 and late-2023 precious metals rallies, where strong momentum attracted leveraged positions before a rapid reset. Each time, volatility flushed weak hands before price discovery resumed
Near-term turbulence is likely to continue as markets reassess inflation, interest-rate expectations, and global risk sentiment. However, if macro uncertainty persists, precious metals may regain traction as strategic hedging assets rather than momentum trades.

Investor Takeaway

This is a market for discipline, not emotion. Chasing moves on either side carries elevated risk until volatility cools.
What’s your approach right now — patience or positioning?

#preciousmetalsturbulence

A historic liquidation event swept through gold and silver markets over the past 48 hours, erasing roughly $7 trillion in value from precious metals. Meanwhile, Bitcoin fell 7% but remained surprisingly resilient amid the broader sell-off.
Bitcoin analyst Joe Consorti noted that the decline in the precious metals market cap was roughly four times Bitcoin’s entire capitalization.
BTC Avoids Liquidation Cascade That Crushed Gold and Silver Prices
Data from blockchain analytics firm Santiment highlighted the rarity of the event. The firm noted that Bitcoin and altcoin prices remained flat, while gold dropped by more than 8% and silver by over 25%.
Notably, gold’s price had collapsed from a high of $5,600 an ounce to trade around $4,700, while silver plummeted from $121 to $77
Market observers linked the sell-off in precious metals to President Donald Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh to replace Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chairman.
Warsh is widely regarded as an inflation hawk committed to defending the U.S. dollar. This stance upends the depreciation narrative that drove the recent surge in metals prices.
Notably, traders had piled into leveraged bets, assuming the administration would pursue aggressive rate cuts.
However, the Warsh nomination signaled a pivot toward tighter monetary policy, which triggered a violent unwinding of trades.
“The violent move in the metals is a symptom of a lot of hot money chasing price recently which now are being stopped out, leverage being unwound, and profit taking among many players,” Bob Coleman, CEO of Idaho Armored Vaults, explained.
Meanwhile, some market experts noted that the gold market was due for a correction, having become overheated amid soaring public interest in precious metals.
“While parabolic moves often take asset prices higher than most investors would think possible, the out-of-this-world spikes tend to occur at the end of a cycle. In our view, the bubble today is not in AI, but in gold. An upturn in the dollar could pop that bubble, a la 1980 to 2000 when the gold price dropped more than 60%,”Cathie Wood, founder of Ark Invest, said.
What’s Next for #Bitcoin ?
The question now facing Bitcoin investors is whether the top crypto’s stability near $82,000 signals a decoupling from traditional commodities or a delayed reaction.
Unlike metals, Bitcoin did not participate in the final, euphoric leg of the “debasement trade.” This potentially leaves it with less speculative froth to shed and more room to rally.
Some analysts argue that as liquidity exits the crowded metals trade, capital may rotate into digital assets. These observers view Bitcoin’s scarcity as distinct from the industrial dynamics that are currently weighing on gold and silver.
However, if the Warsh nomination leads to sustained global liquidity tightening, risk assets, including cryptocurrencies, could face renewed pressure in the coming week
#Bitcoin

After a violent wave of liquidations ripped through the crypto markets, Bitcoin’s market cap slid into the $1.6–$1.7 trillion range, pushing it briefly behind industrial and energy heavyweights like Saudi Aramco and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.

Bitcoin is hanging on tightly to the top by market cap position, source: CMC
The immediate trigger was brutal: a cascade of forced selling as leveraged traders got wiped out en masse. Bitcoin fell sharply from the high-$80,000s toward the low-$80,000 range, setting off more than $1.6 billion in long liquidations in a matter of days. That kind of number doesn’t represent “retail panic.” That’s institutional-grade leverage getting vaporized. It’s what happens when a market that’s been riding borrowed money runs headfirst into a liquidity wall.

Source: BNC
For most of its life, crypto lived in its own weird financial ecosystem, driven by narratives, memes, and internal cycles. That era is ending. Bitcoin ETFs, institutional custody, and pension-grade capital have plugged it directly into the global liquidity machine. When financial conditions tighten, Bitcoin doesn’t get a free pass. It gets treated like a high-beta risk asset — right alongside tech stocks and emerging markets.
The liquidation wave wasn’t caused by long-term holders dumping. On-chain data shows that most selling pressure came from leveraged traders — the same class of market participants who turn every rally into a casino and every dip into a cliff. This is the structural flaw in crypto’s market design: extreme leverage is still too cheap, too accessible, and too normalized. That makes Bitcoin’s price less about fundamentals and more about how much speculative froth is sitting on top of it at any given moment.
Bitcoin is trying to become a global reserve-grade asset while still being priced by a derivatives market that behaves like a high-frequency betting exchange. Those two identities don’t coexist peacefully. Every liquidation cascade reinforces the idea that Bitcoin is still, at its core, a volatility engine — not a financial anchor.

Who Will Trump Nominate as the Next Fed Chair?

The Federal Reserve Chair plays a critical role in shaping U.S. monetary policy, influencing interest rates, inflation, and overall economic stability. With Jerome Powell’s term ending in May 2026, speculation is heating up over who President Donald Trump will select as his successor. Two leading candidates have emerged: Rick Rieder and Kevin Warsh.

Rick Rieder

Rick Rieder is BlackRock’s Chief Investment Officer for Global Fixed Income, a senior Wall Street expert in bonds and macroeconomic trends. He has impressed President Trump with his understanding of financial markets and monetary policy.
• Pros: Strong market expertise; seen as flexible and market-friendly, potentially aligning with Trump’s preference for lower interest rates.
• Cons: Lacks prior Fed leadership experience, which could raise questions about his familiarity with internal Fed operations.

Kevin Warsh
Kevin Warsh is a former Federal Reserve governor (2006–2011) with extensive experience in monetary policy and financial regulation. He represents a more traditional choice, with credibility among economists and policymakers.
• Pros: Deep knowledge of the Fed and policy-making; institutional experience.
• Cons: Viewed by some as less likely to implement aggressive interest-rate cuts, which may not align with Trump’s priorities.

Who Has the Edge?
Current prediction markets indicate that Rick Rieder has the higher chance of being nominated, with odds around 50–60%, compared to Kevin Warsh’s 24–30%. Rieder’s rising momentum is fueled by Trump’s positive comments about him and market sentiment favoring a candidate with a flexible, market-oriented approach.
While Warsh remains a strong contender due to his Fed experience, the trend suggests that Rieder is currently the frontrunner.
Why It Matters

The nomination will have wide-reaching implications:
• For markets: Investors will closely watch how the new Fed Chair may influence interest rates and market stability.
• Politically: Trump’s decision reflects both his economic priorities and his desire to leave a legacy on U.S. monetary policy.
• Confirmation process: Even after nomination, the Senate must confirm the candidate, adding another layer of political consideration.

In conclusion, while both candidates are qualified, Rick Rieder appears more likely to become the next Fed Chair, signaling a potentially more market-driven approach to U.S. monetary policy.
#Fed #TRUMP @HASSII