Discover original content on presales, IDOs, IEOs, and crypto projects. Stay informed with detailed analysis and insights into emerging crypto opportunities
Arkham Intelligence published a report examining Lazarus Group’s crypto laundering network and operational tactics between 2017 and 2026. According to the research, Lazarus-linked actors were tied to more than $6 billion in stolen cryptocurrency across exchange breaches, ransomware campaigns, bridge exploits, and decentralized finance attacks. Arkham said North Korean-linked actors accounted for more than 70% of crypto exploit losses recorded so far in 2026. The report described how Lazarus allegedly moves stolen assets through cross-chain bridges, mixers, centralized exchanges, OTC brokers, and fragmented wallet activity to complicate blockchain tracing efforts. THORChain was identified as a frequently used bridge for converting stolen assets into Bitcoin. Arkham also referenced mixers including Sinbad.io and YoMix, along with Russian exchanges and Chinese OTC brokers involved in cash-out activity. The research examined the April 2026 Drift Protocol ($DRIFT ) exploit, where attackers allegedly spent months building trust with employees through conferences, deposits exceeding $1 million, and fake partnership activity. Arkham said Lazarus later used pre-authorized Solana transactions to drain about $285 million from the protocol. The report also covered the February 2026 KelpDAO exploit. According to Arkham, attackers compromised LayerZero RPC nodes and forged cross-chain messages, allowing the withdrawal of 116,500 $rsETH valued at about $292 million. Arkham concluded that Lazarus continues adapting its laundering methods and attack strategies as blockchain tracing systems become more advanced.
Most memecoins rely entirely on online hype cycles. Wadoozie is trying to turn the launch itself into a live nationwide crypto experience. The Ethereum-based $WADZ token launches on May 27, 2026, with no presale, no private rounds, 0/0 tax, a renounced contract, and 75% of the supply placed into a DAO-governed locked liquidity pool. What makes the project stand out is its real-world campaign structure. Wadoozie plans to send a branded RV across 48 U.S. states as part of an eight-act narrative tour featuring livestream storytelling, community meetups, and hidden “Signal Fragments” that can be redeemed for fixed $WADZ rewards. According to the project’s litepaper, the hunt will distribute nearly 50 million $WADZ directly to participants, while a separate 70 million token allocation funds a “Publishers Network” designed to reward creators for clips, memes, and community-driven content. The concept is closer to an interactive crypto reality show than a traditional memecoin launch! Launch date: May 27, 2026.
Pepeto Presale Review: Is the $PEPETO token legit or a Potential Scam?
The Pepeto presale has been running since late October 2024 and is now in its third calendar year with no token distribution and no live product. The project has raised $9.7 million from retail investors over 18 months.
Pepeto markets itself as a meme-coin infrastructure ecosystem on Ethereum, with a zero-fee exchange, a cross-chain bridge, and an AI token screener. All three exist only as demos.
The whitepaper spans 12 pages, eight of which are a fictional story about a frog god. It contains no architecture diagrams, no bridge specification, no AI model details, no team bios, no legal entity, and no breakdown of how the raised funds are used.
The token has a total supply of 420 trillion and a fully diluted valuation around $78.5 million at the current presale price. Allocations include 30% presale, 30% staking, and 20% marketing, with no public timelock or vesting disclosure.
The team is anonymous. The only names attached to press releases, Baker Uccio and Dani Bonocci, have no verifiable record outside Pepeto material. Claims about a Pepe cofounder and a senior Binance developer are unnamed and unverified.
The SolidProof audit only covers a 200-line ERC-20 contract. It does not cover the bridge, exchange, AI screener, staking, or fund custody. Marketing materials promise 100x to 1,000x returns, advertises staking APY up to 1,378%, and references a Binance listing Binance has never confirmed. Trustpilot rates it at 2.1 with reports of blocked accounts.
The $PEPETO structure doesn’t look legitimate by the standards of a transparent project. A doxxed team, a full-stack audit, a registered entity, conservative marketing, reasonable claims, and a working product before launch are all missing.
Anyone considering participating in the $PEPETO presale should weigh that record against the projected returns the marketing copy is promising.
Kyiv is once again becoming one of the key Web3 meeting points in Eastern Europe. On June 13, Incrypted Conference 2026 will return to the Parkovy Convention and Exhibition Center venue in Kyiv, bringing together the crypto community, global companies, builders, founders, investors, regulators, and technology leaders. The fourth edition of the conference is expected to be the largest yet, with over 3,000 attendees, more than 50 speakers, and over 50 partners participating. The event will also remain the central gathering of Ukrainian Blockchain Week. This year’s agenda reflects how quickly the industry is evolving. Alongside crypto, blockchain, and Web3 topics, the conference will place a strong focus on AI and its synergy with decentralized technologies — one of the most important conversations shaping the next stage of digital infrastructure. The program will take place across two parallel stages: Main Stage — strategic discussions with leading voices from the industry. Workshop Stage — practical sessions designed for professionals who want actionable insights, not just theory. The expanded format will also include a dedicated VIP zone, exclusive activities, and more space for networking, business development, and partnership opportunities. The event is supported by major market players such as BingX, OKX, MEXC, TrustWallet, and Bitget, alongside more than 50 world-class partners. Incrypted Conference has already established itself as the main platform for dialogue between the crypto community, business, and regulators in Ukraine. In 2026, it returns with an even stronger ambition: to connect people who are building the future of Web3 in Ukraine and beyond.
📍 Kyiv, “Parkovy”, Parkova Road, 16a 📅 June 13, 2026 🎟 More information: incryptedconference.com
On-chain investigator ZachXBT wrote on April 28, 2026, that Sam Altman’s Worldcoin, now rebranded as World, launched a predatory low float crypto token comparable to Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX companies.
He posted the remarks in a reply to an Elon Musk tweet that read “Scam Altman …” and included a Grok conversation about Ronan Farrow’s New Yorker reporting on OpenAI and Altman.
ZachXBT wrote that Worldcoin preyed on people in low-income countries for biometric data, that its proof-of-personhood technology created a black market for verified accounts, and that WLD supply inflates at unsustainable levels while insiders regularly offload holdings through OTC channels.
He attached three screenshots. The first showed verified World ID accounts being sold for as low as $0.50 each on escrow platforms. The second showed a transaction in which the World Foundation sold 85.45 million WLD for $25 million through FalconX at an average price of $0.293. The third was a 2022 MIT Technology Review report that described Worldcoin’s early recruitment tactics as “deception, exploited workers, and cash handouts” aimed at low-income individuals.
In March 2026, a World Foundation-related entity sold tens of millions of dollars worth of WLD through OTC deals.
ZachXBT’s statements land while the Musk v. OpenAI civil trial is in progress, and a 52.5% WLD unlock is scheduled for July 23, 2026.
Spain's Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) has issued a public warning against the Snorter ($SNORT) project, stating it is not authorized to provide crypto-asset services under the EU's MiCA Regulation.
The notice was published on April 20, 2026, and flags the Spanish-language version of the Snorter Token website. The CNMV pointed to Articles 3 and 59 of MiCA, which require firms offering services such as operating trading platforms or executing orders on behalf of users to obtain prior authorization.
Snorter's core product is a Telegram-based trading bot that executes token purchases and interacts with user wallets. Functions like these can fall within the definition of a crypto-asset service provider under MiCA. If the bot performs these activities, it would need to be registered with regulators like the CNMV.
The CNMV did not accuse Snorter of fraud. The warning is meant to inform the public that the project is unsupervised and lacks approval to offer regulated crypto services in the EU.
Snorter ran a 5-month presale that raised $5.7 million from retail investors and ended in October 2025. The founding team is anonymous, with no developers, executives, or prior project history disclosed.
At the time of writing, $SNORT trades at $0.0069, a 93% decrease from the $0.1 listing price.
This is the second high-profile crypto presale flagged by the Spanish regulator in 2026, following Bitcoin Hyper in January.
Justin Sun has filed a federal lawsuit against World Liberty Financial, the DeFi project backed by Donald Trump and his family, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
The 52-page complaint lists Sun and two British Virgin Islands entities, Blue Anthem Limited and Black Anthem Limited, as plaintiffs. Causes of action include breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, conversion, unjust enrichment, and declaratory relief.
According to the filing, Sun invested $45 million in WLFI tokens between November 2024 and January 2025 and received an additional 1 billion tokens as an advisor. Reporting puts his total position at around $75 million, with roughly 540 million unlocked and 2.4 billion locked tokens in the frozen wallet.
Sun alleges WLFI secretly installed a "backdoor blacklisting function" that prevented the sale of his tokens after they became tradable in September 2025. The freeze followed on-chain outflows from his wallet, including one transfer of about $9 million. WLFI says the freeze was a routine security measure and previously told Sun, "See you in court, pal."
Sun also opposes a governance proposal WLFI published on April 15, which would burn 10% of all advisor tokens and impose a two-year cliff plus two-year vesting on early-purchaser tokens. He says the freeze leaves him unable to vote.
In his X post, Sun distanced President Trump from the dispute and said he remains a supporter of the administration's crypto agenda, attributing the conflict to specific individuals on the WLFI project team.
Former ClickOut Media Writer Exposes SEO Practices in Poker and iGaming Media
Blaise Bourgeois, a World Series of Poker (WSOP) Circuit ring winner and former ClickOut Media poker writer, published a blog post on April 16, 2026, describing how the UK-based digital publishing group operates across poker, iGaming, crypto, and finance affiliate content.
Key claims from his post:
-Card Player Magazine, acquired by ClickOut Media in December 2024, will stop printing physical copies and continue as a newsletter and free bi-monthly online magazine. Insider sources say it was losing 750,000 dollars per year.
- Bourgeois describes ClickOut Media as a parasitic SEO company that hires legitimate journalists, then pushes them toward high-volume SEO pages like Best online poker sites in 2026 and Top crypto poker platforms to drive affiliate signups.
- He claims ClickOut Media owns CoinPoker, a crypto-based poker platform, and doubled the rake charged to players. CoinPoker is listed at the top of affiliate pages on Card Player and other ClickOut-owned sites.
- He alleges some articles were fully AI-generated and credited to writers who do not exist, and that his own name stayed on articles he never reviewed after leaving in August 2025.
- He was let go shortly after raising ethics concerns internally, despite strong performance reviews and three promotions during 21 months at the company.
- Bourgeois is pursuing legal action over wrongful termination and unauthorized use of his name. ClickOut Media has not publicly responded.
** The full article can be found on TheHolyCoins, a crypto news platform focused on early-stage projects, token launches, and presales.
Kelp DAO, a liquid restaking protocol connected to EigenLayer, was exploited on April 18, 2026. Around $292 million worth of $RSETH was drained through its LayerZero cross-chain bridge.
The attacker forged a cross-chain message that the system accepted as valid, even though no real deposit happened on the source chain. This allowed them to mint or unlock about 116,500 rsETH without any actual ETH backing it.
The stolen rsETH was then sent to Aave, a major DeFi lending protocol, where it was used as collateral to borrow large amounts of real ETH and wrapped ETH. By the time protocols responded, much of the borrowed ETH had already moved.
A second attack was nearly executed that could have drained another $100M, but a rapid blacklist response stopped it just before it went through.
Kelp DAO paused rsETH contracts across mainnet and several Layer-2 chains. Aave froze the $RSETH markets. Compound, Euler Labs, and Venus Protocol also reviewed and adjusted their exposure.
The failure is reported to have happened in the Decentralized Verifier Network layer, which is responsible for confirming cross-chain messages, not in the core smart contracts themselves. This points to a configuration weakness in how external validation was trusted.
The exploit was first reported by the blockchain investigator ZachCBT and is now considered one of the largest DeFi incidents of 2026, showing how a single bridge failure can spread risk across the entire DeFi ecosystem within minutes.
A security researcher on Reddit has uncovered a fake Ledger Nano S+ being sold on a Chinese marketplace at the same price as the official device.
The counterfeit hardware looked legitimate from the outside, but an internal analysis revealed a generic ESP32-S3 chip by Espressif Systems instead of the secure element used in real Ledger devices. Some component markings were deliberately scraped off, and sensitive data, including PIN codes and seed phrases, were found stored in plain text in the device's firmware.
The attack does not rely on bypassing Ledger's security. The official Ledger Live app correctly detects the fake device through its built-in Genuine Check. The real threat comes from a QR code inside the packaging that redirects users to a cloned website resembling ledger.com. From there, users are pushed to download malicious versions of Ledger Live for Android, iOS, Windows, and macOS.
These fake apps show a hardcoded verification screen that does not actually check anything. In the background, they capture seed phrases and send them to attacker-controlled servers. The Android version also monitors wallet balances and intercepts communication between the device and the app.
The researcher linked the operation to a Shanghai-registered shell company set up specifically to sell on JD.com, with infrastructure supporting multiple distribution channels across desktop and mobile.
The scam appears to be designed to target first-time hardware wallet users, who are more likely to follow onboarding instructions, scan QR codes, and download software from links in the box.
Ledger has not issued a public statement, but a verified support account asked the researcher to file a formal report. Always buy hardware wallets from official sources and download software only from the official website.
Justin Sun vs World Liberty Financial ($WLFI ) is getting heated.
Sun invested $75M in WLFI, a Trump-backed DeFi project.
In September 2025, his wallet was frozen after he moved $9M in tokens. He denied any wrongdoing.
Now, on-chain data shows the blacklist function didn't exist when he invested. It was added 11 months later, one week before trading opened. One anonymous wallet can freeze any WLFI holder's tokens with a single signature and no vote needed.
Sun is publicly demanding WLFI name who controls that wallet.
WLFI responded: "See you in court."
The governance votes, the vesting structure, and the freeze power are all verifiable on-chain. The identity behind the address still hasn't been disclosed.
The U.S. Department of Justice Has Launched a Formal Cmpensation Process for Victims of OneCoin
The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a formal compensation process for victims of OneCoin, one of the biggest crypto fraud cases ever handled by U.S. federal prosecutors. Between 2014 and 2019, OneCoin co-founders Ruja Ignatova and Karl Sebastian Greenwood ran a global MLM network selling a cryptocurrency that had no real value. Victims around the world invested more than $4 billion based on false information about the coin. The DOJ has now made more than $40 million in forfeited assets available for victim compensation, a fraction of total losses, but the result of years of criminal forfeiture work by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Who can file? If you purchased OneCoin between 2014 and 2019 and ended up with a net loss, meaning you lost more than you withdrew, you may be eligible. You'll need to submit documentation of your losses along with your petition. How to file Go to onecoinremission.com and submit your petition before June 30, 2026. You can also call 1-833-421-9748 or email info@OneCoinRemission.com. There are no fees to file, and no lawyer is required. Watch out for scams The FBI has warned that crypto fraud victims are frequently targeted by secondary scams during compensation processes, and fake law firms and government impersonators are the two most common. Neither the DOJ nor the remission administrator will ask you for money.
A major international effort called Operation Atlantic just finished, marking a big win against crypto fraud. Led by the UK National Crime Agency and authorities from the US and Canada, the team found more than 20,000 victims and froze $12 million in stolen money. The operation focused on stopping approval phishing scams. This is a scam where criminals trick you into giving them permission to access your digital wallet, often using fake investment links or pop-up alerts. It’s different from a regular fraud because the scammers trick you into signing away control of your assets so they can empty your wallet instantly. A key part of the success was how police worked directly with private companies. Teams from Binance and Elliptic used blockchain tracking to follow the money in real time and stop the funds before they could disappear. This shows that when authorities and regulators decide to act, they can stop scams and protect the public. It also proves that even though these crimes are growing, the transparency of the blockchain makes it very hard for criminals to hide when experts work together across borders.
BlockDAG is selling $BDAG at $0.000022 after listing around $0.05 on exchanges. That price implies an FDV of $3.3M, compared to a reported $440M crypto presale. Less than 1%. The same token supply that raised hundreds of millions is now being sold at a fraction of that valuation. The $BDAG token is still being sold directly at lower prices, while higher prices are listed on exchanges. Presale investors are left exposed to severe losses with this pricing structure.
We've published a review of the ApeMars ($APRZ) crypto presale.
The article examines the presale structure, APRZ coin tokenomics, whitepaper, audit, and team transparency.
It shows there is no planned working product, no MVP, and no clear explanation of how the funds are used. It also covers the high FDV and “100x” ROI marketing.
AlphaPepe ($ALPE) Presale Review: Legit Crypto Project or Potential Scam?
The AlphaPepe ($ALPE) crypto presale launched in October 2025 and claims to have raised around $716,000 through sales of the ALPE token. The project markets itself as more than a meme coin. It claims to build AlphaSwap, a decentralized exchange (DEX) with an “AI-powered intelligence layer” to help users analyze tokens, detect risks, and make better trading decisions. However, there is no working product, no MVP, and no verifiable demo. Most claims remain unproven. AlphaPepe Product Review: No MVP, No Demo, No Verifiable AlphaSwap AlphaPepe claims to build a DEX with AI-based risk analysis, whale tracking, and market signals. But: No live AlphaSwap platformNo testnet or demoNo GitHub or development activityNo proof the AI system exists The entire product remains concept-level only. Without AlphaSwap, the ALPE token has no clear utility beyond speculation. ALPE Tokenomics and FDV: $50M Valuation With No Product The project has a total supply of 1 billion ALPE tokens. Presale price implies ~$7.9M FDVTarget listing price implies ~$50M FDV This creates a large price gap, meaning early buyers are already in profit before launch. 👉 This setup often leads to strong sell pressure after listing In addition: Large allocations (marketing, development) remain project-controlledToken economics are not fully decentralized AlphaPepe Team Review: Anonymous Founders and No Accountability The AlphaPepe team is fully anonymous. No foundersNo LinkedIn profilesNo track recordNo verified company Funds are sent directly to wallets controlled by the project. 👉 This creates a full trust-based system with no accountability AlphaPepe Audit Review: Limited Scope and Centralized Control The project claims an audit by BlockSAFU, but: Only the token contract is auditedNo audit of AlphaSwap, DEX logic, or AI systems The audit also shows: Owner can change feesOwner can exclude wallets (whitelisting) 👉 This means token economics can be modified after launch AlphaPepe Marketing Analysis: Strong Hype, Weak Product Proof AlphaPepe uses aggressive marketing: Paid PR articles“100x” and high ROI claimsUrgency-based presale stages At the same time: No product proofNo real development updatesNo organic community signals 👉 Demand appears marketing-driven, not product-driven Final Verdict: High-Risk Crypto Presale With Scam-Like Signals AlphaPepe shows multiple risk indicators: No product or MVPAnonymous teamCentralized control over funds and token behaviorHigh FDV target (~$50M)Heavy marketing without proof This does not confirm it is a scam. But based on available data, there is no strong evidence that it is a legit, working crypto project either. 👉 Current assessment: High-risk presale with strong scam-like characteristics ** Full review in the comments #CryptoPresale #memecoin #reviews #CryptoAnalysis #CryptoReview
DeepSnitch AI ($DSNT) Presale Review: Is the DSNT Token Legit or a Scam?
The DeepSnitch AI ($DSNT) crypto presale has raised over $2.35 million for its DSNT token, which powers data analysis and intelligence tools that use artificial intelligence and blockchain technology. According to its whitepaper, DeepSnitch AI aims to deliver AI-driven insights through a token-based ecosystem. The DSNT token is intended to provide access to platform features, though the rationale for using a blockchain token rather than a traditional subscription model remains unclear. The presale current fully diluted valuation (FDV) is $45 million before exchange listing. This places DeepSnitch AI in the mid-range of crypto presales, despite limited publicly verifiable product development at this stage. The whitepaper outlines AI capabilities, token utility, and a phased roadmap. However, key technical elements such as data sources, model architecture, and system design are not described in detail, making it difficult to evaluate how the platform is expected to function in practice. Regarding development, the project states that its platform is “fully operational” and “actively serving users.” At the same time, there is no publicly accessible MVP, demo, or working interface to independently verify these claims. No GitHub repositories, technical documentation, or example outputs are provided. The team behind DeepSnitch AI is not publicly disclosed. The project operates under SignalPlex Labs Ltd., a British Virgin Islands (BVI) entity, with no identifiable founders, developers, or advisors presented in official materials. This indicates the project shows no transparency or accountability if it fails or if fraud is committed. The tokenomics allocate 35% of the supply to the presale, with additional allocations for marketing, staking, development, and liquidity. The structure includes minimal vesting, where non-staked tokens are fully transferable at the Token Generation Event (TGE), and staked tokens unlock after a short 7-day period. In addition, promotional campaigns include bonus allocations of up to 300% extra tokens, which can significantly reduce the effective entry price for early participants and increase potential selling pressure once the token becomes tradable. The project also presents MiCA compliance language in its whitepaper, including formal disclosures and risk statements. However, the absence of team transparency and identifiable responsibility creates a gap between regulatory structure and actual accountability. Another point of inconsistency appears between the whitepaper and external marketing. While the documentation emphasizes that the DSNT token is not an investment and may have no value, promotional materials highlight potential returns of 100x to 1000x, similar to other scam presales that dropped over 90% after listing. DeepSnitch AI reports that its token contract has been audited by SolidProof and Coinsult. These audits confirm the security of the ERC-20 token contract but do not cover the AI platform, data systems, or off-chain infrastructure described in the project. There are currently no confirmed partnerships, integrations, or external entities validating the platform’s technology. The roadmap outlines multiple development phases but does not include specific timelines or measurable milestones. Overall, DeepSnitch AI represents an AI crypto presale that combines a $45M+ valuation, limited product verification, an anonymous team structure, aggressive marketing, and flexible tokenomics. These factors position the project as a high-risk early-stage project, with a clear potential to be a scam. ** Link to the full investigation in the comments #ArtificialInteligence #DeepSnitchAI #Presale #scamriskwarning #ScamAwareness
Zero-Knowledge Proof Presale Review: Is the ZKP Token Legit or a Potential Scam?
The Zero Knowledge Proof ($ZKP) crypto presale launched on November 27, 2025, and is a blockchain project built on zero-knowledge proof technology, a cryptographic method used in blockchain systems to verify transactions without revealing private data. According to the project website, the ZKP presale has raised more than $2 million, while a press release claims the company has already self-funded over $100 million to support development. However, we did not find publicly verifiable proof confirming that this investment was made. The project has also attracted attention after members of the crypto community suggested a possible link between the ZKP presale and the BlockDAG presale, which previously raised hundreds of millions of dollars and later faced widespread criticism and allegations of a scam. A sponsorship announcement involving FC Barcelona was later terminated by the club, which clarified that the ZKP token issuance was not part of the partnership agreement. The ZKP whitepaper is a long technical document describing zero-knowledge proof cryptography and blockchain verification systems. However, much of the content explains existing cryptographic concepts already used across the industry rather than clearly presenting a unique blockchain architecture. Another concern is the anonymous team behind the project. The website claims that a core team of 40 specialists is building the platform, but the founders, developers, and executives are not publicly identified. The project states that the team identities will only be revealed in 2026. The project also claims that the ZKP blockchain network is already operational, providing a testnet with tools such as a block explorer, a faucet, a swap interface, and a development environment. However, it is difficult to independently verify whether this infrastructure represents a fully decentralized blockchain network. ZKP also promotes Proof Pod hardware devices designed to generate ZKP tokens by producing cryptographic proofs for the network. We did not find independent technical demonstrations or external validation showing that these devices perform these functions in a live environment. Despite raising funds through a crypto presale, we also found no evidence of a public third-party smart contract audit for the ZKP token, the presale contracts, or the blockchain platform. Taken together, the anonymous team, the unverified $100 million funding claim, the absence of independent technical validation, and the lack of a publicly verified security audit make it difficult to independently confirm the development status of the ZKP blockchain project. These factors raise questions about the credibility of the ZKP token presale, and investors should carefully evaluate these risks before participating. Full article link in the comments. #CryptoNews #CryptocurrencyNews #reviews #ZKP #Presale
Italy’s CONSOB Orders Immediate Halt of Solaxy’s $SOLX Token Offer Under MiCA Italy’s financial regulator, CONSOB (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa), has ordered the immediate cessation of Solaxy’s $SOLX token offer to the Italian public under the EU’s MiCA Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114). Resolution No. 23891 states that the $SOLX utility token was offered without notification of a required crypto-asset whitepaper under Article 8 of MiCA. CONSOB determined that the Solaxy website provided instructions for purchasing the token and redirected users to trading platforms. According to the resolution, the offer qualified as a public offering of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens or electronic money tokens. In a related press release addressing illegal financial activities, CONSOB included Solaxy’s token offering as part of its enforcement action. Italian ISPs are working to block access to the website. The decision does not declare Solaxy a scam. However, it confirms that the crypto presale failed to comply with EU crypto regulation requirements applicable to utility token offerings in the European Union. MiCA enforcement is now moving from theory to application, with regulators actively reviewing crypto presales and public token offers targeting EU investors.