Binance Square
CryptoQuant Quicktake
8k Publicaciones

CryptoQuant Quicktake

Verificado Plus de Binance Square
CryptoQuant.com - Leading On-chain Data/Analytics Provider
0 Siguiendo
22.8K+ Seguidores
26.8K+ Me gusta
Publicaciones
·
--
Artículo
Bitcoin Leverage Reset Risk Rising As Binance Funding Flashes Long Squeeze WarningBitcoin perpetual futures are flashing structural warnings for leveraged traders as funding conditions shift into a zone of strong bullish leverage, activating a long squeeze setup. As of July 2, the Binance BTC funding rate sits at 0.006078, pushing the 7-day moving average to 0.005601. This represents a sharp acceleration in long leverage when compared to the 30-day average of 0.002156, a statistical divergence reflected by a z-score of 1.313. Over the past week, Binance has printed elevated funding above the 0.005 threshold for five out of seven days, marking a persistent willingness among traders to pay an aggressive premium to maintain directional long exposure. Digging into exchange-specific market structure reveals an interesting divergence. While Binance funding remains firmly elevated, it is actually lagging behind the broader market. The market median funding rate currently sits higher at 0.007634, creating a negative Binance-to-market spread of -0.001557. This mild divergence signal suggests that speculative appetite on alternative exchanges is even more aggressive than on Binance. Historically, when market-wide funding eclipses Binance in this manner, it indicates frothy retail-driven leverage that is highly sensitive to sudden spot volatility. The investor psychology behind this BTC market structure is straightforward. High conviction in the near-term trend has translated into over-leveraged positioning. With 23 out of the last 30 days printing positive Binance funding, the derivatives market has accumulated significant latent sell pressure in the form of stacked long liquidations. The active long squeeze parameters indicate that a moderately sharp move against these overextended positions could trigger a cascading unwind. Unless spot demand steps in to absorb this leverage organically, the current funding environment leaves Bitcoin structurally fragile to downside vol Written by Crazzyblockk

Bitcoin Leverage Reset Risk Rising As Binance Funding Flashes Long Squeeze Warning

Bitcoin perpetual futures are flashing structural warnings for leveraged traders as funding conditions shift into a zone of strong bullish leverage, activating a long squeeze setup.
As of July 2, the Binance BTC funding rate sits at 0.006078, pushing the 7-day moving average to 0.005601. This represents a sharp acceleration in long leverage when compared to the 30-day average of 0.002156, a statistical divergence reflected by a z-score of 1.313.
Over the past week, Binance has printed elevated funding above the 0.005 threshold for five out of seven days, marking a persistent willingness among traders to pay an aggressive premium to maintain directional long exposure.
Digging into exchange-specific market structure reveals an interesting divergence. While Binance funding remains firmly elevated, it is actually lagging behind the broader market. The market median funding rate currently sits higher at 0.007634, creating a negative Binance-to-market spread of -0.001557.
This mild divergence signal suggests that speculative appetite on alternative exchanges is even more aggressive than on Binance. Historically, when market-wide funding eclipses Binance in this manner, it indicates frothy retail-driven leverage that is highly sensitive to sudden spot volatility.
The investor psychology behind this BTC market structure is straightforward. High conviction in the near-term trend has translated into over-leveraged positioning. With 23 out of the last 30 days printing positive Binance funding, the derivatives market has accumulated significant latent sell pressure in the form of stacked long liquidations.
The active long squeeze parameters indicate that a moderately sharp move against these overextended positions could trigger a cascading unwind. Unless spot demand steps in to absorb this leverage organically, the current funding environment leaves Bitcoin structurally fragile to downside vol
Written by Crazzyblockk
Artículo
BTC's $61.7K BoundaryBitcoin's on-chain cost basis structure is flashing a configuration that demands attention. Not because it predicts price—but because it maps who is in profit, who is in pain, and who is positioned to act. Spot at $62,571 sits just 1.4% above the New Holder cost basis at $61,683. This is the average acquisition price for coins moved within the last 0–3 months—the freshest capital in the market. Hold above this level, and recent entrants remain in profit. Break below, and the most reactive cohort slips into unrealized loss. The Short-Term Holder cohort (0–155 days) tells a different story. Their average cost basis sits at $72,243—nearly $10,000 above spot. This means the average buyer from the past five months is underwater by over 13%. This is the primary source of overhead supply and behavioral pressure. What makes this structure particularly interesting is the inversion between the 1–3 month and 3–6 month cohorts—a regime that has occurred only nine times in the full dataset. Newer buyers are entering at lower prices than medium-term holders. This signals redistribution, not distribution. The 2–10 year+ cohort holds at an average cost of $17,861. These are the deepest conviction holders—the ones who have held through multiple cycles. They're sitting on 250%+ unrealized gains. They are not selling, and they are not the source of sell pressure. The Realized Price ($53,101) and Balanced Price ($39,194) remain well below spot, suggesting we are in a correction within a broader cycle—not a structural breakdown. The line is clear. The data is in. The market decides. Written by Crazzyblockk

BTC's $61.7K Boundary

Bitcoin's on-chain cost basis structure is flashing a configuration that demands attention. Not because it predicts price—but because it maps who is in profit, who is in pain, and who is positioned to act.
Spot at $62,571 sits just 1.4% above the New Holder cost basis at $61,683. This is the average acquisition price for coins moved within the last 0–3 months—the freshest capital in the market. Hold above this level, and recent entrants remain in profit. Break below, and the most reactive cohort slips into unrealized loss.
The Short-Term Holder cohort (0–155 days) tells a different story. Their average cost basis sits at $72,243—nearly $10,000 above spot. This means the average buyer from the past five months is underwater by over 13%. This is the primary source of overhead supply and behavioral pressure.
What makes this structure particularly interesting is the inversion between the 1–3 month and 3–6 month cohorts—a regime that has occurred only nine times in the full dataset. Newer buyers are entering at lower prices than medium-term holders. This signals redistribution, not distribution.
The 2–10 year+ cohort holds at an average cost of $17,861. These are the deepest conviction holders—the ones who have held through multiple cycles. They're sitting on 250%+ unrealized gains. They are not selling, and they are not the source of sell pressure.
The Realized Price ($53,101) and Balanced Price ($39,194) remain well below spot, suggesting we are in a correction within a broader cycle—not a structural breakdown.
The line is clear. The data is in. The market decides.
Written by Crazzyblockk
Artículo
Evaluating the MVRV Ratio and Market Cycle BottomBased on recent Bitcoin MVRV data, it appears somewhat premature to conclude that we have reached the absolute bottom of the current market cycle. The MVRV ratio is currently hovering at 1.18, accompanied by an ongoing death cross between the 365-day moving average (blue line) and the long-term 4000-day moving average (black line). Looking back at the bottoming periods of previous cycles, the MVRV ratio historically dropped as low as the 0.8 level, marking a true bottom zone where the realized value fell below the market value. While it is true that a broader bearish trend is underway and the possibility of further downside remains, the current market conditions could actually present a strategic window. This period may prove to be highly effective for investors utilizing incremental accumulation strategies, such as Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA). Written by Yonsei_dent

Evaluating the MVRV Ratio and Market Cycle Bottom

Based on recent Bitcoin MVRV data, it appears somewhat premature to conclude that we have reached the absolute bottom of the current market cycle. The MVRV ratio is currently hovering at 1.18, accompanied by an ongoing death cross between the 365-day moving average (blue line) and the long-term 4000-day moving average (black line).
Looking back at the bottoming periods of previous cycles, the MVRV ratio historically dropped as low as the 0.8 level, marking a true bottom zone where the realized value fell below the market value. While it is true that a broader bearish trend is underway and the possibility of further downside remains, the current market conditions could actually present a strategic window. This period may prove to be highly effective for investors utilizing incremental accumulation strategies, such as Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA).
Written by Yonsei_dent
Artículo
Heavy Overhead Supply and Vulnerable Market StructureThe market share-weighted average cost basis for Short-Term Holders (1w-1m, 1m-3m, and 3m-6m cohorts) currently sits at $74.6k. At current price levels, these investors are experiencing an average loss of approximately 18%, a trend that has persisted since early June. Because short-term holders are highly vulnerable to unrealized losses, the prolonged duration of this underwater phase means the risk of panic selling in response to even minor negative news or events remains extremely high. The situation is equally severe for the 6-12 month holders who entered the market near the peak of the bull run. They are enduring significant pain as prices decline. Notably, their share of the realized cap has surged to 35.1%. It is highly likely that this group is facing intense psychological pressure on par with that of the short-term holders. In conclusion, the current market is in a heavy and fragile state, actively suppressed by a massive wall of underwater supply overhead. Written by Yonsei_dent

Heavy Overhead Supply and Vulnerable Market Structure

The market share-weighted average cost basis for Short-Term Holders (1w-1m, 1m-3m, and 3m-6m cohorts) currently sits at $74.6k.
At current price levels, these investors are experiencing an average loss of approximately 18%, a trend that has persisted since early June. Because short-term holders are highly vulnerable to unrealized losses, the prolonged duration of this underwater phase means the risk of panic selling in response to even minor negative news or events remains extremely high.
The situation is equally severe for the 6-12 month holders who entered the market near the peak of the bull run. They are enduring significant pain as prices decline. Notably, their share of the realized cap has surged to 35.1%. It is highly likely that this group is facing intense psychological pressure on par with that of the short-term holders.
In conclusion, the current market is in a heavy and fragile state, actively suppressed by a massive wall of underwater supply overhead.
Written by Yonsei_dent
Artículo
Assessing the Extended Drop in HashRate and Mining DifficultyBitcoin mining difficulty and network hashrate have continued to decline within a broad structural trend following the sharp drop observed during January and February. The critical factor distinguishing the current market behavior is that this downward trajectory is lasting significantly longer than previous historical corrections. Historically, continuous declines lasted 64 days between May and July 2021, and 86 days between April and July 2024. However, the current downturn has persisted for a staggering 234 days (approximately 7 months) of extended contraction. For Bitcoin, a prolonged reduction in mining difficulty and hash rate—both of which represent foundational network security and fundamental metrics—presents an unfavorable development regarding its overall standing as a digital asset. Conversely, if a definitive upward trend becomes firmly established in these metrics, it should be recognized as a key mid-to-long-term signal indicating a robust resurgence of interest and network expansion within the Bitcoin ecosystem. Written by Yonsei_dent

Assessing the Extended Drop in HashRate and Mining Difficulty

Bitcoin mining difficulty and network hashrate have continued to decline within a broad structural trend following the sharp drop observed during January and February. The critical factor distinguishing the current market behavior is that this downward trajectory is lasting significantly longer than previous historical corrections.
Historically, continuous declines lasted 64 days between May and July 2021, and 86 days between April and July 2024. However, the current downturn has persisted for a staggering 234 days (approximately 7 months) of extended contraction.
For Bitcoin, a prolonged reduction in mining difficulty and hash rate—both of which represent foundational network security and fundamental metrics—presents an unfavorable development regarding its overall standing as a digital asset.
Conversely, if a definitive upward trend becomes firmly established in these metrics, it should be recognized as a key mid-to-long-term signal indicating a robust resurgence of interest and network expansion within the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Written by Yonsei_dent
Artículo
Supply in Profit Nears 2022 Bear Market LowsThe Supply in Profit (%) metric indicates the percentage of the circulating Bitcoin supply that is currently held in profit. It is widely used to evaluate the current stage of the market cycle and identify potential phase transitions. Bull Market (Euphoria): Greater than 80% Transition Phase: 55% to 80% Bear Market / Bottom Phase: 55% or lower Currently, the Supply in Profit stands at 51.9%. It has consistently remained within the Bear Market / Bottom territory since June. The downward trend has not only persisted since October 2025, but the metric is also approaching the 44% range, which marked the absolute bottom of the 2022 bear market. During the previous cycle, the Bear Market / Bottom phase lasted for approximately 8 months. If we apply this historical timeline to our current data, this phase could potentially stretch until September or October. Assuming that market cycles repeat and exhibit similar patterns over time, the on-chain data strongly suggests that we are currently navigating toward the ultimate cycle bottom. Written by Yonsei_dent

Supply in Profit Nears 2022 Bear Market Lows

The Supply in Profit (%) metric indicates the percentage of the circulating Bitcoin supply that is currently held in profit. It is widely used to evaluate the current stage of the market cycle and identify potential phase transitions.
Bull Market (Euphoria): Greater than 80%
Transition Phase: 55% to 80%
Bear Market / Bottom Phase: 55% or lower
Currently, the Supply in Profit stands at 51.9%. It has consistently remained within the Bear Market / Bottom territory since June.
The downward trend has not only persisted since October 2025, but the metric is also approaching the 44% range, which marked the absolute bottom of the 2022 bear market. During the previous cycle, the Bear Market / Bottom phase lasted for approximately 8 months. If we apply this historical timeline to our current data, this phase could potentially stretch until September or October.
Assuming that market cycles repeat and exhibit similar patterns over time, the on-chain data strongly suggests that we are currently navigating toward the ultimate cycle bottom.
Written by Yonsei_dent
Artículo
Stablecoin Inflows Hit 18-Month Low — What It Means for BitcoinStablecoin Inflows Hit 18-Month Low — What It Means for Bitcoin By Zakariya Sharif | July 4, 2026 Bitcoin is currently trading around $62,397, down significantly from its all-time high of $109,000 reached in late 2025. While price action alone tells part of the story, on-chain data reveals a deeper concern — stablecoin inflows to exchanges have collapsed to their lowest level in 18 months. What the Data Shows According to CryptoQuant, the mean stablecoin inflow across all exchanges currently sits at 21,557 — a 56.25% drop from recent levels. During Bitcoin's peak rally in mid-2025, inflows regularly spiked between 100,000 and 280,000, providing the buying pressure needed to push prices higher. That fuel has nearly vanished. Why This Matters Stablecoins sitting on exchanges represent ready-to-deploy capital — money waiting to buy crypto. When inflows are high, it signals fresh demand entering the market. When inflows collapse as they have now, it means buyers are sitting on the sidelines. Simply put: you cannot have a sustained rally without buying power. The ROC Warning The Rate of Change (ROC) indicator shows one significant spike in May 2026 — a brief wave of capital that failed to reverse the trend. Since then, ROC has flatlined, confirming that the May move was isolated, not the start of a recovery. Two Scenarios to Watch Bearish continuation — if inflows remain below 30,000 for the next two weeks, expect Bitcoin to retest the $58,000–$60,000 support zone. Reversal signal — if inflows recover above 80,000–100,000 consistently, that would be the first real sign that buyers are returning and a meaningful rally could follow. Written by Zakariya Sharif

Stablecoin Inflows Hit 18-Month Low — What It Means for Bitcoin

Stablecoin Inflows Hit 18-Month Low — What It Means for Bitcoin
By Zakariya Sharif | July 4, 2026
Bitcoin is currently trading around $62,397, down significantly from its all-time high of $109,000 reached in late 2025. While price action alone tells part of the story, on-chain data reveals a deeper concern — stablecoin inflows to exchanges have collapsed to their lowest level in 18 months.
What the Data Shows
According to CryptoQuant, the mean stablecoin inflow across all exchanges currently sits at 21,557 — a 56.25% drop from recent levels. During Bitcoin's peak rally in mid-2025, inflows regularly spiked between 100,000 and 280,000, providing the buying pressure needed to push prices higher. That fuel has nearly vanished.
Why This Matters
Stablecoins sitting on exchanges represent ready-to-deploy capital — money waiting to buy crypto. When inflows are high, it signals fresh demand entering the market. When inflows collapse as they have now, it means buyers are sitting on the sidelines.
Simply put: you cannot have a sustained rally without buying power.
The ROC Warning
The Rate of Change (ROC) indicator shows one significant spike in May 2026 — a brief wave of capital that failed to reverse the trend. Since then, ROC has flatlined, confirming that the May move was isolated, not the start of a recovery.
Two Scenarios to Watch
Bearish continuation — if inflows remain below 30,000 for the next two weeks, expect Bitcoin to retest the $58,000–$60,000 support zone.
Reversal signal — if inflows recover above 80,000–100,000 consistently, that would be the first real sign that buyers are returning and a meaningful rally could follow.
Written by Zakariya Sharif
Artículo
Bitcoin’s Different Dimensions ↓• Same asset, multiple dimensions, different manifestations of the same broader market deterioration: Price, On-Chain Data (Supply, Demand, Holders), and Derivatives (Open Interest). • All of this suggests that Bitcoin remains in a bearish macro trend. Written by Facundo Fama

Bitcoin’s Different Dimensions ↓

• Same asset, multiple dimensions, different manifestations of the same broader market deterioration: Price, On-Chain Data (Supply, Demand, Holders), and Derivatives (Open Interest).
• All of this suggests that Bitcoin remains in a bearish macro trend.
Written by Facundo Fama
Artículo
Ethereum’s Builder Divergence: Smart Contract Surge Amid Binance Liquidity DrainObservation Ethereum is currently exhibiting a profound structural divergence between speculative capital and network utility. On-chain data reveals that new smart contract deployments have surged by 303% compared to the 90-day baseline. Conversely, speculative liquidity is rapidly exiting the market, evidenced by Binance stablecoin netflows dropping 887%, averaging a massive -$170M daily outflow. Context This extreme contrast highlights a classic “builder’s phase.” The heavy outflows of stablecoins from Binance, combined with a 167% increase in stablecoin redemptions globally, suggest that retail and institutional traders are de-risking and moving capital to the sidelines. The persistently negative Coinbase premium (-0.15) further confirms this widespread market apathy and lack of speculative appetite. Comparison However, while traders are abandoning exchanges, developers are aggressively stepping in. Taking advantage of the current macro apathy and historically cheap block space (with median transaction burn dropping by 60%), builders are deploying decentralized applications at a furious pace. This means the underlying network is expanding its infrastructure precisely when token price and exchange liquidity are being ignored. Potential Outcome Historically, periods marked by severe exchange liquidity contraction alongside explosive developer activity create the foundational layer for future fundamental cycles. While the current lack of stablecoin purchasing power on Binance may suppress short-term price action, this quiet infrastructure expansion creates conditions that often precede utility-driven momentum once macroeconomic liquidity eventually returns. Written by CryptoOnchain

Ethereum’s Builder Divergence: Smart Contract Surge Amid Binance Liquidity Drain

Observation
Ethereum is currently exhibiting a profound structural divergence between speculative capital and network utility. On-chain data reveals that new smart contract deployments have surged by 303% compared to the 90-day baseline. Conversely, speculative liquidity is rapidly exiting the market, evidenced by Binance stablecoin netflows dropping 887%, averaging a massive -$170M daily outflow.
Context
This extreme contrast highlights a classic “builder’s phase.” The heavy outflows of stablecoins from Binance, combined with a 167% increase in stablecoin redemptions globally, suggest that retail and institutional traders are de-risking and moving capital to the sidelines. The persistently negative Coinbase premium (-0.15) further confirms this widespread market apathy and lack of speculative appetite.
Comparison
However, while traders are abandoning exchanges, developers are aggressively stepping in. Taking advantage of the current macro apathy and historically cheap block space (with median transaction burn dropping by 60%), builders are deploying decentralized applications at a furious pace. This means the underlying network is expanding its infrastructure precisely when token price and exchange liquidity are being ignored.
Potential Outcome
Historically, periods marked by severe exchange liquidity contraction alongside explosive developer activity create the foundational layer for future fundamental cycles. While the current lack of stablecoin purchasing power on Binance may suppress short-term price action, this quiet infrastructure expansion creates conditions that often precede utility-driven momentum once macroeconomic liquidity eventually returns.
Written by CryptoOnchain
Artículo
Bitcoin’s On-Chain Indicators At the Mid-Year 2026 Close - June 30, 2026 ↓• Bitcoin on-chain indicators closed on June 30 as follows: 1) Supply in Loss: 10M BTC. 2) Realized Cap: $1.06T. 3) Long-Term Holder SOPR: 0.61. • This level of on-chain pain is rarely observed and could suggest a potential medium- to long-term DCA accumulation opportunity. Written by Facundo Fama

Bitcoin’s On-Chain Indicators At the Mid-Year 2026 Close - June 30, 2026 ↓

• Bitcoin on-chain indicators closed on June 30 as follows:
1) Supply in Loss: 10M BTC.
2) Realized Cap: $1.06T.
3) Long-Term Holder SOPR: 0.61.
• This level of on-chain pain is rarely observed and could suggest a potential medium- to long-term DCA accumulation opportunity.
Written by Facundo Fama
Artículo
Bitcoin’s On-Chain Indicators At the Mid-Year 2026 Close - June 30, 2026 ↓• Bitcoin on-chain indicators closed on June 30 as follows: 1) Supply in Loss: 10M BTC. 2) Realized Cap: $1.06T. 3) Long-Term Holder SOPR: 0.61. • This level of on-chain pain is rarely observed and could suggest a potential medium- to long-term DCA accumulation opportunity. Written by Facundo Fama

Bitcoin’s On-Chain Indicators At the Mid-Year 2026 Close - June 30, 2026 ↓

• Bitcoin on-chain indicators closed on June 30 as follows:
1) Supply in Loss: 10M BTC.
2) Realized Cap: $1.06T.
3) Long-Term Holder SOPR: 0.61.
• This level of on-chain pain is rarely observed and could suggest a potential medium- to long-term DCA accumulation opportunity.
Written by Facundo Fama
Artículo
Is Bitcoin About to Make a Major Move Again? — CryptoQuant Sees Volatility AheadCryptoQuant's latest Weekly Report suggests Bitcoin may be approaching another period of significant volatility. The report highlights a sharp increase in exchange inflows, with nearly 50,000 BTC transferred to exchanges on June 30—one of the largest spikes recorded this year. At the same time, the average deposit size doubled from roughly 1 BTC to 2 BTC, indicating that whales and institutional investors are becoming increasingly active. Exchange deposits do not necessarily mean investors are preparing to sell. They may also reflect collateral transfers or positioning for derivatives trading. However, history shows that unusually large inflows often precede periods of heightened market volatility. The trend extends beyond Bitcoin. Ethereum exchange inflows have also surged, while altcoin exchange deposit transactions recently climbed to levels last seen before Bitcoin's previous correction. This suggests that capital is moving across the entire crypto market rather than within a single asset. xWIN's View At xWIN, we do not view these on-chain signals as confirmation of a new bear market. Instead, we believe they indicate that market participants are actively repositioning ahead of the next major move. On-chain data is valuable because it reveals investor behavior before prices react. Rather than focusing solely on exchange inflows, we believe investors should monitor them alongside ETF flows, Coinbase Premium, Apparent Demand, and stablecoin liquidity. Whether Bitcoin breaks lower or stages a recovery will ultimately depend on whether new capital enters the market. The current data suggests that a decisive move may be approaching—and that this is a period requiring closer attention rather than stronger conviction in either direction. Written by XWIN Japan

Is Bitcoin About to Make a Major Move Again? — CryptoQuant Sees Volatility Ahead

CryptoQuant's latest Weekly Report suggests Bitcoin may be approaching another period of significant volatility.
The report highlights a sharp increase in exchange inflows, with nearly 50,000 BTC transferred to exchanges on June 30—one of the largest spikes recorded this year. At the same time, the average deposit size doubled from roughly 1 BTC to 2 BTC, indicating that whales and institutional investors are becoming increasingly active.
Exchange deposits do not necessarily mean investors are preparing to sell. They may also reflect collateral transfers or positioning for derivatives trading. However, history shows that unusually large inflows often precede periods of heightened market volatility.
The trend extends beyond Bitcoin. Ethereum exchange inflows have also surged, while altcoin exchange deposit transactions recently climbed to levels last seen before Bitcoin's previous correction. This suggests that capital is moving across the entire crypto market rather than within a single asset.
xWIN's View
At xWIN, we do not view these on-chain signals as confirmation of a new bear market. Instead, we believe they indicate that market participants are actively repositioning ahead of the next major move.
On-chain data is valuable because it reveals investor behavior before prices react. Rather than focusing solely on exchange inflows, we believe investors should monitor them alongside ETF flows, Coinbase Premium, Apparent Demand, and stablecoin liquidity.
Whether Bitcoin breaks lower or stages a recovery will ultimately depend on whether new capital enters the market. The current data suggests that a decisive move may be approaching—and that this is a period requiring closer attention rather than stronger conviction in either direction.
Written by XWIN Japan
Artículo
Chronology: the Trend of Realized Cap - Bitcoin’s Bearish Trend Intensified ↓• The Realized Cap is one of the most important and foundational tools in the on-chain analysis discipline. 1) Apr 19, 2024. BTC: $63K. Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving. 2) On the monthly timeframe, Realized Cap was in a bullish trend (orange), then gradually lost momentum and eventually turned bearish (blue). 3) Apr 7, 2025. BTC: $74K. Despite the low generated by the tariff war, a bullish monthly candle formed, indicating that the macro bullish trend still prevailed. 4) Oct 6, 2025. BTC ATH: $126K. 5) Dec 31, 2025. BTC: $87K. When the first bearish monthly candle formed, Bitcoin closed at $87K. 6) May 5, 2026. BTC: $80K. Despite the recovery from $60K to $80K, bearish monthly candles continued to form, indicating that the macro bearish trend still prevailed. 7) Jun 30, 2026. BTC: $58K. Bitcoin’s bearish trend intensified, which could suggest a potential DCA accumulation zone. Written by Facundo Fama

Chronology: the Trend of Realized Cap - Bitcoin’s Bearish Trend Intensified ↓

• The Realized Cap is one of the most important and foundational tools in the on-chain analysis discipline.
1) Apr 19, 2024. BTC: $63K. Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving.
2) On the monthly timeframe, Realized Cap was in a bullish trend (orange), then gradually lost momentum and eventually turned bearish (blue).
3) Apr 7, 2025. BTC: $74K. Despite the low generated by the tariff war, a bullish monthly candle formed, indicating that the macro bullish trend still prevailed.
4) Oct 6, 2025. BTC ATH: $126K.
5) Dec 31, 2025. BTC: $87K. When the first bearish monthly candle formed, Bitcoin closed at $87K.
6) May 5, 2026. BTC: $80K. Despite the recovery from $60K to $80K, bearish monthly candles continued to form, indicating that the macro bearish trend still prevailed.
7) Jun 30, 2026. BTC: $58K. Bitcoin’s bearish trend intensified, which could suggest a potential DCA accumulation zone.
Written by Facundo Fama
Artículo
Chronology: the Trend of Realized Cap - June 2026 ↓• The Realized Cap is one of the most important and foundational tools in the on-chain analysis discipline. 1) Apr 19, 2024. BTC: $63K. Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving. 2) On the monthly timeframe, Realized Cap was in a bullish trend (orange), then gradually lost momentum and eventually turned bearish (blue). 3) Apr 7, 2025. BTC: $74K. Despite the low generated by the tariff war, a bullish monthly candle formed, indicating that the macro bullish trend still prevailed. 4) Dec 31, 2025. BTC: $87K. When the first bearish monthly candle formed, Bitcoin closed at $87K. 5) May 5, 2026. BTC: $80K. Despite the recovery from $60K to $80K, bearish monthly candles continued to form, indicating that the macro bearish trend still prevailed. 6) Jun 30, 2026. BTC: $58K. Bitcoin’s bearish trend intensified, which could suggest a potential DCA accumulation zone. Written by Facundo Fama

Chronology: the Trend of Realized Cap - June 2026 ↓

• The Realized Cap is one of the most important and foundational tools in the on-chain analysis discipline.
1) Apr 19, 2024. BTC: $63K. Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving.
2) On the monthly timeframe, Realized Cap was in a bullish trend (orange), then gradually lost momentum and eventually turned bearish (blue).
3) Apr 7, 2025. BTC: $74K. Despite the low generated by the tariff war, a bullish monthly candle formed, indicating that the macro bullish trend still prevailed.
4) Dec 31, 2025. BTC: $87K. When the first bearish monthly candle formed, Bitcoin closed at $87K.
5) May 5, 2026. BTC: $80K. Despite the recovery from $60K to $80K, bearish monthly candles continued to form, indicating that the macro bearish trend still prevailed.
6) Jun 30, 2026. BTC: $58K. Bitcoin’s bearish trend intensified, which could suggest a potential DCA accumulation zone.
Written by Facundo Fama
Artículo
Chronology: the Trend of Realized Cap - June 2026 ↓• The Realized Cap is one of the most important and foundational tools in the on-chain analysis discipline. 1) Apr 20, 2024. BTC: $63K. Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving. 2) On the monthly timeframe, Realized Cap was in a bullish trend (orange), then gradually lost momentum and eventually turned bearish (blue). 3) Apr 7, 2025. BTC: $74K. Despite the low generated by the tariff war, a bullish monthly candle formed, indicating that the macro bullish trend still prevailed. 4) Dec 31, 2025. BTC: $87K. When the first bearish monthly candle formed, Bitcoin closed at $87K. 5) May 5, 2026. BTC: $80K. Despite the recovery from $60K to $80K, bearish monthly candles continued to form, indicating that the macro bearish trend still prevailed. 6) Jun 30, 2026. BTC: $58K. Bitcoin’s bearish trend intensified, which could suggest a potential DCA accumulation zone. Written by Facundo Fama

Chronology: the Trend of Realized Cap - June 2026 ↓

• The Realized Cap is one of the most important and foundational tools in the on-chain analysis discipline.
1) Apr 20, 2024. BTC: $63K. Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving.
2) On the monthly timeframe, Realized Cap was in a bullish trend (orange), then gradually lost momentum and eventually turned bearish (blue).
3) Apr 7, 2025. BTC: $74K. Despite the low generated by the tariff war, a bullish monthly candle formed, indicating that the macro bullish trend still prevailed.
4) Dec 31, 2025. BTC: $87K. When the first bearish monthly candle formed, Bitcoin closed at $87K.
5) May 5, 2026. BTC: $80K. Despite the recovery from $60K to $80K, bearish monthly candles continued to form, indicating that the macro bearish trend still prevailed.
6) Jun 30, 2026. BTC: $58K. Bitcoin’s bearish trend intensified, which could suggest a potential DCA accumulation zone.
Written by Facundo Fama
Artículo
TradFi Equity Trading Volume Surges on Crypto ExchangesTradFi equity perpetual futures emerged as a major new product category in 2026, driven primarily by demand for Pre-IPO equity contracts. Binance led the market, capturing 80% ($53.8 billion) of total TradFi equity perps trading volume in June, while all other exchanges held relatively small market shares. The launch of SpaceX (SPCX) perpetual futures was the primary catalyst behind the category's rapid expansion, becoming the most actively traded TradFi equity contract across crypto exchanges. Beyond SPCX, established equities also generated significant trading activity, contributing to the broader adoption of tokenized TradFi equity products. The rapid growth of this market highlights how crypto exchanges are expanding beyond digital assets, leveraging 24/7 trading, high liquidity, and global accessibility to compete with traditional equity trading venues and attract new trading activity. Written by CQ Research

TradFi Equity Trading Volume Surges on Crypto Exchanges

TradFi equity perpetual futures emerged as a major new product category in 2026, driven primarily by demand for Pre-IPO equity contracts.
Binance led the market, capturing 80% ($53.8 billion) of total TradFi equity perps trading volume in June, while all other exchanges held relatively small market shares.
The launch of SpaceX (SPCX) perpetual futures was the primary catalyst behind the category's rapid expansion, becoming the most actively traded TradFi equity contract across crypto exchanges. Beyond SPCX, established equities also generated significant trading activity, contributing to the broader adoption of tokenized TradFi equity products.
The rapid growth of this market highlights how crypto exchanges are expanding beyond digital assets, leveraging 24/7 trading, high liquidity, and global accessibility to compete with traditional equity trading venues and attract new trading activity.
Written by CQ Research
Artículo
ETH: Funding Re-Accelerates While Price Stays Below Late-May LevelsEthereum funding rates across all exchanges have risen sharply again, reaching around 0.0163% while ETH trades near $1.73K. This is higher than on May 24, when funding stood near 0.0093% while ETH traded around $2.10K. Funding has strengthened even as price remains significantly lower. By June 5, ETH had dropped toward $1.58K while funding cooled to roughly 0.0047%. That showed part of the long-side pressure had eased, but the market never entered a sustained negative-funding reset. Since then, price has stabilized above the lows, while funding has re-accelerated to levels higher than in late May. This suggests long-side bias has rebuilt ahead of structural recovery. This does not mean downside is guaranteed. Positive funding can support price continuation when structure confirms it. The main risk arises when funding re-accelerates before price structure has clearly recovered. Key takeaway: ETH funding has risen above late-May levels, but price remains significantly lower. Long-side bias has rebuilt ahead of structural recovery, leaving the setup vulnerable without clear price confirmation. Source: CryptoQuant Written by Zizcrypto

ETH: Funding Re-Accelerates While Price Stays Below Late-May Levels

Ethereum funding rates across all exchanges have risen sharply again, reaching around 0.0163% while ETH trades near $1.73K.
This is higher than on May 24, when funding stood near 0.0093% while ETH traded around $2.10K. Funding has strengthened even as price remains significantly lower.
By June 5, ETH had dropped toward $1.58K while funding cooled to roughly 0.0047%. That showed part of the long-side pressure had eased, but the market never entered a sustained negative-funding reset.
Since then, price has stabilized above the lows, while funding has re-accelerated to levels higher than in late May. This suggests long-side bias has rebuilt ahead of structural recovery.
This does not mean downside is guaranteed. Positive funding can support price continuation when structure confirms it. The main risk arises when funding re-accelerates before price structure has clearly recovered.
Key takeaway:
ETH funding has risen above late-May levels, but price remains significantly lower. Long-side bias has rebuilt ahead of structural recovery, leaving the setup vulnerable without clear price confirmation.
Source: CryptoQuant
Written by Zizcrypto
Artículo
BTC Quarterly Capitalization Structure: $1.15T in Market Cap Destroyed, Cost Basis Barely MovedMVRV has compressed for four consecutive quarters, falling from 2.185 in Q4 2025 to 1.130 entering Q3 2026. Bitcoin now trades just 13% above its aggregate on-chain cost basis — the closest the network has come to break-even since Q1 2023 at $16,566. The 54.7% MVRV compression from this cycle's peak of 2.492 has brought the market to a structural threshold where the behavior of realized cap becomes the dominant variable. The asymmetry between the two caps tells the deeper story. Market cap has contracted by $1.15 trillion over three quarters while realized cap declined just $13 billion — an 89:1 ratio. In the 2022-2023 bear, $82B in realized value was destroyed as holders capitulated at scale. This time, the speculative premium has evaporated but the cost basis infrastructure remains largely intact. Realized cap dominance has surged from 45.8% to 88.5%, meaning nearly nine-tenths of BTC market cap is now backed by actual on-chain cost basis rather than speculative repricing. NUPL at 11.5% places the network in the Hope/Fear zone — a regime that has historically preceded either capitulation into sub-1.0 MVRV territory or stabilization into accumulation. The two consecutive quarters of realized cap outflow (−$36.8B in Q2, −$19.0B in Q3) confirm that loss realization is active, but the deceleration from Q2 to Q3 suggests exhaustion pressure is fading rather than intensifying. If realized cap stabilizes or flips positive next quarter, it would signal fresh capital entering at current prices and resetting the aggregate cost basis floor. Written by Crazzyblockk

BTC Quarterly Capitalization Structure: $1.15T in Market Cap Destroyed, Cost Basis Barely Moved

MVRV has compressed for four consecutive quarters, falling from 2.185 in Q4 2025 to 1.130 entering Q3 2026. Bitcoin now trades just 13% above its aggregate on-chain cost basis — the closest the network has come to break-even since Q1 2023 at $16,566. The 54.7% MVRV compression from this cycle's peak of 2.492 has brought the market to a structural threshold where the behavior of realized cap becomes the dominant variable.
The asymmetry between the two caps tells the deeper story. Market cap has contracted by $1.15 trillion over three quarters while realized cap declined just $13 billion — an 89:1 ratio. In the 2022-2023 bear, $82B in realized value was destroyed as holders capitulated at scale. This time, the speculative premium has evaporated but the cost basis infrastructure remains largely intact. Realized cap dominance has surged from 45.8% to 88.5%, meaning nearly nine-tenths of BTC market cap is now backed by actual on-chain cost basis rather than speculative repricing.
NUPL at 11.5% places the network in the Hope/Fear zone — a regime that has historically preceded either capitulation into sub-1.0 MVRV territory or stabilization into accumulation. The two consecutive quarters of realized cap outflow (−$36.8B in Q2, −$19.0B in Q3) confirm that loss realization is active, but the deceleration from Q2 to Q3 suggests exhaustion pressure is fading rather than intensifying. If realized cap stabilizes or flips positive next quarter, it would signal fresh capital entering at current prices and resetting the aggregate cost basis floor.
Written by Crazzyblockk
Artículo
XRP Binance Net Wallet Flows Turn Negative for First Time Since July 2025, Reaching 4.6x the Prio...XRP wallet activity on Binance has flipped sharply toward withdrawals, with the exchange’s 7-day net depositing/withdrawing wallet count falling from +26,200 on June 7 to -6,210 on June 30. The move represents a 32,410-wallet swing in just 23 days, shifting Binance from a strong net-deposit environment into one where wallets withdrawing XRP now outnumber those sending XRP to the exchange. This is Binance’s first negative reading since July 9, 2025, when the metric reached only -1,350. The current reading of -6,210 is therefore about 4.6 times deeper than that prior negative level. The change is notable because withdrawal dominance has become visible across most exchanges tracked in the data, suggesting a broader reduction in the number of wallets moving XRP onto trading platforms. However, Binance stands out as the clearest case: it is the only major exchange in the chart to post a sharply negative net-wallet reading. The data does not measure the number of XRP tokens moved, so it cannot independently confirm whether large holders are accumulating. Still, the collapse in net depositing wallets indicates that Binance’s XRP flow structure has materially changed: fewer wallets are bringing XRP onto the exchange, while more are moving it away. Written by Amr Taha

XRP Binance Net Wallet Flows Turn Negative for First Time Since July 2025, Reaching 4.6x the Prio...

XRP wallet activity on Binance has flipped sharply toward withdrawals, with the exchange’s 7-day net depositing/withdrawing wallet count falling from +26,200 on June 7 to -6,210 on June 30.
The move represents a 32,410-wallet swing in just 23 days, shifting Binance from a strong net-deposit environment into one where wallets withdrawing XRP now outnumber those sending XRP to the exchange.
This is Binance’s first negative reading since July 9, 2025, when the metric reached only -1,350.
The current reading of -6,210 is therefore about 4.6 times deeper than that prior negative level.
The change is notable because withdrawal dominance has become visible across most exchanges tracked in the data, suggesting a broader reduction in the number of wallets moving XRP onto trading platforms.
However, Binance stands out as the clearest case: it is the only major exchange in the chart to post a sharply negative net-wallet reading.
The data does not measure the number of XRP tokens moved, so it cannot independently confirm whether large holders are accumulating.
Still, the collapse in net depositing wallets indicates that Binance’s XRP flow structure has materially changed: fewer wallets are bringing XRP onto the exchange, while more are moving it away.
Written by Amr Taha
Artículo
BTC Derivatives Are Re-Leveraging, but Spot Flow Remains SupportiveAccording to CryptoQuant data, total BTC Open Interest has started to recover over the recent period. At the same time, derivative exchange netflow has turned noticeably positive, suggesting that more collateral is moving back into futures markets. However, the spot side remains more constructive. Spot exchange netflow has stayed negative, meaning BTC is still leaving spot exchanges on net. This creates a mixed market structure. Spot flow is not showing strong sell pressure, but derivatives leverage is starting to rebuild. Whale supply has also softened recently, while smaller wallet cohorts have increased, suggesting that strong whale accumulation has not fully returned yet. Key takeaway: BTC spot flow remains supportive, but derivatives leverage is rising again. This does not confirm a bearish reversal, but it does suggest that volatility risk is increasing after the recent OI reset. Written by 우민규 Woominkyu

BTC Derivatives Are Re-Leveraging, but Spot Flow Remains Supportive

According to CryptoQuant data, total BTC Open Interest has started to recover over the recent period. At the same time, derivative exchange netflow has turned noticeably positive, suggesting that more collateral is moving back into futures markets.
However, the spot side remains more constructive. Spot exchange netflow has stayed negative, meaning BTC is still leaving spot exchanges on net.
This creates a mixed market structure.
Spot flow is not showing strong sell pressure, but derivatives leverage is starting to rebuild. Whale supply has also softened recently, while smaller wallet cohorts have increased, suggesting that strong whale accumulation has not fully returned yet.
Key takeaway: BTC spot flow remains supportive, but derivatives leverage is rising again. This does not confirm a bearish reversal, but it does suggest that volatility risk is increasing after the recent OI reset.
Written by 우민규 Woominkyu
Inicia sesión para explorar más contenidos
Únete a usuarios globales de criptomonedas en Binance Square
⚡️ Obtén información útil y actualizada sobre criptos.
💬 Avalado por el mayor exchange de criptomonedas en el mundo.
👍 Descubre perspectivas reales de creadores verificados.
Email/número de teléfono
Mapa del sitio
Preferencias de cookies
Términos y condiciones de la plataforma