openai

Pensavi che la faida tecnologica del secolo fosse risolta? Ripensaci. 🛑
Il recente rigetto della causa ad alto rischio di Elon Musk contro OpenAI ha scosso i settori tech e AI. La sorpresa? Il caso non è stato archiviato per merito, ma su una semplice questione di calendario.
Ma se conosci Elon, sai che non si tira indietro quando le puntate sono così alte.
La Controffensiva: Direzione il Nono Circuito ⚖️
Musk sta ufficialmente rispondendo, preparando un massiccio ricorso presso la Corte d'Appello del Nono Circuito. Questo non è solo un normale documento legale; è una posizione decisiva per il futuro dell'intelligenza artificiale, della tecnologia open-source e degli ecosistemi decentralizzati.

The legal dispute between Elon Musk and OpenAI has reached a decisive moment—for now. A jury rejected Musk’s key claims in under two hours, siding with Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and tech giant Microsoft, which was also named in the lawsuit.
Swift verdict after weeks of hearings
The decision followed a three-week trial in Oakland, California, where Musk attempted to prove that OpenAI had strayed from its original mission. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers upheld the jury’s conclusion, ruling that neither OpenAI nor its leadership bore legal responsibility.
She also dismissed additional claims, including breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment, citing that they had been filed too late.
Musk’s argument: from nonprofit to profit-driven
Musk filed the lawsuit in 2024, arguing that OpenAI was originally founded as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for the benefit of humanity. According to him, the organization later shifted toward a profit-oriented model.
He stated that he invested around $38 million based on that original vision. His legal team accused OpenAI’s leadership of effectively “turning a charity into a business” for personal gain.
Massive financial demands
The stakes were enormous. Musk’s lawyers sought up to $134 billion in what they described as improperly obtained profits from OpenAI and Microsoft.
The lawsuit also called for:
🔹 Removal of Sam Altman and Greg Brockman from leadership
🔹 Reversal of OpenAI’s 2025 restructuring
🔹 Return of all funds to a charitable structure
Musk emphasized that he was not seeking personal profit, but rather a restoration of the organization’s original mission.
Key issue: lack of hard evidence
A major weakness in Musk’s case was the absence of formal documentation. He failed to present any binding agreement that would permanently require OpenAI to remain a nonprofit.
Instead, his legal team relied on emails, internal communications, and early discussions. Ultimately, the jury found OpenAI’s version of events more convincing.
OpenAI’s defense: AI development is costly
OpenAI’s lawyers argued that while Musk contributed funding, he did not impose legally binding restrictions on how the organization should operate.
They also emphasized the immense cost of developing advanced AI—requiring capital, computing power, engineering talent, and cloud infrastructure. Without restructuring, OpenAI would not have been able to compete with players like Google DeepMind.
Interestingly, the defense also pointed to Musk’s own past statements, noting that he had previously considered a for-profit structure—provided he retained control—and had even explored integrating OpenAI into Tesla.
Microsoft cleared of wrongdoing
Microsoft, which invested heavily in OpenAI starting in 2019, was also accused by Musk of enabling the alleged violations.
The court dismissed these claims as well, effectively removing Microsoft from the case.
What comes next?
Following the ruling, OpenAI’s legal team celebrated the outcome, while Musk’s lawyers confirmed that an appeal remains possible.
Although the legal battle may not be entirely over, the verdict represents a significant setback for Musk—and a pivotal moment for the broader AI industry.
#ElonMusk , #OpenAI , #Tesla , #AI , #INNOVATION
Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies.
Disclaimer:
The information and opinions presented in this article are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Nothing on this page constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell any assets. Cryptocurrency investments are inherently risky and may result in financial loss. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.

#OpenAI
The exOpenAI researcher who was fired for warning that China could steal their AI models then turned $225 million into $5.5 billion in 12 months just filed his Q1 2026 13F with the SEC.
One quarter ago he had $5.5 billion in disclosed equity exposure. As of March 31, 2026 that number is $13.67 billion. The portfolio nearly tripled in a single quarter across 42 positions.
He initiated $7.46 billion in put options against every major semiconductor company between January 1 and March 31, 2026.
None of these positions existed in his Q4 2025 filing.
- SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF PUT: $2.04 billion
- Nvidia PUT: $1.57 billion
- Oracle PUT: $1.07 billion
- Broadcom PUT: $1.01 billion
- AMD PUT: $969 million
- Micron PUT: $583 million
- Taiwan Semiconductor PUT: $535 million
- ASML PUT: $494 million
- Intel PUT: $159 million
For the past 18 months Aschenbrenner was betting only on electricity, memory, compute, and physical data center infrastructure. That made him one of the best performing fund managers in the world. And his long stock book still reflects that exact same thesis.
- Bloom Energy: $878 million
- SanDisk: $724 million
- CoreWeave: $556 million
- IREN: $401 million
- Core Scientific: $389 million
- Applied Digital: $320 million
- Riot Platforms: $142 million
- CleanSpark: $104 million
- Solaris Energy: $62 million
- T1 Energy: $43 million
- Bitfarms: $38 million
- Bitdeer: $29 million
- Power Solutions: $26 million
- WhiteFiber: $20 million
- Babcock and Wilcox: $19 million
- SharonAI: $18 million
- ProPetro: $13 million
- Hive Digital: $6 million
He is also running call options on specific names at the same time as his puts, which means he is not simply betting against semiconductors everywhere.
- Micron CALL: $422 million
- SanDisk CALL: $388 million
- Taiwan Semiconductor CALL: $354 million
- CoreWeave CALL: $140 million
- Bloom Energy CALL: $55 million
This means he believes the companies supplying power, storage, and compute to the AI industry still have years of growth ahead of them.
But the chip companies that Wall Street has been buying for the past two years at record valuations have already priced in everything good that is going to happen to them.
The man who has been right about every major AI trade for the past 18 months is now betting that the biggest names in semiconductors are about to fall.
If his track record means anything, the chip stocks Wall Street has been buying for the past two years may be in serious trouble.
FOLLOW LIKE SHARE