CoinRank

CoinRank sta reclutando scrittori indipendenti in tutto il mondo 💥

Cosa stiamo cercando:
→ Ricerca approfondita & analisi delle tendenze
→ Approfondimenti basati sui dati o on-chain
→ Narrazioni Web3 / Crypto / Mercato
→ Contenuti in inglese (argomenti proposti o guidati)

Cosa ottieni:
Esposizione globale tramite il sito web di CoinRank & rete media
Promozione su Twitter, Telegram & canali partner
Identità ufficiale del collaboratore di CoinRank
Articoli in evidenza & shoutout sui social
Profilo autore dedicato con i tuoi link

Se vuoi che la tua scrittura sia vista da veri lettori crypto, questo è per te.

As #Trump begins his second term, a so-called “informal fast track” to presidential pardons has reportedly emerged in U.S. politics. #Binance founder CZ @cz_binance is said to be viewed as a potential beneficiary of this new pathway.
Sources say the practice is partly rooted in Trump’s own experience as a criminal defendant, giving rise to a lobbying industry centered on presidential pardons, with a reported “market price” of around $1 million. Some lobbyists with close ties to Trump are allegedly charging success fees of up to $6 million, payable only if a pardon is secured.
The report has reignited debate over political lobbying, the transparency of the pardon system, and the motivations behind media narratives.

Permissionless blockchains prioritize open access and decentralization but face scalability and privacy challenges.

 

Permissioned blockchains offer controlled access, easier upgrades, and customization, often suited for enterprises and governments.

 

Blockchain design is flexible, and real-world systems may combine elements of both permissioned and permissionless models.

What are permissioned and permissionless blockchains? Learn how they differ in access control, governance, scalability, and use cases, and how each model fits different blockchain applications.

 

WHAT ARE PERMISSIONED & PERMISSIONLESS BLOCKCHAINS?

 

Blockchains come in different forms, and one of the most important distinctions is whether a blockchain is Permissioned or Permissionless. Understanding this difference helps clarify how a network is governed, who can participate, and what kind of use cases it is best suited for.

 

📌 Permissionless Blockchains

 

A Permissionless blockchain is an open network that anyone can access and use. No prior approval is required to join the network, submit transactions, run a node, or participate in the validation process.

These networks are designed to be open by default, allowing public participation while relying on consensus mechanisms to maintain security and integrity.

 

Well-known examples of Permissionless blockchains include Bitcoin, BNB Chain, and Ethereum.

In each case, the network remains accessible to anyone, with no central authority controlling who is allowed to participate.

📌 Permissioned Blockchains

 

In contrast, a Permissioned blockchain restricts participation to approved entities. Users or nodes must be granted explicit permission before they can join the network or take part in transaction validation.

Because of this controlled access, Permissioned blockchains are typically used in private or semi-private environments, such as within organizations or enterprise systems.

 

For example, a company may use Hyperledger Fabric to build a Permissioned blockchain for supply chain management. In this setup, network access is managed by administrators, and only authorized participants are allowed to interact with the system.

 

>>> More to read: What is Blockchain and How Does It Work?

KEY CHARACTERISTICS & PROS AND CONS

 

The following characteristics do not apply uniformly to every Permissioned or Permissionless blockchain. However, in most cases, these traits generally reflect the typical design patterns associated with each model.

 

 

🚩 Permissionless Blockchains: Advantages

 

▶ Decentralization potential.
Not every Permissionless blockchain is fully decentralized in practice, but most of them offer a high degree of decentralization potential. As long as users are willing and have the necessary resources, anyone can participate in the consensus mechanism or interact with a Permissionless network.

 

▶ Collective consensus.
Users can voluntarily join the network and take part in decisions regarding protocol changes. Validators and network participants may also express disagreement, and unpopular changes can result in alternative versions of the network through forks.

 

▶ Ease of access.
Anyone can create a wallet and join a Permissionless blockchain. These networks are generally easy to access, with relatively low barriers to entry compared to controlled systems.

❗Permissionless Blockchains: Disadvantages

 

▶ Scalability challenges.
Permissionless blockchains must support large user bases and high transaction volumes. Improving scalability typically requires network upgrades, which must be approved through collective consensus before they can be implemented effectively.

 

▶ Malicious participants.
Because Permissionless blockchains are open to everyone, there is always a risk of malicious actors operating within the network.

 

▶ Excessive transparency.
Most information on Permissionless blockchains is publicly accessible. While this supports openness, it may also introduce potential privacy and security concerns.

🚩 Permissioned Blockchains: Advantages

 

▶ Scalability.
Permissioned blockchains are usually operated by identifiable entities and maintain a degree of control over validators. As a result, implementing upgrades is generally easier and more efficient.

 

▶ Customization.
A Permissioned blockchain can be designed for specific purposes and optimized for particular functions. When changes are required, the system can be modified with relative ease.

 

▶ Controlled transparency.
Operators of Permissioned blockchains can determine the appropriate level of transparency based on the intended use case.

 

▶ Invitation-based access.
A Permissioned blockchain allows precise control over who is allowed to join the network and who is excluded.

❗ Permissioned Blockchains: Disadvantages

 

Centralization.
Control may rest with a central entity or a small group of validators selected by the blockchain owner. This means network decisions may not reflect the interests of all stakeholders.

 

Increased vulnerability to attacks.
Permissioned blockchains often rely on a limited number of validators, which can make their consensus mechanisms less resistant to attacks.

 

Censorship risk.
Network connections or updates introduced by Permissioned blockchain operators may introduce censorship risks. If enough participants agree, information stored on the blockchain could potentially be altered.

 

>>> More to read: 6 Common Types of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms

SHOULD YOU USE A PERMISSIONED OR PERMISSIONLESS BLOCKCHAIN?

 

The answer to this question is relatively straightforward. If your goal is to build a service that is open to everyone, then a Permissionless blockchain is the appropriate choice. However, using a Permissionless blockchain does not mean you must strictly follow the conventional principles or ideological goals often associated with public networks.

 

In practice, it is possible to design a blockchain that is Permissionless yet still centralized in its operation. Depending on your objectives, you can also incorporate additional privacy features while maintaining open access at the network level.

 

If, on the other hand, you plan to use blockchain technology in a private environment—such as within an enterprise or a government setting—a Permissioned blockchain is generally more suitable. That said, a Permissioned blockchain does not have to conform to every commonly assumed characteristic of permissioned systems. It can still be fully transparent and even allow public visibility, depending on how it is designed and governed.

✏️ Summary

 

Even if, as a crypto investor, you primarily interact with Permissionless blockchains, understanding the differences between Permissioned and Permissionless blockchains is highly valuable. It is easy to assume that distributed ledger technology (DLT) naturally aligns with transparent, open, and decentralized cryptocurrency models.

 

However, these assumptions do not always hold. In reality, many private organizations actively use Permissioned blockchains that intentionally deviate from traditional expectations. This flexibility highlights an important point: blockchain design is not binary, and real-world implementations often blend characteristics from both Permissioned and Permissionless models to meet specific needs.

 

 

 

ꚰ CoinRank x Bitget – Sign up & Trade!

Looking for the latest scoop and cool insights from CoinRank? Hit up our Twitter and stay in the loop with all our fresh stories!

〈What Are Permissioned & Permissionless Blockchains?〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

CZ’s renewed visibility strengthens Binance’s narrative power but deepens regulatory skepticism in the U.S.

 

Binance’s ownership structure, not operations alone, is emerging as a core obstacle to state-level licensing.

 

Even with political tailwinds, fragmented state regulation makes Binance’s U.S. return a long and uncertain process.

As CZ regains influence after a Trump pardon, Binance faces mounting U.S. hurdles—from ownership concerns to state-level licensing—raising doubts over whether a comeback is possible without structural change.

 

After receiving a pardon from U.S. President Donald Trump, Binance founder CZ has re-emerged at the center of the crypto stage. Although CZ is legally prohibited from participating in Binance’s day-to-day operations, his influence and political capital have returned swiftly. Alongside the elevation of He Yi to co-CEO and Binance’s increasingly proactive outreach to U.S. financial and political circles, speculation about the exchange’s potential return to the U.S. market has once again gained momentum.

 

CZ’S RETURN, BINANCE’S DILEMMA?

 

After admitting to anti–money laundering violations in 2023, Changpeng Zhao (CZ) stepped down as CEO of Binance. Following a pardon from Donald Trump in October, CZ has quickly regained high visibility across the crypto industry. He has repeatedly praised Trump’s pro-crypto stance and stated his ambition to “make the United States the crypto capital of the world.”

 

Although CZ is legally barred from any formal or informal involvement in Binance’s operations, his public presence and influence continue to shape market sentiment—and remain a central factor in evaluating Binance’s potential return to the U.S.

 

According to Bloomberg, citing multiple people familiar with the matter, Binance is evaluating concrete plans to revive its U.S. subsidiary, Binance.US, including a potential capital restructuring that could reduce CZ’s ownership stake.

 

Sources said CZ’s equity position has become a key obstacle to securing licenses in multiple U.S. states, making it one of the main barriers to business expansion. In response, Binance pushed back on the report, stressing that Binance.US is legally independent and denying claims that the parent company is directing a restart of its U.S. operations.

YI HE AS CO-CEO: STABILITY OR AN EXTENSION OF CZ’S INFLUENCE?

 

A few weeks ago, Binance appointed co-founder Yi He—long regarded as a close ally of CZ—as co-CEO, a move widely interpreted as signaling stability and transformation. However, her close relationship with CZ has also made it harder to clearly separate CZ from Binance in the eyes of regulators and the market.

 

Following CZ’s incarceration, Yi He became the company’s most visible public face, shaping strategic direction and reframing Binance’s growth narrative. At the same time, questions have emerged around the internal balance of power between Yi He and fellow co-CEO Richard Teng, whose regulatory background rose to prominence after the enforcement crisis subsided.

FROM WALL STREET TO POLITICAL ALLIES: IS BINANCE REBUILDING ITS U.S. NETWORK?

 

Binance.US once commanded roughly 35% market share, but following U.S. enforcement actions 2 years ago, multiple states revoked its licenses, driving its presence in the market to near zero.

 

More recently, Binance appears to be actively strengthening ties with U.S. financial and political forces. This includes deepening product collaboration with BlackRock in the tokenization space, as well as building links with the Trump family–backed World Liberty Financial.

 

These moves are widely seen as part of Binance’s effort to pave the way for a return to the U.S., rebuilding a network of allies across both financial and political spheres.

A LONG ROAD BACK: STATE-LEVEL REGULATION REMAINS THE BIGGEST BARRIER

 

At present, Binance.US is still unable to operate in more than a dozen U.S. states—a situation that increasingly intersects with political dynamics. Lee Reiners, a financial law scholar at Duke University, noted that obtaining money transmitter licenses will be a major challenge, particularly in states governed by Democrats, citing past compliance violations and ongoing regulatory concerns.

 

Even as the broader political climate appears to be turning more crypto-friendly, state-level regulatory hurdles continue to pose a formidable obstacle for Binance, making any return to the U.S. a long and difficult process.

 

 

 

ꚰ CoinRank x Bitget – Sign up & Trade!

Looking for the latest scoop and cool insights from CoinRank? Hit up our Twitter and stay in the loop with all our fresh stories!

〈As Long as CZ Stays, Binance Stays Out〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

Jack Yi: Will continue to deploy $1 billion in funds to buy Ethereum on dips as planned.

CryptoQuant: Bitcoin's RSI is approaching bear market territory; a break below the 4-year moving average usually signals a potential deeper bear market phase.

Nano Labs Founder: Bitcoin bear market bottoms often occur around Christmas.

Streamflow launches interest-bearing stablecoin USD+ on Solana.

Anchorage becomes a USDe custodian and will provide public proof of custody monthly starting in January next year.

Lo yuan offshore ha superato il segno di 7 contro il dollaro USA per la prima volta dal 2024, mentre lo yuan onshore ha raggiunto un nuovo massimo in oltre un anno.

Il mercato NFT ha toccato un minimo nel 2025, con una diminuzione del 72% della capitalizzazione di mercato per l'anno.

Si prevede un grande mercato rialzista nel 2026 e 1 miliardo di dollari continuerà a essere investito nell'acquisto di ETH durante le flessioni.

Benvenuti nel CoinRank Daily Data Report. In questa serie di colonne, CoinRank fornirà importanti notizie quotidiane sui dati delle criptovalute, consentendo ai lettori di comprendere rapidamente gli ultimi sviluppi nel mercato delle criptovalute.

Logan Paul accetta di mettere all'asta carte Pokémon per un valore di 5,3 milioni di dollari il 12 gennaio, potenzialmente stabilendo un nuovo prezzo record.
Le narrazioni crittografiche più redditizie del 2025: RWA e Layer 1 guidano la strada, le monete AI e Meme subiscono significative correzioni, mentre GameFi e DePIN guidano il declino.
Il presunto "whale insider 1011" Garrett Jin: La presa di profitto nei metalli preziosi sta riportando capitali in BTC ed ETH.
Due importanti borse russe pianificano di lanciare il trading di criptovalute compliant nel 2026.
Istituzioni: Si prevede che la spesa globale per l'IA generativa raggiunga 699 miliardi di dollari entro il 2030.

Il quarto halving di Bitcoin, il 20 aprile 2024, ha ridotto la ricompensa per blocco da 6,25 BTC a 3,125 BTC, riducendo l'emissione giornaliera da circa 900 BTC a 450 BTC.

 

Di conseguenza, l'inflazione annualizzata dell'offerta di Bitcoin è scesa a circa lo 0,83%, con più del 93,8% dei 21 milioni di BTC totali già emessi entro la fine del 2024.

 

L'halving ha spostato permanentemente l'economia dei miner verso le commissioni di transazione e ha bloccato Bitcoin in una base di emissione più bassa che rimarrà in vigore fino al prossimo halving intorno al 2028.

Il quarto halving di Bitcoin ha ridotto permanentemente la nuova offerta. Questo articolo esamina il programma di emissione post-halving, il tasso di inflazione, l'economia dei miner e perché la dinamica dell'offerta di Bitcoin è ora matematicamente fissata.

Nel dicembre 2025, JPMorgan Chase & Co. ha portato il suo token garantito da deposito JPMD in operazione attiva su Base, segnando la prima volta che i depositi di bilancio di una grande banca globale operano su una blockchain pubblica.



A differenza delle stablecoin, i token di deposito rappresentano diritti diretti su depositi bancari regolamentati, incorporando la regolazione on-chain all'interno dei quadri esistenti di supervisione, contabilità e audit a una scala potenziale di trilioni di dollari.



Insieme al lancio di MONY, il fondo del mercato monetario tokenizzato di JPMorgan, questi sviluppi mostrano come gli RWA si stiano evolvendo da esperimenti di tokenizzazione a un'infrastruttura finanziaria blockchain controllata dalle istituzioni e operante in modo continuo.

Sentiment del Mercato & Riduzioni dei Tassi: Esplora perché la fiducia degli investitori rimane bassa nonostante le attese riduzioni dei tassi d'interesse, evidenziando l'avversione al rischio e le preoccupazioni macroeconomiche.



Liquidità & Condizioni Finanziarie: Analizza come i vincoli di liquidità, i flussi di credito e le aspettative politiche stanno plasmando le risposte lente del mercato anche di fronte a segnali di allentamento.



Indicatori Economici & Prospettive: Analizza i dati economici chiave—occupazione, inflazione, utili aziendali—e i loro segnali misti, contribuendo a un slancio rialzista attenuato.

Architect sta ridefinendo la struttura di mercato applicando futures perpetui e trading continuo agli asset tradizionali all'interno di un quadro regolamentato.



Eliminando la scadenza dei contratti e consentendo il movimento del collaterale 24 ore su 24, Architect riduce l'attrito del rollover, la frammentazione della liquidità e il rischio temporale nel trading istituzionale.



La forza principale di Architect risiede nella sequenza regolamentare, consentendo all'innovazione di progredire senza aspettare riforme strutturali nei mercati tradizionali.

QUANDO LA STRUTTURA DI MERCATO RIMANE INDIETRO RISPETTO AGLI ASSET GLOBALE

#Circle ha smentito le affermazioni di aver lanciato una piattaforma di trading di metalli preziosi tokenizzati chiamata “#CircleMetals .” Secondo CoinDesk, l'annuncio rilasciato la vigilia di Natale era falso, utilizzando un marchio Circle fabbricato e citazioni di dirigenti.
La falsa release ha indirizzato gli utenti a connettere i portafogli per scambiare #USDC con presunti token d'oro (#GLDC ) e argento (#SILC ). Circle ha confermato di non aver mai offerto tale servizio, e il sito web correlato è stato rimosso. L'azienda ha esortato gli utenti a rimanere vigili ed evitare link non verificati o richieste di connessione al portafoglio.

La Commissione per i Titoli e i Futures di Hong Kong elenca due tipi di token RWA al sapore di Maotai come prodotti di investimento sospetti
Vitalik prevede: Codice senza bug sarà disponibile negli anni 2030
#BlackRock : I tagli ai tassi della Fed nel 2026 potrebbero essere limitati
CZ: L'industria crypto dovrebbe eradicare gli attacchi di avvelenamento degli indirizzi; Binance ora supporta l'identificazione degli indirizzi malevoli
Le Filippine intensificano la lotta contro i fornitori di servizi di asset virtuali non autorizzati, bloccando #Coinbase e #Gemini
#CoinRank #GN

Il movimento di Polymarket riguarda meno "lasciare Polygon" e più possedere l'intero stack—controllo del prodotto più cattura di valore.

 

Numerosi punti dati suggeriscono che Polymarket potrebbe aver contribuito a circa il ~25% dell'attività di Polygon in dimensioni chiave (quota TVL e spesa per gas).

 

Il tempismo è probabilmente legato a un prossimo TGE: migrare prima dell'emissione del token evita costi di coordinamento più elevati ed espande la narrativa di valutazione.

Polymarket prevede di lasciare Polygon e lanciare il proprio Ethereum Layer 2, POLY. Ecco la logica del prodotto e quella economica, più quanto valore Polymarket potrebbe aver contribuito a Polygon.

Una Sidechain è una blockchain parallela indipendente collegata a una catena principale tramite un ponte bidirezionale per il trasferimento di asset e token.



Una Sidechain può migliorare la scalabilità e l'efficienza dei costi personalizzando il consenso e i parametri dei blocchi per una maggiore velocità di elaborazione.



Una Sidechain può supportare la compatibilità EVM per facilitare il deployment di DApp, ma introduce compromessi nella decentralizzazione, nella responsabilità della sicurezza e nella complessità.

Scopri cos'è una Sidechain, come si collega a una catena principale tramite ponti bidirezionali, perché migliora la scalabilità e i principali compromessi nella decentralizzazione, nella sicurezza e nella complessità.